Transcript 2009-2010 Federal Budget

2012-2013 Federal Budget:
Preliminary Overview
Presentation to the
Providence School Board :
June 18, 2012
Federal Funding Sources – CRP
Funding
Source
Purpose
FY12
Allocations
FY13 Allocations
Change from ‘12
Title I
Improving the academic
achievement of
disadvantaged students
$ 21,639,989
$ 19,812,945
$ (1,827,044)
$ 3,579,927
$ 3,403,697
$ (176,230)
$ 955,187
$ 68,341
$(375.198)
Title II
Title III
Teacher Quality/Class
Size
Limited English
Proficient
$
886,846
IDEA
Special Education
$ 6,546,810
$ 6,171,612
IDEA
Preschool
Special Education
$
$
TOTAL:
203,645
$32,857,217
197,635
$ 30,539,606
$ (7,480)
$ (2,317,611)
How is Education Funded in Rhode Island?
1. Local money: funds from Providence property taxes, car
taxes, etc.
2. State Money: funds from the State of Rhode Island
3. Federal money: funds provided from the federal
government for additional programs and support
Use of Federal Funds
Federal funds can be used
to:
Fund “supplementary”
programs;
Fund “supplementary”
materials and staff; and
Fund programs that
specifically support students
with the greatest academic
need.
Federal funds should be used
to carry out activities in the
School Improvement Plan
(SIP)
Federal funds cannot be
used to:
 Federal funds cannot be
used to:
Carry out activities that are
required by State law,
regulations or union contracts;
Replace or rehire teaching
positions or local other
activities that have been cut; or
Purchase “core” materials or
services for students and
classrooms;
“Supplement, Not Supplant”
What does “Supplement, Not Supplant” mean?
 federal funds must enhance or increase the level of
funding which is normally available from state or
local sources;
 federal funds must not replace state and local
funds.
Title I Required Reserves
 Choice/Supplemental Education Services – 20% of total allocation (Note: The U.S.
Department of Education approved Rhode Island’s request for flexibility under
NCLB; details regarding the granting of this waiver are forthcoming).
 Professional Development – 10% for districts/schools in need of improvement
 Parental Involvement – not less than 1%, 95% of the 1% must be distributed to
schools
 Private School Services – sufficient for the provision of equitable services as
compared to Providence students, to include parental involvement services
 Neglected/Delinquent Youth – as necessary to provide comparable services; PSD
reserves $15K for additional services to students living in neglected facilities
 Homeless Services – not required, however PSD sets aside approx. $10K-$15K to
provide additional services to support students experiencing homelessness
Funds Previously Reserved for Choice and SES
Broad Parameters for
Reinvestment
Funds may not be used to:
 Focused on clearly defined
 Support improvement
school and district
improvement strategies.

Explicit connection to
improvement plans for
Priority, Focus and Warning
schools
initiatives


 Responsive to the needs of
traditionally underserved
populations.
 Focused upon direct
services to students and
classroom teachers.

in which the primary
beneficiary are nonidentified schools;
With little or no clear
relationship to the reasons
for school or district
identification; or
That focus primarily upon
building district level
capacity without
corresponding investment in
building-level support.
Enrollment data used to calculate
poverty % at each school.
Office of Federal Programs constructs
budgets based upon District
initiatives that result in
1.
School Level
Allocation
2.
FY11 SLA--$11,535,750
•
FY12 SLA--$11,933,400
Schools receive per
pupil based upon
poverty bands.
•90% or higher—Band 1
•80%-89%--Band 2
Principal receives a summary of data
used to calculate the school level Title
I allocation inclusive of District
initiatives and discretionary funds.
Discretionary funds result from the
balance of District initiatives and
school –level personnel costs.
3.
4.
•70%-79%--Band 3
Per pupil determined by
amount needed to
support all initiatives
and stable amount of
discretionary funds.
direct services benefiting schools
(programs, services and personnel)
•
•
Schools are responsible for preparing and
submitting a budget for approval;
Budgeted activities must support schoolwide Title I plan/school improvement plan.
 District receives enrollment report from RIDE
Non-Public
Schools
for all schools in RI that have Providence
resident students.
 The District contacts all the schools to see if
they would like to participate in Title I.
FY12

78 School contacted to
participate in Title I

30 accepted invitations to
participated
24 actually participated
726 non-public students
met Title I poverty
guidelines resulting in an
allocation of $441,050
29 Non-Publics received
a total of $247,500 in
Title II allocations

PPSD determines school attendance area of each
non public student that qualifies for free/reduced
lunch.
The non public school receives a per pupil amount
that is equivalent to the public school in the
students attendance area.
The non public schools also receive Title I funds for
parent involvement and PD.
 District contacts 38 Non Public/Private
Providence schools to see if they wish to
participate in Title II.


29 out of 38 agreed to participate.
18 of the 29 also received Title I funds.
 In total between Title I & Title II the District
engages 35 non public/private schools.
Focus of the FY13 CRP
Implementation of key district strategies and initiatives to create dramatic positive
improvement in student outcomes:
I.
Curriculum , Instruction & Assessment
Rigorous and relevant curricula aligned to performance standards for K-12 instruction
o Transition to Common Core in English language arts
Research-based instructional programs, strategies, practices and tools
Comprehensive Assessment System which supports screening, progress monitoring, benchmarking,
and end-of-course assessments of student learning across time
o
o
o
Student Supports and Services
II.
Multi-tiered Support System providing Academic and Social/Emotional programs and interventions
Programs to support English Language Learners
Virtual Credit Recovery and Learning Recovery
Transition Supports and Programs
o
o
o
o
Aligned and Differentiated Professional Development
III.
Comprehensive, ongoing training aligned to district initiatives and targeted school-based needs
Educator evaluation supports
o
o
School Intervention and Innovation Initiatives
IV.
o
Lead partners and EMOs provide direct support and oversight of clusters of schools
Expanded Learning Opportunities
V.
o
Investing in innovations that promote in-school and out-of-school learning opportunities
Federal Funding Sources – Other Allocations
Funding Source
Purpose
FY12 Allocations FY13 Allocation
Perkins
to develop more fully the academic, career, and
technical skills of secondary and postsecondary
students who elect to enroll in CTE programs
to provide support to schools that have missed
Adequate Yearly Progress by providing
resources to help schools overcome barriers to
improving academic performance
$ 1,270,463.00 $ 1,300,000.00
SIG 1003(a)
SIG 1003 (g) –
Cohort 1
SIG 1003(g) –
Cohort 2
RTTT
to provide public school districts with
additional funds and resources to assist their
persistently lowest-achieving schools
Supports state and district initiatives in the
following areas: curriculum and instruction,
instructional management system, educator
evaluation, human capital management, and
school transformation
$ 1,309,200.00
TBD
$ 3,972,909.99
TBD
$ 1,101,406.00
TBD
$ 8,518,366.89
(Total direct allocation to district
covering 4 year grant period)
Overview of All Federal Funding
SIG G - Cohort 2
1,101,406.00
2%
RTTT
8,518,366.89
18%
Title I
19,812,945.00
42%
SIG G- Cohort 1
3,972,909.99
9%
SIG A
1,309,200.00
3%
Perkins
1,300,000.00
3%
IDEA Preschool
196,165.00
1%
IDEA Part B
6,171,612.00
13%
Title III
955,187.00
2%
Title II
3,403,697.00
7%