Transcript Slide 1
CHILD FAMILY CHILD AND AND FAMILY CHILD & FAMILY DISASTER DISASTER RESEARCH RESEARCH DISASTER MENTAL HEALTH TRAINING EDUCATION TRAINING AND AND EDUCATION RESEARCH TRAINING & EDUCATION Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 1 1 Federal Sponsors NIMH National Institute of Mental Health NINR National Institute of Nursing Research SAMHSA Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 2 2 Principal Investigators Betty Pfefferbaum, MD, JD University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Alan M. Steinberg, PhD University of California, Los Angeles Robert S. Pynoos, MD, MPH University of California, Los Angeles John Fairbank, PhD Duke University Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 3 3 Children’s Psychosocial Services in Disasters Gil Reyes, PhD Associate Dean for Clinical Training at Fielding Graduate University Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 4 4 Learning Objectives Upon completion of this Module, participants will be able to: • Recognize the current status and limitations of child disaster mental health services and interventions • Describe the goals and elements of psychological first aid and other early interventions • Identify the reasons screening is needed after disasters • Describe the rationale for providing child disaster mental health interventions in schools Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 5 5 Services Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 6 6 Types of Services • Educational Interventions – Pre-disaster preparedness • Red Cross Masters of Disaster – Injury prevention – Coping self-efficacy – Stress-inoculation – Post-disaster coping education • Mastery of reactions – Verbal group processing of reactions and coping – Class-room projects – Coloring books Reyes et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 7 7 Types of Services • Crisis Intervention – Psychological First Aid (e.g., Pynoos & Nader, 1988) • • • • Establishing rapport and comforting presence Protecting and reassuring Mobilizing support Connecting with significant others – Crisis Hotlines (e.g., Ponton & Bryant, 1991) • • • • Suicide prevention Substance abuse intervention Coping assistance Often operate indirectly through parenting assistance Reyes et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 8 8 Types of Services • Crisis Intervention (continued) – Psychological debriefing (e.g., Stallard & Law, 1993) • Adapted from adult format (e.g., CISD) – Verbal group processing of reactions and coping – 1 or 2 lengthy (e.g., 3 hr.) group sessions – Share perceptions, thoughts, and feelings about the event – Reflect on treatment they’d received – Explore psychological effects of traumatic experiences – Discuss problems and methods of coping – Normalize response similarities Reyes et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 9 9 Types of Services • Crisis Intervention (continued) – Caregiver Support • • • • • • Parenting support Informational support Coping support Respite care Disaster Childcare Critical Response Childcare (aviation events and terrorism) Reyes et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 10 10 Types of Services • Community Outreach – Mobilization, Consultation, and Capacity-Building • Political and Social Leaders • Primary Healthcare Systems – Pediatric facilities and providers • Mental Health Systems – Community mental health centers – Public and private provider networks • Childcare facilities and providers • Schools – Teacher and other personnel education – Screening – Direct education of students Reyes et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 11 11 Types of Services • Group Interventions – General emphasis groups • Addressing fears and concerns • Stress management education • Coping education and modeling – Issue oriented groups • Grief groups (Saltzman et al. 2001) Reyes et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 12 12 Recommendations • National Initiatives modeled after the National Child Traumatic Stress Network – Raise the profile and priority of children’s psychosocial needs following potentially traumatic events. – Improve dissemination of accurate and useful information and training. • Developing a National Public Health Model for disaster mental health – – – – Address and redress the existing inadequacies (surge capacity). Emphasize population level preventive efforts. De-emphasize immediate direct “clinical” intervention. Define and incorporate key roles for pediatricians, schools, and other systems of care for children (not mental health specific). – Coordinate efforts across multiple disaster systems of care. Reyes et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 13 13 Recommendations • Develop culturally sensitive and appropriate approaches for serving a diverse range of communities – Recognize “subtle” cultural differences and how they inform differential responsiveness to a generalized model of care. – Adapt generalized models of care in collaboration with key cultural informants. – Don’t assume that proximity or similarity confer equivalency. • • • • Living nearby Looking alike Migrating from the same country, region, or continent Sharing a salient demographic characteristic – Age – Gender – Sexual orientation Reyes et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 14 14 Public Mental Health Approach Pynoos, Goenjian, & Steinberg, 1998 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 15 15 Organization • Sources of population-based mental health interventions for children involve three levels of organization: – Governmental and Social Institutions • Mobilization of public, private, and volunteer resources – Educational Systems – Healthcare Systems – Mental Health Systems – School-based services – Community-based intervention teams Pynoos et al. 1998 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 16 16 Components • Screening • Triage and assessment – – – – – – – Traumatic exposure (objective and subjective) Loss exposure Acute difficulties Ongoing adversities Traumatic reminders Recent traumatic exposure or loss (one year) Current levels of distress • Mental health interventions Pynoos et al. 1998 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 17 17 Guidelines • Augment children’s self-report with other sources: – Parent reports – Teacher reports • Conduct periodic screening to track the course of recovery – Surveillance for more than trauma • Depression • Adverse circumstantial stressors – Choose continuous scales over categorical decisions – Use results to promote effective dedication of mental health resources where most needed Pynoos et al. 1998 • Example of school-based services Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 18 18 Disaster Mental Health Services for Children Covell et al. 2006 Hoven et al. 2002 Stuber et al. 2002 Fairbrother et al. 2004 Pfefferbaum et al. 2003 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 19 19 September 11 Project Liberty Services • 753,015 service logs (inception through 2003) – Group education – Individual (including family) counseling • Agencies – – – – Large and small mental health agencies Consumer-run organizations Faith-based social service agencies Agencies serving particular ethnic, cultural, or racial groups Covell et al. 2006 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 20 20 Project Liberty Services for Children – 1 • 15% of service logs for first and follow-up visits were for children either individually or in family counseling • 9% of first visits were for children – Significantly fewer than represented in census data • 69% of first visits for children were for those aged 12 to 17 years • 41% of first visits for children were provided in schools • Children were more likely than adults to receive followup visits Covell et al. 2006 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 21 21 Project Liberty Services for Children - 2 • Elementary school children were more likely than older (12-17 yr) children to exhibit – Isolation and withdrawal – Anxious and fearful reactions – Concentration difficulties • Older children more similar to adults and more likely than younger children to exhibit – Avoidance and numbing reactions – Abuse of substances • Possible major depressive disorder and PTSD appeared to increase with age Covell et al. 2006 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 22 22 September 11 School-based Study ~ 2/3 of children with PTSD and impaired functioning had not sought treatment 6 months after the attacks 40 35 36 32 34 30 25 22 22 20 Ground Zero 17 15 Remainder of NYC 10 5 0 School counselor Outside professional Either Representative sample of > 8000 students in grades 4-12 6 months after the attacks Hoven et al. 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 23 23 September 11 Counseling 22% received counseling 58% of those receiving counseling received them at school 35 33 30 25 25 2121 school teacher 20 school psychologist 15 psychologist/psychiatrist 10 social worker 5 0 % receiving counseling Telephone survey of 112 parents in lower Manhattan 5-8 weeks after incident Stuber et al. 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 24 10 24 September 11 Counseling 10% received counseling 44% in schools 40 36 35 30 30 25 20 20 15 14 school teachers school psychologists/counselors Of those receiving counseling 47% had severe or very severe posttraumatic stress 50% had moderate posttraumatic stress 3% had mild posttraumatic stress1/3 had received counseling before 9/11 mental health 10 religious leaders/others 5 NYC parents 4-5 months after incident 0 % receiving counseling Fairbrother et al. 2004 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 25 25 Early Psychological Interventions NIMH 2002 APA 1954 Everly and Flynn 2006 NCTSN and NCPTSD 2006 ARC IFRC Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 26 26 Early Psychological Interventions Recommendations from Mental Health and Mass Violence: Evidence-Based Early Psychological Intervention for Victims/Survivors of Mass Violence. A Workshop to Reach Consensus on Best Practices (NIMH 2002) Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 27 27 Hierarchy of Needs • Early assessment and intervention should focus on a hierarchy of needs – – – – – – – – – – Survival Safety Security Food Shelter Health (physical and mental) Triage Orientation (to immediate service needs) Communicate with family, friends, and community Other forms of psychological first aid NIMH 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 28 28 Assumptions and Principles • In the immediate post-event phase, expect normal recovery • Presuming clinically significant disorder in the early post-event phase is inappropriate except in those with a pre-existing condition NIMH 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 29 29 Key Aspects of Early Intervention • • • • • • • • Psychological first aid Needs assessment Monitoring the recovery environment Outreach and information dissemination Technical assistance, consultation, and training Fostering resilience, coping, and recovery Triage Treatment NIMH 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 30 30 Technical Assistance, Consultation, and Training • Improve capacity of organizations and caregivers to provide what is needed to – Reestablish community structure – Foster family recovery and resilience – Safeguard the community • Provide assistance, consultation, and training to relevant organizations, other caregivers and responders, and leaders NIMH 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 31 31 Monitor Rescue and Recovery Environment • • • • • Observe and listen to those most affected Monitor the environment for toxins and stressors Monitor past and ongoing threats Monitor services that are being provided Monitor media coverage and rumors NIMH 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 32 32 Outreach and Information Dissemination • Offer information/education and “therapy by walking around” • Use established community structures • Distribute flyers • Host websites • Conduct media interviews and programs and distribute media releases NIMH 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 33 33 Fostering Resilience and Recovery • • • • Foster but do not force social interactions Provide coping skills training Provide risk assessment skills training Provide education on – – – – – – • • • • Stress responses Traumatic reminders Coping Normal versus abnormal functioning Risk factors Services Offer group and family interventions Foster natural social supports Care for the bereaved Repair organizational fabric Northwest Center for Public Health Practice NIMH 2002 34 34 Needs Assessment • Assess current status of – – – – Individuals Groups Populations Institutions/systems • Ask – How well needs are being addressed – What the recovery environment offers – What additional interventions are needed NIMH 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 35 35 Triage • Conduct clinical assessments using valid and reliable methods • Refer when indicated • Identify vulnerable, high-risk individuals and groups • Provide for emergency hospitalization NIMH 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 36 36 Treatment • Reduce or ameliorate symptoms or improve functioning through – Individual, family, and group psychotherapy – Pharmacotherapy – Short- or long-term hospitalization NIMH 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 37 37 Follow-up • Follow-up should be offered to those at risk of developing adjustment difficulties including those – – – – – – Who have ASD or clinically significant symptoms Who are bereaved Who have preexisting psychiatric disorder Who have required medical or surgical attention Whose exposure was intense and of long duration Who request it NIMH 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 38 38 Expertise, Skills and Training for Providers of Early Intervention • Providers must – Practice within the scope of their expertise and education – Practice within the structure responsible for coordinating the response – Make referrals when appropriate – Avail themselves of training NIMH 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 39 39 Research and Evaluation • The scientific community has an obligation to examine the relative effectiveness of early interventions • A national strategy should be developed to ensure that adequate resources are available for research • A standard taxonomy and terminology are needed for program evaluation to identify – – – – – The most significant variables to monitor Post-event physical and psychosocial environment Subgroups of the affected population including responders Mental health interventions that are provided Characteristics of those deemed the most appropriate providers • The broader research community should be informed of need for research NIMH 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 40 40 Key Research Questions • What ethical issues are introduced by widespread use of unproven interventions? • How acceptable is research to potential subjects? • What is the best process for seeking informed consent; what information should be given in the consent process? • Can a standard taxonomy and terminology be developed? • How effective is public education? • Is screening in itself an effective intervention? • Can screening cause harm; if so, what is the nature of the harm and is the risk offset by risk of failing to screen? • Is it acceptable to screen if care is not provided or accessible? • How feasible are studies of early interventions ? • How can clinical demand be balanced with inadequacies in the empirical evidence-base? NIMH 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 41 41 Psychological First Aid • Goals: – Should be concerned only with the immediate situation. – Restore people to reasonably good functioning. – Make people as comfortable as possible until more complete care can be arranged. • Five types of reactions: – Normal reactions to stress (transient states, not to be confused with abnormal adjustment). – Panic (a rare, but contagious risk). – Immobility or numb detachment. – Hyperactivity and over confidence (hypomanic). – Somatic complaints. • Four principles of care – – – – Accept people’s right to their own feelings Accept a person’s limitations as real. Size up a casualty’s potentialities as accurately and quickly as possible. Accept your own limitations in a relief role. American Psychiatric Association 1954 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 42 42 Psychological First Aid • Protect survivors from further harm • Reduce physiological arousal • Mobilize support for those who are most distressed • Keep families together and facilitate reunions of loved ones • Provide information and foster communication and education • Use effective risk communication techniques NIMH 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 43 43 Principles and practical procedures for acute psychological first aid training for personnel without mental health experience. • Physical First Aid • Psychological First Aid – Stabilize physiological functioning – Stabilize psychological and behavioral functioning by meeting physical needs and then addressing psychological needs – Mitigate physiological distress and dysfunction – Mitigate psychological distress and dysfunction – Achieve return to acute adaptive physiological – Achieve return to acute adaptive functioning psychological and behavioral functioning – Facilitate access to next level of care – Facilitate access to continued care Everly & Flynn 2006 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 44 44 Psychological First Aid • Several organizations have developed manuals to guide the delivery of psychological first aid – International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies – American Red Cross – National Child Traumatic Stress Network and National Center for PTSD Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 45 45 International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) PFA - Modules • • • • • • Community-based Psychological Support (PFA) Stress Responses and Coping Skills Developing Supportive Communication Promoting Community Self-help Caring for Populations with Special Needs Helping the Helper IFRC, 2003 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 46 46 American Red Cross (ARC) PFA - Actions • Psychological first aid actions – – – – – – – Make a connection Help people be safe Be kind, calm, and compassionate Meet people’s basic needs Listen Give realistic reassurance Encourage good coping ARC, 2006 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 47 47 NCTSN and NCPTSD PFA Core Actions and Goals - 1 • Contact and engagement – To respond to contacts initiated by survivors, or initiate contacts in a non-intrusive, compassionate, and helpful manner • Safety and comfort – To enhance immediate and ongoing safety and provide physical and emotional comfort • Stabilization – To calm and orient emotionally overwhelmed or disoriented survivors • Information gathering: current needs and concerns – To identify immediate needs and concerns, gather additional information, and tailor PFA interventions NCTSN & NCPTSD 2006 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 48 48 NCTSN and NCPTSD PFA Core Actions and Goals - 2 • Practical assistance – To offer practical help to survivors in addressing immediate needs and concerns • Connection with social supports – To help establish brief or ongoing contacts with primary support persons or other sources of support, including family members, friends, and community helping resources • Information on coping – To provide information about stress reactions and coping to reduce distress and promote adaptive functioning • Linkage with collaborative services – To link survivors with available services needed at the time or in the future NCTSN & NCPTSD, 2006 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 49 49 Screening Limitations and Rationale for Child Screening Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 50 50 Reasons Screening Needed • Adults may not recognize or acknowledge children’s reactions and needs • Identify need for services • Focus limited services on those with greatest need Stallard et al. 1999 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 51 51 Adults May Underestimate Children’s Distress • Concordance between parent- and child-report of disaster reactions is low – Children do not want to burden parents – Parents deny problems in children – Parental distress decreases ability to identify child suffering McDermott & Palmer 1999 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 52 52 Screening • May increase communication about children’s reactions and concerns • May facilitate service delivery decisions and the appropriate use of scarce resources • May increase the demand for services McDermott & Palmer 1999 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 53 53 Potential Problems With Screening • False positives may result in – Unnecessary treatment with attendant cost and inconvenience – Inappropriate labeling of children – Focus on “illness behavior” • False negatives may create a barrier to later care-seeking McDermott & Palmer 1999 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 54 54 Value of Screening - 1 • Simplicity – Easy to administer – Administered by paraprofessional • Acceptability – Acceptable to those being screened; usually voluntary • Accuracy – True measure of what is being assessed Cochrane and Holland 1971 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 55 13 55 Value of Screening - 1 • Expense – Cost is reasonable in relation to benefit of early detection • Precision (Repeatable) – Consistent results in repeated trials • Sensitivity – Test is positive when the condition is present • Specificity – Test is negative when the condition is not present Cochrane and Holland 1971 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 56 13 56 Interventions Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 57 57 Psychoeducation and Supportive Group Therapy Galante and Foa 1986 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 58 58 Elementary School Children Exposed to Earthquake in Italy • Three phase process – Pretest at 6 months – Treatment with children in village with largest number of children at risk according to pretest – Posttest at 18 months Galante & Foa 1986 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 59 59 Treatment Sample and Program • Sample – All grade 1-4 students in village with largest number of children at risk • Techniques included – – – – – Normalizing reactions Projective techniques Psychoeducation Review of death, funerals, and the future Survival techniques Galante & Foa 1986 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 60 60 Session Objectives and Activities • Communicate about the event – Draw and listen to stories about San Francisco’s recovery • Discuss fears and demonstrate that fear was common – Draw and listen to story about frightened child too shy to ask for help – Discuss drawings and feelings including what they did when afraid • Discuss myths and beliefs about earthquakes – Draw and listen to story about child fearful that the earthquakes would recur – Discuss beliefs • Discharge feelings about the earthquake and place earthquake in the past – Make joint drawing of the community – Focus on what children did to resume a normal life after the earthquake • Release the power of death images and focus on the future – Role play and funeral rituals – Discuss the future of a new village • Develop the idea that children can take an active role in their own survival – Role play being parents teaching children to survive various emergencies • Raise topics associated with closure – Free drawing and discussion Galante & Foa 1986 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 61 61 Change in Risk Scores 50 47 45 40 35 34 30 6 months 18 months 25 20 15 10 5 0 % at risk Galante & Foa 1986 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 62 62 Psychosocial Intervention After Hurricane Iniki Chemtob et al. 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 63 63 Methods • Sample – 4258 children in grades 2 – 6 from all 10 public elementary schools on island of Kauai (91% of the enrolled children) were screened to identify children for the intervention study – 248 children met criteria for treatment and were randomly assigned to • Group (176 children) • Individual (73 children) – 214 completed treatment • Methods – 2 years after hurricane, children with highest levels of trauma symptoms were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 consecutively treated cohorts • Children in the cohorts awaiting treatment served as wait-list controls – Within each cohort, children were randomly assigned to either individual or group treatment to allow comparison of the efficacy of the two treatment modalities • Instruments – Reaction Index – Semi-structured interview Chemtob 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 64 64 Sample 4285 in grades 2-6 3864 (91%) screened 248 met treatment criteria 65 in cohort 1 64 (99%) completed 101 in cohort 2 85 (84% completed) 82 in cohort 3 65 (79% completed) Chemtob et al. 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 65 65 Treatment Eligible Sample • Demographics – 6 to 12 years of age (mean 8.2, SD 1.3) – Race/ethnicity • • • • Hawaiian/part-Hawaiian 30% White 25% Filipino 20% Japanese 9% • Compared to all screened children, treatment eligible children were more likely to – – – – – Fear death or injury to self Fear death or injury to family Have more intense fear reactions to hurricane Be girls Be poor Chemtob et al. 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 66 66 Intervention • Groups included 4 to 8 children • Manual-based intervention with 4 weekly sessions using protocols that outlined session content and activities to elicit relevant material – – – – Session 1: safety and helplessness Session 2: loss Session 3: mobilizing competence and anger Session 4: ending and going forward Chemtob 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 67 67 Results Post-treatment < Pre-treatment Follow-up (1 year) < Pre-treatment but not Post-treatment 50 45 40 47 46 42 42 41 46 45 44 41 40 38 39 44 41 41 39 40 36 35 30 pretreatment 25 posttreatment follow-up 20 15 10 5 0 group 1 group 2 group 3 individual 1 individual 2 individual 3 Group and individual treatments did not differ in efficacy Fewer children dropped out of group treatment Chemtob et al. 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 68 68 Clinician Ratings 25 20 20 15 12 treated 10 untreated 5 0 Posttraumatic stress Random sample of 21 treated and 16 untreated p = .01 Chemtob et al. 2002 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 69 69 Cognitive Behavioral Group Psychotherapy March et al. 1998 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 70 70 Sample and Design • 14 participants with PTSD completed treatment – 10 to 15 years of age – Single-incident stressor • 10 had 2 or more stressors • Recruited through schools • 18 weekly group sessions • Single case across setting design March et al. 1998 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 71 71 Status at Initiation of Treatment • As a group, at the start of treatment, participants experienced mild to moderately severe – PTSD – Anxiety – Depression • Children with severe disruptive behavior were excluded • Average duration of PTSD symptoms was – 1.5 years for younger participants – 2.5 years for older participants • None had received mental health treatment • Most were doing reasonably well in school March et al. 1998 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 72 72 Improvement Significant group differences occurred early and persisted None relapsed 80 74 71 70 60 54 50 40 45 Baseline Final Follow-up 33 30 20 19 14 10 12 8 4 2 2 0 PTSD Depression Anxiety Global March et al. 1998 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 73 73 Outstanding Issues • The study did not ascertain – If CBT was unique in its effectiveness – Which specific aspects of the intervention were responsible for outcomes – If results would extend to children with more severe illnesses or comorbid conditions March et al. 1998 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 74 74 Trauma/Grief Focused Group Psychotherapy Goenjian et al. 1997 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 75 75 Trauma/Grief Focused Group Psychotherapy After Earthquake • Early adolescents in severely damaged schools after a massive Armenian earthquake – 35 students received intervention – 29 students received no therapy • Intervention – Delivered over a 6 week period 1.5 years after earthquake – Included • 4 ½-hour group sessions in classroom • an average of 2 1-hour individual sessions – Focused on • • • • • Trauma Traumatic reminders Post disaster stresses and adversities Bereavement and the interplay of trauma and grief Developmental impact Goenjian et al. 1997 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 76 76 Results • Treated group – Improved in posttraumatic stress – No worsening in depression • Non-treated group – Worsening in posttraumatic stress – Worsening in depression • Treatment benefits did not appear transient and were evident 1.5 years after the intervention Goenjian et al. 1997 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 77 77 Posttraumatic Stress after Treatment 50 45 47.2 45.3 Severity decreased in treated Severity increased in not treated 41.1 40 32.2 35 30 Treated 25 Not Treated 20 15 10 5 0 1.5 Years* 3 Years** *1.5 Years: No difference between treated and non-treated groups **3 Years: Treated < non-treated group **3 Years: Treated: 3-year score < pretreatment **3 Years: Not treated: 3-year score > 1.5-year score Goenjian et al. 1997 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 78 78 Depression after Treatment 25 20.2 20 16.8 15.3 Severity did not change in treated Severity increased in not treated 16 15 10 Treated 5 Not Treated 0 1.5 Years* 3 Years** *1.5 years: No difference between treated and non-treated groups **3 years: Treated < non-treated **3 years: Treated: no change from 1.5 years **3 years: Non-treated: score increased from 1.5 years Goenjian et al. 1997 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 79 79 Implications • Treatment may prevent worsening of posttraumatic stress and depression • Worsening in posttraumatic stress may be due to reminders; treatment may have decreased reactivity to reminders • Increased severity of depression may have been due to – Increased severity of posttraumatic stress – Persistent severe posttraumatic stress interfering with grief resolution – Difficulty coping with secondary adversities Goenjian et al. 1997 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 80 80 Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Childhood Traumatic Grief Stubenbort et al. 2001 Cohen et al. 2004 Cohen et al. 2006 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 81 81 Group CBT for Bereaved Children • Sample: 12 children (aged 5 – 12 years) and 18 adults some parents of the children • Event: Airplane crash with dramatic media portrayals of the event • Intervention: 7 weeks of treatment with parallel child and adult groups Stubenbort et al. 2001 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 82 82 Intervention Sessions • Introduction, definition, group treatment rules • Psychoeducation to normalize the experience and increase coping skills • Coping with traumatic death • Strengthening group cohesion by exploring loss and unfinished business • Continuing to explore loss and unfinished business • Increasing coping skills • Closure and moving on Stubenbort et al. 2001 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 83 83 Methods • Sample: – 22 children (aged 6-17 years) with significant child traumatic grief and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms – Children’s primary caretakers • Intervention: – 16 week manual-based individual treatment with sequential trauma- and grief-focused components – 2 joint parent-child sessions in each module • Design: open uncontrolled treatment design Cohen et al. 2004 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 84 84 Intervention Components • Trauma-focused components – Improve affective modulation and stress reduction (sessions 1 to 4) – Trauma-specific exposure and cognitive processing (sessions 5 to 8) • Grief-focused components – Naming and accepting the loss (sessions 9 to 12) – Preserving positive memories and making meaning of the loss (sessions 13 to 16) • Two joint parent-child sessions in each module Cohen et al. 2004 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 85 85 Results PTSD symptoms improved during the trauma-focused component Grief improved during the trauma- and grief-focused components 18 17 * 16 14 11.4 ** 12 10 8 9.25 * Pre-4 weeks * 6.8 4-8 weeks 6 4.5 4 1.8 1.95 2 ** 1.4 8-12 weeks 12-16 weeks 0 PTSD Symptoms * p < .001 ** p < .01 Traumatic Grief Cohen et al. 2004 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 86 86 Limitations • Lack of a control group makes it impossible to determine if improvements represented treatment response or natural recovery • The small sample size, with no minority children other than African Americans, makes it impossible to generalize to diverse groups Cohen et al. 2004 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 87 87 Implications • The study lends tentative support to the conceptualization of traumatic grief as the impingement of trauma symptoms on the normal grief process and to the importance of sequential treatment of trauma and grief • The final four sessions addressing positive aspects of grieving may have contributed to grief resolution or grief may have resolved on its own once trauma symptoms were treated • The study suggests the importance of including parents in treatment of children Cohen et al. 2004 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 88 88 Teacher-mediated Intervention after 1999 Earthquake in Turkey Wolmer et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 89 89 Advantages of Locating Interventions in Schools - 1 • Disaster reactions may emerge in the context of school • School settings provide access to children and the potential for enhanced compliance • School personnel are familiar with, and deal with, situational and developmental crises • School personnel have opportunities to observe children • Schools are a natural support system where stigma associated with treatment is diminished • Services in schools help normalize children’s experiences and reactions • Classroom settings are developmentally-appropriate Wolmer et al. 2003; Wolmer et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 90 90 Advantages of Locating Interventions in Schools - 2 • Classroom settings provide – – – – – Predictable routines Consistent rules Clear expectations Immediate feedback Stimulus for curiosity and engaging learning skills • School-based interventions facilitate peer interactions and support which may prevent withdrawal and isolation • Supervision, feedback, and follow-up are possible • School curricula already address prevention in other mental health areas Wolmer et al. 2003; Wolmer et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 91 91 Teachers as Clinical Mediators • Teachers may help as clinical mediators because they – Occupy a central role in children’s lives – Are trusted by children and parents – May be amenable to being trained Wolmer et al. 2003; Wolmer et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 92 92 Role of Teachers • • • • • • • Model children’s responses Provide factual information and correct rumors Reinforce coping skills Facilitate mutual support Identify children who are suffering Prepare the class for future experiences Encourage students to contribute to their family, school, and community Wolmer et al. 2003 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 93 93 Sample • 202 displaced children – 44% boys, 56% girls – Mean age 8.2 years; grades 1-5 • Comparison sample of 101 children 300 miles away who were not directly affected – 46% boys, 54% girls – Mean age 8.83 years Wolmer et al. 2003 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 94 94 Methods • Teachers interviewed children individually at school 4 months after the earthquake and before any interventions • Intervention lasted 4 weeks with 2 meetings per weeks • Assessed 6 weeks after the intervention series was completed Wolmer et al. 2003 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 95 95 Instruments • Traumatic Dissociation and Grief – Grief factor • Irritability • Guilt/anhedonia – Dissociative factor • Body/self distortions • Perceptual distortions • Child PTSD Reaction Index – 20 reactions • Traumatic exposure questionnaire – Risk index reflected extent of risk ranging from 0 to 5 Wolmer et al. 2003 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 96 96 Intervention • Trained, supervised, and supported school leadership and teachers • Intervention consisted of 8 two-hour sessions of psychoeducation and cognitive-behavioral techniques • Teachers conducted the intervention over the course of 4 weeks Wolmer et al. 2003; Wolmer et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 97 97 Intervention Modalities • Modalities – – – – Psychoeducational modules Cognitive-behavioral techniques Play activities Documentation in personal diaries Wolmer et al. 2003 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 98 98 Intervention Sessions • • Introductory session with parents to – Engage them – Provide information related to the program – Educate them about children’s disaster reactions 8 two-hour sessions with children to – Restructure traumatic experiences – Deal with intrusive thoughts – Establish a safe place – Learn about the earthquake and prepare for future earthquakes – Mourn the ruined city – Control body sensations – Confront posttraumatic dreams – Understand reactions in the family – Cope with loss, guilt, and death – Deal with anger – Extract life lessons – Plan for the future Wolmer et al. 2003 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 99 99 Results at 6 Weeks 35 Trauma and dissociative symptoms decreased Grief symptoms increased 32 30 28 25 22 Before 20 18 After 15 13 12 10 5 0 Trauma Grief Dissociation Wolmer et al. 2003 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 100 100 Increased Grief Symptoms • Normal grief may have begun after other symptoms were relieved • Interventions may not have addressed depression adequately • Children may have been more comfortable expressing grief symptoms after the intervention Wolmer et al. 2003 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 101 101 Grief at Follow-up • 26 children who still had moderate to severe posttraumatic stress were interviewed 6 months after treatment • Their grief score was significantly lower at follow-up than posttreatment and significantly higher than at pre-treatment 25 23 20 20 17 15 Grief 10 5 0 PrePostFollow-up treatment treatment Wolmer et al. 2003 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 102 102 Severe to Very Severe Posttraumatic Stress • The percent of children with severe to very severe posttraumatic stress, associated with a diagnosis of PTSD, decreased from 30% to 18%, the latter similar to the 15% found in the baseline control sample Wolmer et al. 2003 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 103 103 Posttraumatic Stress Severity at 6 Months for Children Who Received the Intervention • 33.5% remained stable • 39% decreased in severity • 27.5% increased in severity Wolmer et al. 2003 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 104 104 Children Without Symptoms • Reasons children without risks or without symptoms should participate – Only a minority were without risk or symptoms – Intervention had a preventive element and focused on rehabilitation of the whole school and intent to prevent children who participate from being labeled – Asymptomatic children lent support to others and served as models for coping – Increase in grief was moderate and significantly decreased 6 months later Wolmer et al. 2003 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 105 105 Three Year Follow-up of Teachermediated Intervention • Sample: 287 children from 3 schools – 9-17 years (mean 11.5) – 67 children participated and 220 did not participate in the earlier intervention • All 3 schools included both children who did and did not participate in the intervention – Groups were comparable on sex, age, and risk • Studied 3.5 years after the event with child, mother, and teacher (blind to which children participated) ratings Wolmer et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 106 106 Follow-up of Children Who Received the Intervention Significant decrease post-intervention to 3 year follow-up 35 30 30 25 24 23 20 Post-intervention 3 Year Follow-up 13 15 10 10 4 5 0 Posttraumatic stress Grief Dissociation Wolmer et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 107 107 Posttraumatic Stress Severity at 3 Years for Children Who Received the Intervention • • • • 30% remained stable 41% decreased 29% increased 18% continued to have severe trauma symptoms Wolmer et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 108 108 Intervention and Comparison Group at Three Years • No significant differences between the two groups at 3 years in child self-report for – Posttraumatic stress – Grief – Dissociation Wolmer et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 109 109 Daily Functioning in Intervention and Comparison Groups at Three Years 5 4.5 4.3 4.1 4 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.3 Intervention Intervention group had significantly higher daily functioning in: Academic performance Social behavior General conduct 3 Comparison 2.5 Predictors of daily functioning: Functioning before disaster Group (intervention v. no intervention) Trauma symptoms 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Academic performance Social behavior General conduct Wolmer et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 110 110 Summary of Findings • Significant trauma and dissociative symptom decrease and grief symptom increase 6 weeks after the intervention • Significant symptom decrease over 3 years in posttraumatic stress, grief, and dissociation – A large proportion of both treated and untreated children reported moderate 30-35%) or severe (17-18%) posttraumatic stress – In some children, symptoms appeared within 6 months and crystallized into the full-blown syndrome months or years later • Symptom levels similar in treated and untreated groups at 3 years • Teacher-rated functioning better in treated than untreated children – Correlations between children’s symptoms and daily functioning were small and non-significant supporting previous findings that children can function despite internal struggles Wolmer et al. 2003; Wolmer et al. 2005 Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 111 111 Conclusions Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 112 112 Conclusions - 1 • There is some evidence that treatments (psychosocial, psychoeducation, CBT, EMDR) are effective for posttraumatic stress; grief and depression may be especially difficult to treat • There is some evidence for the sequential treatment of trauma and grief Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 113 113 Conclusions - 2 • It remains unclear what elements of an intervention are responsible for effects • Interventions have not been compared; thus, it is unclear if some interventions are better than others • It remains unclear if interventions are superior to natural recovery Northwest Center for Public Health Practice 114 114