Transcript Document
ATC Planning Zone Meeting Teresa Mogensen Director, Transmission Planning & Service Scott Barnhart Manager, Transmission Planning Welcome and Introductions • Your name and affiliation • Please state your name and affiliation each time you offer input during today’s discussion Overview of ATC • Began operations on January 1, 2001 • A transmission-only public utility company with transmission assets in Wisconsin, Michigan and Illinois • Offices in Waukesha, Cottage Grove and Green Bay, Wis.; Kingsford, Mich.; and Washington D.C. • Owns, plans, constructs, maintains, and operates electric transmission equipment • Provides electric transmission service to utilities and other wholesale power buyers • Jointly owned by electric cooperatives, investor-owned utilities, municipal utilities, and other public power entities • Regulated by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for rates and tariffs • Regulated by states for siting Goals for this Meeting • Familiarize you with ATC and the transmission planning process • Discuss identified system needs and possible solutions in this region • Solicit your ongoing participation in, and shaping of, the planning process • Solicit your input in helping identify and refine feasible options to address needs ATC Transmission Planning Philosophies • Adequate Infrastructure – To support load growth and system utilization • Reliable Service • Interconnection – Generators, loads, and other transmission systems • Access – To a competitive energy market • Collaboration • Timeliness of project efforts ATC Planning Bases • • • • Individual Load/Generator Zone ATC System Wide US Regional/National • Consolidate resolution of needs into cohesive overall plan Process to Date – Ten Year Transmission System Assessment • Covers years 2001-2010 • Identifies needs, limitations, and violations of planning criteria • Lists solutions to certain needs, limitations, and violations – Projects within existing substations – Projects within existing right-of-way – Near term transmission projects • Other solutions to be defined after public discussion • Initial assessment published June 1, 2001 Process to Date-Ten Year Assessment Logistics • Developed system performance criteria • Developed logical “planning zones” – Facilitates development of projects that serve multiple purposes and resolve multiple issues – Umbrella plans – phased approaches to needs resolution – Allows for more focused public discussions • Evaluated peak system usage scenarios • Included proposed new generation that had been announced or for which applications had been filed ATC Planning Zones KEWEENAW H OUGH TON LAKE SUPERIOR ON TON AGON BARAGA MARQUETTE GOGEBIC ALGER SCH OOLCRAFT IRON IRON ASH LAN D DELTA VILAS DICKIN SON FLOREN CE SAWYER ON EIDA PRICE MEN OMIN EE FOREST RUSK LIN COLN MARIN ETTE LAN GLADE GREEN BAY MEN OMIN EE OCON TO MARATH ON SH AWAN O DOOR CLARK EAU CLAIRE WOOD WAUPACA OUTAGAMIE PORTAGE BROWN KEWAUN EE CH IPPEWA TAYLOR JACKSON MAN ITOWOC WIN N EBAGO WAUSH ARA CALUMET WINNEBAGO ADAMS MON ROE JUN EAU GREEN LAKE MARQUETTE FON D DU LAC SH EBOYGAN VERN ON OZAUKEE COLUMBIA SAUK DODGE WASH IN GTON LAKE RICH LAN D MICHIGAN LACROSSE LAKE DAN E IOWA JEFFERSON WAUKESH A MILWAUKEE CRAWFORD GRAN T RACIN E LAFAYETTE GREEN ROCK WALWORTH KEN OSH A Process to Date – June 8 Introduction • Introduced public planning process concepts – – – – Identification and discussion of needs and possible solutions Importance of your input Evolutionary process Iterative process (Needs, Assessment, Input, Analysis, Plan Design, Input) - Repeat – Desire for coordination with you and your processes – Commitments to treat affected landowners fairly and to mitigate the environmental impact of construction, maintenance, and operation activities • Introduced and offered initial report for your review • Announced upcoming Planning Zone Meetings for more focused discussion Transmission Network Concepts Overview and Discussion of Zone Needs Figure II-6 Zone 5 Existing Transmission Facilities Auburn KEY 345 kV Substation Fredonia 138 or 230 kV Substation OZAUKEE Generation 345 kV Transmission Barton Port Washington Charter 230 kV Transmission Sauk 115 to 161kV Transmission St. Lawrence Pleasant Valley MICHIGAN Hartford Muni WASHINGTON Mequon Rubicon DODGE Concord Bark River Range Line Granville Cooney Sussex Cottonwood Crawfish River Summit Butler Cornell Tosa Fiebrantz Center 28th St. Waukesha JEFFERSON Bluemound Arcadian Jefferson Glendale MILWAUKEE Tamarack WAUKESHA Shorewood Haymarket Everett Parkhill 96th St. Valley Harbor W. Junction Lakehead Moorland Lincoln Merrill Hills LAKE Germantown Parkland Swan 68th St. Maple Dewey Norwich Lakeside Kansas Fort Atkinson St. Martins Allerton Brookdale Branch Ramsey Nicholson Pennsylvania LS Power Mukwonago Oak Creek Root River Whitewater Lakehead St. Rita Tichigan WALWORTH RACINE Sugar Creek Racine Hayes Burlington Elkhorn Paris Air Liquide ROCK N. Lake Geneva Williams Bay Albers KENOSHA Kenosha Bain Brick Church Spring Valley Pleasant Prairie Overview and Discussion of Zone Needs Figure IV-5 Zone 5 Performance Criteria Violations and Other Needs Auburn KEY 345 kV Substation Fredonia 138 or 230 kV Substation OZAUKEE Generation 345 kV Transmission Barton Port Washington Charter 230 kV Transmission Sauk 115 to161 kV Transmission St. Lawrence Pleasant Valley MICHIGAN Hartford Muni WASHINGTON Mequon Rubicon DODGE Concord Bark River Range Line Granville Cooney Sussex Cottonwood Crawfish River WAUKESHA Summit Butler Cornell Tosa Fiebrantz Center 28th St. Waukesha JEFFERSON Bluemound Arcadian Jefferson Glendale MILWAUKEE Tamarack Shorewood Haymarket Everett Parkhill 96th St. Valley Harbor W. Junction Lakehead Moorland Lincoln Merrill Hills LAKE Germantown Parkland Swan 68th St. Maple Dewey Norwich Lakeside Kansas Fort Atkinson St. Martins Allerton Brookdale Branch Ramsey Nicholson Pennsylvania LS Power Mukwonago Oak Creek Root River Whitewater Lakehead St. Rita Tichigan WALWORTH RACINE Sugar Creek Racine Hayes Burlington Elkhorn Paris Air Liquide ROCK N. Lake Geneva Williams Bay Albers KENOSHA Kenosha Bain Brick Church Spring Valley Pleasant Prairie Overview and Discussion of Potential Solutions FigureV-5 Zone 5-Proposed Transmission System Additions KEY 345 kV Substation Fredonia 138 or 230 kV Substation OZAUKEE Generation 345 kV Transmission Barton Port Washington Charter 230 kV Transmission Sauk 115 to 161 kV Transmission Pleasant Valley WASHINGTON Mequon Rubicon St. Lawrence MICHIGAN Hartford Muni DODGE Concord C Bark River C SS Tamarack Cooney Cottonwood Duplainville Crawfish River Summit WAUKESHA JEFFERSON Waukesha Jefferson Range Line Granville Sussex SS T Lakehead Glendale MILWAUKEE Butler Cornell Tosa Fiebrantz Center 28th St. Arcadian Shorewood Haymarket Everett Bluemound Parkhill 96th St. Valley Harbor W. Junction Moorland LAKE Germantown Parkland Swan C 68th St. Maple Dewey Norwich Lincoln Merrill Hills Lakeside Kansas Fort Atkinson St. Martins Allerton Brookdale Branch Ramsey Nicholson Pennsylvania Mukwonago Oak Creek Root River St. Rita Tichigan Waukesha Co. SS RACINE Racine Hayes Burlington Paris Air Liquide Albers KENOSHA Kenosha Bain Spring Valley Badger SS Pleasant Prairie Zion Overview and Discussion of Potential Solutions Figure V-10 Zone 5 Residual System Needs After Proposed Additions Auburn KEY 345 kV Substation Fredonia 138 or 230 kV Substation OZAUKEE Generation 345 kV Transmission Barton Port Washington Charter 230 kV Transmission Sauk 115 to 161 kV Transmission St. Lawrence Pleasant Valley MICHIGAN Hartford Muni WASHINGTON Mequon Rubicon DODGE Concord Bark River Range Line Granville Cooney Sussex Cottonwood Crawfish River WAUKESHA Summit Butler Cornell Tosa Fiebrantz Center 28th St. Waukesha JEFFERSON Bluemound Arcadian Jefferson Glendale MILWAUKEE Tamarack Shorewood Haymarket Everett Parkhill 96th St. Valley Harbor W. Junction Lakehead Moorland Lincoln Merrill Hills LAKE Germantown Parkland Swan 68th St. Maple Dewey Norwich Lakeside Kansas Fort Atkinson St. Martins Allerton Brookdale Branch Ramsey Nicholson Pennsylvania LS Power Mukwonago Oak Creek Root River Whitewater Lakehead St. Rita Tichigan WALWORTH RACINE Sugar Creek Racine Hayes Burlington Elkhorn Paris Air Liquide ROCK N. Lake Geneva Williams Bay Albers KENOSHA Kenosha Bain Brick Church Spring Valley Pleasant Prairie Zion Your Regional Plans and Concerns • Given what you have heard so far, – General comments and thoughts? – Potential impacts on you? – Your area plans which may be affected? • Also, in your area, – What infrastructure planning processes are underway now? – Any current efforts to coordinate your overall infrastructure plans? – Thoughts on most suitable general locations for transmission infrastructure? – What is coming up that we should know about? – What are key issues in this region that we should be aware of? – Any timing coordination issues to consider? Lunch • 12:30 – 1:00 Focus on Possible Solutions Planned System Additions • New Transmission Lines – Waukesha-Duplainville-Sussex – Connection of PG&E Badger power plant (Kenosha) – Requirements for Oak Creek generation expansion – Madison-Milwaukee or Beloit-Racine “Bypass” Planned System Additions • Upgrading Existing Lines – Saukville-Granville – St. Lawrence-Pleasant Valley-Saukville – Bain-Racine – Various – for Oak Creek generation expansion Planned System Additions • New Substations – Duplainville – Lannon Junction – Proposed generation site in Waukesha Co. Planned System Additions • Equipment Additions at Existing Substations: – Capacitor banks at Sussex substation – Capacitor banks at Tamarack substation – Replace transformers at Arcadian substation – Capacitor bank at Moorland substation Moving Ahead • What are the best ways to continue to coordinate and work with you? • Who else should we be coordinating with? • What else would you like to see from us? To Watch For • Planning Zone Meetings in July and August • Updated Ten Year Assessment in October • Planning Zone Meetings in November and December • Additional meetings and information as announced ATC Invites your Continued Input and Participation • Upcoming meeting notices, reports, and other planning process information will be posted on the new ATC Planning page found via the ATC web site at www.atcllc.com • New ATC Planning general e-mail address for your questions and comments: [email protected] • We are also open to suggestions for additional meetings with you and any other interested organizations to discuss and coordinate further. • The more information we have, the better! We want to know what you think, it will help to develop and refine our plans. Please offer any input you think might be revelent. Meeting is Adjourned We appreciate your time and input! Thank You