John Culshaw and the recording as a work of art
Download
Report
Transcript John Culshaw and the recording as a work of art
John Culshaw and the recording as
a work of art
David Patmore, University of Sheffield
Presentation outline
Culshaw: life
Culshaw: ideas
Examples of these in action
Suggested explanations for decline
Sources: Culshaw’s articles for record press,
interviews
The central issue
‘John had the concept of
the recording being an
art form in itself – and
that’s what he believed
in.’ – Gordon Parry in
interview, 8th April,
1999.
Life (1)
Born: 1925, Southport, UK
Bank clerk before joining Fleet Air Arm
After war, writes freelance music articles
1946 Joins Decca’s publicity department
1947 Begins work as a producer with Decca
1951 Becomes permanent with Decca
1953-55 Heads Capitol’s European classical
operation
Life (2)
1955 Returns to Decca as producer
1956 Replaces Victor Olof as head of classical
production at Decca
1957-58 Introduction of stereo LPs
1957-67 Produces major recordings for Decca and
RCA
1967 Leaves Decca to become head of music at BBC
TV
1975 Leaves BBC TV, and pursues freelance career
1980 Dies of hepatitis
Ideas and influences (1) - general
Foundation: working internationally for large
corporation, dedicated to recording
Access to capital plus freedom of action
Primary function of producer: to draw out
best from performer
Saw value of recordings as long-term
documents, in the service of the composer
Team player not an autocrat
But not shy in pushing forward his ideas
Ideas and influences (2) - the keys
‘John had not only the musical side…but he also
had this deep sense of what the market wanted,
where it should be going. Stereo: as soon as John
heard of stereo, he was there. He saw the potential.’
– Jack Boyce (Decca marketing) in interview, 8th
April, 1999.
‘A fine production in any medium is the sum of its
small details, which have to be mastered and
absorbed before it an transcend then and approach
the realms of art.’ – John Culshaw, Records and
Recording, February 1962.
Ideas and influences (3)
Key influence: Gordon Parry
Parry saw Das Rheingold as an ideal work for stereo
production
Convinced Culshaw of this
Timing excellent: strong interest in stereo in USA
Rheingold recording a major commercial success
Opened the way to further similar productions
James Mallinson’s view
Re: the recorded performance as a legitimate
art work in its own right:
‘…that is what it is. It is what it should be.
You should never look at a record as being a
sort of poor relation of a live performance’. –
in interview, 2nd June, 1999.
The key recordings
1959 Das Rheingold
1961 Tristan und Isolde
1962 Salome
1963 Siegfried, War
Requiem
1965
Gotterdammerung
1967 Elektra
Key characteristics of successful (opera)
recordings
Constructed : too many errors in live recordings
The recording is artificial and unique: key features:
Satisfactory balance: relationship with conductor
key (Solti) (Rheingold)
Uniqueness: getting inside the score gives specific
vision (Tristan designs)
Movement: acting and so intensity of expression
(Tristan)
Atmosphere: drama (Salome)
Authenticity: fidelity to composer’s intentions (War
Requiem)
Recordings and Film
Parallels with film:
- created in the studio
- cost
- cutting
- continuity
- the record producer =
the film director
Example:
Gotterdammerung film
The recording as art work
Culshaw strove to create recordings that
were parallel to successful theatrical and
film productions
Individual concept, mastery of
technology, attention to detail,
outstanding performances =
A work of art
Decline and Fall
Immediate: no-one followed Culshaw’s ideas
SonicStage ‘childish’ (1980)
Possibly seen as classical parallel to Phase 4 (critical
opinion dismissive – but vast sales)
Long-term: miniaturisation and improved recording
eliminated need for studio
Made live recording technically as good as studio,
as well as cheaper
Overall discourse: the objective of recordings: to
emulate the concert hall: in conflict with these ideas
The recording now seen as no more than a process
The verdict of history?
‘It is …open to question whether any studio
recording of The Ring could reasonably be
expected to be more atmospheric, exciting or better
performed than this one.’ – Arnold Whitall,
Gramophone, March 1989.