Transcript Document

Suppressed Demand
An NGO Perspective
Anja Kollmuss, CDM Watch
24 March 2012
www.cdm-watch.org
CDM Watch scrutinizes carbon markets and
advocates for fair and effective climate
protection.
CDM Watch provides an independent
perspective on the CDM and wider carbon
market developments.
We work to empower civil society around the
world to have a strong voice in the CDM
by exposing weak governance rules and
practices and organising capacity building
workshops and providing tools.
Ideally.... addressing suppressed demand to support a
CDM that is:
• Clean: Leapfrogging to low-carbon development
• Pro-poor: enabling projects that benefit the poorest
• Fair: equitable among different project types
Yet mitigation goals must not be undermined!
Discussion on how to negotiate sup. demand and mitigation goals.
Revision of the suppressed demand guidelines
9. This area will focus on the improvement of the clarity and level of
detail contained in the suppressed demand guidelines. This
improvement may include:
(i)
more guidance on the minimum service level, including on how
data is selected and the periodicity of updates of the data will be
provided;
(ii)
additional specifications pertaining to areas/sectors/project types
for which the guidelines are applicable;
(iii) further issues raised by further analysis by the secretariat and
public consultation as described in A above.
(Work Programme on Suppressed Demand)
Minimum service level
The minimum service level is a service level that is able to meet basic
human needs (e.g. basic housing, basic energy services including
lighting, cooking, drinking water supply). In some situations, this
service level may not have been provided prior to the implementation
of the CDM project activity.
Which services should be defined as basic human needs in the
context of CDM? Who decides? e.g. right to waste collection?
SODIS method used for water purification Senanga, Zambia (Monika Tobler, copyright by SODIS/Eawag)
Identification of the baseline service level:
1.
The service level provided prior to the implementation of the
project activity
2.
The service level provided under the project activity
3.
A minimum service level [suppressed demand scenario]
Guidance and clarity needed on which baseline scenario is applicable:
 3. should only be applied to sectors/project types that cover basic
human needs.
 3. should only be applied for sectors/project types that have clear
sustainability benefits.
Setting suppress demand minimum service level:
The minimum service level should be realistic and reasonable
but not overly conservative.
 What does this mean? How is it operationalised? How does
this fly with environmental integrity?
The minimum service level should be so chosen that over a
long time horizon, it will always be reached (with rare
exemptions, such as a protracted conflict or a
regional/global economic collapse).
 Vague language needs to be clarified and specified.
Setting the minimum service level
The following should be taken into account:
(a) Environmental integrity of the emissions reductions
has to be safeguarded;
 how is this operationalized?
(b) Financial viability of the CDM project cannot be the
predominant determining criteria;
 ?!
Cost as a proxy to set minimum service level?
Comments from a project developer:
“I think it would be important to look at what the costs are to bring these services to the
poor […] This would result in a fairer approach because it would be tied to the true costs
required to reach the level of service that there is a demand for.”
Cost are not a suitable proxy because costs give no information about the
level of actual or avoided emissions reductions (and you still need to
decide on service levels).
 Project cost effectiveness cannot be used as a determining factor
 Some project types will not be suitable for the CDM because is it
impossible to make them financially feasible without compromising the
environmental integrity of the CDM
Setting the minimum service level, cont
The following should be taken into account:
(c) Normative decisions have to be clearly referenced and explained;
 We like it.
(d) Decisions regarding suppressed demand have to be re-evaluated
and updated periodically based on recent data to ensure they are
based on realistic assumptions.
 This needs further specific guidance : e.g. vintage requirements,
what needs to be updated and when, etc.
Setting minimum service levels
 Minimum service levels should be set universally and
should not be country specific.
Determining baseline emissions
The conversion of a minimum service level to GHG emissions
depends on the technology and fuel used to provide this
service.
 Baseline emissions will be location specific (e.g. heating
needs) and depend on the fuel type used.
Determining baseline emissions
Is technology dependent ! Relationship between level of service
and GHG emissions is not linear. Emission intensity may
change radically with level of consumption ( water
purification)
 Need for explicit guidance on the translation of minimum
service level to GHG emission equivalent.
 Most details have to be resolved within methodologies.
Overarching guidelines can help but cannot give guidance
on all issues that may come up with different project types
Determining baseline emissions
Example: Water Purification
Baseline activity only to a limited
extent energy based:
• People boil only limited
quantities of water, no matter
how rich they are.
• People use other non-energy
based purification technologies
such as chlorination.
 Chosen SD baseline activity
cannot be an energy-intensive
activity, when non- or low energy
intensive solutions are viable!!
Summary
 Financial viability cannot be a determining criteria for
minimum service level or baseline emissions. Some project
types will not be suitable for the CDM.
 Need for explicit guidance on the translation of minimum
service level to GHG emission equivalent. E.g. chosen SD
baseline activity cannot be an energy-intensive activity,
when non- or low energy intensive solutions are viable.
 Overall guidance on SD can improve consistency but the
specific approaches have to be developed for each project
type specifically (sectors are very different: e.g.
transportation, water purification, rural electrification)
 Robust sampling and monitoring rules have to go hand in
hand with SD guidelines
 Way forwards: Honest, transparent process with input from
all relevant stakeholders.
Looking forward to a constructive dialogue!
Thank you!
Anja Kollmuss
Carbon Market Expert
CDM Watch
Switzerland: +41 77 485 3667
Germany: +49 1578 7702218
[email protected]
www.cdm-watch.org