Transcript Slide 1

Working together for clean air
Option: customize this presentation to
your audience (i.e. construction dust,
asbestos, etc.) by placing a topical photo
over this photo. Be sure to match your
new photo to this photo’s size, use the
“Crop” tool (looks like barbed wire) in
the “Picture” tool bar to remove the part
of your picture that is too wide or too
long. Delete this box before presenting
(left click in the box, then click on the
hash-mark border, then click “Delete”).
Central Puget
Sound Diesel
Emission Reduction
Program
Dave Kircher
Manager, Air Resources
Department
June 7, 2007
Presentation Overview
How we got started
Five year funding from the
WA Legislature
How we are implementing the
program
Next steps toward
sustainable funding
History of the Puget Sound Diesel Solutions
Program
A local program developed in
collaboration with EPA’s National
Voluntary Retrofit Program
Focused on introducing cleaner
fuels and emission retrofits on
diesel engines in the four central
Puget Sound counties
Began in early 2001, starting with
EPA and local fleet funding
Initial focus on transit fleets,
school buses and other municipal
vehicles
WA State Funding for School Buses
Senate Bill 6072 passed in 2003.
Our Agency and our lobbyist
promoted this legislation
Provides $25 million statewide over
five years
Initially focused on retrofitting school
buses
In 2005, House Bill 1397 amended
program to allow the funds to be used
for all public diesel equipment
Program extended until 2020. Current
funding expires 2008
Additional State funding has been
available from Governor’s Budget
Diesel Solutions Program Implementation
School buses
Transit fleets
Municipal fleets
Marine-related projects
Rail
Solid waste trucks
Other
Diesel Solutions Program Implementation
(continued)
 A major implementation challenge has been timely
installation of retrofits
 Agency worked with Ecology to develop a statewide
contract (one contractor) and developed competitive
contracts of our own for some individual projects.
 With half the school buses in the State, our Agency
needed a better contracting tool
 For school buses, we developed a “master contract”
with four installation firms. We issue work orders
under this contract for specific projects.
Sustainable Funding
 Since state funding sunsets July 1, 2008, Agency and
Ecology co-sponsored a Diesel Funding Task Force in
the Summer of 2006
 Diverse representation
 Task force felt that up to $20 million annually was
needed
 Considered a variety of revenue options including title
transfer fees, motor vehicle excise tax, battery and/or
tire tax, and a carbon/emission tax.
Sustainable Funding (continued)
 During the past legislative session, Agency and partners
developed an “omnibus” clean air and clean fuels bill.
 Aimed at both climate and diesel emission reduction
 HB 1303 passed legislature without diesel funding since the
lawmakers could not decide on a source of funding.
 Bill does enhance the diesel program... accelerated school bus
replacement program, specifically addresses private fleets, gives
Ports authority to provide retrofit grants to their tenants.
 We will be working on long term funding in 2008 session.
Conclusions, Next Steps
 Diesel Solutions has been a very successful
voluntary/incentive program
 State funding has helped and has been leveraged with
federal grants and partner contributions
 Sustainable funding like TERP and Carl Moyer are still
necessary and will be pursued in 2008
 The Agency is also developing a diesel risk reduction
strategy which will include criteria for project
selection in anticipation of sustained funding
Thanks!