Beyond Engagement: Improving Persistence Through

Download Report

Transcript Beyond Engagement: Improving Persistence Through

February 19, 2011 31 st Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience San Antonio, TX

  Alexander Astin › Theory of Involvement  “Students learn by becoming involved” (Astin, 1985) Vince Tinto › Theory of Student Departure  “Integration is the extent to which the individual shares the normative attitudes and values of peers and faculty in the institution…” (Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005)  Academic integration  Social integration

Source: National Center for Education Statistics, IPEDS

Monitoring engagement in academic and social activities is not enough.

Many students, such as those attending broad access institutions, are limited in how they can approach college. Work Family

Integration?

Building up institutional integration can break down pre-existing connections Has been especially emphasized as inappropriate with racial and ethnic minority students

“Validation is an enabling, confirming and supportive process initiated by in- and out-of-class agents that foster academic and interpersonal development” -Rendón, 1994

 Puts responsibility not just with the student to “integrate,” but also with the institution to invite involvement.

 Occurs in and out of class  Forms of validation › Academic validation › General Interpersonal validation

 Previously never empirically examined at a national level  CIRP’s YFYC and DLE surveys include measures of both general validation from faculty and staff and validation in the classroom

Funded Research Freshman Survey YFCY HERI Faculty Survey DLE CSS • Ford Foundation • National Institutes of Health •National Institute of Science

    New CIRP instrument in 2011 The DLE captures: › Institutional climate › Campus practices › Student learning outcomes Separate versions for › › 2-year (at least 24 credits) 4-year institutions (Sophomores and Juniors) Web based

Please indicate how often you have experienced the following in class at this institution:

Items Instructors provided me with feedback that helped me assess my progress in class I feel like my contributions were valued in class Instructors encouraged me to meet with them after or outside of class Faculty were able to determine my level of understanding of course material Instructors encouraged me to ask questions and participate in discussions

Felt that my contributions were valued in class 41% 52% Faculty provided me with feedback that helped me assess my progress in class 39% 54% Faculty encouraged me to ask questions and participate in discussions 58% 37% 0% Frequently 20% Occasionally 40% 60% 80% 100%

Faculty encouraged me to meet with them outside of class 20% 61% Faculty showed concern about my progress 15% 57% 0% 20% Strongly Agree Agree 40% 60% 80% 100%

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements:

Items At least one faculty member has taken an interest in my development At least one staff member has taken an interest in my development Faculty believe in my potential to succeed academically Staff recognize my achievements Faculty empower me to learn here Staff encourage me to get involved in campus activities

Faculty believe in my potential to succeed academically 26% Faculty empower me to learn here 19% At least one staff member has taken an interest in my development At least one faculty member has taken an interest in my development 34% 26% 63% 68% 52% 59% Staff recognize my achievements 13% 63% Staff encourage me to get involved in campus activities 17% 55% 0% Strongly Agree 20% Agree 40% 60% 80% 100%

  Navigation is critical for increasing academic goal attainment (AAC&U, 2002) › › Equip students with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions about appropriate routes for their academic goals  (AAC&U, 2002) Actions and requisite knowledge represent navigational capital  (Yosso, 2005) Students of color must develop academic resilience that enables them to navigate social institutions › (Alva, 1991, Yosso, 2005; see Solorzano, Ceja & Yosso, 2000)

Academic advising Student health services 7% 18% 49% 68% Study skills advising Financial aid advising 10% 6% 33% 35% Writing center 8% Career services 4% Student psychological services 4% 12% 28% 33% Disability resource center 3% 6% 0% 20% Frequently 40% Occasionally 60% 80% 100%

Used the institution's website to learn about campus resources 26% 60% Use the institution's course catalog (paper or online) 29% 57% 0% Frequently 20% 40% Occasionally 60% 80% 100%

www.heri.ucla.edu

[email protected]