G&W / BHPB Cost Comparison
Download
Report
Transcript G&W / BHPB Cost Comparison
Sophisticated
Simplicity
Heavy Haul Operations
Supported by Proven
Technology
Mike Darby
Karribrook WA Pty Ltd
Presentation Overview
What is “Sophisticated Simplicity”?
BHP Billiton’s Railway NW Australia
BHPB’s use of technology
Example of Sophisticated Simplicity in a
Heavy Haul Railway Operations supported
by proven technology
2
7/18/2015
What is Sophisticated Simplicity?
Traditional Approach
Simple System
Proven Technologies
BHP Billiton Ltd
Is the worlds largest diversified resources company
(>US$100 billion)
Global resource development company
BHP Billiton Iron Ore located in Northern Australia:
• Developed a “Fit for Purpose” Railway
• Operates in a harsh and isolated environment
• Operates the heaviest axle loads/trains in the
world
Operations in ‘Cyclone Alley’
BHP Billiton Iron Ore Railway
History of the BHP Billiton Railway
Mt Whaleback was the largest single iron ore deposit
in the world (>1 billion tonnes)
Historically Iron Ore deposits in Western Australia
seen as too far (400 km) from tidewater prior to heavy
haul railways
Heavy haul rail line built in 1969 by North American
contractor
In 1970 Oroville Dam Project cars and dumpers
brought from California to Australia / evolved as a
North American Railroad
Regulated by Mines Department not DOT
BHP Billiton Iron Ore Railway
Operating Philosophies:
Good Safety Is Good Business
Continuous Improvement
Use Assets to Their Full Potential
Research and Development
Proven Technologies
High axle load issues
Hot bearing-Hot/Cold Wheel Detectors
Wheel Impact Monitor
“Weigh-in-Motion” Weighbridges
Acoustic Bearing Detection
Instrumented ore cars
Auto Locomotive Downloads
Video Imaging
Workshop Initiatives
Axle Load Evolution
Axle Loading
40 tonnes
35.0 tonnes
32.5 tonnes
28.5 tonnes 30.0 tonnes
Wet
tonnes
per
wagon
1970
1974
1986
1996
2005
Issues with 40 tonne Axle Load
“Thermit” Welds/Flash Butt Welds
- 6000 “Thermit” welds – 2% failure/annum
- 35000 flash butt welds - .008% failure/annum
- Program in place to replace “thermit” welds
Rail Grinding Program
Wheel/Rail Interface
Weekly Rail Ultra Sonic Inspection
Thermit/Flash Butt Welds
Stress Free Temperature (SFT)
Incorrect SFT leads to:
•Track buckles – when hot
• Rail Breaks – when cold
1,000 meters rail @ 60°C is 999.386meters @ 5°C
25°C change causes 92 tonnes of tensile force
“Thermit” welds
• Sensitive to SFT & lateral loading
Concrete SFT 33 - 38°C
Timber & Steel SFT 35 - 40°
Painting Welds
Reduce lateral loading
Hot/Cold Wheel/Bearing Detection
18 hot bearing wheel detectors
1 cold wheel detector
Automated and site activated
Impact Detection & Weigh-In Motion
1 impact load detector
4 weigh-in motion scales
Acoustic Bearing Detection
Following faults are detected:
Cone Faults
Roller Faults
Audible Wheel Flats
Cup Faults
Looseness / fretting
Noisy Wheel sets (flanging)
Consequence of System
Breakdown
Result of System Breakdown
Instrumented Ore Cars (IOC)
4 IOC’s in service
Vertical suspension travel (ride quality)
Wheel-rail acceleration (rail condition)
In-train forces
Lateral stability (hunting)
Longitudinal acceleration
Car body/draft gear pocket strains
Temperature
Brake pipe pressure
Auto Locomotive Downloads
The “Black-Box” is downloaded at each arrival at port
Driver education/incident management
Fuel utilization
Data for automated train operation
All operating parameters
Video Imaging
Measures:
Flange Height
Flange Width
Vertical Flange
Hollowing Depth
Rim Thickness
Wheel Diameter
Workshop Initiatives
Component Tracking
Ultra-Sonic Wheel Testing
Super Clean Wheel Specs
Bearing Quality Assurance
“H” Class Bearings
40 tonne trucks
Side Wall Thickness Tracking
Asset Protection Information Integration
Ultrasonic Wheel Inspection
Shop Facilities
37 Traceable
Components Tracking
for each Ore Cars
Component
Coupler Inspection
Developed in UK, for in-
situe inspection
Uses ultrasonic probe
inserted through the
drain hole
Detect lower pulling lug
cracks which are the
primary mode of failure
for fixed & rotary
couplers
BHP
Iron Ore Railroad
Productivity
Results
R&D into the
rail/wheel
interface
allows for the
useful life of
assets to be
extended
Ore Car Wheel Life
1980
2006
million km
million km
0.34
1.95
Life extension
6.5 fold
increase
Rail Life (Tangent Track)
1980
million gross
metric tonnes
350
2006
million gross
metric tonnes Life extension
1,200
3.4 fold
increase
Employee Productivity Tripled in the last 10 years
353
301
(‘000’s tonnes per employee /yr)
245
258
216
126
1996
148
151
1997
1998
167
1999
179
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Heavy Haul Railways of the Future
KIS: Keep it simple
• Train operation designed with minimum interfaces
Implicit safe operation
• Design the operation to avoid train movements
Intense capital utilization
• Use assets to the fullest
Integrated knowledge process implementation
• Proven technology to protect assets
The Knowledge Process
Integrated
data collection
information
knowledge
implementation
System management
What’s in the Future ?
Continued safety focus
Human resource efficiency
Higher axle loads
Evolution of “Cruise Control”
Automated trains
Electric brakes
Electric Brakes
Handbrakes on grades can be managed
Ease of train handling
• all brakes on and off simultaneously within 7 seconds
• graduated release
• Faster brake charging time
Reduced in train coupler forces and less brake shoe wear
Distributed power (no radio based locotrol)
End of train monitoring
Brake system charges while brakes are applied
Load / empty features not required
Advantages cont.
Faster train cycle time
• Faster accelerations brakes release sooner
• May be able to increase speed of loaded trains
• Graduated release of train brakes
Individual wagon brake status monitoring
Fault finding i.e. train break location
Faster train brake charging times (uses less air)
Fuel savings as brakes release faster
Increased wheel life
• No sticking brakes / hot wheels
Even wearing brake shoes
“Highway” for future Developments
Derailment detection
Hot bearing / hot wheel detection
Hand brake status
“GPS” train braking
(individual brakes graduated as loads traverse
undulation)
Car weights linked to load out facilities
(ensures each car is loaded to maximum)
Automated trains platform
Objective
“Move 6 million tonnes
of product per annum
a distance of 100 km”
Traditional Approach
Simple Approach
250 cars/wagons
80 cars/wagons
7 locomotives
3 locomotives (Push/Pull)
Rotary/Bottom dump wagons
Side dump cars/wagons
Rotary or bottom dump station
Flat unloading platform
80 employees
35 employees
Extensive track/yard system
Simple track/yard system
Cost for plant >US$100 million
Cost for plant <US$30 million
High maintenance costs
Less plant to maintain
Supported by proven technology
The End Result