Transcript Slide 1

EARLY CHILDHOOD PROFILE 2013
KINGFISHER COUNTY
Commissioned by the
Prepared by the Community Service Council
February 2013
KINGFISHER COUNTY
Demographic Trends
 Economics and Employment
 Health Indicators

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
Population change--migration to suburban
areas of Tulsa and Oklahoma City MSA with an
overall decrease in new births
 Age--aging population
 Race and ethnicity--more culturally diverse
 Living arrangements--transitional for family
living arrangement
Demographics

Population Trends for Total Population and Under Age 5
Kingfisher County, 1980 through 2030
18,000
16,000
Demographics
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
Total Population
Under age 5
1980
1990
2000
2010
2011
(est.)
2020
(proj.)
2030
(proj.)
14,347
1,252
13,212
951
13,926
870
15,034
1,121
15,213
1,105
15,364
1,197
15,878
1,231
Source: US Census Bureau, 1980, 1990, 2000, & 2010 Censuses; American Community Survey 2007-2011;
Population Estimates Program; County Population Projections (2012 Demographic State of the State Report)
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Race Comparison for Total Population and Children under
Oklahoma and Kingfisher County, 2010
Kingfisher County
Oklahoma
17.6%
59.3%
19.8%
Demographics
Under 5
0.2%
3.8%
1.3%
77.1%
1.6%
Hispanic
16.8%
11.0%
8.2% N = 266,547
72.2%
Hispanic
23.6%
N = 2,783
11.0%
10.1%
Total
Population
1.7%
84.5%
0.3%
3.1%
1.1%
8.6%
Hispanic
8.9%
White
7.4%
N = 3,642,361
Black
American Indian
Hispanic
13.4%
Asian
N = 41,848
Other/2+ races
Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Population Trends and Projections by Age Group
Demographics
Projections
Kingfisher County, 1980 - 2030
2030
6.5
20.5
6.8
2020
7
20.4
6.2
47.2
2.5
16.7
50.8
2.1
13.4
1.9
2010
7.5
21.6
5
50.9
13.1
1.4
2000
6.2
1990
7.2
1980
8.7
0%
23.7
23.8
24.3
5.4
49.2
13.1
4.5
48.7
13.7
.9
13.3
.6
8.2
20%
43.8
40%
60%
80%
1.2
100%
Percent of population
0-4
5-19
20-24
25-64
65-84
85+
Source: US Census Bureau, 1980, 1990, 2000, & 2010 Censuses; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division,
Population Projections, 2000 - 2030.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Living Arrangements of Related Children Under 18
Kingfisher County, 1990, 2000, 2010, & 2007-11 Estimates
100%
1990
2000
2010
2007-11 est.
80%
Demographics
60%
40%
20%
0%
1990
2000
2010
2007-11 est.
Married Couple
Male-headed
Female-headed
Other relatives
83.8%
76.4%
70.5%
75.2%
2.6%
4.9%
5.9%
4.5%
8.8%
11.3%
13.7%
13.1%
6.1%
6.1%
9.9%
7.2%
Children living with 1 or both parents
Source: US Census Bureau, 1990, 2000, and 2010 Censuses; US Census Bureau, American Community Survey
2007-11.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
ECONOMICS AND EMPLOYMENT
Ratio of Income to Poverty Level
Percentage of Total Population and Children
Kingfisher County, 2007-11
Economics & Employment
Percentage of population
Below 100%
75%
Below 185%
Below 200%
50%
25%
0%
Below 100%
Below 185%
Below 200%
Total population
10.4%
28.9%
32%
Under 18
14.3%
39.3%
42.8%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.
Under 6
11%
46.8%
49.9%
6-17
15.8%
36%
39.8%
Comparison of Wages: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum,
Poverty, 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income
Family of Three, Kingfisher County, 2013*
Annual Wage
Economics & Employment
$80,000
$62,093
($29.40/hr)
$60,000
$62,093
($28.26/hr) $59,071
$54,674
Self-Sufficiency Wage = $28,915
($25.89/hr)
Male-headed
families w/
children <18
($13.69/hr)
$40,000
Married-couple
families w/
children <18
All families w/
children <18
$36,131
($17.37/hr)
$20,000
$15,312
$10,309
$0
$19,530
$19,545
($9.39/hr)
($9.26/hr)
($7.25/hr)
Female-headed
families w/
children <18
($4.88/hr)
Welfare
Wage
Minimum
Wage
Poverty
Wage
185% Poverty
Wage
Median Family
Income
(2007-11 ACS)
Notes: For the self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume
full-time, year-round employment. Welfare wage is the combined value of TANF, SNAP, & WIC.
Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency
Standard for Oklahoma 2009; 2013 HHS Poverty Guidelines, Federal Register, Vol. 78, No. 16, January 24, 2013, pp. 5182-5183; Oklahoma
State Dept. of Human Services; U.S. Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.
Participation in Public Assistance Programs
Number of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating
Kingfisher County, 2012
Economics & Employment
Soonercare Total (185%/100%)
Soonercare <19 (185%)
21.4%
3,254
46.1%
1,807
24%
113
WIC Infants (185%)
48%
232
WIC age 1-5 (185%)
61
Child Care Subsidy <5 (185%)
9.4%
1,432
SNAP Total (130%)
5.4%
34
TANF <18 (50%)
0.8%
43.8%
1,429
Elem. School Free Lunch (130%)
Elem. School Reduced Lunch (185%)
12.9%
420
5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000
Number of Participants
0%
0
20%
40%
60%
Percent of Population
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, September 2012; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2011-12; US
Census Bureau, 2010 Census; Oklahoma State Department of Health-WIC Service, Caseload Report, October 2012; Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Monthly
Enrollment Fast Facts November 2012.
Educational Attainment for Persons Age 25 & Older
Kingfisher County, 2007-11 Estimates
15.1%
Economics & Employment
Less than
high school
34.3%
High school
graduate
24%
Some
college
7.1%
Associate
degree
12.2%
Bachelor's
degree
5.6%
Master's
degree
1.2%
Professional
school degree
0.6%
Doctorate
degree
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Percent of persons 25+
Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2007-11.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
30%
35%
40%
Unemployment Rates
Kingfisher County and Oklahoma City MSA, 1990 - 2012
Economics & Employment
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Oklahoma City MSA
Kingfisher Co.
1990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011Dec.
2012
5.3 5.2 5.4 4.9 4.4 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.6 2.7 2.7 3.6 4.5 5.2 4.6 4.4 4.1 4.2 3.8 6.2 6.5 5.7 4.6
4.3 3.4 4.7 4.6 4.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.2 2.4 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.3 2.8 2.6 2.3 4.6 4.8 3.8 3.0
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
CHILD INDICATORS
WHY ARE CHILDREN AT RISK?
Lack of health insurance
 Limited access to preventative services
 Living in high risk families
 Living in a state with a high level of
premature death
Child Indicators

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Child Indicators
THE ADVERSE CHILDHOOD
EXPERIENCES (ACE) STUDY

Major American research project that poses the question of
whether and how childhood experiences affect adult health
decades later

Provides compelling evidence that:




Adverse childhood experiences are surprisingly common
ACE’s happen even in “the best of families”
ACE’s have long-term, damaging consequences
Findings reveal powerful relationships between emotional
experiences as children and physical and mental health as
adults
Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “About the Adverse Childhood
Experiences Study.”
THE ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES (ACE)
STUDY PYRAMID
Death
Early Death
Child Indicators
Disease,
Disability and
Social Problems
Adoption of Health-risk
Behaviors
Social, Emotional and Cognitive
Impairment
Disrupted Neurodevelopment
Adverse Childhood Experiences
Conception
Mechanisms by which Adverse Childhood Experiences Influence
Health and Well-being throughout the Lifespan
Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “About the Adverse Childhood
Experiences Study.”
ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES…
Child Indicators
…GROWING UP IN A HOUSEHOLD WITH:





Recurrent physical abuse
Recurrent emotional
abuse
Sexual abuse
An alcohol or drug
abuser
An incarcerated
household member




Someone who is
chronically depressed,
suicidal, institutionalized
or mentally ill
Mother being treated
violently
One or no parents
Emotional or physical
neglect
Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “What are Adverse Childhood
Experieinces (ACE’s).”
Child Indicators
…LEAD TO HEALTH-RISK BEHAVIORS…






Smoking
Overeating
Physical inactivity
Heavy alcohol use
Drug use
Promiscuity
Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org
…WHICH CAUSE DISEASE, DISABILITY AND SOCIAL
PROBLEMS IN ADULTHOOD
Child Indicators








Nicotine addiction
Alcoholism
Drug addiction
Obesity
Depression
Suicide
Injuries
Unintentional pregnancy






Heart disease
Cancer
Chronic lung and liver
disease
Stroke
Diabetes
Sexually transmitted
diseases
Source: Felitti, Vincent J., “The Relationship of Adverse Childhood Experiences to Adult Health: Turning gold into lead;”
CDC Media Relations, May 14, 1998, “Adult Health Problems Linked to Traumatic Childhood Experiences.”
Summary of Risk Factors for Infants
Kingfisher County and Oklahoma, 2008
11.6%
13.7%
Teen mother
(age 15-19)
31.9%
Unmarried mother
42.3%
2.3%
Child Indicators
Poor prenatal care
(3rd trimester/no care)
5.4%
19.4%
21.4%
Mother w/ <12th grade
education
Kingfisher Co.
Oklahoma
5.1%
6.9%
Low birthweight
(1500-2499 grams)
0.9%
1.4%
Very low birthweight
(<1500 grams)
33.8%
34.8%
Short birth spacing
(<24 mos. apart)
19.2%
20.5%
Very short birth spacing
(<18 mos. apart)
10.2%
11%
Premature
(<37 weeks gest.)
0%
10%
20%
Kingfisher County births: 216
Oklahoma births:
54,753
30%
Percent of Births
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
40%
50%
Characteristics of Births to Teen Mothers (Age 15-19)
Kingfisher County and Oklahoma, 2008
84%
81.6%
Unmarried
Poor prenatal care
(3rd trimester/no care)
0%
7.1%
64%
Child Indicators
Mother w/ <12th grade
education
Low birthweight
(1500-2499 grams)
54.1%
0%
7.9%
8%
Very low birthweight
(<1500 grams)
1.8%
Short birth spacing
(<24 mos. apart)
N/A
Very short birth spacing
(<18 mos. apart)
N/A
67.6%
46.9%
12%
11.6%
Premature
(<37 weeks gest.)
Kingfisher County births to teens: 25
Kingfisher County teen birth rate: 50.2
(per 100,000 females age 15-19)
16%
1+ previous births
2+ previous births
Kingf isher Co.
Oklahoma
Oklahoma births to teens:
Oklahoma teen birth rate:
20.8%
0%
7,492
61.6
(per 100,000 females age 15-19)
3.6%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Percent of Teen Births
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
80%
100%
Resident Births to Teens Age 15-17 and 18-19
Kingfisher County, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2008
Number of births
Specif ic birth rate
180
Child Indicators
30
120
20
60
10
0
0
Births 15-17
Births 18-19
Birth rate 15-17
Birth rate 18-19
1980
1990
2000
2008
10
28
25.4
137.3
10
23
33.3
172.9
15
9
36.2
48.9
11
14
33.2
83.8
Note: Specific birth rate is the number of births to females in specified age group per 1,000 females in age group.
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Infant Mortality Rates
Kingfisher County and Oklahoma, 1980 through 2008 (5-Year Estimates)
25
Number of inf ant deaths per 1,000 liv e births
Kingfisher County
From 2003 through 2008, there was an
average of 1 infant death per year in
Kingfisher County, for a rate of 5.1 per 1,000
live births. In Oklahoma, the average was
421 infant deaths, for a rate of 8.0.
15
“Healthy People 2020”
goal = 6.0 per 1,000
10
Kingfisher County 13.9 12.4 11.2 6.5 5.6 4.6
Oklahoma 11.2 10.9 10.6 10 9.7 9.3
5
9
4.2 4.3 5.7 6.8 5.9 4.9 6.2 4.6 3.5 3.4 4.3 3.1 5.3 5.4 4.2 3.1 5.1
8.9 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.6 8.4 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2
8 8.1
8 7.9 7.8
8 8.1
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
2004-08
2003-07
2002-06
2001-05
2000-04
1999-03
1998-02
1997-01
1996-00
1995-99
1994-98
1993-97
1992-96
1991-95
1990-94
1989-93
1988-92
1987-91
1986-90
1985-89
1984-88
1983-87
1982-86
0
1981-85
5
1980-84
Child Indicators
20
Oklahoma
4
8
Average Daily Membership and Percentage of Children
Enrolled in Special Education, by School District
Kingfisher County County, School Year 2011-12
1,500
ADM
Percent in Special Education
ADM
Child Indicators
1,200
25%
% Spec. Ed.
20%
Kingfisher County total ADM = 3,324.4;
percentage in special education = 13.9%
900
15%
600
10%
300
5%
0
ADM
% Spec. Ed.
0%
Cashion
Dover
Hennessey
Kingfisher
Lomega
Okarche
519.9
11.3%
216.9
11%
788.8
15.8%
1,283.3
14.2%
219.5
14%
296
14.2%
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education, Education Oversight Board, Office of Accountability, Profiles 2012 Reports.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
DHS Licensed Child Care Services
Provided to Children Under Age 5, by Age
Kingfisher County, December 2002 - December 2012
Percent
25
December 2002
December 2007
December 2012
19
Child Indicators
20
17
16
15
13
12 12
12
11
9
10
11
9
9
7
5
4
5
0
Age <1
Age 1
Age 2
Age 3
Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Monthly Statistical Bulletins.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Age 4
Child Deaths Due to Abuse
Oklahoma, Fiscal Years 1978 - 2010
60
52
51
50
45
47 48
38
40
38
31
31
24
21
18
20
16 16
23
25
39
41
38
35
34
30
40
32
29
27
23
18
20
12 13
10
0
7
5
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Child Indicators
42
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.
Child Indicators
CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT

In Kingfisher County in FY 2012, there were 66 reports of child abuse and/or
neglect accepted for investigation or assessment. 79 children were involved in
these reports (duplicated count).

20 children were confirmed victims of child abuse and/or neglect. 13 were
abused, 5 were neglected, 2 were victims of both abuse and neglect.

Approximately 2.3 of every 1,000 children in Kingfisher County are victims of
abuse and/or neglect. In Oklahoma, the rate is just under 9 of every 1,000
children.

Oklahoma ranks #23 in the nation in the rate of children who are victims of
abuse and/or neglect.

Parents make up 78.6% of all perpetrators, followed by “no relation” at 6.9%,
step-parents at 5.4%, and grandparents at 3.0%.

Substance abuse is a major contributing factor to child neglect.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Age of Children of Confirmed Abuse and Neglect
Oklahoma, FY 2012
1,630
Child Indicators
(16.6%)
2,849
1,498
(15.2%)
(28.9%)
(16.2%)
(23.1%)
1,594
2,271
Under 1
1-2
3-6
7-11
12 & older
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Elementary School Students Eligible for Free and
Reduced Lunch Program
By School District, Kingfisher County, 2012-2013 School Year
Kingfisher County Total
46.5%
Child Indicators
Dover
9.4%
64.6%
Lomega
12%
39.5%
Kingfisher
Reduced lunch eligibility
requirement: annual household
income below 185% of poverty,
which currently is $36,131 for a
family of three.
19.7%
42.7%
Hennessey
9.9%
72.7%
Cashion
23.8%
Okarche
19.3%
0%
Free lunch eligibility
requirement: annual household
income below 130% of poverty,
which currently is $25,389 for a
family of three.
7.4%
7.8%
6%
20%
Free
40%
Reduced
60%
Percent of Students Eligible
Source: Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2012-2013.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
80%
100%
Juvenile Arrests, by Type of Crime
Kingfisher County, 2002 through 2011
Number of arrests
35
2002
2007
Child Indicators
30
2003
2008
2004
2009
2005
2010
2006
2011
A total of 12 juvenile arrests were
made in Kingfisher County in 2011, for
a rate of 5.9 per 1,000 juveniles age
10-17, down from 55 arrests for a rate
of 30.9 in 2002.
25
20
15
10
5
0
Index crimes
Includes murder, rape,
robbery aggravated
assault, burglary, larceny,
and motor vehicle theft.
Drug related
Alcohol related
Other crimes
Includes sale/
manufacturing
and possession
of drugs.
Includes driving
under the influence,
liquor law violations,
and drunkenness.
Includes other assaults,
disorderly conduct, curfew
& loitering, runaway and all
other non-traffic offenses
Source: Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports.
Youth Risk Behavior Survey:
Summary of Alcohol, Other Drug & Tobacco Use
High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2011, and U.S. 2011
47.8%
Used once or
more during
past 30 days...
43.1%
Alcohol
38.3%
38.7%
22%
15.9%
Marijuana
19.1%
Child Indicators
23.1%
9.9%
Ever
used...
5.5%
4.2%
3.8%
Methamphetamine
2003 Oklahoma
2007 Oklahoma
2011 Oklahoma
2011 US
22.2%
Offered/sold/given
illegal drugs at school
19.1%
17.2%
25.6%
26.5%
Smoked cigarettes
during past month
23.2%
22.7%
18.1%
17.5%
Drove after drinking
alcohol in past month
13.3%
7.2%
8.2%
30.6%
Rode with drinking
driver in past month
26.8%
19.7%
24.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health,
OK2SHARE.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
50%
Youth Risk Behavior Survey:
Summary of Sexual Behaviors, Suicide & Physical Health
High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2011, and U.S. 2011
50%
50.9%
50.5%
47.4%
Ever had
sexual intercourse
5.8%
5.8%
5%
6.2%
Child Indicators
Had sex before age 13
64.3%
59.6%
57.1%
60.2%
Used condom last time
17.7%
16.7%
20.5%
18%
Used birth control
pills last time
7%
5.9%
6.3%
7.8%
Attempted suicide
in past year
14.2%
15.2%
16.3%
15.2%
Overweight
(according to BMI)
Physical activity for
60 min/day 5 of past 7 days
2003 Oklahoma
2007 Oklahoma
2011 Oklahoma
2011 US
N/A
49.6%
50.8%
49.5%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health,
OK2SHARE.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
80%
Health Status
Percent adults reporting fair or poor health
25%
50
Oklahoma
Rank
US
20%
40
15%
30
10%
20
5%
10
0%
0
'96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12
US 12.9%12.9%12.8%12.6% 13%13.9% 14%14.7%14.7%14.9%14.8%14.7%14.9%14.4%14.5%14.7%16.9%
Rank
26
32
28
25
42
34
45
41
41
44
42
46
43
42
42
45
41
Oklahoma 13.1% 14%13.4%12.6%17.4%15.3%19.6%17.7%17.8%19.7%18.7%20.2%19.2%18.7%20.2%20.5%19.6%
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
State rank
Child Indicators
Oklahoma and United States, 1996 - 2012
Prevalence of Obesity
Oklahoma and United States, 1990 - 2012
Percent of population estimated to be obese
50
30%
40
25%
30
20%
15%
20
10%
10
5%
Oklahoma
Rank
US
0%
0
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
State rank
Child Indicators
35%
Prevalence of Smoking
Percent of population over 18 that smoke regularly
60%
60
Oklahoma
Rank
US
50%
50
40%
40
30%
30
20%
20
10%
10
0%
0
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
State rank
Child Indicators
Oklahoma and United States, 1990 - 2012
Oklahoma’s Prison Population
Fiscal Years 1950 - 2012
Prison population
US incarceration rates (2012):
Male: 932 per 100,000 people
Female: 65 per 100, 000 people
Total: 497 per 100,000 people
25,000
Oklahoma incarceration rates (2012):
Male: 1,167 per 100,000 people
Female: 128 per 100,000 people
Total: 686 per 100,000 people
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
Source: Oklahoma Department of Corrections.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
2010
2012
2005
2000
1995
1990
1985
1980
1975
1970
1965
1960
1955
0
1950
Crime & Incarceration
30,000
Health Insurance Status, by Age
U.S. & Oklahoma, 2010-11
Total Population
39,996,700
(13.0%)
39,136,100
(49.9%)
149,350,600
(48.5%)
Health Indicators
7,633,900
1,135,000
(9.7%)
(1.4%)
48,611,600
(15.8%)
3,846,400
(1.2%)
United States
Oklahoma
1711300
(46.0%)
12,057,800
(6.4%)
538700
(24.5%)
96500
(10.0%)
438200
(45.2%)
392400
(40.5%)
156300
(4.2%)
Employer
594100
(16.0%)
Individual
114300
(5.2%)
156500
(7.1%)
112100
(5.1%)
1276000
(58.1%)
42700
(4.4%)
Medicaid
6,526,400
(3.5%)
19,609,300
(10.4%)
109,524,600
(58.3%)
3,112,700
(4.0%)
79100
(2.1%)
538500
(14.5%)
40,281,600
(21.4%)
27,361,400
(34.9%)
50,670,200
(16.5%)
15,416,100
(5.0%)
638500
(17.2%)
Age 19-64
Under Age 19
Medicare
Other public
Uninsured
Estimated uninsured non-elderly population of Kingfisher County (2008) = 17.6%
Estimated Medicaid enrollment rate for Kingfisher County (2007) = 16.0%
(Oklahoma Health Care Authority, May 2009)
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation, StateHealthFacts.org; Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Oklahoma County Chartbook, May 2009.
Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Determinants,
2012 (part 1)
According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings
1992
Personal Behav iors
2002
2012
Prevalence of smoking
#47
Health Indicators
Prevalence of Binge Drinking
#12
Prevalence of obesity
#45
Community & Env ironment
High school graduation
#25
Violent crime
#39
Occupational fatalities
#42
Infectious disease
#11
Children in poverty
#24
Air pollution
#29
#0
#10
#20
#30
Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst
Note: Missing data values represent years in which variables were not measured/ranked.
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
#40
#50
Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Determinants,
2012 (part 2)
According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings
1992
Public & Health Policies
2002
2012
Lack of health insurance
#35
Health Indicators
Public health funding (per capita)
#15
Immunization coverage
#20
Clinical Care
Early prenatal care
#47
Primary Care Physicians
#49
Preventable Hospitalizations
#45
All Determinants
#42
#0
#10
#20
#30
#40
#50
Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst
Notes: Missing data values represent years in which variables were not measured/ranked. Updated data for “early prenatal care” were not available. Shown
results are for 1991, 2001, & 2011.
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Outcomes,
2012
According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings
Oklahoma’s overall health ranking for 2012 is #
1992
2002
43
2012
Health Indicators
Poor mental health days
#46
Poor physical health days
#40
Geographic disparity
#20
Infant mortality
#39
Cardiovascular deaths
#48
Cancer deaths
#42
Premature death
#46
All Health Outcomes
#44
#0
#10
#20
#30
Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst
Note: Missing data values represent years in which variables were not measured/ranked.
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
#40
#50
ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES
KINGFISHER COUNTY RANKINGS

Child Indicators




Incarcerated household member
Violence against mother
Mental illness and substance abuse
Psychological, physical & sexual abuse
Emotional & physical neglect
Overall ACE ranking
25
19
63
25
8
2
Rankings: 1 = best, 77 = worst
*Indicates a tie with at least one other county
Source: Oklahoma 2009 KIDS COUNT Factbook (2007-2008 rankings), Oklahoma Institute for
Child Advocacy, OKDHS FY2012 Child Abuse and Neglect Statistics, Oklahoma State Bureau of
Investigation 2011 Uniform Crime Report
…IN SUMMARY
EARLY CHILDHOOD PROFILE 2013
KINGFISHER COUNTY
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
February 2013
…is available on our website:
www.csctulsa.org
Presentations are available from
Jan Figart
[email protected]