Transcript Working Architects Group HiEd IT Architecture

Working Architects Group
HiEd IT Architecture
Update #3
Harvard CSG
9/23/2004
Today’s Discussion
• Third time around
• First – established the affinity
• Second – explored architecture and
architect
• Today
– Recap the WAG agenda
– Update from MIT
– Discussion
• CIO Perspective: Incorporating Architecture
7/18/2015
Harvard CSG - 9/23/2004
Structure of the WAG Agenda
1. On the Topic: Common Issues, Range of Motion
a)
b)
c)
d)
Motivation, Integration, Results
Models, Definitions, Artifacts
Roles, Perspectives, Interactions
Methods, Processes, Tools
2. In the Topic: Technical Discussions
a) Consideration/collaboration on 'architecture issues‘
b) Leverage a larger architecture group to discuss issues
c) Compose/share recommendations
3. For the Topic: Structure/Activities of the WAG
a) Communication, Outreach, Expansion, Focus
7/18/2015
Harvard CSG - 9/23/2004
MIT Perspective
CIO Perspective:
Incorporating Architecture
1. What’s missing? What gap is there that I see
architecture filling?
2. What form will it take? Is it a perspective, a
roadmap, a list of tools/methods, a set of
opinions, and/or a set of people? Does it deal
with questions of today, tomorrow, or infinity?
3. How will I incorporate it? Perspectives must be
consulted, roadmaps must be read, tools must
be used, opinions must be discussed, people
need to interact... What actions do I foresee
using to incorporate the architecture forms into
the planning and operation of my organization?
7/18/2015
Harvard CSG - 9/23/2004
Working Architects Group
HiEd IT Architecture
Update #3
Harvard CSG
9/23/2004