2009 Harry H. Mellon Award of Excellence in Job Order

Download Report

Transcript 2009 Harry H. Mellon Award of Excellence in Job Order

Administering Your
Programs with Less
Funding
Strategies from the Field
Scott Stevenson – Los Angeles County CDC
[email protected]
Joseph Hollett – The Gordian Group
[email protected]
1
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
The Bad News for L.A. County….
 From this year to next year, 22% reduction in CDBG funding -
$26.9M reduced to $21.9M
 Over the last 10 years – 46.8 % reduction, from $39.5M to
$21.9M for the 2012-13 program year
 Reduction from the highest grant year in 1995-96 at $42.8M-
51% or a loss of $21.8M
 In terms of administrative dollars over the last 5 years – a
loss of $1.9M or 31.6%
2
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
3
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Coping Mechanisms
 Staffing reductions – 9 positions going into the 2012-13
program year. Highest 60 positions, next year 33
 However…improved efficiency through automated grant
system allowed staffing reductions through attrition for
several years
 Urban County remedy – eliminate general admin authority
from participating cities – 10% general admin-7.5%-0%
 Raise public service contract minimum from $10k to $20k
4
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Coping Mechanisms (cont’d)
 Strategic monitoring using more desktop and report reviews
 Refine monitoring risk analysis to possibly reduce
monitoring load
 Allocate some staff costs away from general admin to
activities such as capacity building
 Cost savings and efficiency through a streamlined
procurement method – Job Order Contracting or JOC
5
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Streamlining Procurement
through the
Job Order Contracting System
Joseph Hollett
6
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Agenda
Overview of Job Order Contracting (JOC) Process
Job Order Contracting Benefits
Job Order Contracting Implementation Options
Discussion
7
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
The Challenge
Elapsed Time
Traditional Design - Bid - Construct Model
It can take 6-12 months to get a typical
repair/alteration project under contract
using the design/bid/construct model
8
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Impact of the JOC Solution
9
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Job Order Contracting Overview
10
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Job Order Contracting Definition
 Job Order Contracting (JOC) is a Firm Fixed Priced, Competitively Bid,
Indefinite Quantity Procurement Process Primarily Used for Repair,
Alterations, and Minor New Construction Projects.
 Provides the Public Agency with a Team of “On-Call” Contractors where
all future pricing has already been fixed through a competitively bid
process
 Fundamentally Different Construction Procurement Relationship

Contractors are subjected to different motivations and behaviors

Non-adversarial relationship between Owner & Contractor
11
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Job Order Contracting Documents
 Customized Pricing Structure
 Technical Specifications
 Standard Details
 General Conditions
 Bid Documents
12
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Customized Pricing Structure
 A list of all construction tasks to be included in the contract is developed
 A price to install and/or demolish is established for each task

Direct Cost Only

Local prevailing labor rates, local material prices & local equipment prices
 The list of tasks represent the “Scope of Work” for the contract
 Gordian’s JOC pricing structure is the Construction Task Catalog® (CTC)
13
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Technical Specifications
 Customized technical
specifications for each task

Incorporates unique needs of the
owners
 Pricing Structure and Technical
Specifications must be
coordinated
 Critical to Bidder's confidence
in the Pricing Structure of the
JOC Process
 KEY POINT!


Must know what you are buying!
Essential that each construction
task be tied to a concise technical
specification!
14
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Contract Terms and Conditions
 Critical document
JOC Specific Clauses
 Must accurately explain the JOC
process
 Some standard clauses need to be
modified for JOC
 Poorly drafted contract language
increases risks & costs
15

Overview of Contract

Procedure for Ordering Work

Proposal Preparation

Updating Adjustment Factors
Modified Standard Clauses

Scope of Work

Extra Work

Time Extensions

Liquidated Damages

Substantial Completion

Payment

Close Out
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
JOC Structure & Bid Guidance
 Facility Owner establishes a fixed initial term


Typically one year
May include options to extend
 Facility Owner establishes a guaranteed minimum dollar value

Some nominal amount - typically $25,000
 Facility Owner sets a pre-established maximum value


Represents the expected amount of work to be accomplished
Based on Facility Owner’s budget
 Prior to Bid the Facility Owner does not:


Identify or commit to any specific project or location
Identify or commit to any specific quantities or tasks in the catalog of construction
tasks
 TGG’s JOC Complete Solution Typically has multiple
contracts/contractors

Promotes post-bid competition on the basis of service
16
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
JOC is Competitively Bid
 Each contractor must tender Adjustment Factors to be
applied to the unit prices published in the Pricing Structure
 Two Adjustment Factors are typically bid

Normal Working Hours

Other Than Normal Working Hours
 Adjustment Factors must include all overhead and profit
 Adjustment Factors fixed for one year
 The same Adjustment Factors apply to every task in the
Pricing Structure
17
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
JOC Process
 Joint Scope Meeting
 Owner & contractor jointly develop Detailed Scope of Work
 Owner determines final scope and level of documentation required
 A/E & subcontractors may also be part of scoping team
 Contractor Prepares Proposal
 Contractor prepares Price Proposal
 Cost of each project = unit prices x quantities x adjustment factor
 Price is fixed, always based on unit prices, never negotiated
 Contractor also develops schedule, list of subcontractors, submittals
 Owner Review
 Contractor’s price proposal & other information is reviewed & approved
 Owner Issues a Lump Sum Job Order
 The risk of performance remains with Contractor
 No adjustment of quantities after Job Order issued
18
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Job Order Contracting Benefits
19
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Better Result with Higher Quality
 Contractor is guaranteed a small amount of work – typically
$25k
 Potential to earn much greater volume of work
 Key to earning more work is good quality work delivered
timely – future job orders depend on it
 Otherwise – The Penalty Box!
20
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
JOC Cost Savings
 Cost of construction

Contractor offers discount because bidding a large volume of work, not one small project

Overhead and profit spread over entire value of contract

Independent LAUSD Audit showed a 9.2% savings (1 December 2011)
 Lower procurement and administrative costs

JOC eliminates the need to use the full procurement cycle for each and every project
 Fewer change orders and claims

Joint scoping process eliminates misunderstandings about Detailed Scope of Work

Detailed Scope of Work and JOC general conditions written to make Contractor responsible
for errors and omissions
 Reduction of A/E fees

Currently many small projects are "designed" primarily for procurement purposes

JOC projects can be defined with less than a full bid package of plans and specifications
21
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Greater Business Participation
JOC Increases the Number of Opportunities for Small, Local, Disadvantaged
and Emerging Businesses

No Pre-established quantities inhibits trade staffing by Prime Contractor

Responsiveness requires Prime Contractor to use multiple local subcontractors

Agency Review & Approval Prior to Issuance of each Job Order ensures Compliance with
any Established Participation Goals

Advantages for Disadvantaged Business Contractors Include:

Prime JOC Contractor establishes a “Mentoring Program”

Expanded business opportunities

No Bonding requirement for the sub-contractor

Fast payment

Less Red Tape
22
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Greater Scheduling Flexibility
 Joint Scope process allows Owner and Contractor to discuss and agree to
scheduling issues before the Owner is Obligated

Issues include site access, work hours, stand down time etc.
 No Shelf Life for prices or Job Orders

Projects may be scoped and proposals developed in advance of work actually
starting.

Allows for flexibility in ordering long lead items
 No Time Delay Claims in Job Order Contracting

Joint Scope process eliminates misunderstandings about scope and schedule

Liquidated Damages may be assessed on a project by project basis
 A Better Solution for Non-Performance is No Further Work!
23
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
NAHRO Innovation Awards
24
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Section 3 and JOC Contracting
 Section 3 preferences are incorporated into the JOC bidding
process
 Proactive interaction with JOC contractors at pre-bid to
explain Section 3 preference in bidding process
 Once subcontractors are identified, they are provided Section
3 compliance information and forms at the pre-construction
meeting
 Performance based approach under JOC provides leverage
and incentive for contractors to meet Section 3 commitments
25
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved
Discussion
26
copyright © 2012 The Gordian Group, Inc., all rights reserved