Transcript Slide 1

PRESENTATION
ON THE IDP SUPPORT TO MUNICIPALITIES
AND THE ROLE OF OTHER SBU’s
NYIKO MASHAMBA
MANAGER: IDP COORDINATION (DLGH)
MMS MEETING
M.J. GATEWAY
12 MAY 2008
CONTENT
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Purpose
Background
Planning and Policy Environment in Limpopo
Defining the IDP Process & Expected Outcomes
Inter-Governmental Planning Cycle
Role of Sector Departments in the IDP process
The ISRDP Nodes and Provincial Growth Points
2
CONTENT
• Organogram of the Development Planning Branch
• Role of the IDP Coordination SBU & other SBU’s in
the IDP process
• Improving IDP Credibility
• Way Forward
• Conclusion
3
PURPOSE
• To develop a shared understanding on the IDP process; as a
component within an inter-governmental planning system;
• To highlight various, and distinct, roles of SBU’s in the
Development Planning Branch and other SBU’s in IDP process;
• To seek best practice in our respective specialized fields, guided
by an integrated understanding of our diverse planning roles.
4
5
Map: The Republic of South Africa
6
Map of the Limpopo Province
Vh e m b e
V&
Musina
M ess in a
M u t a le
M akh ado
Th o h o y a n d o u
V&
Makhado
B lo u b er g
T h u la m el a
V&
D e n d ro n
V&
V&
V&
So e k m e k a a r
Ag a n a n g
V&
V&
W a t er b e rg
V&
Mokopane
L ep el le- N k u m p i
F eta k go m o
Le b o w a k g o m o
T u b a tse
V&
T h a b a zi m b i
V&
M o o k go p o n g
M a k h u d u t a m a ga
V&
B u rg e rs fo rt
V&
Ste e l po o rt
B e la - B e l a
V&
B ela - B ela
H o e d s p ru i t V&
Sek h uk hu ne
Mookgopong
V&
M a r u len g
V&
M o d i m o lle
M o d i m o l le
B a -P h a la b o r w a
T z a n een
M opani
C a p ric o r n
V a a lw a te r
Th a b a zi m b i
Tz a ne e n
V&
Po l o k w a n e G r ea t er
V&
Giyani
M o d j a d ji k lo o f
V&
P o lo k w a n e
L ep h a l a le
V&
G r ea t er L e ta b a
M o l em o le
M o ga la k w en a
Le p h a l a le
G iy a n i
G r ea t er
V&
Ph a l a bo rw a
B o h la b e la
B u sh b u ck rid ge
O h rig s ta d
M a rb l e H a l l
V&
M a r bl e H a l l
V&
V&
M k h u h l u 'A '
G ro bl e rs d a l
G r o b ler sd a l
7
BACKGROUND
• Executive arm of the State consists of 3 distinct (National,
Provincial, and Local), interrelated and inter-dependent spheres;
• 1994-1999: National and Provincial Government establishment
and consolidation; rapid service delivery extension and macroeconomic interventions;
• 1999-2004: Establishment and stabilization of (Developmental)
Local Government sphere; macro-economic stability and
confidence in South African economy;
8
BACKGROUND
• 10 Year Review:
Need for greater focus,
decisiveness, and will to
make trade-offs and strategic
choices necessary for new the
trajectory of growth and
development.
9
BACKGROUND
• 2004-2014: Consolidation and sustainability of local sphere
and IGR crucial for:
–
–
–
–
Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative (ASGI-SA);
halving poverty and unemployment;
building social cohesion; and
Overcoming exclusion.
Project Consolidate
Presidential Imbizos
IDP Hearings 2005
The performance and accountability of individual spheres and departments is
paramount in the 2nd decade of democracy
The need for spheres and departments to act in relation to each
other around a shared development vision of the district is key
10
PLANNING & POLICY MAKING
ENVIRONMENT
Provincial EXCO
HOD’s Meeting
• Political Clusters: Social,
Economic and G & A
•Technical Clusters
• Premier Mayor’s Forum
•PDPF (Establish standing committees to
deal with planning issues in between
quarterly meetings of the forum)
• Mayors Forum
• Municipal Manager’s Forum
(District Development Planning Forums)
11
PLANNING & POLICY MAKING ENVIRONMENT
Key planning and policy instruments:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF);
National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP);
State of the Nation and of the Province Address (SONA) / (SOPA);
The Provincial Growth and Development Strategy (PGDS);
The Integrated Development Plan (IDP);
MEC’s Budget Speeches;
Departmental strategic and Annual Performance Plans (APPs); and
Relevant legislation.
12
13
DEFINING THE IDP PROCESS & EXPECTED
OUTCOMES
• It is a 5 year government-wide plan in a specific municipal area
and is a product of the integrated development planning process.
• It is a key planning instrument which guides and informs all
planning, budgeting, management and decision-making in a
municipality.
• The success of the IDP is dependent on high level support and
buy-in from local citizens and other key stakeholders.
14
DEFINING THE IDP PROCESS & EXPECTED
OUTCOMES
The IDP answers the questions:
From where we are, where How are we going to get
are we going?
there, with what resources,
@ what cost?
The IDP poses the challenge of finding powerful new ideas for change
and to manage the implications of those ideas.
15
DEFINING THE IDP PROCESS & EXPECTED
OUTCOMES
Each municipality is expected to produce a proper IDP which
addresses issues of:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Service delivery
Poverty alleviation
Local economic development
Institutional transformation
Spatial integration
Environmental care
which would ultimately result in the improving quality of 16life
17
LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE IDP
PROCESS
• National & provincial government have passed legislation that
impacts on municipal planning & ,therefore, needs to be
considered during the IDP process.
• This compels the municipalities to be multi-sectoral in their
approach to integrated development planning.
• These requirements should be linked to a single planning cycle
and processes within municipalities.
18
LEGAL & POLICY FRAMEWORK
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-1
Constitution of the RSA,1996
White Paper on Local Government, 1998
Municipal Demarcation Act,1998
Municipal Structures Act,1998
Municipal Systems Act,2000
Municipal Finance Management Act,2003
Municipal Property Rates Act, 2004
Employment Equity Act,
Skills Development Act,
White Paper on Spatial Planning & Land Use Management
Development Facilitation Act, 1995
19
LEGAL & POLICY FRAMEWORK
-2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Restitution of Land Rights Act,1994
Disaster Management Act, 2002
Housing Act, 1997
National Environmental Management Act, 1998
Environment Conservation Act, 1989
White Paper on Environmental Management Policy, 1998
White Paper on Integrated Pollution & Waste Management for
South Africa, 2000
• Minerals Act,1991
• National Water Act, 1998
• White Paper on Energy Policy, 1998
20
LEGAL & POLICY FRAMEWORK
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-3
National Land Transport Transition Act, 2000
National Heritage Resources Act, 1999
White Paper on Safety and Security
Inter-Governmental Relations Framework Act, 2005
Electricity Regulation Act, 2006
The Reconstruction & Development Programme(RDP)
The Growth, Employment & Redistribution Programme (GEAR)
Accelerated Shared Growth Initiative–South Africa (ASGISA)
Domestic Tourism Strategy (2004 – 2007)
21
KEY FRAMEWORKS TO GUIDE THE IDP
• Adoption of an “IDP Review Framework” which binds both the DM
& LMs to ensure proper coordination & alignment;
• Adoption of a “Process Plan” set out in writing by each municipality.
Whilst the Process Plan has to be based on appropriate consultation with
local communities and to be communicated to them, the Framework has to
be based on engagement with local municipalities and Sector Departments
within the district.
“The preparation task of the IDP is the duty of municipal
management. The process should contribute to the institutional
preparedness of the municipality for the IDP process”
22
INTER-GOVERNMENTAL PLANNING
CYCLE
SPHER
E
August
Sept
Oct
Provincial
Level
Developmen
t of Draft
Annual
Performanc
e Plans
Develop
ment of
Draft
Annual
Performa
nce
Plans
Development of Draft
Annual
Performance
Plans
(Sector
Depts)
Municipal
level
(District &
Local
Municipali
ties)
District
consultation
on IDP
District
Framework
Municipal
Consultatio
ns with
communitie
s on the
Process
Plans
Budget adjustments of
sector departments
Dec
Jan
Feb
March
Com
pile
their
&
final
APP
docu
ment
Comp
ile
their
&
final
APP
docu
ment
Com
pile
their
&
final
APP
docu
ment
MTEF projections
Analysis
Phase
Prioriti
sation
Apr
Tabling
of
APPs in the
Legislature
Financial
year start
Approval of
draft IDP and
submission
to province
Assessm
ent
of
Final
Draft
IDPs
Strategies
Phase
Budget
preparation
Projects
Phase
May
June
July
Adopt
IDP
&
Budget
Municipal
financial
Year end
New
Financial
Year
begins
Finalise
IDP and
Budget
Integration
Phase
IDP
Coordination
units
/
Developm
ent
Planning
Units
Assessing
adopted
IDPs
(DLGH)
Engage with sector departments to
ensure their programmes are
informed and respond to municipal
priorities
(OTP)
Nov
Provide feedback to
municipalities and
sector Depts on IDP
assessment
(MEC’s
Assessment
Reports)
Ensure
sector
Departments
make
available
budget
adjustments
and
strategic
planning
information
to
municipalities
Development of
SDBIPs
(PMS)
Develop
District
Framewo
rk
and
IDP
Process
Plans
Ensure
sector
Departments
make
available
budget
adjustments
and
strategic
planning
information
to
municipalities
Engage with sector departments to ensure their
programmes are informed and respond to
municipal priorities
23
ROLE OF SECTOR DEPARTMENTS
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Statistics
Spatial Development Framework
Disaster Management Plan
LED Strategy
Tourism Strategy
Integrated Environ. Management Plan
Land Reform
Water Services Development Plan
Health Plan and HIV/AIDS Plan
Integrated Transport Plan
Social Crime Prevention Strategy
• Communication Strategy
= Statistics SA
= DLGH
= DLGH
= DLGH / DEDET
= DEDET
= DEDET
= DLA
= DWAF
= Dept. Health & Social Dev.
= Dept. Roads andTransport
= SAPS, Depts: Justice and
Correctional Services
= DLGH
24
ISRDP Nodes & Provincial Growth Points
• There are two ISRDP nodes:
Sekhukhune and Maruleng
• 17 Provincial Growth Points in Limpopo:
Polokwane, Phalaborwa, Tzaneen, Makhado, Thabazimbi,
Marble Hall, Mogalakwena, Groblersdal, Burgersfort, Lephalale
• Investment focus is to be on 10 Provincial Growth Points, on a
cumulative basis.
25
WHY FOCUS OUR SUPPORT TO PGP & NODES
• Pockets of poverty that needs special intervention (Nodes).
• Increasing demand for decent housing and services driven
by combination of:
– Population growth
– Decrease in household size
– Splitting of households between rural and urban areas
• Increase in number of people entering the employment
market is faster than the rate at which new jobs are created.
• Youth employment is crucial factor for social stability.
26
WHAT IDPs SHOULD PROVIDE (PGP & NODES)
Sustainable Human Settlements
• Vision
•Place Hierarchy
•Relation between places
Robust and Inclusive Local Economy
• Potential
•Endogenous factors
•PGDS and NSDP
– Population trends & projections related to economic base analysis
– Accurately costed infrastructure/service backlogs & projected increases
– Identification of municipal income streams (own and transfers from
national and provincial level)
– Outline powers, functions and roles and responsibilities
27
WHAT IDPs SHOULD PROVIDE (PGP & NODES)
Sustainable Human Settlements
• Vision
•Place Hierarchy
•Relation between places
Robust and Inclusive Local Economy
• Potential
•Endogenous factors
•PGDS and NSDP
– Model of tariffs, property tax income, debt analysis
– Spatial and infrastructure modeling and land use policies clearly
demarcating land use areas and targets
– Implementation capability requirements
28
BRANCH ORGANOGRAM
Development Planning Branch
LOCAL
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
SPATIAL &
HUMAN
SETTLEMENT
PLANNING
LAND USE, DEEDS INFRASTRUCTURE
INTEGRATED
DEVELOPMENT AND STATUTORY
DEVELOPMENT
BOARDS
PLANNING
PLANNING
SUPPORT
COORDINATION
29
ROLE OF IDP COORDINATION SBU
• To perform IDP assessment and provide (planning)
support to municipalities.
“This include supporting municipalities to develop
credible IDPs and coordinating the ISRDP within
the parameters of the IDP process”
30
ROLE OF SPATIAL AND HUMAN SETTLEMENT
PLANNING SBU
• To render spatial and human settlement planning.
“This include supporting municipalities to develop their
Spatial Development Frameworks (which are a
component in the IDPs)”
Township Establishment & Site Demarcations
31
ROLE OF LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SBU
• To manage local economic development.
“This include supporting municipalities to develop their
Local Economic Development Strategies / Plans
(which are a component in the IDPs)”
32
ROLE OF LAND USE, DEEDS AND STATUTORY
BOARDs SBU
• To provide and co-ordinate land use management
systems and efficient statutory boards.
“This include supporting municipalities to develop their
Land Use Management Schemes / Systems (which
are a component in the IDPs) and adjudication on
applications from municipalities”
33
ROLE OF INFRASTRUCTURE
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SBU
• To provide and co-ordinate land use management
systems and efficient statutory boards.
“This include supporting municipalities to develop
Municipal Infrastructure Investment Frameworks and
3-Year Capital Investment Plans linked to the IDP and
Budget.”
34
5 Big Ideas (IDP Hearings 2005):
– A shared paradigm of sustainable development;
– Government connectivity with communities;
– Impact of intergovernmental investment in localities;
– Provincial developmental and strategic role; and
– Improving credibility of IDPs.
35
Improving IDP Credibility
• Regulatory refinement
– Transform District IDPs into expressions of the plans of all 3
spheres of government;
– Streamline process and product according to differentiated
requirements of municipalities;
– Strengthen SDF and Land Use management application;
36
Improving IDP Credibility
– Sector interface & exchange of common planning information;
– Definition and relationship between components: Long-term,
5-year term, MTEF/annual service delivery and budget plans;
– Powers and functions vs wider municipal developmental role;
– Linkage with community/ward based planning;
37
Improving IDP Credibility
• Culture and Capability
– Leadership and management tool;
– Skill and experience of officials responsible for managing
IDP functions;
– Linkage with other professional inputs;
– Business-Labour-Civil Society interfaces;
38
IMPACT OF INTERGOVERNTAL PLANS
39
WAY FORWARD
• Ensure that there is improved internal co-ordination amongst the SBUs to
can better contribute in the effective planning and implementation of IDPs;
• Ensure that IDPs reflect agreement between spheres of government on
priorities and interventions;
• Strengthen the credibility of the IDP as a planning tool;
• Exploit the potential of the IDP as an instrument of intergovernmental
planning;
• Improve the quality of our IDPs (Credible IDPs); and
• Address the ‘own affairs’ type of relationship between the PGDS and the
IDP by aligning all planning within the spheres of government.
40
INTER-GOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
THE SUCCESS OF THE IDP PROCESS DEPENDS ON THE
COOPERATION & INVOLVEMENT OF THE VARIOUS GOVT. AGENCIES
41
CONCLUSION
“Our glory is in never failing, but in rising
each time we fail”
42