Transcript Document

Placeholder image borrowed
from the web
The Future of Work
In Pennsylvania
This presentation is best viewed on a screen, scrolling through
the powerpoint. Printouts will show repetition in slides. Text in the
“notes” section helps explain many of the slides.
Work is changing
 Robots and automation
 A networked economy
 Continued productivity increases
 Near-zero marginal cost for goods from
pharmaceuticals to video games to online
college classes has potentially significant
implications for production and wages
 A “sharing economy” poses both threats and
opportunities
 The degree of public interest in “the future of
work” shows an openness to different economic
structures that is exciting to engage
Implications for
 Job quality, including wages and working
conditions
 Who gets which jobs
 Do we all work less, or do some work more and
some not at all?
 Education needed for jobs…and, changing jobs
to take advantage of increased education
 Income polarization or a broad middle class?
The labor force is changing,
too
 Discussion has often focused on the changing
nature of jobs
 Let’s look, as well, at the changing labor force.
What can we expect in Pennsylvania over the
next 30 years?
Population is expected to grow,
but with a smaller share in working age
(working age=20-65 years old)
14
70%
12
Total population
65%
10
Millions
60%
60%
8
Ratio of Working
Age to Total
6
55%
55%
50%
4
actual
2
45%
projected
0
40%
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
Pennsylvania 2010 to 2040 projected change:
• Total population: 4%
• 65 and older: 42%
• 70 and older 50%
Projections are based a study from the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service's
Demographics & Workforce Group at the University of Virginia
Population is expected to grow,
but with a smaller share in working age
14
70%
12
Total population
65%
10
Millions
60%
60%
8
Ratio of Working
Age to Total
6
55%
55%
50%
4
actual
2
45%
projected
0
40%
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
Implications
• Higher productivity needed from a smaller labor force?
• Higher share of working-age people in the labor force?
• Changing idea of “working age?”
Population is expected to grow,
but with a smaller share in working age
14
70%
12
Total population
65%
10
Millions
60%
60%
8
Ratio of Working
Age to Total
6
55%
55%
50%
4
actual
2
45%
projected
0
40%
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
What could change the projection?
Domestic migration
Immigration
Not much else (fertility rate & longevity change slowly & predictably)
It is hard to imagine change in PA on the
scale some states have seen
35
If PA grows at the
rate fast-growing
states did over
the past 30 years
30
Millions
25
Standard (baseline)
projection for PA
20
15
If PA grows at the
rate slow-growing
states did over
the past 30 years
10
actual
5
projected
0
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
Domestic migration and immigration make a big difference. Aging population
does as well.
The five fastest-growing states over the past 30 years more than doubled in
population, something hard to imagine in Pennsylvania. The five slowest-growing
states over the past 30 years averaged very close to the projection for PA over
the next 30 years.
It is hard to imagine change in PA on the
scale some states have seen
35
If PA grows at the
rate fast-growing
states did over
the past 30 years
30
Millions
25
Standard
projection
20
15
If PA grows at the
rate fast-growing
states did over
the past 30 years
10
actual
5
projected
0
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
Still, keep in mind that, as philosophers from Niels Bohr to Yogi
Berra have said:
“It’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future.”
It is hard to imagine change in PA on the
scale some states have seen
35
If PA grows at the
rate fast-growing
states did over
the past 30 years
30
Millions
25
Standard
projection
20
15
If PA grows at the
rate fast-growing
states did over
the past 30 years
10
actual
5
projected
0
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
Could anything realistically make the fast growth projection
happen?
Climate change repopulating upstate cities, as the coasts
and Southwest become less attractive?
Is the education shortfall in the labor
force…or in the jobs?
College degree
actual
projected
We often hear that future workers will need more education to compete. No doubt it’s good
advice to invest in education. But, the jobs that the Bureau of Labor Statistics projects will be in
Pennsylvania in 10 years don’t require even as much education as workers already have.
Maybe the focus should be on restructuring jobs so that they make better use of the
education—and potential productivity—of workers?
Is the education shortfall in the labor
force…or in the jobs?
Less than High School
actual
projected
27%
27%
Share of the labor
force with less
than a high
school degree
23%
14%
10%
1980
1990
2000
8%
2010
Share of jobs
requiring less than
a high school
degree
7%
2012
2022
A quarter of jobs in Pennsylvania require less than a high school degree…and that number is
note projected to shrink
How do we improve wages in those jobs, make sure there are career ladders up from them,
and urge on the public, private and nonprofit sectors a “good jobs” business model so that
there is a better match between the skills of the labor force and the jobs available?
Top 10 fastest growing jobs projected for
Pennsylvania
2012 to 2022
1. Registered Nurses
2. Home Health Aides
3. Personal Care Aides
4. Food Preparation and Serving Workers (incl. Fast Food)
5. Heavy and Tractor-Trailer Truck Drivers
6. Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand
7. Secretaries and Administrative Assistants (except legal, medical, and
executive)
8. Carpenters
9. Customer Service Representatives
10. Nursing Assistants
Projected Change in Race/Ethnicity of PA Population
actual
Other, 4%
Asian, 3%
Black, 11%
projected
Other, 8%
Asian, 5%
Black, 12%
White, 82%
2010
White, 75%
2040
Despite some issues with the definitions here, we can see:
 A growing Asian population
 Black population is about the same size
 A shrinking white population
 All races includes increasing numbers of Hispanic immigrants
Projected Change in Race/Ethnicity of PA Population
actual
2%
1%
99%
1980
98%
1990
projected
3%
6%
7%
97%
94%
93%
91%
89%
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
9%
11%
Hispanic
Non-Hispanic
 The biggest changes in race/ethnic categories is expected to come from Hispanic
immigration and the birth of children to Hispanic families
Projected Change in Race/Ethnicity of PA Population
actual
2%
1%
99%
1980
98%
1990
projected
3%
6%
7%
97%
94%
93%
91%
89%
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
9%
11%
Hispanic
Non-Hispanic
 If there is a big gap in educational attainment for Hispanics, the growing Hispanic share of
population should make us redouble our efforts to close these gaps
 While the black population share is not projected to grow substantially, closing the
education gap is critical to a sustainable social, political, and economic environment
Projected Change in Race/Ethnicity of PA Population
actual
2%
1%
99%
1980
98%
1990
projected
3%
6%
7%
97%
94%
93%
91%
89%
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
9%
11%
Hispanic
Non-Hispanic
 Hispanics and African Americans have considerably lower wages in Pennsylvania today,
even after adjusting for level of educational attainment. As the non-white share of the
population increases, what will it mean for our economy if we don’t close those gaps, too?
Immigration in Pennsylvania
There are no current state-based population projections,
but here’s Pennsylvania’s long-term history
14
12
20%
Immigrant share of
population
10
16%
14%
12%
8
Population in Millions
18%
6
10%
Foreignborn
8%
U.S.-born
6%
4
4%
2
2%
0
0%
1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2013
Immigrants make up six percent of Pennsylvania’s population, a little up from the 1990 lowpoint of three percent. Note that recent growth in Pennsylvania’s population is due almost
entirely to immigrants.
In the United States as a whole, immigrants made up 13 percent of the population in 2013
Two estimates of immigration at the national level
Census Bureau 2008
Pitkin Myers
Immigration policy is one of the most contentious issues in Washington, making future policy
particularly hard to predict
Other “push” and “pull” factors will also determine immigration levels—economic and social
conditions in immigrant sending countries and in the United States
How will immigrants fit into
the Pennsylvania economy?
Three possible scenarios
1) A “Gloves Off” economy
 Continued large numbers of unauthorized immigrants
 Big areas of the labor market that are largely unregulated
How will immigrants fit into
the Pennsylvania economy?
Three possible scenarios
1) A “Gloves Off” economy
2) An official system of a 2nd class labor force
 Guest workers
 Expansion of skilled temporary work (H1-B and related)
 Long pathway to citizenship for some; no pathway for many
 More and more categories of non-citizens, temporary workers
but not citizens
How will immigrants fit into
the Pennsylvania economy?
Three possible scenarios
1) A “Gloves Off” economy
2) An official system of a 2nd class labor force
3) A better regulated labor market
 Few unauthorized immigrants
 Legal flows that respond to labor market demands, plus family
unification and refugee programs
 Maximizing benefits of diversity, wide talent pool, people’s
eagerness to be part of the US
 …while keeping pressure to increase wages, invest in higher
education, invest in technology to increase productivity
How will immigrants fit into
the Pennsylvania economy?
Three possible scenarios
1) A “Gloves Off” economy
2) An official system of a 2nd class labor force
3) Immigration reform and a better regulated labor market
It’s obvious which scenario is preferable, but how do we get there?
Top 1 Percent Share of Income in US
40%
35%
30%
25%
1929
24%
2006
24%
20%
15%
10%
United States
5%
1914
1918
1922
1926
1930
1934
1938
1942
1946
1950
1954
1958
1962
1966
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
0%
 The United States is already more polarized than it has been since just before the Great
Depression of the 1930s
 How much more polarization can we sustain?
What is the future of work?
An opportunity to think differently
• Changes in the nature of work give us the opportunity to think
differently about growth
• Policies and practices we put in place today can help shift how the
future looks
What new technologies and business models mean for workers depends
on us
• The future economy can be more equitable than the current one. But,
we will have to make conscious choices to continually push in that
direction. Otherwise, current inequities may be carried into the future or
even exacerbated.
• New technologies that allow for less work can give us a chance to work
less and share work more evenly, while also accommodating a lower
share of the population that is in working age.
• We can look for ways to build career ladders, put people’s increasing
levels of education to productive use, and make sure that the sharing
economy does not mean a race to the bottom for wages and working
conditions, but instead means an increased opportunity to earn a
decent living.