Transcript Document
Environmental Compliance Hot Topics Hardwood Plywood Veneer Association May 25, 2010 Today’s Top 2 •SPCC •Boiler MACT Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule SPCC Rule • This impacts me if I have: – An underground storage of greater than 42,000 gallons; or – An aboveground storage of greater than 1,320 gallons (only container of 55 gallons or greater are counted); and – Due to location, could reasonably be expected to discharge oil in quantities that may be harmful into or upon “navigable waters” of the U.S. – Must exclude consideration of manmade features like dikes, equipment and/or other structures SPCC Rule Revisions • On November 5, 2009, EPA issued revisions to the SPCC Rule • The new deadline for compliance with the rule is November 10, 2010 • Expect to see increased inspection presence from EPA • Typical fines for not having a plan $1000-$7000 • If you have a release- escalates to the cost of cleanup, and $$$$ in fines Action to Take Now • Prepare and/or Update your SPCC plan • Follow the plan • Remember- compliance date is November 10, 2010 Proposed Boiler MACT What Happened? • On April 29, 2010 EPA issued a proposed rule that would reduce toxic air pollutants from boilers and process heaters • Provisions in the rule cover- essentially all boilers • Currently proposed rule is out for public comment. Will this Impact Me? • If you have a boiler-YES • If you plan on installing a boiler –YES Best Scenario • You do not have a boiler • Your existing boiler is Natural gas fired only (exempt) • Your existing boiler is small in size (<10 MMBTU/HR) • You have a temporary boiler only (operates less than 180 consecutive days)(exempt) What’s Required for the Best Scenario • Biennial Tune-up – Inspect the burner-clean or replace components as necessary – Inspect the flame pattern-make adjustments to optimize – Inspect the system controlling the air-to-fuel ratio, and ensure calibrated and functioning properly – Minimize the CO emissions following manufacturer specifications – Measure CO emissions before and after adjustments • Annual Report Most Stringent Scenario • You are a HAPS major source – Emit 10 tons or more of an individual HAP – Emit 25 tons or more of combined HAPs • Focus on reductions for carbon monoxide, particulate, HCl, Mercury, and dioxin/furans. • Standards are based on the fuel type for all parameters and both fuel type and boiler design for dioxin/furans and carbon monoxide standards. What’s Required for the Most Stringent Scenario? • • • • Installation of Continuous Monitors Installation of Controls Energy Assessment Initial and Annual Source Testing ($20-$30K) Most Common Scenario • You are not a HAPS Major but an “AREA SOURCE” – Emit less than 10 tons per year of any individual HAP – Emit less than 25 tons per year of any combination of HAPs • Boilers are greater than 10 MMBTU/HR* *(We’re not looking at coal for this scenario) What’s Required for the Most Common Scenario? • Initial and Annual Source Testing for Carbon Monoxide ($2500-$3000) • New limits for particulate and CO for new sources of oil and biomass • Particulate, CO, and mercury for coal sources • New limits for Carbon Monoxide for existing sources – Will require “Generally Achievable Control Technology” (GACT). – Methods, practices and techniques are commercially available and appropriate • Energy Assessment Energy Assessment Requirements • Energy assessment must be performed by qualified personnel • A qualified specialist is someone: – Who has successfully completed the Department of Energy’s Qualified Specialist Program for all systems or – A professional engineer certified as a Certified Energy Manager by the Association of Energy Engineers. Energy Assessment Requirements • Complete a visual inspection and review of the boiler system. • Establish operating parameters of the facility energy systems • Identify the high energy sources, conservation measures, and potential savings • Prepare a comprehensive report detailing the ways to improve efficiency, the cost of specific improvements, benefits, and the timeline Other Changes Proposed for the Boilers • Proposed standards vary based on the fuel type • EPA is proposing either daily or monthly standards • Sources w/o wet scrubbers that have particulate and mercury emission limits will require continuous opacity monitors • Sources electing fuel sampling to comply with the mercury standard are required to sample monthly • Recordkeeping and compliance reporting requirements Compliance Timeline • The final rule is to be complete by December 16, 2010. • Compliance is required three years following the date of publication of the final rule. Ways to send comments… • Email: [email protected] • Fax: 202-566-9744 • Mail: EPA Docket Center Environmental Protection Agency Mailcode: 2822T 1200 Pensylvania Av., NW Washington, DC 20460 DOCKET- ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790 Separate but Related Action • EPA has proposed updated definitions of nonhazardous wastes and fuels with respect to boilers dictating how a unit is regulated under the boiler MACT • Majority of the fuels we use are clean biomass. • If the fuels are under the control of the generator and not contaminated will be considered nonhazardous solid waste. • Concerns-with the treated wood, painted wood, construction debris with contaminants, and materials generated somewhere else. Heather Bartlett Principal Engineer SLR International Corp Address: 1800 Blankenship Road, Suite 440, West Linn, OR 97068 Office: (503) 723-4423 Facsimile: (503) 723-4436 Email: [email protected] Website: www.slrconsulting.com