Transcript Slide 1

Post discharge phone calls improve care coordination
Paula Anton, MS, RN, CRRN, ACNS-BC, Michelle Fernamberg, BSN, MHA, RN, CRRN,
Erica Duchnowski, Health Care Administration Intern, Eastern Michigan University
6A Acute Rehabilitation Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Purpose
Methods
Results
It is known that patient care does not end at discharge. There
is growing demand that hospitals ensure that patients’
transition to home is smooth from a comfort standpoint, is
medically sound, comprehensive and understandable. Followup telephone calls shorty after discharge is an effective strategy
to accomplish this goal.1, 2 These calls allow providers to
impact patient satisfaction, decrease readmissions, verify
effectiveness of discharge education and the discharge plan,
and perform service recovery at a particularly vulnerable time
for patients.1,2
A pilot was conducted from May thru December of 2010 in
which a Health Care Administration Intern and the Nurse
Manager contacted each patient within 48 hours of discharge.
A tool was developed to assist the caller to ask standard
questions that elicited the information necessary to assess
effectiveness of discharge. During the calls the caller would
gather information to rectify problems and apologize for any
problems experienced. Feedback was provided to the whole
rehabilitation team including nurses, physicians, therapists and
managers in real time.
Results of calls were tabulated and Root Cause Analysis (RCA)
of comments was completed.
Initially, the most concerning response from patients was that
they did not have a post-discharge medical appointment. Clinic
managers were engaged and a process was developed to solve
this quickly.
Background
Results
In Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation it was becoming
evident that patients were dissatisfied with some aspects of
their care. They were being discharged from the inpatient
setting without follow-up regarding discharge education and
plans. Complaints were common. Physician comments and
calls from patients after discharge with questions provided
doubts that the transition to home was smooth.
Additionally, the typical post-hospitalization patient satisfaction
survey is not obtained from patients discharged from the Acute
Rehabilitation Unit. This limits data that can be used to drive
vital changes. Complaints and frustration expressed in phone
calls from patients and families and at the time of clinic
appointments were common among patients who left the
Acute Rehabilitation Unit.
Outcomes measured include patient satisfaction with overall
care, willingness to recommend and instructions for self care
from discharge cards at time of discharge. In addition, patient
comments regarding understanding of instructions, whether
prescriptions and supplies were received and whether they had
follow-up appointments obtained during the phone calls was
analyzed.
We found steady improvement in patient
satisfaction over time, and improvement in most measures of
smooth discharge.
The RCA provides evidence that there continues to be
opportunities for improvement.
Next Step is to consider the RCA and to look for opportunities
to develop processes to address issues.
Conclusion / Implications
Management commitment and engagement in the process is
the key to success.
Overall, this strategy is an excellent way to evaluate and
determine effectiveness of discharge processes at University of
Michigan Hospital.
References
1. Braun, E., Baidusi, A, Alroy, G., & Azzam, ZS. (2009). Telephone follow-up
improves patients satisfaction following hospital discharge. European
Journal of Internal Medicine, 20(2), 221-5.
2. Setia, N., & Meade, C. (2009). Bundling the value of discharge telephone
calls and leader rounding. Journal of Nursing Administration. 39(3), 13841.