Transcript Slide 1
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Building on Children’s & Families’ Strengths January 2012 Marlene Gross-Ackeret Jennifer Grenke 1 Who’s Here? Parents? Teachers? Advocates? Administrators? Other? 2 Advanced Organizer • Challenges/Rationale for PBIS • Overview of PBIS • Research Findings • Framework of support • What does PBIS look Like? • Wisconsin PBIS Initiative • Family/Parent Involvement in PBIS 3 Challenges Facing Schools Today • Doing more with less • Educating increasing numbers of students with more diverse needs • Educating students with challenging behaviors • Creating “host environments” or systems that enable adoption & sustained use of effective practices 4 Over-Reliance on Exclusion • Exclusion & punishment are the most common responses to conduct disorders in schools. (Lane & Murakami, 1987; Rose, 1988; Nieto, 1999; Sprick, Borgmeier, & Nolet, 2002) • Exclusion & punishment are ineffective at producing long-term reduction in problem behavior. (Costenbader & Markson, 1998) • “When the horse is dead, it’s time to dismount.” 5 Research Findings Reviews of over 600 studies on how to reduce school discipline problems indicate that the least effective response to school violence are: – Disconnected “fix the student” counseling – Psychotherapy – Punishment (Gottfredson, 1997; Lipsey, 1991 & 1992; Tolan & Guerra, 1994; Elliott, Hamburg, Williams, 1998) 6 Most Effective Trends in Discipline Practices • Proactive school-wide discipline systems • Social skills instruction • Academic/curricular restructuring • Behaviorally based interventions • Early screening & identification of antisocial behavior patterns (Biglan, 1995; Gottfredson, 1997; Colvin, et al., 1993; Lipsey, 1991, 1992; Mayer, 1995; Sugai & Horner, 1994; Tolan & Guerra, 1994; Walker, et al., 1995; Walker, et al., 1996) 7 Basic Principles of PBIS • Just as we teach students to read, write & compute, we also need to teach students how to behave. • There is always a function to someone’s behavior, even if the person cannot tell you what that function is. • Discipline alone is not enough. Appropriate replacement behavior must be taught to prevent re-occurrence of misbehavior. 8 The Old Way….(hopefully) • Referrals to Special Education may be seen as the “intervention” vs. actual changes in student’s learning environment • FBA may be viewed as required “paperwork” vs. a needed part of designing an intervention • Rely on interventions the system is familiar with vs. ones that are likely to produce an effect • Focus one-student at a time (reactive approaches) vs. capacity (systems) within schools to support ALL students 9 Without Problem Solving Special Education Sea of Ineligibility General Education 10 Amount of Resources Needed to Solve Problem Bridging the Gap General + Intensive Resources General + Supplemental Resources General Resources Intensity of Problem 11 What is PBIS? A broad range of proactive, systemic, and individualized strategies for achieving important social & learning outcomes in safe & effective environments while preventing problem behavior with all students. (Sugai, 2007) 12 School-Wide Systems FOR Student Success: A Response to Intervention (RtI) Model Academic Systems Behavioral Systems Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions •Individual students •Assessment-based •High intensity Tier 2/Secondary Interventions •Some students •High efficiency •Rapid response •Small group interventions • Some individualizing 1-5% 5-15% Tier 1/Universal Interventions 80-90% •All students •Preventive, proactive 1-5% Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions •Individual students •Assessment-based •Intense, durable procedures 5-15% Tier 2/Secondary Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response •Small group interventions •Some individualizing 80-90% Tier 1/Universal Interventions •All settings, all students •Preventive, proactive Illinois PBIS Network, Revised May 15, 2008. Adapted from “What is school-wide PBS?” OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. Accessed at http://pbis.org/school-wide.htm 13 Emphasis on Prevention at Each Level Universal Level • GOAL: To reduce new cases of problem behavior &/or academic failure Secondary Level • GOAL: To reduce current cases of problem behavior &/or academic failure Tertiary/Wraparound Level • GOAL: To reduce complications, intensity, severity of students with chronic problem behavior &/or academic failure 14 Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success through Family Involvement Academic Systems Behavioral Systems Tertiary Interventions • Few families • Family voice • High Intensity Secondary Interventions • Some families • High efficiency • Rapid response • Planned Interventions • Some Individualizing Universal Interventions • All families • Preventive, proactive 1-5% 5-10% 80-90% 1-5% Tertiary Interventions • Few families • Family voice • Intense, durable procedures 5-10% Secondary Interventions • Some families • High efficiency • Rapid response • Planned Interventions • Some Individualizing 80-90% Universal Interventions • All families • Preventive, proactive 15 Tiered Model for Students: Identify the needs of these students To provide instruction & interventions To meet standards. 16 16 Tiered Model for Families: Identify the needs of these parents To develop differentiated outreach To meaningfully engage with parents across all Tiers 17 17 PBIS Biggest Idea! Instead of working harder (inefficient), schools have to establish systems & processes & use data & practices that enable them to work smarter (efficient, effective). • Establish a small number of priorities – Do less but better. • Consolidate/integrate whenever possible – Only do it once. • Specify what is wanted & how you’ll know when you get there – Invest in a clear outcome & assess progress. • Give priority to what works – Use research- & evidence-based practices & programs. 18 Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior 19 Data - How Decisions Are Made Components of decision making with PBIS • Data collection • T-chart • ODR form • A problem-solving team • Data at every meeting • Data use • Big 5 reports • Communication with school community about data, patterns, & decisions • Newsletter • Website 20 Systems - How Things are Done • Procedures for classroom and nonclassroom settings – lunchroom, bus, bathroom, assembly, transition/hallway • Procedures for reinforcing expected behavior • Procedures for responding to office discipline referrals (ODRs) • Procedures for meeting the needs of ALL students 21 22 Practices - How adults Interact with Students Every time any adult interacts with any student, it is an instructional moment! PBIS emphasizes… • Teaching behaviors like we teach academics • Modeling & practicing expected behaviors • http://www.hasd.org/schools/ges/pbis.cfm • Reinforcing expected behaviors • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fc8H_7D0Q1Y • Pre-correcting to ensure positive behaviors are displayed • Actively supervising to prevent problem behaviors 23 What Does PBIS Look Like? • 3-5 Positively stated expectations are defined and taught for all students in all settings • >80% of students can tell you what is expected of them & give behavioral example because they have been taught, actively supervised, practiced, & acknowledged • Positive adult-to-student interactions exceed negative • Data- & team-based action planning & implementation are operating • Administrators are active participants • Full continuum of behavior support is available to all students 24 Teaching Matrix SETTING All Settings Hallways Playgrounds Cafeteria Library/ Compute r Lab Study, read, compute. Sit in one spot. Watch for your stop. Assembly Bus Respect Ourselves Be on task. Give your best effort. Be prepared. Walk. Have a plan. Eat all your food. Select healthy foods. Respect Others Be kind. Hands/feet to self. Help/share with others. Use normal voice volume. Walk to right. Play safe. Include others. Share equipment. Practice good table manners Whisper. Return books. Listen/watch. Use appropriate applause. Use a quiet voice. Stay in your seat. Recycle. Clean up after self. Pick up litter. Maintain physical space. Use equipment properly. Put litter in garbage can. Replace trays & utensils. Clean up eating area. Push in chairs. Treat books carefully. Pick up. Treat chairs appropriately. Wipe your feet. Sit appropriately. Respect Property 25 Behavior is Acknowledged and Recognized 26 Consistency across staff/locations http://schools.u-46.org/index.pl?id=27311 27 Wisconsin PBIS Implementation • • • 872 schools trained by January 2012 761 schools implementing 380 schools implementing with fidelity Wisconsin Data 2010-11 Office Discipline Referral counts were received from 95 schools • 28 schools were implementing PBIS with fidelity by the end of the 2009-10 school year • 67 schools were implementing PBIS but hadn’t yet reached fidelity by the end of the 2009-10 school year Number of Office Discipline Referrals in an Average School (180 days, 400 students) 410 450 400 353 350 14% Lower 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Fidelity Implementing, no Fidelity # of Days of Out of School Suspension Days of OSS in an Average School (180 days, 400 students) 60 48 50 40 52% Lower 31 30 23 20 10 0 Fidelity Implementing, No Fidelity Trained, Not Implementing # of Students receiving Out of School Suspension Number of Students receiving OSS in an Average School (400 students) 16 14 14 12 36% Lower 10 10 9 8 6 4 2 0 Fidelity Implementing, No Fidelity Trained, Not Implementing # of Infractions Resulting in Out of School Suspension Number of Out of School Suspensions in an Average School (400 students) 50 47 45 40 43% Lower 38 35 30 27 25 20 15 10 5 0 Fidelity Implementing, No Fidelity Trained, Not Implementing Sustaining Schools 27 schools met fidelity by July 2010 and have sustained fidelity on all assessments since at least Spring of 2010. • 18 of them are Elementary Schools • 4 Middle Schools • 4 are Multi-Level Schools (K8/K12) • 1 is an Alternative School • Represent 12 school districts Academic Outcomes – Reading Proficiency Reading Proficiency 100% % of Students Profienct and Advanced 90% 80% 73.45% 73.18% 2008-09 2009-10 76.27% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2010-11 Academic Outcomes – Reading Proficiency Reading Proficiency 100.00% % of Students Proficient and Advanced 90.00% 85.50% 84.70% 85.80% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 64.30% 58.30% 58.80% Higher Performing 50.00% Lower Performing 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Academic Outcomes – Math Proficiency Math Proficiency 100% % of Students Profienct and Advanced 90% 80% 69.97% 72.45% 71.26% 2009-10 2010-11 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2008-09 Academic Outcomes – Math Proficiency Math Proficiency 90.00% 84.56% 84.47% 83.14% 57.43% 56.42% % of Students Proficient and Advanced 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 51.74% 50.00% Higher Performing 40.00% Lower Performing 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 SCHOOL-WIDE CLASSROOM 1.Leadership team 1.All school-wide 2.Behavior purpose statement 3.Set of positive expectations & behaviors 4.Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior 5.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior EVIDENCEBASED INTERVENTION PRACTICES 6.Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations 2.Maximum structure & predictability in routines & environment 3.Positively stated expectations posted, taught, reviewed, prompted, & supervised. 4.Maximum engagement through high rates of opportunities to respond, delivery of evidencebased instructional curriculum & practices 5.Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays of appropriate behavior. 6.Continuum of strategies for responding to inappropriate behavior. 7.Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation FAMILY ENGAGEMENT INDIVIDUAL STUDENT 1.Behavioral competence at school & district levels 2.Function-based behavior support planning 3.Team- & data-based decision making 4.Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes 5.Targeted social skills & self-management instruction 6. Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations NONCLASSROOM 1.Continuum of positive behavior support for all families 1.Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged 2.Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements 2.Active supervision by all staff (Scan, move, interact) 3.Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner 3.Precorrections & reminders 4.Positive reinforcement 4.Access to system of integrated school & community resources http://www.mjsd.k12.wi.us/clo/PBISatHo 38 meKit.asp Positive behavior support has been defined as a collaborative endeavor that includes all relevant stakeholders, including especially families. (Hieneman, Childs & Sergay, 2006; Koegel, Koegel, & Dunlap, 1996; Lucyshn, Dunlap, & Albin, 2002) “Facilitates the inclusion of and respect for the values and priorities of families and all team members.” APBS Standards of Practice Leadership Team –range of stakeholders (special education, regular education, families, mental health, administration). School-wide PBS Implementer’s Blueprint 39 • Higher grades, test scores, graduation rates • Better school attendance • Increased motivation, self-esteem • Lower rates of suspension • Decreased use of drugs and alcohol • Fewer instances of violent behavior Henderson & Mapp (2002) – A New Generation of Evidence 40 • Many problems at school reflect broader community issues • Engaging the community will improve the effectiveness and outcomes of PBS • Students who need more intensive levels of support are often supported by systems other than the educational system 41 Family Teaching Matrix Family Teaching Matrix SETTING At Home Morning Routine Homework Meal Times In Car Play Bedtime Expectations Respect Ourselves Respect Others Respect Property Stolen from OSEP National Technical Assistance Center 42 Contact Information: Marlene Gross-Ackeret [email protected] 608.697.8826 Jennifer Grenke [email protected] 920.855.2114 x 245 43