PPI in Water in 2008 Perard
Download
Report
Transcript PPI in Water in 2008 Perard
PPI in developing countries
Results from the 2009 water update
of the PPI Database
A product of the World Bank and PPIAF
1
Notes on the easy-to-use graphs
Graphs include data on projects:
Reaching financial or contractual closure in 1990–2009
In low- and middle-income countries as classified by the
World Bank in July 2009
Data on investment commitments are reported in billions of
2009 U.S. dollars.
The data were adjusted by the U.S. consumer price index,
using 2009 as the base year.
Data at http://ppi.worldbank.org/ are reported in millions of
current U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.
A graph’s formatting, title, and notes can be changed by
double clicking.
See the last slide for notes on the methodology of the PPI
Database.
2
Investment commitments to water projects with private
participation in developing countries, 1990–2009
18
2009 US$ billions
New projects
80
Manila
15
90
concessions
70
12
60
Johor
Chilean concession
9
Buenos Aires
40
Syabas
concession
concession
6
3
50
privatizations
30
Malaysia Indah
Region sewerage
20
10
0
0
1990
1995
Other investment commitments
2000
Large commitments
2005
2009
Projects
Source: World Bank and PPIAF, PPI Database.
3
New water projects with private participation in developing
countries, by semester, 1990–2009
90
New projects
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
First semester
Source: World Bank and PPIAF, PPI Database.
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Second semester
4
Investment commitments to water projects with private participation
in developing countries, by semester, 2001–09
6
2009 US$ billions
5
4
3
2
1
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
First semester
Source: World Bank and PPIAF, PPI Database.
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Second semester
5
Water projects with private participation in developing countries,
by country income group, 1990–2009
90
New projects
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1990
1995
Low income
China
2000
Other lower middle income
2005
2009
Upper middle income
Note: China is classified as lower-middle-income country by the World Bank
Source: World Bank and PPIAF, PPI Project Database
6
Investment commitments to water projects with private participation
in developing countries, by country income group, 1990–2009
15
2009 US$ billions
12
9
6
3
0
1990
1995
Low income
2000
China
Other lower middle income
2005
2009
Upper middle income
Note: China is classified as lower-middle-income country by the World Bank
Source: World Bank and PPIAF, PPI Project Database
7
Water projects with private participation in developing countries,
by type of business, 1990–2009
90
New projects
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1990
1995
2000
2005
Potable water and sewage treatment plant
Potable water treatment plant
Sewage treatment plant
Water utility with sewerage
Water utility without sewerage
Sewage collection and treatment
Source: World Bank and PPIAF, PPI Database.
2009
8
Investment commitments to water projects with private participation
in developing countries, by type of business, 1990–2009
15
2009 US$ billions
12
9
6
3
0
1990
1995
2000
2005
Potable water and sewage treatment plant
Potable water treatment plant
Sewage treatment plant
Water utility with sewerage
Water utility without sewerage
Sewage collection and treatment
Source: World Bank and PPIAF, PPI Database.
2009
9
Water projects with private participation in developing countries,
by region, 1990–2009
90
New projects
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1990
1995
2000
2005
2009
East Asia and Pacific
Europe and Central Asia
Latin America and the Caribbean
Middle East and North Africa
South Asia
Sub-Saharan Africa
Source: World Bank and PPIAF, PPI Database.
10
Investment commitments to water projects with private
participation in developing countries, by region, 1990–2009
15
2009 US$ billions
12
9
6
3
0
1990
1995
2000
2005
2009
East Asia and Pacific
Europe and Central Asia
Latin America and the Caribbean
Middle East and North Africa
South Asia
Sub-Saharan Africa
Source: World Bank and PPIAF, PPI Database.
11
Water utility projects with private participation in developing
countries, by region, 1990–2009
35
New projects
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1990
1995
2000
2005
2009
East Asia and Pacific
Europe and Central Asia
Latin America and the Caribbean
Middle East and North Africa
South Asia
Sub-Saharan Africa
Source: World Bank and PPIAF, PPI Database.
12
Water treatment plant projects with private participation
in developing countries, by region, 1990–2009
60
New projects
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1990
1995
2000
2005
2009
East Asia and Pacific
Europe and Central Asia
Latin America and the Caribbean
Middle East and North Africa
South Asia
Sub-Saharan Africa
Source: World Bank and PPIAF, PPI Database.
13
Water utility projects with private participation
in developing countries, by subtype, 2005–09
Partial
divestitures, 6
BOO, 1
Full
divestitures,1
Management
contracts, 11
BOT, 6
RLT, 2
Leases, 13
ROT, 20
BROT, 19
Note: ROT = rehabilitate, operate, transfer; BROT = build, rehabilitate, operate, transfer; RLT = rehabilitate, lease, transfer; BOT =
build, operate, transfer; BOO = build, own, operate. The PPI Project Database classifies merchant, BOO, and BOT projects as
greenfield projects, and BROT, RLT, and ROT projects as concessions.
Source: World Bank and PPIAF, PPI Project Database.
14
Water treatment plant projects with private participation
in developing countries, by subtype, 2005–09
Partial
divestitures,
4
BOO, 6
Management
contracts, 6
Leases, 4
BROT, 7
ROT, 37
BOT, 160
Note: ROT = rehabilitate, operate, transfer; BROT = build, rehabilitate, operate, transfer; RLT = rehabilitate, lease, transfer; BOT =
build, operate, transfer; BOO = build, own, operate. The PPI Project Database classifies merchant, BOO, and BOT projects as
greenfield projects, and BROT, RLT, and ROT projects as concessions.
Source: World Bank and PPIAF, PPI Project Database.
15
Methodological notes on the PPI Database
Data are reported on the basis of commitments, not disbursements.
The database includes only projects that have reached financial or
contractual closure.
For management and lease contracts, a contract authorizing the commencement of
management or lease service must exist.
For concessions and greenfield projects, financial closure is defined as the existence of a legally
binding commitment of equity holders or debt financiers to provide or mobilize funding for the
project. The funding must account for a significant part of the project cost, securing the
construction of the facility.
For divestitures, the equity holders must have a legally binding commitment to acquire the assets
of the facility.
Investments in infrastructure projects are classified as one of two types:
Investment in physical assets. The total cost of developing or expanding the facility during the
contract period is entered as investment data in the year of financial closure. Privately run
telecom projects and energy utilities are exceptions. For these, annual investments in facility
expansion are entered in the year of the investment when information is publicly available.
Payments to the government—expenditures on government assets such as state-owned
enterprises or rights to provide services in a specific area or to use radio spectrum. These
include divestiture revenues, license fees, and canon payments. Where divestitures are phased,
the investments are recorded in the years in which the transactions take place.
More information can be found at http://ppi.worldbank.org/
16
PPI in developing countries
Results from the 2009 water update
of the PPI Database
A product of the World Bank and PPIAF
17