Transcript 2009-2010 Federal Budget

Federal Budget Overview
Presentation to the
Providence School Board
January 14, 2013
FY12-13 Context for Federal Budget
PPSD VISION AND MISSION
 VISION: The Providence Public School District will
be a national leader in educating urban youth.
 MISSION: The Providence Public School District will
prepare all students to succeed in the nation’s
colleges and universities, and in their chosen
professions.
FY12-13 Context for Federal Budget
PPSD STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESS
 Engaged Students and Families.
-Provide all students and families with access to excellent schools and prepare all students for
success in their post-secondary endeavors.
 Highly Effective Educators.
-Promote high expectations and support and support the growth and development of teachers,
leaders, and staff.
 Student-Centered Instruction.
-Implement a rigorous and engaging curriculum and provide rich learning opportunities at all
grade levels and in all content areas.
 Systems that Work.
-Build, refine, and create systems that support high-quality teaching and learning.
 Collaborative Community.
-Foster rich and meaningful partnerships with members of district community promoting a shared
investment in Providence’s youth.
Federal Budget as Percentage of PPSD Funds
Federal Funds as Percentage of Total
Budget
Federal
Total Budget,
$387,226,619
(87%)
Total Budget
Federal
$58,150,663
(13%)
Note:
Local Budget
= $329,075,956
FY13-14: Challenges
 Federal budget expected to be lower next year than this year



Funding for federal programs is determined by using the most recent population and poverty counts of children
residing in each jurisdiction, as determined by the by U.S. Census.
The amount of funding each district receives is influenced by the change in the poverty level in each district as
compared to the change in poverty levels of the entire nation; thus, a rise in poverty levels in non-urban school
districts would result in a reduction in the amount of funding in urban areas as the same amount of national
funding must be shared with a larger number of districts.
Funding notification from RIDE typically occurs in March or April of each year
 Fourteen (14) more schools identified as being in need of intervention
 Staffing: Over reliance on federal funding for administrative positions
 Sequestration: The automatic across-the-board cuts for most federal programs
and activities have been delayed for two months


The mini-deal between Congress and the Administration resolves many of the tax portions of the Fiscal Cliff, but
delays the spending cut portions of the Fiscal Cliff for another two months.
8.2% projected cuts in education across all titled funds , but delayed to take effect until the FY13-14 year.
“Supplement, Not Supplant”
What does “Supplement, Not Supplant” mean?
 federal funds must enhance or increase the level of
funding which is normally available from state or
local sources;
 federal funds must not replace state and local
funds.
Federal Funding Sources – CRP
Funding
Source
Purpose
FY12
Allocations
FY13 Allocations
Change from ‘12
Title I
Improving the academic
achievement of
disadvantaged students
$ 22,076,259
$ 20,749,365
$ (1,326,894)
$ 3,650,626
$ 3,564,925
$ (85,701)
$
889,356
$ 1,011,374
$ 122,018
$(201,448)
Title II
Title III
Teacher Quality/Class
Size
Limited English
Proficient
IDEA
Special Education
$ 6,665,400
$ 6,463,952
IDEA
Preschool
Special Education
$
$
TOTAL:
207,196
$33,488,837
Note: Roughly $700K go to private school services
205,457
$ 31,995,073
$ (1,739)
$ (1,493,764)
Use of Federal Funds
Federal funds can be used
to:
Fund “supplementary”
programs;
Fund “supplementary”
materials and staff; and
Fund programs that
specifically support students
with the greatest academic
need.
Federal funds should be used
to carry out activities in the
School Improvement Plan
(SIP)
Federal funds cannot be
used to:
 Federal funds cannot be
used to:
Carry out activities that are
required by State law,
regulations or union contracts;
Replace or rehire teaching
positions or local other
activities that have been cut; or
Purchase “core” materials or
services for students and
classrooms;
Title I Required Reserves
 Funds Previously Reserved for Choice/Supplemental Education Services – 20% of
total allocation (Note: The U.S. Department of Education approved Rhode Island’s
request for flexibility under NCLB; the 20% set aside must be used to support
district improvement strategies on the needs of schools identified as Priority, Focus,
or Warning schools ).
 Professional Development – 10% for districts/schools in need of improvement
 Parental Involvement – not less than 1%, 95% of the 1% must be distributed to
schools
 Private School Services – sufficient for the provision of equitable services as
compared to Providence students, to include parental involvement services
 Neglected/Delinquent Youth – as necessary to provide comparable services; PSD
reserves $15K for additional services to students living in neglected facilities
 Homeless Services – not required, however PSD sets aside approx. $10K-$15K to
provide additional services to support students experiencing homelessness
Focus of the FY13 CRP
Implementation of key district strategies and initiatives to create dramatic positive
improvement in student outcomes:
I.
Curriculum , Instruction & Assessment
Rigorous and relevant curricula aligned to performance standards for K-12 instruction
Transition to Common Core in English language arts
Research-based instructional programs, strategies, practices and tools
Comprehensive Assessment System which supports screening, progress monitoring, benchmarking,
and end-of-course assessments of student learning across time
o
o
o
o
Student Supports and Services
II.
Multi-tiered Support System providing Academic and Social/Emotional programs and interventions
Programs to support English Language Learners
Virtual Credit Recovery and Learning Recovery
Transition Supports and Programs
o
o
o
o
Aligned and Differentiated Professional Development
III.
Comprehensive, ongoing training aligned to district initiatives and targeted school-based needs
Educator evaluation supports
Master Schedule Process Improvement Partnership
o
o
o
School Intervention and Innovation Initiatives
IV.
o
Lead partners and EMOs provide direct support and oversight of clusters of schools
Expanded Learning Opportunities
V.
o
Investing in innovations that promote in-school and out-of-school learning opportunities
Federal Funding Sources – Other Allocations
Funding Source
Purpose
Perkins
to develop more fully the academic, career, and
technical skills of secondary and postsecondary
students who elect to enroll in CTE programs
to provide support to schools that have missed
Adequate Yearly Progress by providing
resources to help schools overcome barriers to
improving academic performance
SIG 1003(a)
SIG 1003 (g) –
Cohort 1
SIG 1003(g) –
Cohort 2
RTTT
FY12 Allocations FY13 Allocation
to provide public school districts with
additional funds and resources to assist their
persistently lowest-achieving schools
Supports state and district initiatives in the
following areas: curriculum and instruction,
instructional management system, educator
evaluation, human capital management, and
school transformation
*Budget submitted; awaiting final approval
$ 1,357,084
$ 1,193,198
$ 1,309,200.00
$1,817,500
$ 3,972,909.99
*$3,680,040
$ 1,101,406.00
**$1,101,406
$ 18,363,446
($9,311,282 is the direct
allocation to the district covering
4 year grant period)
**Awaiting final verification from RIDE
Overview of All Federal Funding
Title I
20,749,365
RTTT
18,363,446
SIG (G) Cohort2
1,101,406
SIG (G) Cohort1
3,680,040
SIG A
1,817,500
Perkins, 1,193,198
IDEA, Part B,
6,463,952
IDEA preschool, 205,457
Title II
3,564,925
Title III, 1,011,374