Transcript Community Profile: Tulsa metropolitan statistical area

FOCUS ON WOMEN,
CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Presented to Women Impacting Tulsa
October 17, 2013
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support
from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission
Total population
Sex
Age
Race and Hispanic Origin
Counties in the Tulsa
Metropolitan Statistical Area
Osage
Rogers
Pawnee
Tulsa
Wagoner
Creek
Okmulgee
3
1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
MSA
1,000,000
800,000
County
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
1910
1950
2000
2050
2075
Source: Oklahoma Department of Commerce, “2012 Demographic State of the State Report: Oklahoma State and County
Population Projections through 2075.”
4
100%
90%
80%
50.9%
49.1%
48.7%
70%
56.4%
65.8%
60%
Female
Male
50%
40%
30%
49.1%
50.9%
51.3%
20%
43.6%
34.2%
10%
0%
Total
Under 5
Under 18
65+
85+
Source: US Census Bureau, 2012 Population Estimates.
5
Life expectancy for men and women in 1920 was
1 year difference
 Life expectancy for men and women in 1990 was
7 years difference
 Life expectancy for men and women in 2011 is 5
years difference
 At birth, there are more males than females. By
age 36, the trend turns to more females than
males. At age 100, women outnumber men by 8
to 1

6
90.0
Female
Male
80.0
73.1
65.2
70.0
60.0
50.0
48.3 46.3
81.2
78.8
71.8
76.2 78.2
73.0
66.6
60.8
54.6 53.6
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
1900
1920
1940
1960
1990
2013
Okla.
2011
Source: USDHHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 61, No. 3, Sept. 24,
2012; CIA, The World Factbook: Life Expectancy at Birth.
7
Population Trends and Projections by Age Group
P ro je c tio n s
(2 0 1 2 )
Oklahoma, 1970 - 2030
2030
6.4
16.8
9
2020
6.6
17.2
9.3
2010
7
17.7
10.2
2000
6.8
19
1990
7.2
19.4
1980
7.7
1970
7.7
0%
49
16.3
50
2.5
2.1
14.9
51.5
11.9
1.7
10.3
50.6
11.6
1.7
10.2
49.7
12
1.5
46
11.3
1.1
43.8
10.8
.9
20.5
25.1
20%
13.3
11.6
40%
60%
80%
100%
Percent of population
Total population 1970 =2,559,229
Total projected population 2030 = 4,302,501
0-4
5-17
18-24
25-64
65-84
Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 & 2010 Censuses; Oklahoma Department of Commerce, 2012 Demographic State of the State Report:
Oklahoma State and County Population Projections 2075.
8
85+
Total population = 951,880
55,669
5.8%
18,419
1.9%
Under 5 population = 65,788
83,317
8.8%
10,436
15.9%
76,072
8.0%
7,741
11.8%
33,953
51.6%
1,464
2.2%
78,550
8.3%
639,853
67.2%
5,890
9.0%
6,304
9.6%
White
Black
American Indian & Alaska Native
Asian
2+ races
Hispanic
Source: Census Bureau, Population Division, “Annual Estimates of the Resident Population by Sex, Age, Race and Hispanic
Origin for Counties, April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2012,” June 2013.
9
Total population = 951,880
55,669
5.8%
18,419
1.9%
Under 5 population = 65,788
83,317
8.8%
10,436
15.9%
76,072
8.0%
7,741
11.8%
33,953
51.6%
1,464
2.2%
78,550
8.3%
639,853
67.2%
5,890
9.0%
6,304
9.6%
White
Black
American Indian & Alaska Native
Asian
2+ races
Hispanic
Source: Census Bureau, Population Division, “Annual Estimates of the Resident Population by Sex, Age, Race and Hispanic
Origin for Counties, April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2012,” June 2013.
10
Family
Children and youth
14.9%
23.8%
9.5%
2.0%
Never married
Married
Separated
Widowed
Divorced
49.8%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2011 American Community Survey.
13
80%
60%
60%
51%
49%
40%
20%
39%
23%
20%
17%
16%
10%
2%
0%
42%
40%
20 & over
Never married
3% 1%
7%
20-34
Now married
10%
3% 4%
35-64
Separated
3%
1%
65+
Widowed
Divorced
Source: US Census Bureau, 2011 American Community Survey.
14
100%
Tulsa County
82%
74%
80%
Tulsa MSA 2010
10.0%
71%
65%
61%
60%
20.7%
40%
7.3%
20%
11%
16%
18%
21%
7%
4%
1970
Married couple
23%
9%
7%
0%
62.1%
1980
1990
Male-headed
2000
2010
Female-headed
Other relatives
Source: US Census Bureau, 1970 through 2010 Censuses.
15
20,000
18,393
7.7%
15,000
10,000
5,006
5,000
2.1%
4,118
1.7%
317
0
1.0%
Living with
grandparents
Living with other
relatives
Non-relatives
Institutionalized
Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.
16
100%
22.8%
80%
8.9%
17.7%
26.6%
6.5%
4.2%
18.2%
29.3%
10.3%
8.1%
58.0%
10.4%
60%
10.1%
11.1%
89.3%
74.2%
40%
16.1%
68.3%
73.6%
10.5%
63.1%
59.6%
71.7%
31.5%
20%
0%
Total
NH White
Black
Married couple
Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.
Am. Ind.
Asian
Male-headed
Other
2+ races Hispanic
Female-headed
17
Oklahoma’s Prison Population
Fiscal Years 1950 - 2008
Prison population
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
Source: Oklahoma Department of Corrections.
18
2008
2005
2000
1995
1990
1985
1980
1975
1970
1965
1960
1955
1950
0


Oklahoma has the highest female incarceration rate among
states at 132/100,000 – almost double national average (68)
2,700 Oklahoma women were incarcerated in 2011


3% of Oklahoma children have at least one parent in prison




67% for non-violent offenses
Children with an incarcerated parent are five times more likely
to spend time in prison themselves
Average length of stay is 1.9 years
3 year recidivism rate is 14.4%
Offense categories (fy2010 receptions)





Possession/obtaining CDS: 23.8%
Distribution CDS: 19.1%
Forgery: 8.5%
Larceny: 7.1%
Assault: 7.0%
19
29.0%
Maternal grandparent(s)
28.3%
Father
22.5%
Other maternal relatives
15.9%
Foster care or state agency
Paternal relatives
0.0%
7.2%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
Source: Oklahoma Commission on Children and Youth, “Study of Incarcerated Women and Their Children,” Nov. 21, 2008.
20
Teen mother (15-19)
Total births = 13,133
10.1%
42.2%
Unmarried
Poor prenatal care (3rd tri. or no care)
10.0%
21.4%
Mother w/ <12th grade education
Low birthweight (1500-2499 grams)
7.4%
Very low birthweight (<1500 grams) 1.6%
31.1%
Short birth spacing (<24 mos. apart)
Very short birth spacing (<18 mos. apart)
Premature (<37 weeks gest.)
0.0%
16.6%
12.4%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
Note: Lighter colored bars indicate 2009 data.
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics 2012, OK2SHARE, accessed on 10/11/13.
21
50.0%
Indicator
Oklahoma
rank
Best State
(#1)
Worst State
(#50)
Overall child well-being
36
New Hampshire
New Mexico
Economic well-being
25
North Dakota
Mississippi
Education
40
Massachusetts
Nevada
Health
43
Maine
Montana
Family and Community
39
New Hampshire
Mississippi
Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation, “KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.”
23
U.S. rate
Tulsa
County
rate
Oklahoma
rate
Oklahoma
rank
Best
rank
$58,000
$54,442
$49,400
7
50
Children in poverty
23%
23%
23%
30
1
Children below 200% poverty
45%
47%
49%
35
1
Population in poverty
16%
15%
17%
33
1
Children 3 & 4 not enrolled in preschool
54%
50%
59%
34
1
Population 25-34 not high school graduate
12%
15%
13%
36
1
Children living in concentrated poverty
12%
16%
12%
34
1
Children in single parent families
35%
30%
36%
30
1
Children living with neither parent
5%
10%
6%
41
1
8.1%
8.8%
8.4%
30
1
9/1,000
9/1,000
8/1,000
19
1
Indicator
Median family income
Low birth weight babies
Children confirmed victims of maltreatment
Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation, “KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.”
24
Death
Early Death
Disease,
Disability and
Social Problems
Adoption of Health-risk
Behaviors
Social, Emotional and Cognitive
Impairment
Disrupted Neurodevelopment
Adverse Childhood Experiences
Conception
Mechanisms by which Adverse Childhood Experiences
Influence Health and Well-being throughout the Lifespan
Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “About the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study.”
25
…DISEASE, DISABILITY AND
SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN
ADULTHOOD
…GROWING UP IN A
HOUSEHOLD WITH ADVERSE
CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES:
…ADOPTION OF HEALTH
RISK BEHAVIORS…

Recurrent physical abuse

Recurrent emotional abuse

Sexual abuse

An alcohol or drug abuser

An incarcerated household member

Someone who is chronically depressed,
suicidal, institutionalized or mentally ill

Nicotine addiction

Alcoholism

Drug addiction

Obesity

Smoking

Depression

Overeating

Suicide

Physical inactivity

Injuries

Heavy alcohol use

Unintentional pregnancy

Mother being treated violently

Drug use

Adolescent pregnancy

Living with one or neither parent

Promiscuity

Heart disease

Emotional or physical neglect

Cancer

Chronic lung and liver disease

Stroke

Diabetes

Fetal death

Sexually transmitted diseases
Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “What are Adverse Childhood Experieinces (ACE’s).”
26
Tulsa
Creek
Wagoner
Rogers
Osage
Okmulgee
Pawnee
Parental separation or divorce
49
33
46
55
9
50
59
Incarcerated household
member
76
50
23
18
21
53
41
Mentally ill household member
77
67*
67*
30*
30*
67*
30*
Substance abusing household
member
76*
1*
1*
31*
31*
1*
31*
Violence against mother
57
36
55
60
49
54
34
Psychological, physical &
sexual abuse
12
7
8
26
20
19
13
Emotional & physical neglect
4
16
19
22
15
11
3
Overall ranking
31
15
19
25
10
29
11
Rankings: 1 = best, 77 = worst
*Indicates a tie with at least one other county
Source: Oklahoma KIDS COUNT Factbook, 2006-2007, Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy
28
A
woman is assaulted or beaten every 9
seconds in the US
 Nationally, 1 in 4 women and 1 in 7 men have
experienced severe physical violence by an
intimate partner
 876 homicides due to domestic violence
identified from 1998 to 2008 in Oklahoma
 Men who as children witnessed their parents’
domestic violence were twice as likely to
abuse their own wives than sons of
nonviolent parents
29
Child Abuse and Neglect Reports Received and
Accepted for Investigation or Assessment
Oklahoma, Fiscal Year 2000 - 2012
Number of reports received and accepted
80,000
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Reports received
53,548
53,460
53,562
57,383
59,329
61,613
63,128
63,931
65,493
64,293
64,710
66,541
68,111
Reports accepted
35,477
35,360
38,077
36,967
36,232
36,605
36,445
36,034
35,080
30,625
28,638
29,468
32,421
Notes: Each “report” of child abuse and/or neglect “received” and “accepted” may involve multiple children.
Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Abuse and Neglect Statistics.
30
Number of Children Assessed or Investigated and
Confirmed as Victims of Child Abuse and Neglect
Oklahoma, Fiscal Year 2000- 2012
Number of children
Confirmation rate
40%
80,000
30%
60,000
20%
40,000
10%
20,000
0%
0
Assessed or Investigated
Confirmed
Confirmation rate
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
62,023
56,251
62,795
62,626
60,770
61,926
63,116
62,559
61,327
53,394
45,811
48,393
44,232
14,273
13,394
13,903
12,971
12,347
13,328
13,827
13,191
11,714
8,605
7,248
8,110
9,842
16%
16%
17%
22%
23%
24%
22%
21%
20%
22%
22%
21%
19%
Notes: Each child assessed, investigated or confirmed for child abuse and/or neglect indicates one child. Since a child may be assessed, investigated or
confirmed multiple times in a year, these values are not necessarily unduplicated counts of children. “Confirmation rate” is the number of children
confirmed abused and/or neglected per 100 children investigated or assessed.
Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Abuse and Neglect Statistics.
31
Child Deaths Due to Abuse
Oklahoma, Fiscal Years 1978 - 2010
60
52
51
50
47
48
45
42
41
40
38
40
38
31
38
35
34
32
31
29
30
27
24
25
23
23
21
20
18
20
18
16 16
12
10
39
13
7
5
0
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.
32
2008
2010
Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation, “KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.”
33
Graduation Rate
Senior Graduation Rate
97.3% 97.2% 97.0% 97.3% 97.8% 97.9% 97.9% 97.7%
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
Averaged Freshman Graduation Rate
75.2% 74.3% 74.5% 75.4%
72.9% 73.4% 74.4% 74.3%
79.6%
79.8% 79.0%
77.2% 78.4%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Graduation rate is calculated by comparing the current number of graduates to the 9 th grade student
enrollment four years earlier. Beginning 2005 a Senior graduation rate was used, which divides current year
graduates by graduates plus dropouts (under age 19) for the 12th grade that same year. SYE 2008 Average
freshman graduation rate was added for state and county district totals, calculated as current graduates
divided by the cohort of the average number of students in 8 th, 9th, and 10th grades.
Source: Education Oversight Board, Office of Accountability.
34
Dropout rate (ADM)
Dropout rate (fall enroll.)
20.0%
18.0%
16.8%
16.0%
17.3%
4-year dropout rate
18.2%
17.5%
16.5%
13.9%
14.0%
13.0% 12.6%
12.0%
10.0%
8.0%
6.0%
4.0%
6.4%
6.4%
6.1%
5.5%
5.2%
4.0%
4.7%
4.2%
2.0%
0.0%
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
SYE 1995 to SYE 2000: Dropout rate- The number of 9th through 12th grade dropouts is divided by 9th through
12th grade average daily membership. SYE 2001 to SYE 2004: the number of 9th through 12th grade dropouts is
divided by 9th through 12th grade fall enrollment. Beginning with school year ending, 2005 the Office of
Accountability added a four-year high school dropout rate. The total number of dropouts for a graduating class
was calculated by adding the dropout counts under age 19 for the 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th grade over the
previous four-year period, respectively. Then dividing by the sum of their graduates plus the legal dropouts.
Source: Education Oversight Board, Office of Accountability.
35
0.0%
na
na
-5.0%
-10.0%
-15.0%
-20.0%
-25.0%
-24.5%
-24.9%
-24.5%
-26.0%
-24.6%
-27.2%
-25.9%
-26.7%
-26.8%
-27.6%
-30.0%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Based on data reported by the Oklahoma Office of Accountability, attrition rate is calculated by dividing
number of 9th graders minus the number of 12th graders of same cohort by the number of 9th graders (same
cohort).
Source: Education Oversight Board, Office of Accountability.
36
Youth Risk Behavior Survey:
Summary of Alcohol, Other Drug & Tobacco Use
High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2011, and U.S., 2011
Alcohol
Used once or
more during
past 30 days...
38.3%
38.7%
Marijuana
19.1%
23.1%
Ever
used...
Methamphetamine
4.2%
3.8%
Of f ered/sold/giv en
illegal drugs at school
17.2%
Smoked cigarettes
during past month
25.6%
22.7%
18.1%
2003 Oklahoma
2005 Oklahoma
Drov e af ter/while drinking
alcohol in past month
2007 Oklahoma
7.2%
8.2%
2009 Oklahoma
2011 Oklahoma
Rode with drinking
driv er in past month
2011 US
19.7%
24.1%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.
37
100%
Youth Risk Behavior Survey:
Summary of Sexual Behaviors, Suicide & Physical Health
High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2011, and U.S., 2011
Ev er had
sexual intercourse
50.5%
47.4%
Had sex bef ore age 13
5%
6.2%
Used condom last time
57.1%
60.2%
Used birth control
pills last time
20.5%
18%
Attempted suicide
in past y ear
6.3%
7.8%
2003 Oklahoma
2005 Oklahoma
Ov erweight or obese
(according to BMI)
2007 Oklahoma
33%
28.2%
2009 Oklahoma
na
2011 Oklahoma
Phy sical activ ity f or
60 min/day 5 of past 7 day s
2011 US
50.8%
49.5%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.
38
Labor force participation
Living wage and poverty
Role of education
Income inequality
Program participation
7.7
8.0
5.9
6.0
4.8
5.6
4.0
2.9
2.0
0.0
1990
1995
2000
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics.
2005
2010
41
June 2013
90%
80%
70%
68.2%
62.5%
60%
57.1%
50%
40%
30%
Men
Women
Both sexes
20%
10%
0%
1990
2000
2010
2020 Proj.
Source: Toossi, Mitra. “Employment Outlook: 2010-2020: Labor Force Projections to 2020: A More Slowly Growing Workforce,” Monthly Labor Review, January 2012.
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (5/20/2013).
42
90%
81.3%
80%
70%
65.9%
60%
50%
40%
31.0%
26.5%
30%
20%
10%
10.0%
0%
1990
2000
2010
2020 Proj.
Source: Toossi, Mitra. “Employment Outlook: 2010-2020: Labor Force Projections to 2020: A More Slowly Growing Workforce,” Monthly Labor Review, January 2012.
43
16-19
20-24
25-54
65-74
75+
85%
80%
75%
75.9%
70%
71.0%
67.2%
65%
63.4%
63.1%
59.5%
57.9%
57.2%
56.1%
56.1%
60%
55%
Hispanic men
Asian men
NH White men
Other race men
Black men
Other race women
Black women
NH White women
Asian women
Hispanic women
50%
1990
2000
2010
2020 Proj.
Source: Toossi, Mitra. “Employment Outlook: 2010-2020: Labor Force Projections to 2020: A More Slowly Growing Workforce,” Monthly Labor Review, January 2012.
44
Family
Size
One
person
Two
persons
Three
persons
Four
persons
Self-Sufficiency
Wage (annual)
Poverty
Guidelines
(annual)
$21,227
$11,490
($10.05/hour)
($5.44/hour)
$38,033
$15,510
($18.01/hour)
($7.34/hour)
$43,526
$19,530
($20.61/hour)
($9.25/hour)
$51,027
$23,550
($12.08/hour/adult) ($5.58/hour/adult)
Dollar
Difference
SelfSufficiency
Percent of
Poverty
$9,737
185%
$22,523
245%
$23,996
223%
$27,477
217%
Notes: For the self-sufficiency wages shown in table, family of two consists of one adult and one preschooler; family of three consists of one adult,
one preschooler and one schoolage child; family of four consists of two adults, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given
assume full-time, year-round employment.
Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard
for Oklahoma 2009; Federal Register Notice, 01/24/2013, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines; Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2013.
46
Comparison of Wages: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum,
Poverty, 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income
Family of Three, Tulsa County, 2013
Annual Wage
$80,000
$75,160
Self-Sufficiency Wage = $43,526
($36/hr)
Married-couple
families w/
children <18
($20.61/hr)
$60,000
$54,442
All families w/
children <18
($26/hr)
$40,000
$36,131
$20,000
$19,530
$0
($5.12/hr)
($7.25/hr)
Welf are
Wage
Minimum
Wage
($9.25/hr)
Pov erty
Wage
($19/hr)
$21,502
($10/hr)
$15,312
$10,800
$39,730
Male-headed
families w/
children <18
Female-headed
families w/
children <18
($17.11/hr)
185% Pov erty
Wage
Estimated
Median Family
Income*
(2007-11 ACS)
Notes: For the self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child.
Hourly wages given assume full-time,
year-round employment. Welfare wage is the combined value of TANF, SNAP, & WIC. Values shown for median family income are midpoint estimates within
a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide.
Estimates with margins of error exceeding +/- 10% of estimate are shown in italics.
Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for
Oklahoma 2009; Federal Register Notice, 01/24/2013, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines; Oklahoma State Dept. of Human Services; U.S. Census
Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.
47
30.0%
26.7%
24.6%
25.0%
19.5%
19.1%
20.0%
Male
19.9%
16.9%
15.8%
15.0%
Female
24.9%
13.7%
13.0%
11.7%
10.0%
11.5%
9.8% 10.4%
9.2%
8.4%
8.2% 8.2%
6.0%
7.3%
5.0%
0.0%
Total
pop
Under
6
6-17
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
Source: US Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.
48
75 &
older
60.0%
100%
200%
45.8%
50.0%
40.0%
52.0%
34.7%
31.9%
30.0%
21.4%
20.0%
25.6%
14.4%
8.3%
10.0%
0.0%
Total pop
Under 18
Under 6
65+
Source: US Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.
49
10.6%
All families
Married-couple family
5.0%
with related children <18
8.0%
<5 only
7.7%
15.9%
<5 and 5-17
5-7 only
no related children
5.3%
2.5%
15.7%
Male-headed family
18.6%
with related children <18
14.8%
<5 only
32.2%
<5 and 5-17
16.3%
5-7 only
no related children
11.0%
32.4%
Female-headed family
41.1%
with related children <18
47.9%
<5 only
60.2%
<5 and 5-17
32.5%
5-7 only
no related children
0.0%
10.6%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.
50
70.0%
12.2%
11.5%
12.9%
Less than high school
30.2%
30.5%
29.9%
High school graduate
24.1%
25.1%
23.0%
Some college
8.2%
8.6%
7.7%
Associate degree
Total
Bachelor's degree
Doctorate degree
0.0%
Male
5.4%
5.4%
5.3%
Master's degree
Professional school degree
Female
17.6%
17.3%
17.8%
1.7%
1.0%
2.3%
0.8%
0.5%
1.1%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.
52
35.0%
2012 dollars
$45
$37.34
$40
$35
$29.56
$28.28
$30
$24.46
$25
$18.06
$20
$15
$10
$17.30
$16.77
$15.78
$14.63
$11.75
$5
$0
1973
1976
1979
1982
Less than high school
1985
1988
High school
1991
1994
1997
2000
Some college
2003
College
2006
2009
2012
Advanced degree
Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th Edition, table 4.14.
53
2012 dollars
$45
$40
$31.55
$35
$30
$25.30
$25
$19.10
$20
$15
$10
$5
$0
$24.21
$15.53
$13.79
$13.70
$12.76
$10.31
1973
1976
$10.06
1979
1982
Less than high school
1985
1988
High school
1991
1994
1997
2000
Some college
2003
College
2006
2009
2012
Advanced degree
Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th Edition, table 4.14.
54
2012 dollars
$43.42
$45
$40
$35
$31.07
$30
$27.97
$25
$20
$15
$32.54
$20.73
$19.20
$20.27
$17.41
$17.10
$12.75
$10
$5
$0
1973
1976
1979
1982
Less than high school
1985
1988
High school
1991
1994
1997
2000
Some college
2003
College
2006
2009
2012
Advanced degree
Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th Edition, table 4.14.
55
Real Hourly Wage by Educational Attainment, by Sex
United States, 2012
Real hourly wage (2012 dollars)
$50.00
Both sexes
Women
Men
$40.00
$30.00
$20.00
$10.00
$0.00
Less than
high school
High school
Both sexes
$11.75
$15.78
$28.28
$37.34
Women
$10.06
$13.70
$24.21
$31.55
$12.75
$17.41
$32.54
$43.42
78.9%
78.7%
74.4%
72.7%
Men
Women % of Men
College degree
Advanced degree
Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th edition, table 4.14.
56
Participation in Public Assistance Programs
Number of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating
During a Single Month, Tulsa County, 2012
Soonercare Total (185%/100%)
19.3%
116,415
47%
76,569
Soonercare <19 (185%)
43.5%
3,829
WIC Infants (185%)
20.2%
9,063
WIC age 1-5 (185%)
8.2%
3,667
Child Care Subsidy <5 (185%)
14.8%
89,325
SNAP Total (130%)
1.8%
2,720
TANF <18 (50%)
55.1%
34,358
Elem. School Free Lunch (130%)
10.1%
6,314
Elem. School Reduced Lunch (185%)
150,000
100,000
50,000
Number of Participants
0%
0
20%
40%
60%
Percent of Population
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, Jan. 2012; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2011-12; US Census Bureau,
2010 Census; Oklahoma State Department of Health-WIC Service, Caseload Report, Jan. 2012; Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Fast Facts, Jan.2012.
58
80%
Household
Size
Federal
Poverty
Guidelines
Reduced Price
Meals: 185% of
poverty
Free Meals:
130% of
poverty
1
$11,170
$20,665
$14,521
2
$15,130
$27,991
$19,669
3
$19,090
$35,317
$24,817
4
$23,050
$42,643
$29,965
5
$27,010
$49,969
$35,113
6
$30,970
$57,295
$40,261
7
$34,930
$64,621
$45,409
8
$38,890
$71,947
$50,557
For each add’l
member, add
$3,960
$7,326
$5,148
Source: Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 57, March 23, 2012
Elementary School Students Eligible for Free and
Reduced Lunch Program
By School
TulsaTulsa
County,
2011-122012-13
School Year
By
SchoolDistrict,
District,
County,
School Year
Tulsa County Total
55.5%
9.5%
80.8%
Tulsa
9.5%
58.4%
Keystone
16.3%
62.6%
Sperry
54.2%
Sand Springs
14%
55.8%
Union
11.1%
58.4%
Liberty
7.3%
45.6%
Skiatook
9.5%
42.6%
Glenpool
34.3%
10%
Broken Arrow
33.6%
10.6%
30.5%
Jenks
29.4%
Ow asso
28.3%
18.7%
Bixby
0%
Reduced lunch
eligibility requirement:
annual household
income below 185%
of pov erty , which
currently is $36,131
f or a f amily of three.
2.4%
Collinsville
Berryhill
Free lunch eligibility
requirement: annual
household income
below 130% of
pov erty , which
currently is $25,389
f or a f amily of three.
9.8%
9.6%
7.5%
7.8%
Free
4.2%
20%
40%
60%
Reduced
80%
Percent of Students Eligible
Source:
Oklahoma
State
Dept ofLow
Education,
Low
Report
Source:
Oklahoma
State Dept.
of Education,
Income Report
for Income
2011-2012.
for 2012-13.
60
100%
Pawnee
12.5%
Okmulgee
12.1%
Osage
13.6%
Creek
12.4%
64.3%
62.0%
59.3%
Wagoner
9.9%
56.0%
Tulsa
9.5%
55.5%
Rogers
0.0%
Reduced
Free
57.9%
11.6%
45.7%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
Source: Oklahoma State Dept of Education, Low Income Report for 2012-13.
61
FOCUS ON WOMEN,
CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support
from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission
…is available on our website: www.csctulsa.org