Transcript Slide 1
HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013
September 10, 2013
1
Components of the 2013 Standardized Testing and Reporting Program (STAR)
• • • •
California Standards Test (CST)
– English/Language Arts, Grades 2 - 8 – Writing, Grades 4 and 7 – Mathematics, Grades 2 - 7 – General Mathematics, Grade 8 – Algebra, Grades 7 and 8 – Geometry, Grade 8 – Science, Grades 5 and 8 – History/Social Science, Grade 8
California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) California Modified Assessment (CMA) Standards-based Tests in Spanish (STS)
2
CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST) ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTS
2013 Percentages of Students Meeting Proficiency 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2 79 61 56 3 76 53 46 4 89 71 65 5 87 67 60 6 83 69 60 7 81 68 60 8 74 66 57 81% Average for HBCSD HBCSD Orange County State 3
CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST) MATHEMATICS
2013 Percentages of Students Meeting Proficiency 100 90 80 30 20 10 0 70 60 50 40 86 72 64 87 77 69 89 78 71 81 73 65 55 52 43 39 32 95 95 86 62 49 49 87 80% Average for HBCSD Grades 2 - 8 HBCSD Orange County State 4
CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST) ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTS
2009-2013 Subgroup Results 100 90 40 30 20 10 80 70 60 50 0 75 78 79 82 81 Districtwide 48 58 63 65 61 Students with Disabilities 50 58 59 64 62 Economically Disadvantaged 30 29 34 34 35 English Learners 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 State Results: 33% Students with Disability 45% Economically Disadvantaged 22% English Learners 5
CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST) MATHEMATICS
2009-2013 Subgroup Results 100 90 80 30 20 10 0 70 60 50 40 75 75 76 77 80 Districtwide 49 60 61 63 63 58 56 58 61 66 43 46 49 46 51 Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged English Learners 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 State Results: 48% Students with Disabilities 53% Economically Disadvantaged 40% English Learners 6
CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST) 8th GRADE HISTORY-SOCIAL SCIENCE AND 5th and 8th GRADE SCIENCE RESULTS
100 90 80 30 20 10 0 70 60 50 40 63 65 72 74 75 8th Grade History-Social Science 79 85 82 87 87 5th Grade Science 79 80 85 86 87 8th Grade Science 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 7
STAR WRITING ASSESSMENT 4th and 7 th Graders Meeting Proficiency
40 30 20 10 0 100 90 80 70 60 50 86 90 97 92 4th Grade CST 61 37 71 58 4th Grade CMA 73 93 99 97 89 7th Grade CST 75 76 68 73 38 7th Grade CMA 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 * The State suspended the writing assessment for 4 th Grade in 2010 8
Additional State and Federal Accountability Components
•
Physical Fitness Test (PFT)
9
Physical Fitness Testing (PFT) Percentages of Students Meeting Standards 2009 - 2013
90 80 30 20 10 0 70 60 50 40 73 72 68 70 64 85 84 80 78 75 5th Grade 7th Grade 2006/07: 6 out of 6 = Meets Fitness Standards 2008/09 – 2012/13: 5 out of 6
AND
6 out of 6 = Meets Fitness Standards. = 40% were at 6 out of 6 in 5 th grade and 53% were 6 out of 6 in 7 th grade 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 10
Additional State and Federal Accountability Components
•
California English Language Development (CELDT)
•
Title III Accountability for English Learners(EL)
Data is not available from the California Department of Education at this time and will be presented at a future meeting.
11
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Federal accountability reporting system Looks at the percentage of students meeting proficiency STAR CST, CMA, and CAPA tests used to determine whether a district/school has met their AYP
Criteria for meeting AYP
• •
Participation rate of 95% Percent proficient
•
Additional API Indicator (800 or more)
•
Criteria must be met for students districtwide/schoolwide as well as significant subgroups
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30%
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP)
59% 54% HB Districtwide
ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTS
Proficient and Advanced 60% 65% 69% 71% 100.0% 70% 75% 77% 79% 35.2% 46.0% 56.8% 81% 67.6% 80% 89.2% 20% 24.4% 10% 13.6% 0% 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014 13
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTS
2009-2013 Subgroup Results 2001/02 –2003/04 AMO = 13.6% 2008/09 AMO = 46.0% 2009/10 AMO = 56.8% 2010/11 AMO = 67.6% 2011/12 AMO = 78.4% 2012/13 AMO = 89.2% 14
120 100 ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) ELA Achievement Gap – Subgroups Compared to AYP Targets and All Students 100 80 60 68 57 54 83 74 71 48 84 73 70 46 86 78 75 51 87 79 77 63 53 87 82 79 67,6 64 56 90 85 81 78,4 68 64 61 58 84 80 65 63 60 56 AYP Target HBCSD Overall Students With Disability Economically Disadvantaged English Learners Hispanic or Latino Asian White 40 35,2 35 20 27 25 21 13,6 24,4 0 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 15
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 16.0%
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP)
59% 64% 53% HB Districtwide 65%
MATH
Proficient and Advanced
69% 70% 70% 75% 75% 58.0% 68.5% 37.0% 47.5% 75% 76% 100.0% 79% 89.5% 26.5% 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014 16
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) MATH
2009-2013 Subgroup Results 2001/02-2003/04 AMO = 16.0% 2008/09 AMO = 47.5% 2009/10 AMO = 58.0% 2010/11 AMO = 68.5% 2011/12 /AMO = 79.0% 2012/13 /AMO = 89.5% 17
120 ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) Math Achievement Gap – Subgroups Compared to AYP Targets and All Students 100 100 92 89,5 87 87 90 88 87 89 80 81 79 76 60 40 75 52 50 46 40 46 44 37 61 52 47,5 60 58 56 68,5 61 59 67 65 62 AYP Target HBCSD Overall Students With Disability Economically Disadvantaged English Learners Hispanic or Latino Asian White 32 29 26,5 20 16 0 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 18
Site
District Dwyer Sowers Eader Hawes H. Seacliff Moffett Perry Peterson Smith 33 29 25 13 13 13 15 25 17 17
Huntington Beach City School District 2013 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Summary Number of Criteria AYP Outcomes Subgroups Not Meeting ELA Subgroups Not Meeting Math PI Status
Met 26 of 33 Met 19 of 29 Met 18 of 25 LEAWide, Hispanic, White, Two/More Races, SED, EL, SWD Schoolwide, Asian, Hispanic, SED, EL, SWD Schoolwide, Hispanic, White, SED, SWD Schoolwide, White Met 11 of 13 Met 12 of 13 Met 13 of 13 Met 8 of 15 Schoolwide Met 18 of 25 Schoolwide, White, SED, SWD Schoolwide, Hispanic, White, SED, EL, SWD Schoolwide Met 16 of 17 Met 14 of 17 Schoolwide, White SED White, SED, EL, SWD Hispanic, SWD Schoolwide, SED, SWD SWD Year 2 Year 2 Year 2 Year 1 19
Academic Performance Index (API)
State accountability reporting system Looks at growth in district/school’s performance Star CST, CMA, and CAPA tests used in API calculation
Huntington Beach City School District
Growth Academic Performance Index Results
Eader Elementary School
Growth Academic Performance Index Results
Hawes Elementary School
Growth Academic Performance Index Results
Huntington Seacliff Elementary School
Growth Academic Performance Index Results
Moffett Elementary School
Growth Academic Performance Index Results
Perry Elementary School
Growth Academic Performance Index Results
Peterson Elementary School
Growth Academic Performance Index Results
Smith Elementary School
Growth Academic Performance Index Results
Dwyer Middle School
Growth Academic Performance Index Results
Sowers Middle School
Growth Academic Performance Index Results
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API)
Multi-Year Growth Trend
School Site
Dwyer Eader Hawes Huntington Seacliff Moffett Perry Peterson Smith Sowers
1999/00 Baseline
732 781 846 844* 793 621 757 794 807
2012/13 Overall Results Growth
895 163 932 940 151 94 968 921 812 937 910 892 124 128 191 180 116 85 *2000 Baseline 31
HBCSD POINTS OF PRIDE
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
• One (1) school met all AYP criteria • One (1) Title I school met goals through Safe Harbor • Twenty-Seven (27) groups made Safe Harbor goals • HBCSD students continue to outperform when compared to county and state data
Academic Performance Index (API)
• All schools at or above the State Target of 800 • Seven (7) schools made growth • Six (6) schools over 900 • Positive multi-year growth trend for schools ranging from 85-191 points 32
Program Improvement (PI) HBCSD Responsibilities
Program Improvement (PI)
• Year 1 designation for Peterson • Year 2 designation for District, Dwyer, and Perry • Continued data analysis and implementation of addendum to Local Education Agency (LEA) Plan • Set aside Title I funding for professional development, choice transfers, and supplemental educational services (Year 2 sites only) 33
Huntington Beach City School District
Next Steps for Success:
• Continue to conduct data analysis on 2012/13 STAR and Multiple Measures assessment data • Identify and support student achievement needs based on data analysis • Develop and implement targeted academic interventions for students at each school site • Continue to align Single Plans for Student Achievement to reflect identified needs and goals in English-language arts and Mathematics 34
Huntington Beach City School District
Next Steps for Success (continued):
• Support the continuation of the Benchmark Assessment System to inform instruction and monitor student achievement in English-language arts and Mathematics • Provide Common Core professional development for staff to support instructional goals for student achievement • Take steps to prepare for rigorous assessments in Spring of 2014 • Emphasis during instruction on 21 st Century skills 35