Transcript Water Sector Investment Plan

Water Sector Investment Plan
- Towards a Conceptual framework
Presentation to MWI/Donor meeting 1.12.2005
by Eng. R. N. Gakubia
Director of Water, MWI
Sector Investment Planning Project
1. Key Milestones





Core Management Staff in place
Draft TOR Developed
Draft Conceptual framework developed
Draft Work plan developed
Draft Budget Developed
2. Project Structure
 Project Steering committee
This will comprise the representatives of MoF, MoH, MoE, MoA,
MoLG, CEOs of water institutions and representatives of private
sector.
 Project Management Team
This has been established and seven officers attached (including
two representatives of donors at advisory level). Additional staff
from Dept. of Irrigation & Drainage, Land reclation (ASAL) and
Support staff (Driver, Accounts Clerk, Secretary etc) to be attached
Conceptual Framework: Key Definitions
 Water Supply Coverage
 (based on the draft national water services strategy May, 2005)
(i) Rural Water Coverage from est. 49% to 74% by 2015
Access:
Max. distance to nearest standpipe/point source 2000m
Quantity:
Min. 20 liters per capita per day
Quality:
KBS (WHO) standards
Reliability: 60 % of the time
Affordability: Monthly expenditure 5 % of av. income
(ii) Urban Water Coverage from est. 68% to 74% by 2015
Access:
Quantity:
Quality:
Reliability:
Affordability:
Max. distance to nearest standpipe 100m
Min. 40 liters per capita per day
KBS (WHO) standards
90 % of the time
Monthly expenditure 5 % of av. income
Conceptual framework: Key definitions (Contd.)
 Sanitation Coverage
(based on the draft national water services strategy May, 2005)
(i) Urban Sanitation
Coverage: From estimated 28% to 39% by 2015
Quality: KS 150
 Reliability: 90 %
 Affordability: Monthly expenditure 2 % of average income

(ii) Rural Sanitation
Sewage From estimated 2.4% to 8.7% by 2015
On site sanitation From estimated 40% to 65 %by 2015
 Lowest level of data collection: Community
Definition (still to be operationalised): A group of people in a given
area with a common purpose to develop and/or manage a watsan
project and have formed or have the potential to form WSPs, WUAs
WRUAs.
Level of data coverage
(a) Point sources

The level will be a point source (only sources capable of producing more
than 25 m3/day or serving at least 25 households will be considered)

Appropriate conservation practices like rainwater harvesting will be
captured at house hold level.
(b) Piped schemes and sewerage works & Irrigation schemes,

Lowest level of data collection at WSP, WRUA, WUA, Irrigation schemes,
ASAL project.

DWOs are interim WSPs, WUAs, WRUAs where such structures have not
been formed.
(c) Onsite sanitation
The level is at household level. Sample regions will be selected and the
results extrapolated

Data collection to be organized by WSBs, WRMA regional off., Provincial
Irr. Off., CETRAD.

Data collection to be supervised by consultants and the staff from the
institutions (Consultants estimated input ~300 person weeks)
Details of data to be collected
 The investment requirement will comprise:
– Hardware investment cost including capacity expansion and
rehabilitation
– Related investment specific costs like programme management
costs, planning, design and supervision costs, community
mobilization costs, and hygiene proportion costs, capacity
building
– Operation and Maintenance Costs
Data to be collected will be
 (1) Investment requirements by Reclamation departments
 (2) Investment requirements by Irrigation and Drainage department
 (3) Investment requirements by WRMA
– Hydrological, hydro-geological and geological data
Data details (contd)

(4) Water Supply
– Location
– No. of un-served persons
– Design reports including BQs of the proposed schemes
– Production, condition of exiting facility
(i) Point Sources
Assessment of existing facilities
– No. of typical water points feasible
– Types of water point feasible
– Hydrological, hydro-geological, and topographical conditions

(ii) Piped schemes
–
–
Rehabilitation needs/capacity expansion assessment
Components that need replacement
Data collection
rapid assessment exercise 2004
 Some baseline data were collected
 The baseline data did not capture point sources
 The data for identification, definition of schemes and quantitative
parameters on the ground are usable.
 The data that required assessment are however not reliable and will
need to be collected again under the validation of a consultant.
Way Forward
 Lessons learnt from rapid assessment will be incorporated
 Validation and quality control will be emphasized at all levels
 A manual covering data collection, validation, entry etc. will be
developed
 All project participants at all levels will be given adequate training
 The WSPs, WUAs and WRUAs, DIOs, POs will collect the basic
data and assessment?.
 Payment bonuses for data collected and entered in time
Data Entry and Validation
 Data entry to be done at regional level:
WSBs, WRMA regional offices,
Provincial Irrigation Offices, CETRAD.
 Six stages of data validation:
– Pre-testing of survey instruments
– Data to be validated before input
– The data entry forms designed such that many inconsistent
entries are rejected
– Periodic checking by supervising consultants and institutional
staff
– Data Validation workshops at the regional level before
completion of the exercise
– Final validation of aggregated data at national level
Data Analysis




Baseline average unit cost data per service board
have been developed for the Ministry by Frame
consult. These will be used in estimating investment
cost of various project components.
Unit costs of components will be used to estimated
investment needs of each scheme
Investment cost arising from new facilities will be
estimated using the project design documents.
The investment requirement per WSP, WUA, WRUA
to be aggregated into WSB, WRMA regional office,
Provincial irrigation investment plan
Reporting
Reporting Structure
 Report a collective summary of the institutional (WSB, WRMA reg.
Off. PIO) reports
 Two reports one three year rolling detailed plan to be incorporated
in the MTEF and the other a plan ending 2015 to help track the
MDGS
 The Report will present options for phasing
 Report to be linked to budget systems MTEF, PRSP, ERSWEC
 Project priorities per year to be enlisted
Database Structure




Databases to be set at institutional level
Data entry to be MS Excel
Data analysis in MS Access
Data shall be in stored in GIS at the Ministry Headquarters, the
WRMA and the WRSB
Tentative Budget
Activity, Services, Inputs
Unit cost
(USD)
Quantity
Costs
(USD)
Logistical support
45,000.00
1
45,000.00
Preparatory trainings and development of data
sheet outlines
30,000.00
1
30,000.00
Consultants services (weeks)
1,500.00
312
468,000.00
WSB/WRMA/NIB Conceptual framework
workshops
5,000.00
3
15,000.00
WSB/WRMA/NIB training workshops
5,000.00
16
80,000.00
600.00
70
42,000.00
5,000.00
16
80,000.00
Countrywide workshops
15,000.00
2
30,000.00
Travel
20,000.00
2
40,000.00
Communications/printing
30,000.00
1
30,000.00
Facilitation for data collection (per district)
WSB/WRMA/NIB training workshops
Contingencies
Total
86,000.00
946,000.00
Proposed Work plan

2006
D
1 Develop Project structure
Preparation and Resource
2 Mobilization for SIPP
3 Procure Consultants
Conceptual framework for WSBs,
4 WRMA, PIOs
5 Train data collectors & entry clerks
6 Pre-test data
7 Data Collection
8 Data Entry
9 Data Validation by consultants
10
Aggregation of data by WSBs etc
11
Validation workshops
12
Compilation of SIP
13
Post review workshops
J
F
M A
M J
J
A
S
O
N