Transcript Slide 1

Sarah Waldemar & Pamela Webb
02.18.2010

Late Proposal Statistics

SPA Organizational Updates

Award Processing Turnaround Update
Guide for Using EFS Sponsored Reports
http://www.ospa.umn.edu/efs_sp/documents/GuideforEFSSponsoredReports
-updatedJan2010.pdf






Sponsored Awards in Deficit
Sponsored Project Detail Drilldown
F&A Recovery Distributions
Submitted Proposal Processing Statistics
Award Processing Statistics
Sponsored Projects Summary
Coming Attractions:


Fixed Price Balances
Flexible Period Expense Summary
EFS
EFS
EFS
EFS
EFS

F&A Waiver Policy
(under review)
◦ “Small Project” Waivers available since 10/08
◦ After Presidential Policy Committee review in in March:





“Strategic” and “Regular” Waivers rolled out
Data will be reported on “waived” amount by college
New Excel-format waiver form posted
Master list of pre-approved reduced rates for non-profit and
governmental agencies posted
Summer & Part-Time Effort Policy
(under review)
◦ Maximum of 2.5 months summer salary paid on sponsored projects
unless exception approved
◦ Part-timers can write proposals on time not paid by the University
◦ Work on-campus unless project specifies an off-campus location or
exception approved
Job Aid on SPA web page under “EGMS”
http://www.ospa.umn.edu/documents/SolutiontoSubmitLargeElectronicProposalFiles-1.pdf


Use for electronic proposals larger
than 25 MB
These proposals will bounce if
sent via University email services
Courses expected to be available by June 30th:
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
Sponsored Projects Overview
Research Policies, Compliance, and Ethics
Cost Sharing
Planning & Issuing Subawards
Managing Subawards
Effort Certification
Blue = shared core course taken by everyone
in the certification program
ECRT
Upgrade
Subaward
Tracking
System
PRF
Upgrade
March 28
Summer 2010
(anticipated)
(anticipated)
Not yet scheduled
Electronic Proposal
Development &
Submission

PDF version now shorter and easier to read
◦ Key data elements appear on first page

Data elements have been added or refined to
enhance departmental and college review
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
Time the proposal is due (if not 5 p.m. central)
F&A rate and base, F&A waiver information
Improved information on ICR sharing arrangements
Administering department /DeptID
Quick-scan view of personnel and their effort/roles
For existing projects, agency award # and key EFS info
Ability to include cost-sharing/matching chart-strings (optional)
Enhanced ability to view signatories and signature status
Notes/ instructions print on the PDF version of the PRF





Improved look-up capabilities for names/units
Better award setup guidance to SPA
Ability to update limited data elements mid-route
Improved “Help” text
Bug fixes (e.g, jump to top of PRF when starting
review)
Test & Play Version Available Soon!
•Users will be able to get used to the new screens/data elements
in a “training” version of the system BEFORE Go-Live
•Training classes are available in two Instructor-led formats
•Demo or Hands-On
See
Handout!

Improved reliability and timeliness
◦ Pulling data from source systems not data warehouse
◦ No in-house customization - vendor supports system

“Build As You Go” Effort statements
◦ Watch statements build throughout performance period
◦ Easier to identify needed changes before certification

Ability to Query within ECRT
◦ Search by x.500 as well as EMPLID
◦ Effort Unit able to write custom queries and make
available to end users

Improved Reporting
◦ SPES (Sponsored Project Employee Summary)
◦ ECPR (Effort Certification Payroll Report)
◦ Audit Report (shows all individuals who certified on
a project)
◦ Several others


Commitment management functionality
Later!
Training sessions to be provided before GoLive

Business requirements crafted
◦ On-line tracking of subaward transactions
◦ On-line tracking of invoices
◦ Audit management and tracking

Summer 2009 RFI results
◦ 8 vendors responded, 0 had viable
product

Next Steps
◦ Demo’ing related Oracle/Peoplesoft product (2/23)
◦ Considering partnering with a vendor and possibly other
institutions to create a product

Budget by Individual Subaward!
◦ Existing subawards will stay in existing accounts
◦ New subawards will use new schema
◦ Up to 9 subawards per project
 More than 9 subawards? Use a second project or use
existing account codes
Available in
July 2010

NIH
(http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/policy.htm)
◦ New shorter/revised proposal formats now required
◦ Error correction window extended from 2 days to 5 days
through 5/25 *if* you have errors/warnings
◦ Most out-year increases limited to 2% rather than 3%
◦ NRSA Stipend levels up 1%
◦ NIH Salary Cap increased on 1/1/10 to $199,700
RCR
And then there is..

NSF RCR Requirements
 Effective January 4, 2010
 Certification at time of application
 Must provide appropriate training and oversight in the
responsible and ethical conduct of research
 Applies to undergraduates, graduate students and
postdoctoral researchers
 Must be completed within 90 days of start of funding
 Additional information:
http://cflegacy.research.umn.edu/first/NSFApprCrs.html
“RCR Requirements for NSF & NIH” breakout session materials

NIH RCR Requirements
 applies to all new and renewal applications
submitted on or after January 25, 2010,
 all continuation (Type 5) applications with
deadlines on or after January 1, 2011
 Requires ongoing instruction relevant to career stage
 Specific requirements for content, format, duration and
frequency
 Requires monitoring of attendance and reports on activities
completed
 Additional information:
http://cflegacy.research.umn.edu/first/NSFApprCrs.html
“RCR Requirements for NSF & NIH” breakout session materials


Quarterly reporting requirements
Increased likelihood of audits by external
auditors

Increased scrutiny by sponsors

Oversight activities to be conducted by OAR


High visibility due to interest of federal
government
Disclosure of payments to consultants
required for pharmaceutical companies

New Regents’ policy in review process

New administrative policy to follow



Federal agencies are tuning in
Large penalties for seemingly small errors or
infractions
Review of UMN risk exposure to be initiated
late Spring, 2010
 Additional information:
http://www.research.umn.edu/regulations/export_controls.html
"Foreign Entanglements: Export Controls, OFAC Boycotts,
Prison Sentence for a Prof ” breakout session materials



Transaction and Risk Summary Reviews – active
Proceeding with central unit, targeted and special
compliance reviews
Policy/procedure/regulatory reviews and
education

Reviewing and revising oversight processes

Updates to website

NSF Effort Audits – increase in frequency
planned

Changes to sponsor policies/guidelines –
read your NOGAs, RNO

Audit results from other institutions – be
prepared

Audit requests from agencies – share the fun
with others