Cosmetics and Sunscreens – Analytical Testing Requirements Scott Colbourne – Business Manager NSW ALS Pharmaceutical Australia RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER.
Download ReportTranscript Cosmetics and Sunscreens – Analytical Testing Requirements Scott Colbourne – Business Manager NSW ALS Pharmaceutical Australia RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER.
Cosmetics and Sunscreens – Analytical Testing Requirements Scott Colbourne – Business Manager NSW ALS Pharmaceutical Australia 1 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Contents • Australian Regulations – Testing & Stability requirements • ASEAN and EU Regulations – Testing & Stability requirements • Typical tests - how and why they are performed? • Why validate / re-validate a method? 2 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Australian Regulations • All ingredients in cosmetic products are regulated as industrial chemicals under the Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Act 1989 • In addition the Cosmetic Standard 2007 covers certain products • If a product’s primary function is as a sunscreen it is regulated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) 3 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Australian Regulations: Testing of Cosmetics Substances New chemicals applications via NICNAS* : • Spectral data to confirm the structural formula • Purity • Impurities • Additives • Valid reproducible physico-chemical data, including: – Melting point or boiling point – Specific gravity or density – Vapour pressure – Water solubility – Partition coefficient – Particle size (distribution) or fibre length – Flashpoint, Flammability, Auto-ignition Information from NICNAS Handbook (Appendix F) * Not listed on AICS, Australian Inventory of Chemical Substances 4 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Australian Regulations – Testing from Cosmetics Standard 2007 • The Cosmetics Standard 2007 describes the requirements for six cosmetic product categories. • These categories include various SPF products. • The only specific testing noted is SPF: ‘product meets the performance requirements for a broad-spectrum product’ 5 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Australian Regulations – Sunscreens • TGA regulates as therapeutic goods: - Primary sunscreens - SPF 4 or more - Moisturisers containing sunscreen with SPF >15 • Sunscreens must comply to ARGS (Australian Regulatory Guidelines for Sunscreens) • Efficacy of each sunscreen product is to be tested to determine the sun protection factor (SPF) 6 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Australian Regulations – Testing Sunscreens Stability (ARGS 7.1) • The data must substantiate the physical, chemical and microbiological stability of the product for at least the claimed shelf life • Stability data is not required to be submitted to the TGA for product listing • However may be requested for review by the TGA at any time 7 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Australian Regulations – Testing Sunscreens Stability (ARGS 7.1) • Physical testing (at least): appearance, emulsion stability, absence of crystallisation, odour, viscosity • Chemical stability testing (should include): pH, active/s content. Using a validated, stability-indicating analytical procedure (for example, HPLC) • Microbiological stability - preservative efficacy testing at the start and end of stability trials 8 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Australian Regulations – Testing Sunscreens Stability (ARGS 7.1) • Accelerated studies require enough time points to allow statistical analysis as the shelf life is extrapolated • E.g. 0, (1 or 2), (3 or 4), (5 or 6), 9 and 12 months • Followed by 24 and 30 months as required 9 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Australian Regulations – Testing Sunscreens Quality Control (ARGS 8.2) • Where a specific monograph from the pharmacopoeia is available (BP, Ph Eur or USP-NF), it must be used: • This applies to most ingredients – both organic and inorganic • In addition many of the excipients (including solvents) used in sunscreen products are also available • Finished products are not the subject of monographs and are therefore controlled by appropriate “in house” quality control • “in house” methods cover identity and relevant physical, chemical and microbiological properties. Test methods must be validated, as appropriate. 10 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER ASEAN Cosmetic Directive – Testing Requirements ARTICLE 9 (Methods of Analysis) • The following cosmetic product documents shall be made available to the cosmetic regulatory authority: – methods used by the manufacturer to check the ingredients – the criteria used for • microbiological control of cosmetic products • chemical purity of ingredients of cosmetic products 11 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER ASEAN Guidelines – Testing Requirements Appendix VI – ASEAN Guidelines for Cosmetic Good Manufacturing Practice • Raw and packaging material specifications should include: – Testing parameters and acceptance limits • Bulk and finished product specifications should include : – Physical properties – Chemical assay and/or microbiological assays and their acceptance 12 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER EU Legislation – Testing Cosmetics • Legislation is covered under European Union law (1223/2009). • Each product requires a safety report (Annex I) • The EU provides a guidelines on Annex I for the cosmetic product safety report • Guidelines regarding the testing of cosmetics are taken from the SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) 13 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER SCCS Notes of Guidance for the EU: Testing Cosmetics • Evaluation of new substances includes: – characterisation and purity of the chemical; – characterisation of the impurities or accompanying contaminants; – solubility; – partition coefficient (Log Pow); – additional relevant physical and chemical specifications; – homogeneity and stability; – UV-VIS-absorption spectrum 14 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER SCCS Notes of Guidance for the EU: Testing Cosmetics Stability and physical & chemical characteristics of the cosmetic product (4-3.3) • The physical stability should be established, ensuring no changes in physical state during transport, storage or handling of the product. • Relevant stability tests • Relevant physical and chemical parameters should be controlled for each batch of the finished product, e.g: – Organoleptic properties – pH – Viscosity 15 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER SCCS Notes of Guidance for the EU: Testing Cosmetics Guidelines on Microbiological Quality of the Cosmetic Product (4-4) • to ensure the microbial safety of cosmetics for the consumer • to maintain the quality and specifications intended of the product • Quantitative and qualitative Tests (4-4.2) – Total viable count – Pathogens: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans • Challenge testing (4-4.3) – Based on US Pharmacopoeia and European Pharmacopoeia – The efficacy of the cosmetic product’s preservation through challenge testing – assessed during product development 16 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Typical Tests - Physical • Appearance • Identification • Viscosity • Density (Specific Gravity) • Hydroxyl Value: measure of the content of free hydroxyl groups • Peroxide Value: initial evidence of rancidity in unsaturated fats and oils (primary oxidation) • Anisidine Value: also linked to rancidity (secondary oxidation) • Saponification Value: how much of the fat will saponify. Can be used as a measure of average molecular weight • pH • Acidity/Alkalinity – how much base or acid is required to reach a predetermined pH 17 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Typical Tests - Chemical • Sunscreen Raw Materials: – Tests dictated in Pharmacopoeia Monographs: - Physical Tests (already covered) - Assay - Impurities • Sunscreen Finished Products: • Zinc Oxide and Titanium Dioxide – by titration or ICP • Sunscreen Actives – generally by HPLC • Preservatives – generally by HPLC 18 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Typical Tests - Chemical • Cosmetics and Raw Materials: – Alcohols – Fatty acids – Essential Oils – Vitamins – Heavy Metals 19 Identification and Assay to assess: - Presence - Purity - Amount in finished product RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Typical Tests - Microbiological • Initial Consumer Safety, Good Manufacturing Process: – General • TAMC • Yeast and Mould • Staphylococcus aureus • Pathogens are hygiene able to Indicator ofwhich general affect immunocompromised in water, environment, raw users, wounds, eyes/ears materials and finished product • Pseudomonads Pseudomonads can affect appearance – discolouration and phase separation Ongoing Consumer Safety – multiple use cosmetics – Challenge Testing (Preservative Efficacy) • The test involves inoculating with micro-organisms to challenge the preservative system • Generally tested at 2, 7, 14 & 28 days 20 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Method Validation – what is involved? • Generally performed for quantitative assays, for actives and preservatives (e.g. sunscreen raw materials and finished products) Linearity • Linearity / Range response linear across the required range? Response – Is the method’s 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 y = 200.6379x + 0.0721 R² = 1.0000 0 2 4 6 8 10 Concentration 21 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Method Validation – what is involved? • Precision – If I run the method many times do I get consistent results? • Accuracy – Do I get the number I am looking for? • Specificity – Is there any interference from another substance? • Robustness – How does my method cope to small changes in the parameters? 22 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER Method Validation and Re-Validation – why? • As discussed previously – to ensure the result is Accurate, Precise and Specific • To satisfy regulatory requirements Scenario 1: Excipient B is reduced to 45% and Excipient C increased to 10% • A Sunscreen with the following formulation: • – 5% Active A – 50% Excipient B – 5% Excipient C – 40% Excipient D Probably not, as the ingredients are the same and the assay should not be affected Scenario 2: Excipient C is replaced by a new Excipient E The assay for Active A is validated Yes, the ingredients are different therefore the new • The sunscreen’s formulation is excipient may: changed. Is re-validation required? • Affect the extraction of the active from the sample during the method • Interfere with the active’s response, giving rise to specificity issues 23 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER References • NICNAS Chemical Information - Cosmetics • Cosmetics Standard 2007 – Australia • TGA Sunscreens – Regulatory Guidelines • ASEAN Cosmetics Directive • European Union law Regulation 1223/2009 • Guidelines on Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 • SCCS'S Notes of Guidance for the Testing of Cosmetic substances and their safety evaluation - 8th revision • Draft Guidance for Industry: Cosmetic Good Manufacturing Practices (US FDA) 24 RIGHT SOLUTIONS · RIGHT PARTNER