Labor Law Reform - Widener University
Download
Report
Transcript Labor Law Reform - Widener University
Outline
Labor & Politics
Democratic Class Struggle
To party or not…
AFL, CIO
Why the ‘rules of the game” matter
AFL-CIO COPE
Labor Politics Today
Returns
News of this class
Capitalist economy…but within a
Democracy
Capitalism
“capital and economic resources form the basis of
power, and such resources tend to be more or less
unequally distributed among social classes and interest
groups” (Korpi 1989: 312 not assigned)
Democratic Politics
“…the principal power resources are the right to vote
and the right to organize collective action.”
These rights are tied to citizenship and are equally
distributed
Labor & Politics…
Unions develop a political strategy to address
concerns of workers as employees and as citizens
As Employees
Unemployment insurance, disability, prevailing wage laws,
safety regulations, maximum hours, minimum wage, right to
organize, etc.
As Citizens
Affordable housing, access to health care, public schools,
social security, etc.
See next slide and quote form the CIO
More than just bread & butter…
…workers and Labor Union members have many
problems affecting their lives in addition to wages, hours
and working conditions, and related matters involving the
employer. These are the wide range of the citizen in the
community. The CIO Council becomes the voice of the
Labor movement about housing, public and personal
health, child care, education, public and private welfare,
city and community planning, recreating, and a large
number of things which are the concern of the worker as
citizen where he lives.
Ted Silvey, CIO Leader, 1948
Labor & Politics…
Logic of “organizing politics” is similar to the logic of
“organizing labor”
Individual working class voters, like individual workers, have
little power
Individual workers improved their lives by uniting to form
unions
Question becomes, can unions improve the lives of their
members by supporting parties committed to uniting
individual working class voters behind a common program?
A Labor Party?
Most unions around planet said “Of course” and engage in a
Democratic Class Struggle
Democracy is a game of numbers
strategy aimed at advancing the interests of the working class
through electoral activity and government policy.
Working class keeps growing
A “no brainer”…just do the math
Unions around the planet form their own labo,r socialist, or
social democratic parties
And a lot of people voted for them…
Vote Percentage for Labor, Socialist or
Social Democratic Parties
Austria
France
Germany
Norway
Britain
Sweden
1917-1943
40.5
30.8
36.4
36.3
31.8
47.3
1944-1978
48.2
43.3
38.1
50.5
44.7
51.2
Labor Governments
Democratic Class Struggle
strategy aimed at advancing the interests of the working
class through electoral activity and government policy.
Democratically elected socialist parties now govern around the world
Expand welfare state and push decommodification of life
Free health care, free child care, free college, old age pensions etc.
American Exceptionalism
“American workers in the 19th century engaged in economic
conflicts with their employers as fierce as any known to the
industrial world; yet in their political behavior they consistently
failed to exhibit a class consciousness. Why was militancy in the
factory so rarely translated into the politics of class?- David
Montgomery, Yale University
Unlike unions around the planet, unions in the US did not form
their own successful labor party.
Referred to as “American Exceptionalism”
Raises interesting questions as to why?
Explaining American Exceptionalism
Early suffrage for white men
Allegiance to other parties before unions formed
Divided Working Class
Native vs. Immigrant
Black vs. White
Ideology of Individualism
Firmly entrenched two party system
I believe this is the key one…more in a moment…
AFL & Political Action
AFL President Samuel Gompers argued against forming a labor
party
Too divisive
Laws that were passed often overturned by courts
Right to vote preceded unionization…so worker have pre-existing loyalties
Politics seemed futile
Unions should focus Concentrate on Collective Bargaining &
Business Unionism
Voluntarism
opposition to government relief and welfare legislation and stressing the need for workers to
depend on their own economic strength (Zieger 2002:62)
If do politics…practice a pragmatic politics
“Reward your friends and punish your enemies”
American Exceptionalism
National AFL limited political action and said no to
building its own political party
“…party politics whether democratic, republican,
socialistic, prohibition or any other, should have no place
in the convention of the AFL.”
AFL resolution, 1895
City Central Labor Councils Often Made Different
Political Choices
Union support for labor and socialist parties was widespread
These parties were often very successful
By 1912 the American Socialist Party had elected 1,200 local officials
Mayors or Other Major Municipal Officers
New York City
Birmingham, Alabama
Winslow, Arkansas
Coeur d’Alene, Idaho
Flint, Michigan
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Rockaway, NJ
Schenectady, NY
Milwaukee, WI
State Level Labor/Socialist Party Success…
California
Idaho
Illinois
Kansas
Massachusetts
Minnesota
Montana
Nevada
New Mexico
New York
North Dakota
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
Utah
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
But Almost No National Success…
A Congressman here and there (NY, WI)…but no real national
presence in Congress?
Interesting, given that the vote share of the American labor
and socialist parties was similar to that won by the British
Labor Party during the early 20th century
…
(Mark 1989)
Interesting Puzzle… Why do Labor Parties become major
parties in Europe...while Labor Parties in the US have some
success, but then wither away..
Must consider how the Rules of Political Competition work
against minor parties in the US…let’s explore…
American Exceptionalism & The Political
System
Single Member Winner Take All Districts
If the vote in Congressional District #1 was:
“First past the post”
40% Republican Party
38% Democratic Party
22% Labor Party
Who goes to Congress?
Republican
“American Exceptionalism”
If the vote in every Congressional District in America
was the same as the one on the last slide:
40% Republican Party
38% Democratic Party
22% Labor Party
What is the make-up of Congress?
“American Exceptionalism”
Republicans receive 100% of the seats in Congress,
despite the fact that they only received 40% of the
vote
Preferences of 60% of the electorate would not be
represented in the government
Strange System…few other countries have these rules
Post Communist regimes (Russia, Poland, Hungary etc) opt for
different model…Iraq and Afghanistan create different
model
European Labor Politics
In a Proportional Representation system:
40% Republican Party
38% Democratic Party
22% Labor Party
What would the make up of Congress be?
Proportionate to vote…
40% Republican
38% Democrat
22% Labor Party
More opinions represented in government…
Labor party would be minority…but would have power
“Choices”
Single Member Winner Take All
Rules…
If in the last election, the vote in
every Congressional District in
America was
Proportional Representation Rules
If in the last election, the vote in
every Congressional District in
America was
40% Republican Party
38% Democratic Party
22% Labor Party
Your party received 0 seats, and the
party most hostile to unions won 100%
of the seats
If you’re a union leader …where
do you put your political capacity
in the next election?
40% Republican Party
38% Democratic Party
22% Labor Party
Your party received 22% of the
seats, and ruled in coalition with
the Democrats
If you’re a union leader …where
do you put your political
capacity in the next election?
Labor and the Democrats
SMWTA system results in 2 party system
“Monopoly of the Opposition”
Backers of third party faces tough choice
Mount symbolic campaigns based on principle
Stay out of politics
Back the party closest to her ideas
Logic Has Led Unions to Ally With Party that is Least
Hostile To The Labor Movement…the Democrats
A Wrinkle worth watching…
Working Families Party
Political Party in New York State founded by UAW, Teamsters, Laborers,
Communication Workers and community groups
Why would they choose to create a third party in NY?
30% of budget comes from unions
Some states have laws that change the logic of the SMWTA districts…called
“Fusion”
Fusion
“electoral support of a single set of candidates by two or more parties.”
(Argesinger)
Widespread in US during 19th century, but then outlawed in most states
Powerful American Labor Party in NY during 1940s
Unions in NY: 2010
Working Families Party
Political Party in New York State founded by UAW, Teamsters, Laborers,
Communication Workers and community groups
30% of budget comes from unions
“In the State Comptroller race, Democratic/Working Families
candidate Tom DiNapoli beat Republican Harry Wilson by
roughly 100,000 votes.
Since DiNapoli received well over 140,000 of his votes on the
Working Families Party line, he would not have won without the
support of WFP voters.”
http://www.workingfamiliesparty.org/
How does this give labor more power?
Fusion
Fusion makes the union vote visible
It doesn’t got swallowed/lost in the overall Democratic tallly
Unions have a credible threat of exit…better pay
attention to our interests and demands or we’ll take our
4% elsewhere
If it is a local race in an area where unions are strong,
they might run their own candidate
Fusion is Not the Norm
1955: AFL and CIO merge to form the AFL-CIO
Political Strategy:
“…policy
of supporting worthy candidates regardless…of
party affiliation…We seek neither to capture any
organization nor will we submit our identity to any group
in any manner.”
AFL-CIO,
1955
Labor as an Interest Group
Lacking its own party, organized labor becomes an interest group
an organization that attempts to influence elected officials to consider their aims when deciding
on legislation.
Unions Advance their Political Interests via PACs and COPEs
Political Action Committee
organized for the purpose of raising & spending money to elect & defeat
candidates.
Union members must authorize that money be taken from their paycheck for the PAC
Committee on Political Education (COPE)
Coordinates Political Lobbying, Coordinates Registration, Education, Get out the Vote
Unions can use dues money for these purposes
Regulating Union Politics
Supreme Court (CWA v. Beck, 1988) allows union
members to opt out of funding political activities by
requesting a refund of the portion of their dues used for
such purposes
Republicans Have Fought for “Paycheck Protection”
At present, workers must opt out…
Paycheck protection would reverse it so workers had to opt in…
Unions point out that that stockholders are not required to
authorize corporate lobbying and political action
Interest Groups Compared: 2010
Business-Labor Split in PAC & Individual Donations to Candidates & Parties
“The broadest classification of political donors separates them into business,
labor, or ideological interests. Whatever slice you look at, business interests
dominate, with an overall advantage over organized labor of about 15-to-1.
Even among PACs - the favored means of delivering funds by labor unions business has a more than 3-to-1 fundraising advantage. In soft money, the ratio is
nearly 17-to-1.”
Center For Responsive Politics: Campaign Contributions, 2010
Lobbying Expenditures Compare
Top Sectors
Top Spenders
Democratic Party Contributions
Labor Usually Outgunned
Research Finds Even More So on its Own Issues
1976 Labor Law Reform: Democratic Prez, Democratic House and
Senate
Faster elections; $ penalties for refusal to bargain, stronger penalties
for ULP
2009 EFCA Labor Law Reform Democratic Prez, Democratic House and
Senate
What happened?
Massive employer offensive
Senate Filibuster kills bill
Handful of Democratic Senators align with Republicans
Doing Labor Politics…COPE
Unions forbidden from giving union dues to political
candidates
$ Raised via voluntary contributions to PAC (Political
Action Committee)
Monetarily, can not compete with corporate America
1. Why does Chaison suggest candidates seek union
endorsements?
Doing Labor Politics…COPE
Unions forbidden from giving union dues to political
candidates
$ Raised via voluntary contributions to PAC (Political
Action Committee)
Monetarily, can not compete with corporate America
Labor counters money with “in-kind” donation of
materials & “people power”
2. Chaison describes union members as “foot
soldiers” of the Democratic Party. What does he
mean by this? Please provide at least one concrete
example of things (besides voting) that union
members do for the party.
AFL-CIO Political Action
Since 1995, well over $100 million spent by AFL-CIO on
improving labor’s political operation
Advertising and Mailings
New emphasis on creating local political machines &“Member
to Member Outreach”
Phone Banking
Home Visits
Workplace Visits
Grass Roots Capacity
New Voices: Build Grass Roots Capacity
“…revolutionary notion of the new labor movement
politics is that we are going to talk to our members.
What we find is that miraculously when we talk to
our members, they vote our way”
Steven
Rosenthal, AFL-CIO Political Director
Labor’s Problem…
The AFL-CIO’s “40-40-40 Problem”
40%
of union members are not registered
40%
are registered but won’t vote
40%
of union voters will vote Republican
Eimer on Politics
3. Eimer suggests that organized labor has decided
to change the content or substance of its political
outreach. Briefly explain how labor has altered the
type of political information it provides to
members.
Changing Strategy…
From Marching Orders to Issues
Members are intelligent
Provide quality information
Voting Records
Issue Comparisons
Trust that member will do the right thing
Eimer and Politics
6. Eimer suggests that the labor movement has
altered the “way it delivers information to its
members.” Briefly summarize the changes that
labor has made.
Process Continues…
“In what the federation claims was the “largest
mobilization in history,” 225,000 union members
volunteered to staff phone banks, distribute literature,
knock on doors, and engage in the otherwise
unglamorous work of electoral mobilization. By
election night, more than 90 percent of union
members reported receiving information from their
unions. In the end, this outreach helped deliver 61
percent of the labor vote to Kerry. Not bad,
considering that only 48 percent of the general public
voted that way.”
Eimer, 2005
Long Term Project…
“This is a building process, and there is no going
back. You win some and you lose some, but the
bottom line is that you are moving the ball down the
field a little at the time”
Steven
Rosenthal, AFL-CIO Political Director, 1999
So 10 years later has there been improvement?
53% of General Public Voted for Obama but 60% of Union
members Did: But no change in the 60/40 “problem”
2010 Congressional Races
Future
Political Reaction of Public Sector Unions to Continued
Attempts to Roll Back Rights and Benefits
WI
On
Recall Elections as Interesting Thing to Keep an Eye
Future
Political Reaction of Public Sector Unions to
Continued Attempts to Roll Back Rights and Benefits
WI
Recall Elections as Interesting Thing to Keep an Eye
On
Lobbying Efforts Geared Toward Labor Law Reform
EFCA
etc.
2012 Presidential and Congressional Races
Will
be a massive labor and business mobilization
Next…
What now for American unions…