Overview of Title I, Part D Monitoring
Download
Report
Transcript Overview of Title I, Part D Monitoring
Overview of Title I, Part D Monitoring
Victoria Rankin, Greta Colombi, NDTAC
Chandra Martin, Arkansas Department of Education
1
Overview of Presentation
• Introduction to Monitoring Reviews
– What is monitoring review? Which programs are
monitored? Why is monitoring beneficial?
• Monitoring Review Processes
– Federal, subgrantee
• Conducting Monitoring Reviews
– Onsite, offsite
• Challenges to Subgrantee Monitoring Reviews
• Monitoring Tips From an SEA
• Resources
2
What Is Monitoring Review?
• Program monitoring involves the regular and
systematic examination of program implementation
and administration
• Monitoring of Title I, Part D (Part D)-funded
programs is conducted to ensure compliance with
applicable State and Federal laws
3
Which Programs Are Monitored?
Monitoring reviews occur at three levels:
• The U.S. Department of Education (ED) monitors
State educational agencies (SEAs) that receive
funds (Federal monitoring)
• SEAs monitor their State agency (SA) and local
educational agency (LEA) subgrantees (subgrantee
monitoring)
• SA and LEA subgrantees monitor the facilities and
programs to which they allocate funds (facility
monitoring)
4
Why Is Monitoring Beneficial?
• Allows administrators at all levels to ensure that
students receive a fair, equal, and significant
opportunity to obtain high-quality education/
programming
• Provides a mechanism for collecting information
about State and local needs to enable
administrators to target assistance and other
resources more effectively
5
Federal Monitoring
• Eight of the leading indicators were approved:
1. The percentage of long-term students served (90+ calendar days) who
have both pre- and posttest scores, Subpart 1
2. The percentage of long-term students served (90+ calendar days) who
have both pre- and posttest scores in reading, Subpart 2
3. The percentage of long-term students served (90+ calendar days) who
have both pre- and posttest scores in mathematics, Subpart 1
4. The percentage of long-term students served (90+ calendar days) who
have both pre- and posttest scores in mathematics, Subpart 2
6
Federal Monitoring (Cont.)
5. The percentage of students who enrolled in a school after exit from a
Title I, Part D program, Subpart 1
6. The percentage of students who enrolled in a school after exit from a
Title I, Part D program, Subpart 2
7. The percentage of students served earning high school course credits
up to 90 days after exit, Subpart 1
8. The percentage of students served earning high school course credits
up to 90 days after exit, Subpart 2
7
Federal Monitoring (Cont. 2)
ED will calculate baseline measures using SY 12−13
performance data by August or September 2014. As
part of this process, ED:
• Will ask about State and LEA performance on baseline
measures in performance-oriented monitoring questions
• The baseline measures will then inform ED’s technical
assistance (TA) and monitoring of States
– May identify which States and LEAs seem to be
underperforming on these indicators
– Will follow up with SEA staff to determine (1) if they are
aware of underperformance and (2) specific measures to
address it
8
Federal Monitoring (Cont. 3)
• There is increasing emphasis on having greater
collaboration between ED staff and States
– Using data for strategies that will lead to continuous
improvement of outcomes for students and programs
under Part D
• More information about these processes and
increased emphasis will be forthcoming in the next
fiscal year
9
Subgrantee Monitoring Review
• Per the Federal statute and regulations, SEAs
represented by State coordinators are required to:
– Monitor SA and LEA subgrantees’ implementation of
Part D-funded programs
– Implement a monitoring process that involves
conducting reviews on a set schedule and developing
related monitoring protocols and tools
• In turn, SAs and LEAs are responsible for
monitoring the facilities and programs to which they
allocate funds
10
Conducting Subgrantee Monitoring Reviews
• Often done through:
– Offsite review
Review documents (e.g., desktop review)
Administer self-assessment
– Onsite review
Review documents
Interview SAs, LEAs (if SEA administers Subpart 2),
and facilities
Reviews at facilities (e.g., classroom observations)
11
Conducting Offsite Monitoring
• Two primary methods:
– Desktop monitoring
SEA requests information/data, subgrantees submit,
and SEA determines compliance
– Self-assessment
Subgrantees complete and inform SEAs of compliance
12
Steps for Offsite Monitoring Process
1. Set offsite monitoring schedule
2. Determine what information/data to collect
3. Collect information/data
4. Review information/data
5. Respond to information/data
13
1. Set Offsite Monitoring Schedule
• In light of the onsite monitoring schedule, determine
how often do you need to conduct offsite
monitoring
• Consider the method(s) you plan on using and
when
14
2. Determine What Information/Data To
Collect
• Consider the requirements you wish to review
• Be sure to review if there is anything else you would
like to know, for example:
– Do you have questions based on your review of their
data and onsite monitoring results?
– Are there broader issues that you wish to
investigate?
15
3. Collect Information/Data
• Tools you will use:
– Forms
– Checklists
• Vehicles you will use
–
–
–
–
–
E-mail
Online system
Web-based survey
Video/phone conference
Other
16
4. Review Information/Data
• Check the information/data:
– Confirm receipt
– Confirm completeness
– Confirm quality
• Analyze the information/data:
– Identify isolated issues and/or problematic patterns
– Identify good examples that can be shared
17
5. Respond to Submitted Information/Data
• Response to identified findings:
– SEA writes official response/corrective action plan
– Subgrantee submits plan to address areas of
noncompliance
• Response to findings and other identified issues:
– Develop a tiered TA approach based on analyses of
results
Tier 1: TA for all
Tier 2: TA for some
Tier 3: TA for a few
18
Subgrantee Monitoring Challenges
• Onsite monitoring reviews tend to be short and
infrequent
• Staff turnover tends to be high
• Title I, Part D requirements can be challenging to
understand
• Offsite monitoring is often necessary, but can be
challenging without effective communication and tools
that help to
– Coordinate the receipt of materials
– Coordinate among your team of reviewers
– Address issues as they arise
19
Subgrantee Monitoring: Your Responsibilities
• Create subgrantee monitoring protocols and
guidelines
• Establish consistent monitoring “cycles” or
schedules
• Require corrective actions for subgrantees not in
compliance
• Ensure that LEAs and SAs are monitoring every
facility with which they have contracted for services
20
Tips for Subgrantee Monitoring
• Released in 2013
• Requested by State Title I, Part D (Part D)
coordinators 2012 NDTAC Conference
• Goals of the tip sheet:
– Embed a “youth- and staff-centered” framework in the
monitoring process
– Provide guidelines to capturing student and teacher
perspectives
– Help Part D coordinators secure additional
information during subgrantee monitoring
21
Types of Techniques To Gather Information
and Examples of Questions: Interviews
Technique
Definition
Examples of Questions
Involve one-on-one questioning of
individuals
School/Program Administrators
How do you monitor special education-related services, interventions, and support?
Can be structured (all participants
receive the same questions in the
same order during each respective
interview, with questions focused on a
specific goal) or unstructured
(questions are not presented in any
specific order or format and, although
the interviewer may have a specific
goal or focus, participants are allowed
to speak openly about any issue they
wish to discuss)
How do you ensure that all cumulative records are accurate and up-to-date?
How do you monitor transition services, inclusive of Transition Coordinators, to ensure that
transitions occur effectively?
Do you have any suggestions for improving transition services?
What are some ways in which positive behaviors are reinforced? Is there a schoolwide or
facilitywide behavioral management system operating in the school or facility? If so, please
describe.
How do you ensure youth are enrolled in appropriate credit-bearing courses?
How do you ensure quality education services are offered to all students?
Interviews
Can be conducted face-to-face (with
staff and youth) or by telephone (with
staff)
22
Types of Techniques To Gather Information
and Examples of Questions: Questionnaires
Technique
Questionnaires
Definition
Examples of Questions
Also referred to as surveys
Students
Involve the random selection of
approximately 20–30 percent of
students and 50 percent of teachers
Do you feel your teachers are teaching you what you need to know?
Do you feel teachers in your school try to help you?
Was your class placement or schedule discussed with you on your first day of school?
Can be by either pen and paper or
online
Do you receive a copy of your report card?
Should have only small groups of
students (15 or less) take it at once
to minimize misbehavior or
disruptions
Have you talked to someone about how you will transition to or return home and re-enroll in
school?
Do you expect to continue your education when you are released?
Should be read by a facilitator to
students to ensure that they are
understood
Teachers
Are you certified by the State Educational Agency to teach in the area of instruction that is
assigned to you?
For this school year, how many hours or days have you participated in inservice or professional
development training?
Do you look forward to reporting to work?
Would you say that, in this school, teachers are encouraged and have the opportunity to support
and challenge students to achieve?
Do you encourage your students to aspire to go to college, vocational training, or some other form
of higher education?
Do you use interventions to help students with their behaviors?
Are career and technical education (vocational education) portfolios developed for all of your
students?
23
Types of Techniques To Gather Information
and Examples of Questions: Focus Groups
Technique
Definition
Examples of Questions
Students
Focus
Groups
Require participation of at least 5–10
individuals randomly selected to
participate in a group discussion
Student focus groups should include
most academic placement groups
(e.g., high school, GED, special
education, career/technical/
vocational education)
Teacher focus groups should
represent most instructional groups
(e.g., high school, GED, special
education, career/technical/
vocational education)
Do you feel your school is preparing you for life, a job, and further education?
How would you improve discipline in your school? What incentives are there to encourage positive
behaviors?
What would you do to make the school better?
Do you know the principal of the school?
Is there an adult in the school or facility that you can go to if you have a problem? (The intent is to
determine if there is an adult in the school or facility that the student trusts)
Teachers
What are you doing to prepare each of your students for statewide testing?
What are you doing to enhance and supplement classroom instruction? How do you motivate your
students?
What suggestions do you have for improving the instructional process?
How are transitional needs being addressed for regular as well as special populations?
Do you have any suggestions for how to improve transition services?
How are inservice training needs being met? What has been most beneficial?
24
Monitoring TIPs From an SEA
• Chandra Martin
Program Advisor, Arkansas Department of Education
State Title I, Part D Coordinator
25
Questions About Subgrantee Monitoring?
?
26
Resources
• Guide to Meeting Compliance Requirements for the
Title I, Part D, Program, available on the NDTAC website
• ND Communities’ Monitoring and Compliance topic page
for examples of subgrantee monitoring forms and
protocols from many States
• Federal Monitoring Forms—available under “Monitoring
Indicators” on the ED Web site
http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/monitoring/
index.html
• NDTAC’s Tips for Subgrantee Monitoring
http://www.neglecteddelinquent.org/sites/default/files/Monitor_Tipsheet_
2013_508%20FINAL.pdf
• Your NDTAC State Liaison!
27