Transcript Document

ePortfolios for Leadership Identity
Development with OSP:
Some Very Preliminary Findings
Darren Cambridge
George Mason University
[email protected]
Lives We Lead
• Three-year project at George Mason
University
• Co-curricular leadership portfolio
development using Open Source Portfolio
• Research as part of the third cohort of the
Inter/National Coalition for Electronic
Portfolio Research
I/NCEPR
• Institutional research teams examining the impact
of electronic portfolio practice on learning
• 46 institutions in four cohorts
• Third cohort focuses on student affairs -academic
affairs collaboration
• US, Canada, England, Scotland, Netherlands
• Book to be published by Stylus in 2008
Methodology
• Design research
– Intervention design informed by theory
– Evaluated for effectiveness and contributes to
further development of theory
• Grounded theory
– Collaborative coding of portfolio, video, and
interview data by inter-disciplinary team
– Theoretical sampling
Leadership theory
• Leadership Identity Development
– Based on research on undergraduate student leaders at the
University of Maryland
– From positional leadership to multi-dimensional perspective
• Identity
• Relationships
• Community
• Evidence in leadership portfolios
– Leadership portfolios in Ohio high schools
– Products, reproductions, attestations
Theories of Reflection
• Kolb’s stages of reflection
– Description
– Analysis
– Judgment
– Planning
• Yancey’s types of reflection
– constructive reflection
– reflection-in-presentation
Program Design
•
•
•
•
Semester-long, co-curricular portfolio keeping experience
Three face-to-face, day-long meetings
Faculty, staff, and peer mentors
Students who self-identify as leaders and students who
don’t, first-year to graduate student
• Sequenced use OSP tools with r-smart CLE
– Hierarchical wizards
– Matrixes
– Portfolios
Beginning of Semester
• Expanding thinking about
evidence
• Reflective writing in
response to selections
from a large number of
prompts
• Organized around identity,
relationships, community
• Hierarchical matrix
Mid-semester
• Reconceptualizing as
leadership
• Organizing evidence
and reflections in
relationship to shared
conceptual framework
– Matrix thinking
• Matrix
End of Semester
• Presentation portfolio
for an audience of their
choice
• Identity, relationships,
community, future
directions
• Portfolio using
template
Very Preliminary Findings
• First iteration ended in May 2007
• Analyzed so far
– Evaluation surveys
– Selected final portfolios
• Coding of additional portfolios, video data, and
conducting interviews with students through
December 2007
• Key themes in student leadership identity, rather
than impact of portfolio process
Evidence, Audience, and
Mentoring
• Despite honorarium, significant lack of retention
(From 33 to 16)
• Broader conception of and new value placed in
evidence in relationship to leadership-related
activities
• Strong sense of pride in final product
• Peer mentoring invaluable
– Mirrors research as LaGuardia and other I/NCEPR
campuses
Strong Perceived Impact
Strengthened ability to connect learning
experiences inside and outside of the classroom
73%
Stronger sense of self as a leader
87%
Stronger awareness of my leadership potential
88%
Enhanced awareness of how to present ideas to
different audiences
75%
More confident in ability to use reflective practice 82%
for self-discovery and learning
More confident in my ability to use electronic
environments for my learning
87%
Greater awareness of how to select evidence
that demonstrates my learning
100%
From Position to Integration
• Students see their identities to be inseparable from multiple
kinds of relationships and community memberships
– Family relationships, friendships, academic and professional
community membership
– Navigation between cultures and putting them into conversations
– Portfolios as a sight of integration
• Shift from positional definition of leadership to grounding in
this integrated network
• Mirrors findings of research in eFolio Minnesota and
LaGuardia
Academics as Test of Self
• We intended for curricular content to be an central
source of evidence and ideas and strategies, but it
didn’t show up this way
• Class work functioned as
– A demonstration of character virtues
– An experience
– A goal putting aspiration towards those virtues in action
Steadfastness
• Consistency of commitment over time seen as a
central leadership virtue
– Tenacity, perseverance, patience, follow through
– Standing up to opposition and peer pressure
– Essential to ability to create change
• Much more prominent than persuasiveness
• Spirituality and family key arenas for
demonstrating steadfastness
Change
• While steadfastness is central, so is change
• Leadership requires growth
• Students universally embraced change as
both a personally and societal goal
• Local and global, but very little in between
Evidence
• Primarily reproductions and attestations
• Symbolic rather than persuasive
• Heuristics for reflection
Buncencia Seabreeze’s
Portfolio
Questions Moving Forward
• How do students who self-identify leaders and those who
don’t differ?
• Why is course content not see as relevant, and how might
we change that?
• Do the ways students use evidence match the
expectations of their intended audiences?
• In terms of developing leadership competence, how
important is self-identification? Does it matter when we call
it leadership?
• How well do the different OSP tools support the
development process?