Transcript Slide 1

SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11
AND BEYOND
CONSULTATION
JANUARY 2010
Dedicated School Grant
Pupil Referral Service
SEN
Independent Special School Fees
Se
rv
ic
e
s
MFGs are 81% of total DSG
ars 4%
Early Ye
School Related Contingencies 1%
LA
9%
Schools
Delegated
Budgets
86%
Every Child = £3,881 of DSG
for 09/10
No of Pupils x Guaranteed
Funding Unit = Total DSG
DSG Centrally Controlled Budget
2009/10
Pupil Referral
School
Contingencies
Bus Mangt
Contribution/
CYPD Support
Behaviour
Support
Hospital & Home
Education
Advisory
Teacher Service
School
Improvements
Threshold
payments
Service
SEN
Early Years
Children's
Centres
Independent
Special Schools/
Recoupment
Budget 2010/11
Proposals:
• Minimum Funding Guarantee + 2.1%
• Personalisation/SEN + £2.1m
• Suspend MFG for schools over 100% needsled funding
• Changes to SEN funding
•Broadband
•Post-16
Funding 2011/12 and 2012/13
Chancellor’s pre-budget statement:
•1.6% p.a. increase in costs
To be met by:
•0.7% p.a. increase in funding
•0.9% p.a. efficiency saving
Position on specific grants and DSG
generally not known
Medium Term Outlook
£ Billions
Forecast
of public spending and income
700
650
600
550
500
450
400
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
Receipts
Expenditure
The Gloucestershire Context
•Low funding
•Wide range in funding per pupil
•Funding per pupil increases significantly for schools with
intakes below 20 (primary) and 120 (secondary)
•Funding exceptionally low for Key
Stage 4
•Base allocation, SF and MFG all act as subsidies for small
schools
•Not clear about impact of NLF
•SEN funding used to cover core costs
•Attainment levels high at “headline” level but …
Deconstructing
The Individual Schools Budget
DECONSTRUCTING
THE INDIVIDUAL SCHOOLS BUDGET
The Individual Schools Budget
GLOUCESTERSHIRE LOCAL AUTHORITY
PRIMARY SCHOOL BUDGETS
Age-weighted funding
Social and Special Needs
Total Site-specific factors
Total School-specific factors
Budget adjustments
Minimum funding guarantee
Standards Grant/Fund
Threshold and Performance Pay
£11,800
FUNDING PER PUPIL
£9,800
£7,800
£5,800
£3,800
£1,800
-£200
Infant
Junior
Primary
TYPE OF SCHOOL
The Impact Of Very Low AWPUs On
Performance At the End On Key Stage 4
Minimum
Median
Maximum
Gloucestershire
Gloucestershire
Rank
5 or more
A*-C
Grades –
inc En and
Ma
5 or more
A*-C
Grades
5 or more
A*-G
Grades
Average
Points
score
KS2 – KS4
Contextual
Value
Added
29.6
47.7
67.2
56.8
51.2
64.2
79.1
67.6
83.0
92.9
97.7
93.5
341.9
390.9
454.9
392.6
978.6
1001.6
1022.3
993.8
17th
36th
52nd
66th
135th
SEN – the problem
•Increasing reliance on statements:
- SA + nos. low
- rising cost of statements
•Current funding model not sustainable
•Rising nos. and costs of out-county
placements
•Focus on ASD and BESD
SEN Funding Strategy
SEN delegation in 2003/4 produced only initial decline in statements
13
The Vicious Circle
Higher SEN
spend
schools
Low funded
mainstream
schools
Higher
SEN/PRS
spend
central
Use of SEN
funds for
core
functions
Increase in
statements/
exclusions
14
Strategic Priorities
1. Develop strategic planning and
communications.
2. Optimise the impact of funding available
for schools.
3. Advise Cabinet, schools and government
on the impact of a reducing budget.
4. Reprofile SEN spending to improve
outcomes.
5. Ensuring value for money.
Budget 2010/11
DSG proposals:
•Avoid unaffordable commitments
•Meet unavoidable SEN costs
•Introduce “top up” funding for statements
•Allocate reduction in statementing costs back
to schools
•Develop specialist ASD expertise in
secondary schools
•Suspend MFG for schools > 100% NLF
Impact on Individual Schools
• Key variables:
- pupil numbers
- specific grants
• 2010/11 –roughly standstill
• 2011/12 and 2012/13 – real terms
reductions
• 2013/14 and beyond – further significant
reductions
Impact on DSG of Reducing Pupil Numbers
82,397
81,800
81,001
Consultation Questions
1. What are the particular concerns confronting
your school over the next 3 to 5 years?
2. Do you agree with the strategic priorities
identified by the Schools Forum?
3. Do you agree with the SEN proposals on:
- statementing
- ASD
- accountability for SEN spending
4. Comments on budget proposals for 2010/11
including the suspension of MFG.