CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE RISK ASSESSMENT SUPPORT Group Work: Brainstorming on System Requirements 1st Stakeholders’ Workshop Katowice, March, 5th, 2015 Reinhard Hutter / Peter Klein.
Download ReportTranscript CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE RISK ASSESSMENT SUPPORT Group Work: Brainstorming on System Requirements 1st Stakeholders’ Workshop Katowice, March, 5th, 2015 Reinhard Hutter / Peter Klein.
Slide 1
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE RISK ASSESSMENT SUPPORT
Group Work:
Brainstorming on System Requirements
1st Stakeholders’ Workshop
Katowice, March, 5th, 2015
Reinhard Hutter / Peter Klein
Slide 2
The Group Work
•
•
•
•
•
Objectives
Process
Group Work
Feedback
Way ahead
Slide 3
WP1: Requirements and Concepts
• Identify needs and expectations of Cl
stakeholders in the range of tools and methods
Questions; Needs; Your Feedback
• Specify requirements for the CIRAS tool-set for
risk assessment and management,
• Plan the application of use cases and their
development for experimentation
We think of “large” and “catastrophic” incidents
Slide 4
Typical Requirements Classes
•
•
•
•
•
•
Functional requirements
Requirements concerning data acquisition and
quality
Usability requirements/ user friendliness
Requirements concerning interoperability
Output results analysis and reporting
requirements
Requirements concerning flexibility, adaptability
to different CI environments, etc.
Slide 5
Some Typical General Questions
•
•
•
•
•
Do CIs or CM organizations apply RM tools?
If yes: What is common, what is different?
If no: Is there a need? Which expected benefit?
Who will use a CIRAS tool-set?
Can or should a CIRAS tool-set become some
standard?
• Can a CIRAS tool-set foster PPP cooperation?
• Will a CIRAS tool-set help to understand
unsolved issues?
Slide 6
The Stakeholder Questionnaire
Categories
1. Economic and Business
2. Government and Administrations
3. Societal Factors
4. Interdependencies and Cascading Effects
5. Functional Characteristics
6. Operational Environment
The Group Work will follow the same structure
Slide 7
Two Work Groups
Topics Categories
Group1
Business
focus
Group2
Governm &
admin focus
I
Economic and Business
II
Government and Administrations
2
III
Societal Factors
2
IV
Interdependencies and Cascading Effects
1
2
V
Functional Characteristics
1
2
VI
Operational Environment
1
2
1
Slide 8
Suggested Group1:
Business Focus
Name
Given Name
Organization
City
Bilderbeek Arno
Bańko
Przemysław
Andrzejewsk
a
Monika
Kałkus
National Security Advisory Centre The Hague
Proximus S.A.
Katowice
Szczecin and Swinoujscie Seaports
Authority SA
Szczecin
Polish Air Navigation Services
Włodzimierz Agency
Warszawa
Sitarz
Marek
Mańka
Adam
Larraneta
Javier
Jurczak
Robert
Novak
Peter
Dariusz
Dariusz
Michal
Klein
Rogowski
Rogowski
Professor in WSB Business School Dąbrowa
- Department of Railways
Górnicza
Silesian University of Technology Transport Faculty
Katowice
PESI Spanish Technology Platform
on Industrial Safety, Secretary
General
Bilbao
PSE Polskie Sieci
Elektroenergetyczne S.A. - Polish KonstancinPower Networks
Jeziorna
PNSC Poznań Supercomputing and
Networking Centre
Poznan
CIRAS/ CESS
Moderator
EMAG
Note Taker
EMAG
Rapporteur
Country Group
Netherland
s
Poland
1
1
Poland
1
Poland
1
Poland
1
Poland
1
Spain
1
Poland
1
Poland
1
Slide 9
Suggested Group2:
Government Focus
Name
Given
Name
Organization
Spit
Marcel
National Security Advisory Centre
Head of the Metropolitan Mossos d'Esquadra (Catalonian
Transport security Area Regional Police)
Fachhochschule Polizei SachsenLöbbecke
Peter
Anhalt
Higher Council for Scientific
Santiago
Elvira
Research
Popławski
Gruchmann
City
Country Group
The Hague
Netherla
nds
2
Barcelona
Spain
2
Aschersleben Germany
2
Madrid
Spain
2
Warszawa
Poland
2
Germany
2
Łukasz
Polish Air Navigation Services
Agency
Yvonne
BIGS Brandenburgisches Institut für
Gesellschaft und Sicherheit GmbH Potsdam
Silesian Governor's Office in
Katowice, Director of Department of
Kamieniowski Grzegorz Security and Crisis Management
Katowice
Poland
PKP Polish Railways, Expert on Crisis
Management in the Security
Wilczek
Radosław Department
Warszawa
Poland
Reinhard
Hutter
CIRAS/ CESS
Moderator
Antonio
Garcia
ATOS
Note taker
Jaime
Martin
ATOS
Rapporteur
2
2
Slide 10
Moderated Sessions
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Answer a general key question (next slide)
Discuss Topics (6 Worksheets)
Capture Attributes, Ideas, Questions, Remarks
Add further Topics
Indicate your Priorities
Fill in the Questionnaire
Summarize and report to Plenum
All feedback will be handled anonymously !!!
Slide 11
Moderated Sessions
A first key question to each of you:
• If you were offered an IT tool on Risk
Management/ Risk Assessment (or an
improvement of your existing tools),
• What would be your core most important
REQUIREMENT you would ask for ?
Let’s start the Group Work
Slide 12
Thank you very much for your attention
and cooperation!
Lets start working
Reinhard Hutter
Technical Director
[email protected]
www.cirasproject.eu
Co-funded by the Prevention, Preparedness and Consequence Management of Terrorism and other Securityrelated Risks Programme of the European Union
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE RISK ASSESSMENT SUPPORT
Group Work:
Brainstorming on System Requirements
1st Stakeholders’ Workshop
Katowice, March, 5th, 2015
Reinhard Hutter / Peter Klein
Slide 2
The Group Work
•
•
•
•
•
Objectives
Process
Group Work
Feedback
Way ahead
Slide 3
WP1: Requirements and Concepts
• Identify needs and expectations of Cl
stakeholders in the range of tools and methods
Questions; Needs; Your Feedback
• Specify requirements for the CIRAS tool-set for
risk assessment and management,
• Plan the application of use cases and their
development for experimentation
We think of “large” and “catastrophic” incidents
Slide 4
Typical Requirements Classes
•
•
•
•
•
•
Functional requirements
Requirements concerning data acquisition and
quality
Usability requirements/ user friendliness
Requirements concerning interoperability
Output results analysis and reporting
requirements
Requirements concerning flexibility, adaptability
to different CI environments, etc.
Slide 5
Some Typical General Questions
•
•
•
•
•
Do CIs or CM organizations apply RM tools?
If yes: What is common, what is different?
If no: Is there a need? Which expected benefit?
Who will use a CIRAS tool-set?
Can or should a CIRAS tool-set become some
standard?
• Can a CIRAS tool-set foster PPP cooperation?
• Will a CIRAS tool-set help to understand
unsolved issues?
Slide 6
The Stakeholder Questionnaire
Categories
1. Economic and Business
2. Government and Administrations
3. Societal Factors
4. Interdependencies and Cascading Effects
5. Functional Characteristics
6. Operational Environment
The Group Work will follow the same structure
Slide 7
Two Work Groups
Topics Categories
Group1
Business
focus
Group2
Governm &
admin focus
I
Economic and Business
II
Government and Administrations
2
III
Societal Factors
2
IV
Interdependencies and Cascading Effects
1
2
V
Functional Characteristics
1
2
VI
Operational Environment
1
2
1
Slide 8
Suggested Group1:
Business Focus
Name
Given Name
Organization
City
Bilderbeek Arno
Bańko
Przemysław
Andrzejewsk
a
Monika
Kałkus
National Security Advisory Centre The Hague
Proximus S.A.
Katowice
Szczecin and Swinoujscie Seaports
Authority SA
Szczecin
Polish Air Navigation Services
Włodzimierz Agency
Warszawa
Sitarz
Marek
Mańka
Adam
Larraneta
Javier
Jurczak
Robert
Novak
Peter
Dariusz
Dariusz
Michal
Klein
Rogowski
Rogowski
Professor in WSB Business School Dąbrowa
- Department of Railways
Górnicza
Silesian University of Technology Transport Faculty
Katowice
PESI Spanish Technology Platform
on Industrial Safety, Secretary
General
Bilbao
PSE Polskie Sieci
Elektroenergetyczne S.A. - Polish KonstancinPower Networks
Jeziorna
PNSC Poznań Supercomputing and
Networking Centre
Poznan
CIRAS/ CESS
Moderator
EMAG
Note Taker
EMAG
Rapporteur
Country Group
Netherland
s
Poland
1
1
Poland
1
Poland
1
Poland
1
Poland
1
Spain
1
Poland
1
Poland
1
Slide 9
Suggested Group2:
Government Focus
Name
Given
Name
Organization
Spit
Marcel
National Security Advisory Centre
Head of the Metropolitan Mossos d'Esquadra (Catalonian
Transport security Area Regional Police)
Fachhochschule Polizei SachsenLöbbecke
Peter
Anhalt
Higher Council for Scientific
Santiago
Elvira
Research
Popławski
Gruchmann
City
Country Group
The Hague
Netherla
nds
2
Barcelona
Spain
2
Aschersleben Germany
2
Madrid
Spain
2
Warszawa
Poland
2
Germany
2
Łukasz
Polish Air Navigation Services
Agency
Yvonne
BIGS Brandenburgisches Institut für
Gesellschaft und Sicherheit GmbH Potsdam
Silesian Governor's Office in
Katowice, Director of Department of
Kamieniowski Grzegorz Security and Crisis Management
Katowice
Poland
PKP Polish Railways, Expert on Crisis
Management in the Security
Wilczek
Radosław Department
Warszawa
Poland
Reinhard
Hutter
CIRAS/ CESS
Moderator
Antonio
Garcia
ATOS
Note taker
Jaime
Martin
ATOS
Rapporteur
2
2
Slide 10
Moderated Sessions
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Answer a general key question (next slide)
Discuss Topics (6 Worksheets)
Capture Attributes, Ideas, Questions, Remarks
Add further Topics
Indicate your Priorities
Fill in the Questionnaire
Summarize and report to Plenum
All feedback will be handled anonymously !!!
Slide 11
Moderated Sessions
A first key question to each of you:
• If you were offered an IT tool on Risk
Management/ Risk Assessment (or an
improvement of your existing tools),
• What would be your core most important
REQUIREMENT you would ask for ?
Let’s start the Group Work
Slide 12
Thank you very much for your attention
and cooperation!
Lets start working
Reinhard Hutter
Technical Director
[email protected]
www.cirasproject.eu
Co-funded by the Prevention, Preparedness and Consequence Management of Terrorism and other Securityrelated Risks Programme of the European Union