Transcript Document

Shifting Identities, Blurring
Boundaries: Changing Roles of
Professional Managers in Higher
Education
Dr Celia Whitchurch
Lecturer in Higher Education
Institute of Education
University of London
Centre for Higher
Education Studies
Contexts
• Large literature on academic identity
• Limited understandings about professional
staff identities
• These tended to focus on:
 Roles/structures
 Increased specialisation to deal with eg
legislative, audit and market demands
 Traditional view of ‘professionalisation’ as
eg accreditation; continuous professional
development; maintenance of standards
2
Focus of study
•More nuanced account of:
 Diversity and mobility of professional staff
 Interpretation of roles by individuals
 Blurring of functional and organisational
boundaries
•Conceptual framework of identity:
 The way individuals position themselves vis-avis given structures
 A reflexive process or project requiring the
active participation of the individual
3
Key findings
•Professional identities more complex than implied by
descriptions of roles and functions
•People distinguish themselves by the way that they
operate around organisational boundaries
•Also evidence that:
 The boundary between professional and
academic domains is becoming increasingly
blurred
 A ‘third space’ is being created between the two
4
Identity Strains and
Dispositions
Identity Categories
Characteristics
‘Bounded professionals’
Work within clear structural
boundaries (eg specialist function,
organisational location, job
description)
‘Cross-boundary professionals’
Actively use boundaries and crossboundary knowledge for strategic
advantage and institutional capacity
building
‘Unbounded professionals’
Lack of awareness of boundaries;
focus on broadly-based projects
across the university, and contribute to
institutional development
‘Blended professionals’
Dedicated appointments spanning
professional and academic domains
5
The Emergence of ‘Third
Space’
Professional Staff
Generalist
functions
(eg registry,
department/
school
management)
‘Perimeter’
roles eg
Outreach/study
skills
Specialist
functions
(eg finance,
human
resources)
Access/equity/
disability
‘Niche’ functions
(eg quality,
research
management
Community/
regional
partnership
6
Examples of Institutional Projects
The Student Transitions
Project
eg Life and welfare
Widening participation
Employability and
careers
The Partnership Project
eg Regional/community
development
Regeneration
Business/technology
incubation
The Professional
Development Project
eg Academic practice
Professional practice
Project management
Leadership/management
development
Multi-functional teams
“The Higher Education
Professional”
‘Perimeter’
roles eg
Academic Staff
Pastoral
support
Teaching/
curriculum
development for
non-traditional
students
Links with local
education
providers
Teaching
Research
‘Third leg’ eg
public service,
enterprise
The ‘Higher Education
Professional”?
• Mixed backgrounds, academic credentials
• Authority built on basis of own performance
– “… what you are and not what you represent”
– “… there’s no kind of authority that you come with”
• Ability to use ambiguity of ‘third space’ to advantage
– “Sometimes an academic unit, sometimes an
office”
•Portfolio careers/networks/partnerships, but
– How to combine with mainstream experience eg
line management, budgetary responsibility, so as
7 to achieve senior management role?
An International
Dimension: Australia
• Higher numbers with master’s/doctorates than UK
• Professional staff on time-limited contracts (up to 5
years)
• ‘Project consultant’ roles (concurrent, part-time
contracts)
• Evidence of potential for third space, though not
well-developed
• Self-reliant, innovative approach by individuals to
development of career pathways
8
An International Dimension:
The United States
•Higher numbers with master’s/doctorates than UK
•Mainstreaming of ‘blended’ roles in eg offices of
institutional research/student life
•Applied research: “a parallel set of researchers”
•Networks, conferences, publications
•Office internships/in-house master’s programmes
•Confidence/trust between professional and academic
staff
•More political environment (lobbying roles)
9
Indicators for the future?
•Changing concepts of professionalism:
– Less attention to boundaries
– Project and team working
– ‘Blended’ roles and identities
– Partnership between professional/academic
colleagues
– Applied, practitioner research
– Portfolio careers
•Increase in trust between professional and academic
10
staff…?