AMR Advanced Applications – Taking it a Step Beyond David Glenwright AMR Operations & Strategies NARUC July 15, 2007
Download ReportTranscript AMR Advanced Applications – Taking it a Step Beyond David Glenwright AMR Operations & Strategies NARUC July 15, 2007
AMR Advanced Applications – Taking it a Step Beyond David Glenwright AMR Operations & Strategies NARUC July 15, 2007 Topics Background AMR at PECO Advanced Applications • • • • Outage Management Theft Detection Engineering Studies Other Opportunities 2 Exelon / PECO Background Subsidiary of Exelon Corp (NYSE: EXC) Serving southeastern Pa. for over 100 years Electric and Gas Utility 2,400 sq. mi. service territory Philadelphia and the four surrounding counties Population of approx. 4 million people 3 Customer Profile Service Area Philadelphia & Southeastern PA 2,400 sq. mile service area Customers Electric = 1.7 million Gas = 500 thousand Automated Meters 2.2 million meters on Cellnet Fixed Network 3,000 Large C&I customers on MV- 90 & Metretek 4 Scope of AMR at PECO PECO’s AMR installation project lasted from 1999 to 2003 A Cellnet Fixed Network solution was selected. • 99% of meters are read by the network • Others are drive-by and MV-90 dial-up During the project, meters were activated at a max rate of 143,500 per month. Installation was performed by PECO, Cellnet, and VSI. Cellnet manages the network, performs meter maintenance and provide data to PECO. All meters are read daily. Additional features include on-demand reads, and event processing. 5 Cellnet AMR Network Structure Exelon Applications National Operations Center (NOC) System Controller Cell Master (CM) MicroCell Controller (MCC) Wide Area Network Endpoint devices w/CellNet Radio Local Area Network 6 AMR network components 2.2 M Meters ~1.6 M Res. Electric ~455 K Res. Gas ~135 K Com. Electric ~42K Com. Gas 91 Cell Masters 8,318 MicroCell Controllers 7 Business Benefits of AMR Customer Interface Operational / System Reliability Minimize inconvenience to customers who have difficult to read meters Reduce number of estimated bills Improve ability to answer questions on 1st call Provide more energy usage info Improve customer satisfaction Improve read rate and accuracy Reduce CAIDI by identifying, assessing and responding to outages more efficiently Improve productivity of field forces Reduce customer call volumes Reduce safety incidences •Increase asset utilization •Improve ability to design electric distribution network •Identify precursors to reliability event Financial Management Improve the meter to cash cycle Continuous service - controls Increase revenue Improve power factor measurement Reduce lost revenue from theft 8 Outage Management 9 Outage Example TRF-2 CALL-3 CALL-8 CALL-9 CALL-1 CALL-4 Event Time: 11:49:00 00:00:00 11:27:00 11:31:00 11:35:00 11:38:00 11:43:00 TRF-1 CALL-5 CALL-6 CALL-7 CALL-2 FUSE Customers Affected: 086 000 001 002 003 004 005 006 018 019 10 Outage Example w/AMR CALL-3 CALL-1 LG-1 CALL-4 TRF-2 Event Time: 11:34:00 00:00:00 11:27:00 11:30:00 11:31:00 CALL-2 TRF-1 LG-3 LG-2 FUSE Customers Affected: 086 000 001 002 003 012 013 014 11 PECO’s Outage Management Process AMR Initiated Event SCADA AMR Last Gasp Call Center AMR Initiated Event Outage Record OMS Dispatch AMR PowerUp IVR PECO Contacts Customer Customer Initiated Calls AMR Ping Advanced Assessment Tools Automatic Processing 12 “Summer Slam” - July 18, 2006 A severe band of thunderstorms caused nearly 400,000 power outages. Determined to be the worst summer storm ever experienced by PECO. 1,200+ single customer outage calls were cancelled without crew dispatch due to meter pings that indicated power-on. 750+ single customer outage calls were escalated into primary events via pings to neighboring customer’s meters. This ensured a properly skilled crew was dispatched the first time. The pinging and restoration verification tools were used to confirm active jobs were valid prior to crew dispatch. Feedback from the field crews indicated that they felt like they were working more effectively because they had very few assignments that were “OK on arrival”. Conservative estimates indicate that AMR has helped save in excess of $200,000 in avoided labor costs during this storm. 13 AMR Outage Management Summary Improved outage management performance Quicker response due to last gasp More efficient use of field crews due to pinging (automated & manual) Validate power restoration times using daily reports Reduced CAIDI by 5.5 minutes in 2005 Single Outages Cancelled Outages Escalated 2004 5,450 1,100 2005 6,184 2,418 2006 11,584 4,532 14 Theft Detection 15 Revenue Assurance Theft detected during initial AMR installation Initial focus of using various meter tamper flags to detect potential theft of service proved ineffective Cellnet & PECO developed more advanced tools looking at irregular usage patterns combined with tamper flags • • • • Repeated outages Unexplained usage Customer Load Profile / Irregular Load Shape Repetitive Flags Analysis is used to direct Revenue Protection crews to suspect areas 16 17 Revenue Assurance Reports No Weekend Usage Outage & Reverse Rotation 18 Revenue Assurance Reports Irregular Usage No Read-Window Usage 19 Examples of Customer Bills 117% After Corrections 96.4% After Corrections 128% After Corrections DATE 07/25 06/24 05/24 04/25 03/24 USAGE 8720 6667 4911 2646 2716 DAY 31 31 29 32 30 DAU 281.2 215.0 169.3 82.6 90.5 REVENUE 901.74 777.96 544.37 349.86 366.87 DATE 08/12 07/14 06/14 05/13 04/13 USAGE 1652 1412 981 575 335 DAY 29 30 32 30 30 DAU 56.9 47.0 30.6 19.1 11.1 REVENUE 241.34 205.68 141.62 79.89 48.69 DATE 08/17 07/18 06/16 05/17 04/15 USAGE 1391 1314 1026 678 373 DAY 30 32 30 32 29 DAU 46.3 41.0 34.2 21.1 12.8 REVENUE 202.55 191.11 148.31 93.27 53.63 Prior to Corrections Prior to Corrections Prior to Corrections 20 Engineering Studies 21 Load Management The goal is to use AMR data to get a better understanding of how the distribution system is operating. Visibility into individual distribution transformer and cable loading is created The models are based on combination of actual customer usage, billing data, SCADA-based substation information and weather data. 4 circuits in a dense, urban environment were modeled with the Itron Distribution Asset Analysis Software 22 Load Management Pilot PECO, Itron & Microsoft collaborated to conduct a demonstration of the DAA application 4 circuits in a dense, urban environment were modeled • 7,500 customers • 269 transformers Data Sources • SCADA – 20 points input • Daily and ½ hourly meter data Several enhancements were required to correctly model the circuits: • Virtual nodes to model Secondary Mains • Interposing, Step-Down Transformers • 2-Phase, Scott Connected Transformers 23 Transformer Utilization 24 Meter to Transformer Rollup 25 Transformer Profile 26 Preliminary DAA Results DAA predicted overloads on 2 of the 5 transformers that failed in summer ’06 on one of the demonstration circuits • 1 transformer failed just after midnight, customers experienced a 4 hour interruption DAA provided secondary main loading data that was previously unavailable • Heavily loaded mains are now under analysis 27 Interval Data Pilot SpringGard Old City Chinatown 28 Outage Prediction 29 Outage Prediction AMR Last-Gasp and Power-Up Messages • 750,000 Last-Gasps Annually, 5% associated with actual outages • 6,000,000+ Power-Up Annually Why? What do these messages mean? Precursors • Demonstrated to give advance notice • Need to develop means to interpret these messages 30 High Density of Power-Up Messages 31 Outage Vs Power-Up Messages 32 Orphan Meter Analysis Orphan meters are read by the AMR Network, but there is no corresponding customer location information • Affected customers may receive estimated bills • New meter sets may go unbilled – lost revenue Analysis Process: • Map AMR network elements that are ‘hearing’ orphan meters • Overlay known meter locations vs. tax parcel & vacancy data • Identify occupied tax parcels that do not have meters that are within the range of the network device Results are used to direct field area investigations 33 Orphan Meter Analysis 34 Smart Grid 35 Urban Utilinet Trial 36 Sample Manhole Installation 37 PECO Utilinet Pilot Demonstrate that the following devices can operate simultaneous via a single smart network: Distribution Automation • Reclosers (Monitoring & Control) • Unit Substations (Monitoring & Control) • Faulted Circuit Indicators Meter Reading • • • • Current Meter Reading Functions Remote Disconnect/Reconnect Meters Interval Data/Demand Response Voltage Sensing 38 Jenkintown Area 39 Closing Thought There continues to be a wealth of opportunities to extract real business value from AMI, well beyond what is being delivered today. 40 Contact Information David Glenwright Manager, AMR Operations & Strategies Email: [email protected] Phone: 215-841-6174 41