Transcript Proposal Title - Governors Highway Safety Association
Driver Behavior Modification to Improve Roadway Safety
Dr. Priya Prasad Technical Fellow Ford Motor Company & Member of The National Academy of Engineering 1
Vehicle (cars + light truck) Occupant Fatalities in USA 35000 90% 80% 30000 25000 70% 60% 20000 50% 40% 15000 10000 30% 20% 5000 10% 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
2000 2002 2004 0% 2006 Total Veh.(Pass Car + Lt.Truck) Occupants Killed Belt wearing rate (%) % of Total drivers involved in fatal crashes with BAC=0.08+ TSF, NHTSA 2
Changes in Road Fatalities between 1994 & 2004 3 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% -25% -30% -35% -40% -45% U.S.A
U.K
Australia Sweden Italy Japan Netherlands France Germany UMTRI-2006-26
Safety Vision
Sweden Netherlands Japan Australia Zero Fatality Vision Zero Fatality Vision 50% Reduction in Fatalities by 2015 40% Reduction in Fatalities by 2010 United Kingdom 40% Reduction in Fatalities by 2010 Canada 30% Reduction in Fatalities by 2010 European Union 30% Reduction in Fatalities by 2010 United States 33% Reduction in Fatalities by 2008
4
Holistic Safety Approach
Modification of driver behavior Vehicle safety improvements Infra-structure improvements Enforcements of traffic laws 5
Driver Behavior Factors affecting Fatalities
Seat belt wearing Alcohol Speed Driver age/experience 6
Factors for Fatalities – NOT Wearing Restraints 7 32% 32% 31% 2004 25% 23% 19% 15% 13% 12% 11% 10% <5 5-9 10-15 16-20 21-24 25-34
Age (yrs)
35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 >74 TSF, NHTSA
Factors for Fatalities – Alcohol Involvement 8 9% DRIVERS with BAC 0.08 g/dL or HIGHER (2005) 32% 28% 23% 19% 16% 12% 7% 4% <16 16-20 21-24 25-34 35-44
Age (yrs )
45-54 55-64 65-74 >74 DOT HS 810616
Factors for Fatalities - Speeding 2005 9 DOT HS 810629
Vehicle (cars + light truck ) Occupant Fatality Rate in USA 0.30
10 16-20 yr 0.25
21-24 yr 0.20
>74 yr 0.15
0.10
Total Veh Occ.
0.05
0.00
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
2000 2002 2004 2006 TSF, NHTSA
Holistic Countermeasures
Policy Education Enforcement Technology 11
Belt Wearing Rates
Primary belt wearing laws Educational campaigns Strict enforcement Technological intervention: Ford’s Belt Minder, Seat-belt interlocks, Belt comfort and convenience improvements 12
Alcohol Impaired Driving Reduction
<0.08 BAC law Zero-tolerance laws (proposal in some European countries Strict enforcement of laws High fines (Japan) Educational campaigns Technology: alcohol interlocks 13
Technology Status
Technology has a role Current technology effective for repeat offenders Mass scale introduction expected only after ten years Consumer acceptance may still be an issue Total fleet saturation will take substantially longer time (additional 15 years) 14
Speed
Speed limits Speed limit enforcement Educational campaigns Technology: Roadside and traffic light cameras (highly effective in Europe) Intelligent Speed Adaptation Information and control (European Experiment) 15
Driver Demographics
Teen aged drivers is an issue, some from inexperience and some from risky behavior Graduated Driver Licensing and enforcement Parental education regarding risk factors for teenagers 16
Driving Skills for Life Program
A collaboration between Ford and the GHSA New website launched in May- over 500 logins per day, further enhancements planned Summer camp in August: 600 teens trained, 100 parents participated 30-min. documentary to be launched soon, with PR campaigns on national media (TV, Radio, print/online Investigating other opportunities 17
Potential Technological Interventions for Teenage drivers
Parents can request for the following: – Smart seatbelt interlocks – Smart alcohol interlocks – Smart license to control vehicle acceleration and speed Above is technologically feasible, but needs demand from parents 18
Technology Vs Policy
Technology will play a role in modifying driver behavior, but the effect of technological intervention will be in the long term due to the time taken to reach fleet saturation.
Therefore, a policy based on enforcement and education will have a faster effect. 19