Transcript Philips - Jan van den Biesen
Slide 1
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 2
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 3
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 4
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 5
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 6
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 7
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 8
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 9
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 10
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 2
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 3
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 4
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 5
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 6
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 7
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 8
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 9
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10
Slide 10
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective
EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7
European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005
Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA
VP Philips Research, Director Public R&D Programmes
From “Closed” to “Open” Innovation
from ….
to….
Spin-in of
Technology
External
suppliers
Philips
Research
Companies
Philips
Businesses
Institutes
Philips
Research
100%
Internal supply
Technology
spin-out
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
Philips
Businesses
Joint
Ventures
with Philips
2
FP7 proposal – General comments
• Europe’s key challenge is not only acquiring more knowledge,
but also turning knowledge into more economic value
– Make European Innovation Paradox overarching issue of FP7
• Open Innovation requires cooperation, not segregation
– Academia large firms SMEs
• Industry is key actor in innovation
– Declining participation in successive FPs must be reversed
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
3
FP7 proposal – Specific Programme “Cooperation”
• Maintain cooperation as core of FP7
• Continue & improve FP6 instruments for collaborative R&D
– Ample room for smaller projects
– Current Networks of Excellence not attractive to industry
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
4
European Technology Platforms (ETPs)
• Promising concept
– Industry-driven Strategic Research Agenda as input for Workprogramme
• Philips is actively engaged in many ETPs
– Nanoelectronics* (ENIAC)
– Embedded Systems* (ARTEMIS)
– Mobile & Wireless Communications (eMobility)
– Nanomedicine
– Networked & Electronic Media (NEM)
– Robotics (EUROP)
– Photonics (EPIC)
– Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC; SEE)
– (Potential) interest in Innovative Medicines*, Software & Services (NESSI)
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
*: Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) envisaged by EC
5
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs)
• Public-Private Partnerships for executing (part of) SRA
– Match private resources with adequate public funding (EC + national)
– Implement Art. 171 without excessive red tape
• Philips is actively involved in shaping two JTIs
– Nanoelectronics (ENIAC) and embedded systems (ARTEMIS)
– With close involvement of EUREKA clusters MEDEA+ and ITEA
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
6
FP7 proposal – Other Specific Programmes
• “Ideas”
– Supporting frontier research through ERC is excellent idea
– Fund ERC in addition to existing FP activities
• “People”
– Public-private mobility of researchers is key for Open Innovation
– Take over key characteristics from FP5 Industry Host Fellowships
• “Capacities”
– Support Open Innovation Centres
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
7
FP7 proposal - Simplification
• Rigorous overhaul of FP implementation system is needed
– Transaction costs (public + private) are economically out of proportion
• Introduce notion of “Responsible Partnering” to restore trust
– Between public and private partners within consortium
– Between consortium and Commission
– Between Commission and other EU Institutions
• Take advantage of 2005 revision of Financial Regulation
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
8
Concluding remarks
• Commission’s proposal for FP7 is sound
• By and large, Philips agrees with Working Document on FP7
– ITRE, June 23, 2005; rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
• Philips calls upon European Parliament and Council to invest
more in Europe’s future and double annual FP budget
For comparison
• EU agricultural support for tobacco (CAP):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for ICT (FP6-IST):
~0.9 billion €/yr
• EU research support for Life Sciences & Health (FP6-LSH):
~0.6 billion €/yr
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
9
JvdB/05.039, September 22, 2005
10