Transcript OpenSG Status Report

OpenSG Status
UCAIug Members Meeting
Chris Knudsen – Chair
Gary Stuebing – Vice-Chair
November 9th, 2009
Agenda
• Organization
• SG Conformity
• SG Communications
• SG Systems
• SG Security
SG Conformity
• Key accomplishments
– Defined scope and charter with unanimous agreement
– Established guiding principles
– Agreed on formation and prioritization of 3 TFs:
• Edge Conformity (ADE/ADR/HAN)
• SG Security Conformity
• AMI ENT Conformity (Not currently prioritized)
• Next steps
– kick off task forces and establish weekly calls and
SG Communications
• Key accomplishments
– OpenSG PAP #1 and #2 requirements
• Identified 21 top level SG applications and 15 potential
actors for each
• Worked through 4 of the applications end to end and
created over 100 high level functional requirements
– Organization
• Scope/Charter discussion
SG Communications
• Next steps
– OpenSG PAP #1 and #2
•
•
•
•
Complete walkthrough of top level actions
Align requirements by actor interfaces
Distill communications requirements
Face to face at Grid-Interop in Denver (mid November)
– Organization
• Task Groups per Knoxville session discussion
• Weekly conference calls
SG Systems
• Key accomplishments
– Updated SharePoint
– Electronic Balloting Process
– Task Forces (next slides)
• Next steps
– (Next Slides)
SG-Systems Task Forces & Service Teams
SG-Systems WG
Chair: Brent Hodges
Co Chair: Greg Robinson
AMI-Ent TF
OpenADE TF
OpenADR TF
OpenHAN TF
Chair: Wayne Longcore
Co-Chair: Greg Robinson
Chair: Dave Mollerstuen
Co-Chair: Steve Van Ausdall
Chair: Albert Chiu
Co-Chair: Ed Koch
Chair: Erich Gunther
Co-Chair:
Underway
Underway
With NAESB
Underway
Underway
With NAESB
Use Case Team
Chair: Ralph Martinez
Co-Chair: Kay Stefferud
SRS Team
Chair: Joe Zhou
Planning
Collaboration
With SE 2.0
& OASIS
Collaboration
With SE 2.0
Planning
Planning
Collaboration
With SE 2.0
& OASIS
Collaboration
With SE 2.0
Underway
Underway
Collaboration
With SE 2.0
& OASIS
Collaboration
With SE 2.0
Service Definitions Team
Chair: Jerry Gray
Co-Chair: Shawn Hu
Interoperability Testing Team
Chair: Randy Lowe
Co-Chair: Xiaofeng Wang
Security Team
Chair: Darren Highfill
SG Systems – AMI-Enterprise
• Key accomplishments
– Industry Best Practice Approved:
•
•
•
•
•
Use Cases
System Requirements Specification (SRS)
Methodology
Services
Ready to submit to SDO (IEC TC57 WG14)
• Next steps
• Participate in IEC61968-9 interoperability testing
• Analyze and incorporate security requirements
• Update and ballot next release
Service Definition Team
• Key accomplishments
– Approval of the Service Definition Artifacts
• Next steps – Build the roadmap
• Open a model for access/collaboration
• Baseline the artifacts
• Plan new work, e.g. OpenADE, sharing with WG14
SG Systems - OpenADE
• Key accomplishments
– Agreement on 1.0 version of Use Case document
• Next steps
– Work on SRS, service definitions
– Reference / prototype implementations
• Next encounter data/time (tele./webinar/f2f)
– Weekly meetings, every Thursday @noon Mtn.
SG-Systems - OpenHAN
• Leadership
– Chair and co-chair – lead teleconferences
•
•
•
•
Chair – Mary Zientara (Reliant)
Co-chair – Steve Van Ausdall (Xtensible)
Co-chair – Charles (Google)
Co-chair – Charlie (GE)
• Define scope and charter
• Use cases – common team
– Focused on format and capture
• but still need content and selection for our purposes in OpenHAN
•
•
•
•
•
Business level requirements – in OpenHAN?
Provide input to SEP 2.0 (and others as requested)
Analysis – update SRS requirements table
Conformance tasks
Security tasks
Use Case Development Accomplishments
Use Case #
Use case description
Note
4.2
Notify DR Event
SD and Interaction - Completed
4.2.1
Advanced Notification for DR
SD and Interaction - Completed
4.2.2
Update a DR Event
SD and Interaction - Completed
4.2.3
Cancel a DR Event
SD and Interaction - Completed
4.2.4
DR Resource Confirmation
SD and Interaction - Completed
4.7
Direct Load Control
SD and Interaction - Completed
4.7.1
Monitor DR Event
SD and Interaction - Completed
DR Use Case Discussion Topics
• 4.4 Broadcast “Pricing” (Retail) for DR Purpose – The
term pricing will change to more generic
• Reference Architecture
• DR acknowledgement and confirmation
• Advanced Notification for DR
• Adding testing use case
• DR Resource Confirmation (DR Resource, Asset,
PHEV)
• Direct Load Control – randomization, monitor
protocol
Next steps and next encounter date/time
• Next steps
– Refine use cases developed
– Provide draft use cases to sub-group leader (Joe) by Friday, October
21st
– Refine combined retail and wholesale use cases in the next two weeks
– Finalized use case and framework document by first week of
November
– Continue to work with NAESB, NIST and OASIS on SRS and Service
Definition
• Next encounter date/time
– Every Thursday joint conference call with NAESB (12-2:00 central
time)
– NAESB SGTF sub-group F2F meeting in New England
UtiliSec
• Status:
– Suite of 4 deliverables completed in 2008
•
•
•
•
AMI Security Risk Assessment
AMI System Security Requirements (incorporates Architectural Description)
AMI Security Component Catalog
AMI Security Implementation Guide
– AMI System Security Requirements document ratified December, 2008
(“1.0”)
•
Current Participation:
– 200+ Subscribers to Listserv across 8 countries and 4 continents
– More than a dozen major North American utilities actively engaged
– Broad mix of utilities, vendors, government, and academia
Next Meeting
• Host is Florida Power & Light
• Juno Beach, FL
• January 18-21, 2010
– Boot camps on January 18
– Parallel sessions January 19-21