Assistant Principal Meeting

Download Report

Transcript Assistant Principal Meeting

Assistant Principal Meeting

September 18, 2014 8:00am to 1:00pm Presenters: Anna Arrigo & Marygrace DiForte

AP Expectations

 Assistant Principal sessions are designed to facilitate and maximize opportunities for the participants to engage in informal discussions with their colleagues around topics covered in the seminar sessions.  During the seminars, Assistant Principals are asked to be active participants, ask questions, participate, facilitate, explore, discuss, collaborate and indicate areas and/or topics for further exploration.

Agenda

         8:30am-9:00am Welcome Back 9:00am-10:00am – Tower Building Ice Breaker 10:00am-10:30am – Janet Rock Presentation 10:30am-10:45am – Break 10:45am-11:00am – Cross Walk Documents 11:00am-11:50pm - Literature Circles - “Using Data to Improve Student Learning” and Share 11:50pm-12:00pm – Break 12:00-1:00 - Inquiry Teams Lunch to follow

Janet Rock Vendor Presentation

The Tower Game Build a Tower Build a Team

The Tower Game for Team Building

Goal:

 Working together as a team  Team Roles  Planning –vs- Execution  Communication  Reflecting and Refining

The Tower Game Objective:

To work together

Build the tallest free-standing tower

Only with the supplies given

Paper and Tape

Communicate Collaborate Reflect & Refine

The Tower Game

Reflection:

What was the experience like?

How did your group communicate?

How did you work out conflict?

What were some challenges?

Did you need to readjust your plan?

Did all members participate?

Did you meet the objective?

Communicate Collaborate Reflect & Refine

Instructional Focus Collaborative Professional Learning Knowledge of Students

BREAK

Cross Walking Documents

UFT Contract

Danielson

Quality Review

Cross Walking Documents

Professional Mondays

Other Professional Work

Danielson

Quality Review

Activity

Jigsaw into groups

Discuss given topic

Take notes

Get ready to share

Make personal connections

 

Using Data to

Improve Learning

for All

The Power of Collaborative Inquiry Collaborative Inquiry Improves Student Learning

Collaborative Inquiry Creates Data Cultures

Building the Bridge Between Data & Results

Leadership & Capacity

 

Core-Competencies for High-Capacity Data Use Collaboration

Data Use

Instructional Improvement

Collaborative Culture

What is Collaborative Inquiry?

Collaborative inquiry is a sustained process of investigation and action that empowers teachers to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap.

18

Collaborative Inquiry Teams

Improve Student Outcomes

Allows multiple teams, focused on additional cohorts of students, to study the most effective ways to increase achievement Develop Teacher Capacity and Collaboration

Empowers teachers to make decisions to aligning assessment, curriculum, instruction, and professional development Build School Capacity

Establishes and/or deepens collaboration and communication building a professional learning community

School Reflection Protocol

Purpose:

   Reflecting on past practice can help schools gain insights about what was successful and what can be improved. This protocol guides teams through reflecting on past years’ work and developing next steps for strengthening practice. This activity may be used throughout the year as teams continue to reflect and refine their work. 20

Collaborative Inquiry

COLLABORATIVE INQUIRY AS A PROCESS TO STRENGTHEN STUDENT WORK AND TEACHER PRACTICE

Teachers and Teacher Teams:

Examine Student Work/ Data Examine teacher work (including Classroom visits ) •

Look at student work, curriculum and

assessments.

Assess gaps and strengths represented in that work

Revise and repeat inquiry cycle

EXTENDING COLLABORATIVE INQUIRY TO INCLUDE A FOCUS ON INSTRUCTION FOR ALL LEARNERS

Reflect, learn and plan how to strengthen their practice to help students better meet the standards (curriculum, assessment, and pedagogy)

Monitor student progress with common assessments Take action: implement instructional strategy Define gaps, instructional strategy and set goals Engage external resources

Principals and School Administrators:

Look at student work, curriculum, assessments in the context of teacher practice

Regularly visit classrooms

Provide timely, specific, evidence-based feedback for teachers to assist teachers in improving their practice 22

Making Connections

City wide Instructional Expectations and Collaborative Inquiry

Schools need to strategically align their work, including their instructional focus, professional learning, inquiry work and related supports based on regular assessment of student strengths and needs.

Knowledge of Students

 It remains the responsibility of the classroom teacher to know how each of his or her students is progressing towards mastery of the content and standards.  It is the responsibility of the school to ensure that each student’s academic and social-emotional development and progress toward meeting the benchmarks for college and career readiness are well known and addressed.

Engage external resources

The Collaborative Inquiry Process

Look at teacher work Look at student work/data Instructional Inquiry Cycle (multiple teams) Monitor and track progress Set goals and take action Continue to Share Inquiry Process and Lessons Learned 25

The Collaborative Inquiry Process Supports Coherence at the Classroom, Team and School Levels

Monito r and revise

Instructional coherence The inquiry process is aligned to the Quality Review statements

Align capacity building

Gather and analyze data

Plan and set goals

> > > > >

Classroom coherence:

student inquiry creates aligned curriculum, pedagogy and assessments for every

Team coherence

they teach : teams use a similar approach to inquiry with a focus on specific student cohorts

School coherence:

made as a result of what teacher teams are learning decisions are Appropriate strategies are identified and monitored to help build capacity and ensure the use of rigorous curricula, instructional techniques and assessments In the revision process, teams discuss outcomes and strategies, and share knowledge 26

The Collaborative Inquiry Process: Alignment to Quality Review Rubric Quality Review Indicator: 4.2

Engage in structured professional collaborations on teams using an inquiry approach that promotes shared leadership and focuses on improved student learning 27

The Collaborative Inquiry Process: Alignment to Quality Review Rubric Quality Review Indicator: 4.2 Well-Developed a) The vast majority of teachers are engaged in inquiry-based, structured professional collaborations that have strengthened teacher instructional capacity and promoted the implementation of CCLS (including the instructional shifts), resulting in school-wide instructional coherence and increased student achievement for all learners b) Teacher teams systematically analyze key elements of teacher work including classroom practice, assessment data, and student work for students they share or on whom they are focused, resulting in shared improvements in teacher practice and mastery of goals for groups of students c) Distributed leadership structures are embedded so that there is effective teacher leadership and teachers play an integral role in key decisions that affect student learning across the school

     

Why Does Collaborative Inquiry Matter?

Using an inquiry approach can improve student outcomes, develop teacher capacity, and build school capacity by: Organizing teachers around the learning of a select group of students for whom they then share responsibility.

Building upon and deepening the work of existing teacher teams.

Creating a “ learner-centered school ” where administration, faculty and students are continuously studying their own work and exploring new ways to be more effective.

Focusing teachers on aligning assessment, curriculum, instruction, and professional development to generate school-wide improvement.

Establishing and/or deepening collaboration and communication between school and home where parents/caregivers are partners in supporting their children’s growth.

Supporting the sharing of work within and across schools.

29

Case Study at PS 112

At P.S. 112 there are various teams that meet, each with a specific focus to support students.  Inquiry teams are the grade level and vertical teams that meet weekly.  Grade level teams look at student information and plan accordingly.  In vertical team meetings, academic and social development interventions and ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) student cases are discussed.  Teachers of the various teams also attend professional development based on the surfaced needs. For example, teachers attend TCRWP Reading and Writing Summer Institutes. The expectation is that teachers turnkey information to their respective teams when they return to school in the fall. 30

Inquiry Team Sharing of Artifacts

Citywide Instructional Expectations

Timeline: Fall 2014

 Communicate with families to assure partnership on the school’s instructional priorities  Implement structures that support the school’s knowledge of its students, its instructional focus, and its culture for collaborative professional learning  Gather and reflect upon evidence of student mastery of content and standards, students’ social-emotional learning, and progress towards graduating high school college and career ready  Implement course corrections in areas such as academic intervention services and staffing

BOOKS TO BUILD COMMUNITY

Goals of Assistant Principal Meetings

As a result of participation in ALPAP, it is expected that assistant principals will be able to:  As a result of participation in the AP meetings, it is expected that Assistant Principals will be able to:   Expand knowledge and skills related to professional growth, advanced leadership, and school improvement needed to increase Develop personal vehicles for on-going professional development;  Initiate and implement practical strategies for school improvement and student achievement;   Develop a collegial network for support and follow-up professional activities; Advance their leadership skills aligned to the NYCDOE School Leadership Competencies.

Instructional Rounds in Education

A Network Approach to Improving Teaching and Learning

Elizabeth A. City, Richard F. Elmore, Sarah E. Fiarman and Lee Teitel

Thank You

See you at our next Assistant Principal Meeting on October 21, 2014

Arriving at one goal, is the starting point to another.

- John Dewey