Transcript PENGURUSAN SISA PEPEJAL BERSEPADU KEARAH …

AMANAT TAHUNAN DEKAN
RESETTING THE PRIORITY
Hamidi Abdul Aziz
Pusat Pengajian Kejuruteraan Awam,
Kampus Kejuruteraan,
14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, MALAYSIA
18 February 2009
1
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
1.0 APEX and our present KPI
2.0 Our priority
3.0 Approaches
4.0 Challenges
5.0 SKT 2009
6.0 My words and my wish
1.0 APEX AND OUR PRESENT KPI
APEX
Challenges under APEX: 8 pillars
• Nurturing and learning.
• Research and innovation.
• Services and external activities.
• Students and alumni services.
• Graduate studies.
• Concentration of talent.
• Resources.
• Supportive governance.
3
OUR PRESENT KPI
• Everyone has given the best. Thank you
so much for your contribution.
• We are still behind. We need to work
harder.
4
Kategori KPI
RU
Awards:
Penerbitan:
IF/staff atau
cummulatif
impact factor
Non-cited
indexed journal
Buku
Bab dalam buku
Other
publications
Pencapaian
2006
1
antarabangsa
2 kebangsaan
10 paper
0.6/staf
16.937
Pencapaian
Pencapaian
2007
2008
-1
1 antarabangsa
antarabangasa
(silver)
-2 kebangsaan 2 kebangsaan (2
gold)
KPI universiti
Target 2009
>50
2 antarabangsa
2 kebangsaan
>2/staf
0.6/staf atau 15
10 paper
0.53/staf
14.907
15 paper
0.321/staf
10.904
52 papers
2.08/staf
42 paper
(Proceedings)
1.27/staf
2.0/staf
4 books
0.14/staf
41 papers
1.64/papers
2 buku
0.06/staf
14 bab
0.42/staf
Editorial Board
12
Invited paper 32
Keynote 5
Presentation 21
National
Proceedings 8
0.15/staf
0.2/staf
5
Geran (aktif
pada tahun
semasa)
Kerajaan
(Science Fund,
FRGS, IRPA,
RU)
22 projek
20 projek
RM787,860.0 RM3,135,441
0
27 projek
RM4,109,448
RM125K/staf
40K/staf
40K/staf
Swasta (TNB)
1 projek
RM149,000
RM5,960/staf
1 projek
RM149,000
RM5/staf
13.35K/staf
5K/staf
13.35K/staf
2K/staf
Antarabangsa
3 projek
3 projek
RM48,203
RM1,928/staf
6 projek
RM197,730.87
6K/staf
Jangka Pendek
dan Kampus
Sejahtera,
Insentif
15 projek
RM
185287.00
29 projek
RM679,122.1
0
25 projek
RM746,336
23K/staf
Tiada
1
Post-doctoral
1 projek/staf
20K/staf
15/tahun
2
6
Kuantiti
pelajar
siswazah
berijazah
Ph.D.
berijazah/staf
1
3
5
1:5
2
1:16
1:18
7
1:4
Nisbah pelajar
siswazah:staf
5.24:1
4.59/staf
3.45/staf
3/staf
4.59/staf
Nisbah UG:PG
(termasuk mod
campuran)
4:1
3.2:1
2.85:1
4:1
2.8:1
Peratus pelajar
luar negara
22%
23%
21.34%
>10%
34%
39.7
42.85
38.66%
>50%
45%
25.8
25.8
26%
>10%
26%
Kualiti pelajar
siswazah
Kelayakan
masuk
CGPA>3.0
Pelajar siswazah
dengan
fellow/grant
7
Paten
0
2
12
1
Produk
komersial
Perlesenan
0
-
7
0
0
-
7
0
IPR
0
-
12
0
16.8K
>
Awam 2007
3
2500K/tahun
50K
215,679.50
>1 juta
RM7,598,261.66
(Aktif pada
tahun semasa)
RM878,270
(Baru)
500K
10008.22
<
10,000
15,000
MOU
0
Sama
-
6
1
Staf terlibat
dengan
penyelidikan di
luar
6
Sama
1
225
1
Perkhidmatan
profesional
Kursus
Konsultansi,
termasuk
penyelidikan
berkontrak
Testing
Jaringan luar
8
Pertukaran
pelajar
antarabangsa
Latihan staf ke
luar negara
0
Sama
-
0
4
Sama
-
2
Ahli persatuan
profesional
antarabangsa
(kumulatif pada
tahun semasa)
10
Sama
8
320
10
Ahli persatuan
profesional
kebangsaan
(kumulatif pada
tahun semasa)
41
Sama
52
590
41
Ahli persatuan
profesional
(kumulatif pada
tahun semasa)
dengan jawatan
di Exco
3
Sama
Technical
committee
member/panel
International 7
National 30
3
9
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
1.0 APEX and our present KPI
2.0 Our priority
3.0 Approaches
4.0 Challenges
5.0 SKT 2009
6.0 My words and my wish
2.0 OUR PRIORITY
2.1 Teaching and supervision
• We are here because of our students.
• Quantity of teaching:
– Workload is generally fair (<6 hours/week).
– Relatively speaking, a lot can be done for the
remaining 34 hours.
– Loading is even lesser for staff without mixedmode programme.
– Where does the remaining time go?
11
2.1 Teaching and supervision (cont’d)
• Quality of teaching:
– Does the teaching effective and attractive or have
become culture?
– PPT vs OHP vs internet vs OBE?
– Integration of other teaching and learning
approaches?
– Have me moved forward?
– Recycled exam question?
– Have we returned the script on time?
– Have we been innovative enough?
– Niche programme/syallabus?
12
2.1 Teaching and supervision (cont’d)
• Quality of teaching:
– Have we marked where the mistakes are?
– Have we given enough tutorials?
– Have we prepared model answer for test, exam
papers?
– How much time have we given to our students for
consultation?
– PR with our students-all levels?
13
2.1 Teaching and supervision (cont’d)
• Supervision:
–
–
–
–
–
Having good quality?
How long do we need to read the thesis?
Have we thoroughly checked the thesis?
Students graduated on time?
Good to have many students but have we been fair
to each one of them?
– Have we given enough?
– Do not copy the old traditions when we were
studying and apply them to our students.
14
2.1 Teaching and supervision (cont’d)
• Mixed-mode:
– Not very popular?
– Possibility to offer full-time/part time on
weekdays?
– Less number of international students?
– Should we continue?
– If we stop, can we promise that we will improve on
the other KPI’s?
– Should we extend to other areas?
15
2.2 Research and publication
• Research:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Good number of USM grants.
Comfortable number of national grant.
Poor performance of international grant.
Main researcher or still menempek?
Experience staff should become a role model!
Complacency culture?
Why the same person?
Why need to extend?
Why the given money does not tally with KPI:
• Papers?
• Graduated Ph.D./M.Sc. students?
– Please muhasabah diri. What went wrong?
16
2.2 Research and publication (cont’d)
• Publication:
–
–
–
–
–
Poor performance on impact factor journals.
Still giving so much priorities on conferences.
SKT has been so tolerable to date.
By setting the right priority, we can succeed!
Students mush publish.
17
2.3 Consultancy/testing/Courses
• Consultancy/contract research:
–
–
–
–
Fair performance and can do more.
Same person.
Project leader?
All disciplines must contribute.
• Testing:
–
–
–
–
Starting 2008, the number has increased.
All disciplines must contribute.
Are we competent enough?
How do we share the cakes?
18
2.3 Consultancy/testing/Courses (cont’d)
• Short courses/seminar/conferences:
– Why only AWAM’x?
– We have been so active on short courses, why not
now?
– Without not doing this, the KPI still the same?
• Testing:
–
–
–
–
Starting 2008, the number has increased.
All disciplines must contribute.
Are we competent enough?
How do we share the cakes?
19
2.4 Services to community and university
• Services to community:
–
–
–
–
Does the local community aware of our presence?
How much they benefitted from our presence?
What can we contribute?
KPI vs contribution to community?
• Services to university:
– We are doing ok on this. Many have been involved
– However, it is sometimes limited to the same
person.
20
2.5 Priority: My wish
• Do the best for our teaching and supervision.
– Be innovative
– Narrowing the gap between lecturer/staff-students.
• Conduct quality research and produce tangible
outputs:
– ISI papers.
– Quality Ph.D. and M.Sc. Graduates, on time.
21
INTRODUCTION
• Under the APEX Programme, PG
education plays a pivotal role in
USM’s Transformation Plan
• PG Education as the frontier of
research directly affects:
1. Student Quantity and Quality
2. Publications
3. Commercialization Agenda
4. Patents
OUR TARGET
Student Number
PG Student Population
Our Target
s
To increase Research
Mode students from
3000+ to 7000 by 2010
(Av. 300 new
enrollments/mth)
PG student : Staff
ratio to increase from
2:1 to 4:1
The Reality
PG student: Staff Ratio According to
School/Centre @ Aug. 2008*
% PG intake with CGPA ≥ 3.0 or equivalent*
NOTE:
An Incentive Grant of RM5,000 every year, 2 yrs for Masters and 3 years for PhD student, will be
given to the Main Supervisor for every registered Postgraduate student with a CGPA 3, effective
Aug. 2008.
Procedure:
1. IPS to send list of registered PG students with CGPA  3 (equivalent 85% or 18/20) to RCMO
monthly
2. RCMO sends list to Bendahari to deposit fund of individual Main Supervisor
3. Fund managed by Main Supervisor, Bendahari and RCMO.
4. Technically can be used for anything including equipment. Standard purchasing procedures
TABUNG SISWAZAH
RU ALLOCATION
Local
Int.
1. Fellowship (CGPA 3.00)
√
√
2. GA (CGPA 3.00)
√
√
Research Fund (Dana Penyelidikan)
1. Attending Conferences
√
√
2. Attachment
√
√
3. Research Grant
PG as PI (RM10,000)
- Seed Money
- Completion of Research
√
√
Local
Int.
1. Fellowship (CGPA 3.00)
*
√
X
2. RO/RA (funded by RU
Research Grant held by
PI)
√
√
3. USM-PGRS (PG as PI)
(RM10,000 for Masters &
RM20,000 for PhD)
√
√
* Regardless of candidature, (Bachelor CGPA must be  3.00)
Bottom line, Fellowships are available to local and international students
The Reality
Fellowship Holders According to Schools/Centres: Local & Int’l
To be presented to MPSU
Candidature
Masters
Criteria
End of 1st year
2nd year
Upon submission
of Thesis
No funding
-
Published 1 paper
preferably in IFJ
Published 1 paper
preferably in IFJ
RO
-
Published 1 paper
preferably in IFJ
Published 1 paper
preferably in IFJ
GA
-
Published 1 paper
preferably in IFJ
Published 1 paper
preferably in IFJ
Fellowship
Holder
1. Submit at least paper for
publication in Journal or
2. Presented a Paper at a
conference. Full paper to be
submitted to IPS
or
3. Published in a peer reviewed
proceedings
Published 1 paper
preferably in IFJ
Published 1 paper
preferably in IFJ
FH + PGRS
1. Submit at least paper for
publication in Journal or
2. Presented a Paper at a
conference. Full paper to be
submitted to IPS
or
3. Published in a peer reviewed
proceedings
Published 1 paper
preferably in IFJ
Published 1 paper
preferably in IFJ
PRGS
-
Published 1 paper
preferably in IFJ
Published 1 paper
preferably in IFJ
Candidature
PhD
Criteria
End of 1st year
2nd year
3rd year
Upon submission
of Thesis
No
funding
-
Published 1st paper
preferably in IFJ
Published
2nd
paper preferably in
IFJ
Published 2 papers
preferably in IFJ
RO
-
Published 1st paper
preferably in IFJ
Published
2nd
paper preferably in
IFJ
Published 2 papers
preferably in IFJ
GA
-
Published 1st paper
preferably in IFJ
Published
2nd
paper preferably in
IFJ
Published 2 papers
preferably in IFJ
1.Submit at least paper
for
publication
in
Journal or
2.Presented a Paper at
a conference. Full
paper to be submitted
to IPS
or
3.Published in a peer
reviewed proceedings
Published 1st paper
preferably in IFJ
Published 2nd paper
preferably in IFJ
Published 2 papers
preferably in IFJ
FH +
PGRS
1. Submit at least paper
for
publication
in
Journal or
2. Presented a Paper at
a conference. Full
paper to be submitted
to IPS
or
3. Published in a peer
reviewed proceedings
Published 1st
paper
preferably in IFJ
Published 2nd paper
preferably in IFJ
Published 2 papers
preferably in IFJ
PRGS
-
Published 1st
paper
preferably in IFJ
Published 2nd paper
preferably in IFJ
Published 2 papers
preferably in IFJ
Fellowship
Holder
(FH)
Postgraduate Student Projection @ 31 Jan 2009*
#
Total
Academic
Staff
Total PG
Students
Ratio
Acad. Staff:PG
Projected PG
(1:3.25) '09
Projected PG
(1:4.55) '10
Sains Kajihayat
49
337
6.9
315 (157.5)*
315.0
Sains Farmasi
45
248
5.5
221 (110.5)
221.0
PTJ
Has Been Presented to Deputy Deans, Graduate Studies
Total
Academic
Staff
Total PG
Students
Ratio
Acad. Staff:PG
Projected PG
(1:3.25) '09
Projected PG
(1:4.55) '10
Kej. Elektrik &
Elektronik
40
191
4.8
172 (86)
182.0 (91)
Sains Komputer
38
173
4.6
162 (81)
172.9 (86.5)
Teknologi Industri
39
190
4.9
163 (81.5)
177.5 (88.7)
Kej. Mekanik
28
128
4.6
112 (56)
127.4 (63.7)
PTPM
11
41
3.7
44 (22)
50.1 (25.0)
Ilmu Pendidikan
59
263
4.5
228 (114)
268.5 (134.2)
INFORMM
5
32
6.4
19 (9.5)
22.8 (11.4)
Kej. Bahan &
Sumber Mineral
38
182
4.8
140 (70)
172.9 (86.5)
Kej. Kimia
25
106
4.2
83 (41.5)
113.8 (56.9)
Kej. Awam
28
112
4.0
92 (46)
127.4 (63.7)
Sains Kimia
36
120
3.3
117 (58.5)
163.8 (81.9)
PTJ
* 50% with CGPA  3.00
Total
Academic
Staff
Total PG
Students
Ratio
Acad.
Staff:PG
Projected PG (1:3.25)
'09
Ilmu Kemanusiaan
83
258
3.1
269.8 (135)
377.7 (188.8)
Pengurusan
63
205
3.3
204.8 (102.4)
286.7 (143.3)
Pusat Penyelidikan Arkeologi Malaysia
4
13
3.3
13.0 (6.5)
18.2 (9.1)
Penyelidikan Dadah & Ubat-ubatan
6
23
3.8
19.5 (9.75)
27.3 (13.6)
Perumahan,Bangunan & Perancangan
65
187
2.9
211.3 (105.6)
295.8 (147.9)
Sains Kemasyarakatan
48
119
2.5
156.0 (78)
218.4 (109.2)
Sains Fizik
47
136
2.9
152.8 (76.4)
213.9 (106.9)
Penyelidikan Dasar & Kajian Antarabangsa
8
15
1.9
26.0 (13)
36.4 (18.2)
Pusat Bahasa & Terjemahan
10
17
1.8
32.5 (16.25)
45.5 (22.75)
Seni
33
53
1.7
107.3 (53.6)
150.2 (75.0)
IPPT
11
19
1.6
35.8 (17.9)
50.1 (25)
Pendidikan Jarak Jauh
66
146
1.6
214.5 (107.2)
Komunikasi
21
40
1.5
68.3 (34.1)
Sains Matematik
45
67
1.5
146.3 (73.1)
204.8 (102.4)
REDAC
5
8
1.2
16.3
(8.1)
22.8 (11.4)
KANITA
6
10
1.0
19.5
(86)
27.3 (13.7)
Kej. Aeroangkasa
13
11
0.7
42.3
(86)
59.2 (29.6)
Sains Pergigian
60
40
0.7
195.0 (97.5)
273.0 (136.5)
Sains Kesihatan
90
67
0.6
292.5 (146.25)
409.5 (204.8)
Sains Perubatan
353
89
0.3
1147.3 (573.6)
1606.2 (803)
Pusat Racun Negara
4
1
0.3
13.0 (6.5)
18.2 (9.1)
Pusat Kawalan Doping
4
1
0.0
13.0 (6.5)
18.2 (9.1)
PTJ*
Projected PG
(1:4.55)
'10
300.3 (150.15)
95.6 (47.8)
2.5 Priority: My wish
• Involved in consultancies/testing/seminar/short
courses/conferences:
– Minimum 1 consultancy per year as project leader
– Involved in testing
– Minimum 1 Short course per discipline per year.
33
2.5 Priority: My wish (cont’d)
• Involved in community
professional activities:
–
–
–
–
services
and
Technical committee member.
Reviewer of technical paper.
Keynote speaker.
Examiner. Maintain a good record.
• Involved in university services.
– Various committee member at USM, Engineering
and PPKA.
– Involved in sports.
34
2.5 Priority: My wish (cont’d)
• Closer relationship between staff/student
– Kelab
• Staff involves in riadah.
35
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
1.0 APEX and our present KPI
2.0 Our priority
3.0 Approaches
4.0 Challenges
5.0 SKT 2009
6.0 My words and my wish
3.0 APPROACHES
I will still maintain the 3 approaches:
1) Improving infrastructure and physical needs
(Resources).
2) Maintaining adequate and quality human
capital (Talent).
3) Improving good working environment
(Governance).
37
3.1 Improving infrastructure and physical
needs (Resources)
• Improving facilities to support teaching and
learning.
• Number of laboratories.
• Laboratory facilities.
• Pejabat Am and its accessories.
• Graduate, RO/RA rooms.
• Computer/printer and internet.
• Lecture room facilities.
• Meeting room.
• Facilities for undergraduate students.
38
• Recreational facilities.
3.2 Maintaining adequate and quality
human capital (Talent)
• Keeping the existing staff.
• Continuous recruiting.
• New ASTS and maintaining good contact with
existing ones.
• Selecting the best. CGPA>3.0.
• Only appoint productive contract staff.
• Increasing the number of Ir’s.
• Sending all non-Ph.D. staff to further their
studies asap.
• Above 90% Ph.D. holder in 5 years.
39
3.3 Improving good working environment
(Governance)
• Reassignment of administrative staff.
• Reshuffle of exco member.
• Strengthening the technical team with backup
system.
• Involvement of all staff in PPKA system.
• Think-tank group.
• Empowerment with KPI and responsibility.
• Narrowing the gap between staff/management
team, between staff/student:
– Sports
– Hari keluarga
40
3.3 Improving good working environment
(Governance) (cont’d)
– Kenduri
– Rakan masjid
– Helwa
41
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
1.0 APEX and our present KPI
2.0 Our priority
3.0 Approaches
4.0 Challenges
5.0 SKT 2009
6.0 My words and my wish
4.0 CHALLENGES
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Old timer teaching style?
Old timer supervision style?
Late to office and not compensated?
Late to lecture?
Punch and out?
Long tea break and in group?
Lab cannot start at 0810 am?
Many days out of office uninformed (missing
in action).
43
4.0 CHALLENGES (cont’d)
• Difficult to comply with due dates:
–
–
–
–
–
–
Exam question
Course plan/teaching plan
Updating of folio
Coursework and exam mark.
Returning the course work/assignment/test.
Late to provide response.
• Do not sensitive to PPKA’s activities
– Staff activities
– Student activities
44
4.0 CHALLENGES (cont’d)
• Do not involve in sport or similar activities.
• Seniors do not really become a good role
model to juniors.
• Juniors are not really eager/keen to learn from
seniors.
• Respect:
–
–
–
–
–
Junior respects the senior, senior cares the junior.
Admin respects the academic, vice-versa.
Respect the superior.
Positive working environment.
Student respects staff, staff cares and loves the
45
students.
4.0 CHALLENGES (cont’d)
• Do not involve in students’ activities.
• Complacency
• Unequal loading vs KPI
46
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
1.0 APEX and our present KPI
2.0 Our priority
3.0 Approaches
4.0 Challenges
5.0 SKT 2009
6.0 My words and my wish
5.0 SKT 2009
• Maintaining the last criteria for academics.
• Admin and technical-at least a project is
expected for everyone, apart from the normal
duty.
• Involvement in students’ activities.
• Involvement in Schools’ activities, including
sport.
• Involvement in community services.
• Please set the SKT and fill in online before 15
March 2009.
48
CRITERIA FOR RESEARCH GRANTS PPKA, 2009
STAFF
Contract lecturer
Local lecturer
(Professor)
Local lecturer
(Assoc. Prof.)
Senior lecturer
Local lecturer
Guru
REQUIREMENT (AS HEAD) PEAR YEAR
To obtain at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent
To be involved in at least one external fund (research or
consultancy)
To obtain 1 USM Short Term
To obtain at least 2 Science Fund or Equivalent
To obtain two external fund (research or consultancy)
To obtain at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent
To obtain one external fund (research or consultancy)
To obtain 1 USM Short Term
To obtain at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent
To head or be involved in at least one external fund
(research or consultancy)
To obtain 1 USM Short Term
To apply at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent
To be involved in at least one external fund (research or
consultancy)
To obtain 1 USM Short Term
49
To obtain 1 USM Short Term
CRITERIA FOR PUBLICATIONS PPKA, 2009
STAFF
Contract
Local lecturer
(Professor)
Local lecturer
(Assoc. Prof.)
Senior lecturer
Local lecturer
Teacher
CRITERIA (AS HEAD) PER YEAR
To submit 3 papers to international journal
factor
To publish 2 of them
To submit 3 papers to international journal
factor
To publish 2 of them
To submit 2 papers to international journal
factor
To publish 1 of them
To submit 2 papers to international journal
factor
To publish 1 of them
To submit 1 paper to international journal
factor
To publish 1 paper in national journal
To submit 1 paper to national conference
with impact
with impact
with impact
with impact
with impact
50
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
1.0 APEX and our present KPI
2.0 Our priority
3.0 Approaches
4.0 Challenges
5.0 SKT 2009
6.0 My words and my wish
6.0 MY WORDS AND WISH
• I am serious of what has been presented.
• I am ready to make a change. I am ready to
sketch the fail peribadi. Else, we are at square
one, forget about APEX.
• I am ready to be unpopular.
• I am prepared to change the exco if it needs be.
• I am ready to change the admin/technical staff
if it needs be.
• Empowerment with responsibility.
• My SOP, maximum of 3 days of all letters in.
52
6.0 MY WORDS AND WISH
• PPKA will be the first choice of student.
Requires syallabus review.
• I support students and staff activities within my
means.
• Staff involves in all events.
• Staff removes culture of pahat and penukul.
• No. 1 in services.
• Share findings among staff/group.
• Good ukhwah between all.
• No culture of resilient among staff.
53
• Please help me and the School.
6.0 MY WORDS AND WISH
• Young staffs……
• We do work for the seek of Allah SWT and not
for the Dean/VC….
• I do not carrots to give. I leave it to Allah
SWT to reward you.
54