Transcript Slide 1
www.antaresgroupinc.com Combined Heat and Power (CHP) ENERGY 2014 Orlando, Florida July 23, 2014 Christopher Lindsey [email protected] (301) 731-1900 ext. 216 www.antaresgroupinc.com Presentation Outline • How to Start Off Right • Feasibility Study (go/no go) – Case Study Information • Development Tips • You Probably Already Know – Something about CHP technologies – Why CHP is important www.antaresgroupinc.com Start Right – Energy Measurements • Measure Your Energy Use! – Investment Grade Audit by an INDEPENDENT third party • Why is this critical? – Project sizing driven by your energy loads – Engineering estimates can be problematic – Oversizing equals underused capital and lower operating efficiency – Under sizing equals operational issues and reduced savings. www.antaresgroupinc.com Start Right – Energy Measurements • Know your thermal energy loads in as much detail as you can afford – You will NEVER regret good information about your loads – If your meters or submeters don’t work – fix them – If you don’t have meters – consider data logging for a limited time – budget for it! – If you have distribution/condensate system problems – know what is fixable and what is not – Understand existing steam/hot water boiler performance as best as possible – Make a list of thermal energy savings measures that might be good to implement before CHP project www.antaresgroupinc.com Start Right – Energy Measurements • Know your electrical loads – Try to collect some detailed information on big loads (like chillers). When did they run, how much energy being used, etc. – Ask your utility about interval data – Consider sub-meters or smart meters where it makes sense – Collect data from Building Management Systems – Make a list of electrical energy savings measures needed before CHP project will be implemented www.antaresgroupinc.com Start Right – Energy Measurements • Cross Check Data – Develop facility performance metrics and cross check results with utility bills, correct for weather – That includes: • Electric • Gas • Fuel Oil • and Water! – Good time to cross check bill against interval data too Hopefully it won’t be as hard as this guy thinks it is www.antaresgroupinc.com Start Right – Energy Measurements • But isn’t this the ESCO’s problem? • Don’t you believe it! – Energy Service Agreements may have minimum take requirements, protections against energy cost changes or other clauses that place risk back onto host – When major things go wrong ESCO may or may not be on the hook to fix them (contract). • Load/operational changes • Facility side equipment failures – What about ESCO bankruptcy / financial trouble? www.antaresgroupinc.com Warning Litigation: A machine which you go into as a pig and come out of as a sausage. – Ambrose Bierce www.antaresgroupinc.com Step 1 – Feasibility Study • Key Elements – Define Objectives/Standards – Review Energy Loads – Preliminary Techno/Economic Screening – Selection of Technologies for Analysis – Detailed Performance Estimate – Life Cycle Cost Analysis – Technology Selection (Go/No Go) www.antaresgroupinc.com Renewable Energy Targets - Sample FY 13 Electricity Consumption 16,810 MWh EPACT Mandate (2013 and beyond) Renewable Energy Purchase (7.5%) 1,261 MWh On-site Renewable Energy Generation (3.75%) 630 MWh Renewable Energy Targets from Presidential Memorandum 2015 Target: Renewable Energy Purchase (10%) On-site Renewable Energy Generation (5%) 2020 Target: Renewable Energy Purchase (20%) On-site Renewable Energy Generation (10%) 1,681 MWh 840.5 MWh 3,362 MWh 1,681 MWh www.antaresgroupinc.com Thermal Load Analysis www.antaresgroupinc.com Electric Load Analysis www.antaresgroupinc.com Screening Analysis/Selection www.antaresgroupinc.com Detailed Performance Estimate • Detailed bin or 8760 hourly analysis • Back-up energy supply requirements • Detailed review of tariff impacts – Special attention to change in tariff and demand charge changes • Detailed review of environmental/regulatory changes – DEC, Historic Preservation, habitat www.antaresgroupinc.com Small CT Example www.antaresgroupinc.com GHG Analysis Net GHG Emissions Change (MT CO2e) Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Scope 1 Scope 2 2,876 2,146 3,219 3,917 -5,053 -2,481 -4,444 -7,856 www.antaresgroupinc.com Life Cycle Cost Analysis • More than ENERGY SAVINGS! • For Federal Facilities – Typically use BLCC guidance which dictates • Discount rates • Inflation rates • Escalation rates for electricity and natural gas • Includes Status Quo • Alternative Financing Option Review – UESC, EUL, ESCO, Direct Fund www.antaresgroupinc.com This is not an LCCA www.antaresgroupinc.com Final Selection • MUST PRIORITIZE WHAT’S IMPORTANT – Economics (usually, but not always)? – Meeting Agency/Facility energy intensity, GHG, sustainability goals? – Improved operations? – Showcase? • WARNING – if Economics – be sure to review the economic assumptions carefully! www.antaresgroupinc.com EIA Gas/Electricity Prices Annual escalation ~ 2% per year @ 3%, 2040 would equal 31 cents/kWh In some states, actual escalation over past 20 years was less www.antaresgroupinc.com So You Think You Have a Project… • Ideally Feasibility Study will be used to generate bid specification documents • Start RFP process • Selecting a Contractor • Negotiating Contract • Construction, Start-up • YEAR 1 Operation www.antaresgroupinc.com Development Tips • Use and Independent Engineer even if planning a Turnkey-EPC type project – Feasibility Study – Design (maybe) – Commissioning – Monitoring and Verification – Arbitration/Litigation • Get input from your O&M staff and make them stakeholders in the entire process www.antaresgroupinc.com Development Tips • Understand ALL of the possible project development options – Third party ESA has lots of advantages-but there are other options – Design/Build, Build Own Operate Transfer? • Understand project risks and your tolerance – How different is the new project from what you your O&M staff are used to dealing with – Is this a bleeding edge technology (plasma-arc waste gasification with a recip engine?) www.antaresgroupinc.com Contract, Contract, Contract • IF YOU ARE GOING TO OWN IT - write an Owner’s Requirement Document that provides cover • Understand your contract leverage, how it changes over time--be stingy • Change Orders should be limited to cosmetic, minor things YOU change your mind on • Understand minimum takes, price risk pass through, warranty claim limitations, contractor liability. • SPEND SOME MONEY HERE! Early in Project Owner PAID Contractor OUT Late in Project Owner Contractor www.antaresgroupinc.com Contract, Contract, Contract • If you are not going to own it… – Think like a banker! – Imagine the unimaginable (both sides of fence) • Strikes, natural disasters, Contractor financial trouble • Not everything you think of will be reasonable to protect against, but not everything you do won’t – Protect yourself for performance failures • Ensure you can walk away or control your fate • Be prepared for ligation – What is your back-up plan if Contractor pulls the plug or “new” system fails? www.antaresgroupinc.com What about Biomass CHP? • • • • • Can accommodate a baseload Geographically diverse resource Can be cost competitive Well established options/technologies RENEWABLE Energy Mandates www.antaresgroupinc.com Biomass CHP in the US-for now • District heating – displace higher cost fuels such as #2 oil with woody biomass • For C&I applications (< 5 MW, i.e. hospital, college / university, manufacturing facility)- Close coupled gasifiers with medium pressure steam driving back pressure steam turbine • For larger C&I applications (> 5 MW, i.e. pulp mill, large district heating system) – Fixed bed / fluidized bed gasifiers with higher pressure steam www.antaresgroupinc.com What Biomass Fuel Are You Using? As Received Basis Sample Type Sawdust (Green) Poultry Litter Whole Tree Chip Willow Energy Crop Corn Stover Stumpage Ground Pallets C&D Debris Switchgrass Sawdust (Dry) RTA Wood Wax Cardboard Btu/lb* 4,150 4,637 5,229 6,044 6,385 6,647 6,814 6,939 7,370 7,379 7,864 10,065 MCW^ 52.63 27.40 38.68 29.13 22.00 9.82 19.18 18.77 7.88 11.40 7.04 14.08 Carbon 24.17 27.22 32.35 35.61 36.27 40.77 42.13 42.91 44.70 45.18 46.19 42.92 Hydrogen 2.75 3.72 3.68 3.60 4.53 4.39 4.95 5.11 5.57 5.34 4.98 7.98 Nitrogen 0.22 2.69 0.28 0.33 0.44 0.57 0.34 0.36 0.29 0.40 3.27 0.18 Sulfur 0.02 0.33 0.02 0.02 0.09 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.20 Ash 1.96 15.70 0.71 1.33 5.77 14.99 0.80 0.88 4.53 2.51 0.97 1.56 * Higher Heating Value ^ Moisture Content Wet Basis • Runaway if someone tells you that their technology works equally well with any fuel! Oxygen 18.25 23.10 24.28 29.98 30.94 29.40 32.57 31.91 36.98 35.10 37.47 33.08 www.antaresgroupinc.com Conclusions • CHP projects can be a viable opportunity • Usually – Require high electricity prices, lowish gas prices to make work (spark spread) – Best projects in the presence of good information about loads (current, planned) – Lots of options to choose from – pick one that is appropriate to your operation – The more level your steam load – the better – Get outside help if you can www.antaresgroupinc.com Conclusions • Biomass is a special case – Need the space – Higher O&M – Works best displacing fuel oil or high priced gas – Longer development time • Make sure to include the “hassle factor” • Brace yourself for Year 1 www.antaresgroupinc.com www.antaresgroupinc.com