Transcript Slide 1
Report and Recommendations The Reentry Health Task Force originated out of growing concerns regarding the health status of those returning to the community after incarceration Pilot for the task force process for the new Alameda County Reentry Network Reentry Network will convene an Employment Task Force next, followed by Housing Task Force Goal: To improve the health status of formerly incarcerated people in Alameda County Objective: Create a set of informed recommendations which will increase access and improve the quality of health care after release. Planning and Inauguration (April-September) - Arnold Perkins Key Health Topic Briefings (October and November) - Expert agrees to chair, Identified and recruited members briefings on prevalence of various health conditions and current health care system to address conditions Strategy, Policy and Program Briefings (December and January) - Expert briefings on strategies and policies affecting health status of formerly incarcerated Recommendation and Report Development (February and March) - detailed recommendations and target audiences Continuation and Sustainability – Public Health Department agrees to continue convening Reentry Health Task Force as needed Task Force members were selected to represent the many diverse sectors concerned with reentry Selection was made in an effort to ensure that the final recommendations would be as inclusive and comprehensive as possible This approach was successful with attendance remaining high throughout the process Kevin Ary, Sergeant, Alameda County Sheriff’s Office Robert Ayers, Warden, California State PrisonSan Quentin Mona Barra-Gibson, District Representative, Office of State Senator Don Perata Laura Bowman, Community Partnership Manager, California State Prison-San Quentin Rodney Brooks, Chief of Staff, Alameda County Supervisor Keith Carson Jessica Buendia, Field Representative, Office of Assembly Member Loni Hancock Doug Butler, Director, Men of Valor Academy Josie Camacho, Director Constituent Services, Office of the Mayor of Oakland Dean Chambers, Program Specialist, Alameda County Behavior Health Care Services Arnold Chavez, Urban Male Health Initiative, Alameda State Prison-San Quentin /Federal Receivers Office County Public Health Department Tony Crear, Community Network Coordinator, Alameda County Probation Department Gloria Crowell, Co-Chair of the Allen Temple - AIDS Ministry, Allen Temple Baptist Church Dennis DiBiase, Public Health Nurse, California Fred Degree, Chaplaincy, Regional Congregations and Neighborhood Organizations Nanette Dillard, Executive Director, Associated Community Action Program (ACAP) Mick Gardner, Measure Y Reentry Program Manager, Raza Oakland Human Services Department Carolyn Graham, Corrections and Reentry Program Director, Volunteers of America /Federal Receivers Office Anna Dorman, Health Educator, La Clinica De la Cherlita Gullem, Public Health Nurse, California State Prison-San Quentin Dr. Tony Iton, Director, Alameda County Public Health Department Rev. Raymond Lankford, Executive Director, Healthy Oakland Rev. Jasper Lowery, Pastor, Dorsey Nunn, Director, All Urojas Ministries of Us or None Shirley Poe, District Administrator, California Constituent Liaison & Organizer, Alameda County Parole Department Barbara Quintero, Operations Manager, Women on the Way Vince Reyes, Assistant to the Director, Alameda County Social Services Celsa Snead, Executive Director, Mentoring Center Daniel Stevens, Pastor, New Darryl Stewart, Oakland Life COGIC Supervisor Nate Miley Patricia Van Hook, Member, Community Christian Church Arnold Perkins, Chair Kenyatta Arnold, Research Assistant, Urban Strategies Bill Heiser, Research and Program Associate, Urban Council Strategies Council Dr. Garry Mendez, Executive Director, National Trust For The Development of African American Men Michael Shaw, Director Urban Male Health Initiative, Alameda County Public Health Department Dr. Lawrence Van Hook, Pastor, lead organizer, Bay Area Action Council, RCNO Junious Williams, CEO, Urban Strategies Council Rev. Eugene Williams, CEO, RCNO Topic Name Organization General Health Care- Dr. Tony Iton, Alameda County Public Health Department General Health Care – Alex Briscoe, Alameda County Health Care Services Department Mental Health – Dean Chambers, Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Substance Abuse – Lee Boone, Haight-Ashbury African American Family Healing Center Substance Abuse– Ron Owens, Bay Area Service Network Chronic Care – Dr. Tony Iton, Alameda County Public Health Department Communicable Diseases – Dr. Roslyn Ryals, Alameda County Public Health Department Dental Health – Dr. Jared Fine, Alameda County Public Health Department Transitional Health Care – Dr. Emily Wang, Transitions Clinic, SF Jail Health Care – Dr. Harold Orr, Alameda County Jail, Santa Rita Prison Health Care – Cherlita Gullem, Federal Receiver’s Office at California State Prison- San Quentin Mental Health – Dr. Sean Fruge and Dr. Alexis Green-Fruge, Fruge Psychological Associates 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. BASIC HEALTH CARE CHRONIC DISEASES ORAL, VISUAL, AUDITORY CARE COMMUNICABLE DISEASES SUBSTANCE ABUSE MENTAL HEALTH BASIC HEALTH CARE Preventative care Yearly physical Relevant testing and procedures Acute Care CHRONIC DISEASES Hypertension Diabetes Kidney Disease Cancer Sickle Cell Anemia Asthma ORAL, VISUAL, AUDITORY Oral surgery Oral Diseases Glasses Hearing aid COMMUNICABLE DISEASES STDs HIV/AIDS Hepatitis B & C TB SUBSTANCE ABUSE MENTAL HEALTH Alcoholism Depression Drug abuse Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Tobacco Schizophrenia Dual Diagnosis Bi-polar disorder 1. Issues, Problems and Opportunities 2. Promising Strategies, Policies & Programs 3. Interventions in Planning or Implementation 4.Task Force Recommendations In June 2007, more than 22,249 people were on probation or parole in Alameda County (does not include Federal Probation or Parole) The parole population in Alameda County is overwhelmingly ◦ Male (91%), ◦ Under 50 years old (97%) and ◦ People of color (84%) with African Americans comprising 67% of the parolee population One in every 100 Alameda County residents are currently under criminal justice supervision Three in every 100 Oakland residents are currently under criminal justice supervision Reentry population is concentrated in West Oakland, East Oakland and Hayward PROBATION AND PAROLE POPULATION IN ALAMEDA COUNTY (JUNE 2007) Source of Supervision Adult Parole Adult Probation Federal Probation and Parole TOTAL ADULT REENTRY POPULATION Juvenile Probation ( Juvenile Probation Caseload) Juvenile Parole (DJJ parolees) TOTAL REENTRY POPULATION [i] Total 3,297 16,795 N/A 20,092 2,157 N/A 22,249 Parole Census Data June 30, 2007. CDCR. Retrieved on 10/17/07: http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/Reports_Research/Offender_Information_Services_Branch/Annual/PCensus1/PCENSUS1d0706.pdf [ii] June 2007 Monthly Statistical Report, Alameda County Probation Department. It is important to note that this number reflects all of the Adults on probation in Alameda County, not those that are actively supervised. The number of actively supervised individuals on probation in June 2007 was 2,369. [iii] June 2007 Monthly Statistical Report, Alameda County Probation Department Over 1 in10 Alameda County residents does not have medical insurance (n=166,000 ) The indigent care system provides free or low cost services to 90,000 of the 166,000 The indigent care system is targeted to individuals earning less than 200% of the Federal Poverty Level ($20,800/person or $42,400 for family of four) Uninsured 11% Medicaid 9% Healthy Families/CHIP 1% Medicare & Medicaid 3% Employmentbased 61% Source: California Health Interview Survey Medicare & Others 7% Privately purchased 7% Other public 1% The Urban Strategies Council and All of Us or None surveyed 138 formerly incarcerated people within Alameda County to determine their health status and their access to health care Initial Results: ◦ Formerly incarcerated utilize public insurance at about the same level as other Alameda county residents, ◦ Formerly Incarcerated are five times more likely to be uninsured Someone Private - 2 else's (2%) insurance 2 (2%) Public Insurance 27 (20%) Employer provided 26 (19%) (n=134, 4 respondents missing) Uninsured 77 (57%) Accurate data on the prevalence of health conditions among the reentry population in Alameda County was not available To gauge demand we examined data on the prevalence of health conditions among prison populations from national and state research studies and applied it to the reentry population in Alameda County To gauge supply we attempted to obtain data on programs that focus services on or have designated slots for the formerly incarcerated Compared to the general population, formerly incarcerated people show significantly higher rates of communicable disease, mental illness and chronic disease In 1997 more than 1 in 3 people living with tuberculosis and almost 1 in 3 of those with Hepatitis C were released from a prison or jail that year In Alameda County we estimated that over 17,000 persons were in need of substance abuse services ESTIMATED NEED AND SUPPLY OF HEALTH SERVICES HEALTH SERVICE General Health Mental Health Substance Abuse Communicable Disease Hepatitis C Hepatitis B HIV TB Chronic Disease Asthma Diabetes Hypertension Oral, Auditory and Visual ESTIMATED PREVALENCE AMONG INCARCERATED POPULATION National 100% 17.75% 2% 1.2% 7.4% 8.5% 4.8% 18.3 State 100% 20% 85% 34% 3.5% 1.8% County 100% ESTIMATED SUPPLY FOR THE NEED FORMERLY INCARCERATED County 20,092 4,019 17,078 County 500 605 6,831 703 362 1,487 1,708 964 3,677 N/A [1] Need is estimated by applying the prevalence of the given health condition at the smallest geographic region for which we have prevalence data to the total adult reentry population for Alameda County (20,092). National Commission on Correctional Health Care.(2002). “The health status of soon-to-be-released inmates: A report to Congress”. Chicago: National Commission on Correctional Health Care [ii] Prevalence of HIV Infection, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Hepatitis, and Risk Behaviors Among Inmates Entering Prison at the California Department of Corrections, 1999 [i] Accurate supply data on health care services was difficult to determine Compiled data on indigent care services which are immediately accessible to the formerly incarcerated regardless of health coverage By every measure the indigent care system is operating over capacity ◦ Alameda County medical center serve 103% of the patients that they are contracted to serve ◦ The Community Based Organizations have106% of the visits that they are contracted to provide Table 3: Supply and Utilization of CMSP Funded Indigent Health Care Services HEALTH CARE ESTIMATED UTILIZATION NEED NEED AMONG FORMERLY INCARCERATED SUPPLY OF INDIGENT HEALTH CARE SERVICES FY2006-2007 Unduplicated Contracted Patients Patients Visits Contracted Visits Utilization by Provider Alameda County Medical Center 20,092 36,084 Community Based Organizations 20,092 28,201 [1] 35,000 112,407 N/A This includes the Key Health Topics pertaining to General Health, Communicable Diseases, and Chronic Diseases 83,449 N/A 78,287 Database of service providers that are available to or focus on serving the formerly incarcerated in Alameda County Initial focus on health related services to coincide with the Health Task Force process Data represents results of a phone survey to verify services provided, formal survey is forthcoming Counts represent number of sites that provide services and not the number of organizations Table 4: Reentry Health Resources in Alameda County General Health Mental Health Substance Abuse Dental Vision Reproductive Health TOTAL 141 124 123 23 4 17 432 The “Other” category comprises 70% of all providers and refers to organizations that provide education and/or referrals but not direct services Private Facilities/Providers Hospital 3 Clinic/community based organizations 47 Other 125 Emergency Room 3 TOTAL 178 These providers comprise the Indigent Care system which is currently operating above capacity Indigent Care Facilities/Providers Hospital County based providers Community Health Centers TOTAL Indigent Care 3 26 4 33 Limited focus to community or reentry, tried not to go too far “upstream” into CDCR Issues and problems begin at pre-release stage and extend through reentry Found system of care is often fragmented and duplicative Lack of and/or unrealistic pre-release planning No set release date for undetermined sentences Pre-release planning is often conducted with correctional staff rather than with community based providers Pre-release planning rarely makes direct refers for medical services The formerly incarcerated are not released with a state identification The formerly incarcerated are not enrolled and/or screened for public benefits Lack of medical screening prior to release Poor medication maintenance No issuance of medical records upon release No routine system for reporting communicable disease cases to the county of release No clearly defined medical home The transition from correctional to community based health care is fragmented and duplicative CDCR and the county jail admit that they lack the infrastructure to transfer what medical records they do have to a county/community based provider Parole and probation have difficulty identifying the medical needs of their wards and therefore making appropriate referrals Difficult to connect formerly incarcerated to providers with appropriate cultural and linguistic competencies Every presenter identified an aspect of reentry health care that could be improved through increased collaboration among relevant agencies, organizations and departments These relationships were identified as in need of improvement: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Corrections and Community Among County Agencies County and City County/City and Community/Faith based organizations Among Community/Faith based organizations Corrections/Community: County Agencies: County and Cities: ◦ to ensure continuity of care after release, ◦ to better leverage health care dollars and ◦ to ensure that community based medical providers have access to the medical history of their patients. ◦ To avoid duplication, ◦ Maximize resources ◦ Engage in collaborative strategic planning ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ policy issues, maximize funding sources, align law enforcement with county services to ensure an active exchange of information concerning reentry health care opportunities County/City and Community/Faith Organizations : ◦ to maximize funding opportunities, ◦ to ensure referrals between services are accessible, appropriate and complete ◦ to promote the use of promising practices. Community/Faith Organizations and Providers: ◦ to improve professional development activities, ◦ to increase knowledge and awareness of promising practice and possible partnerships, ◦ to avoid duplication and redundancy and ◦ to best leverage resources. Recommendations were created around the four themes emerged as issues, problems or opportunities: 1. 2. 3. 4. Continuity of Care Payer of medical care Service Delivery Specific Issues 1. Primary and Secondary recommendations were developed for each theme 2. Target audiences were identified for each recommendation 3. Report contains information on the point in the reentry process at which the recommendation is targeted 4. Report identifies whether the recommendation is focused on the short or mid term Make continuity of care during the period leading up to and immediately after release a reality by ensuring that those released have : 1. physical examination, 2. medical records, 3. prescriptions and a supply of medications, and 4. a temporary medical home at the time of release 1a) Structure discharge planning collaborations through formal agreements among agencies and with CBOs, designated agency liaisons, and broad community networks to allow for comprehensive referrals 1b) Develop a specialized plans for parolees with mental illnesses that account for their ongoing care and are flexible enough to prevent recidivism for mental health related incidents 2a) Pre-release plan should have a clear plan for payment of ongoing treatment 2b) Public Health Department should work with CDCR and Santa Rita Jail to develop an electronic “continuity of care record” that would serve as an electronic “health passport” for prisoners upon release 2c) Mandatory public benefit eligibility screening and enrollment prior to release 2d) Suspend public benefits for persons incarcerated in county jail 3a) Create or designate a multi-service clinic for the formerly incarcerated within Alameda County and establish it as the “medical home” for the formerly incarcerated 3b) Create a county wide resource and referral database 3c) When needed, make Substance Abuse and/or mental health treatment a requirement of parole or probation 3d) Create incentives to encourage county jails to conduct more medical screening 4a) Make supply and demand data accessible to better inform policy, funding and program decisions 4b) Mandatory screening and, upon release, reporting for all communicable diseases 4c) Mandatory transference of positive communicable disease cases to county of release 4d) Allow for substance abuse relapse without reincarcerating 4e) Additional funding should be directed to neighborhoods and communities over represented by the reentry population 4f) Dedicate funding to discharge planning and post-release follow-up Widely distribute the report Present the report and advocate for the recommendations with critical audiences: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Alameda County Board of Supervisors, County Department Heads, CDCR officials, city officials within Alameda County, groups representing the formerly incarcerated Alameda County Reentry Network Decision Makers Committee health service providers Continue the collection of data and development/implementation of recommendations through the Public Health Department Provide prisoners with a copy of their medical records upon release Mandated transfer of communicable disease cases to relevant Public Health Department 1. Connect all recently released persons to with Diabetes, hypertension and congestive heart failure to the CMSP-ACE program 2.Create tools and literature that can be used by case managers and the formerly incarcerated to identify possible sources of health care insurance and services 1. Community Based Service providers should hire community health workers to conduct outreach 2. Annual screening for communicable diseases and mental health problems 3. Eliminate co-payment for health care during incarceration 4. Identify culturally competent community based health care and treatment providers that serve the formerly incarcerated 1. Develop a set of preferred health care providers that serve the formerly incarcerated 2. CPOs and/or medical staff need to be trained to identify person’s in need of mental health assessment 3. Ensure prisoners have direct access to medical staff 1. Funding should be allocated to help service providers pay for community health workers 2. Provide education and intervention funding for faith & community-based organizations that are collaborative partners 3. Provide technical assistance funding to counties to foster collaboration w/ faith & communitybased providers 1. Ensure that additional allocations are targeted to communities over-represented by recently released inmates 2. Dedicate funding for discharge planning and post-release follow-up 3. Create a multi-service clinic for the formerly incarcerated 4. Establish a system for making supply and demand data accessible so that program, funding and policy decisions can be used more efficiently 1. Funding should be allocated to help service providers pay for community health workers 2. Provide education and intervention funding for faith & community-based organizations that are collaborative partners 3. Provide technical assistance funding to counties to foster collaboration w/ faith & communitybased providers 1. Structure discharge planning collaborations through formal agreements among agencies and with CBOs, designated agency liaisons, and broad community networks to allow for comprehensive referrals 2. Develop a specialized plan for parolees with mental illnesses 3. Establish a system for making supply and demand data accessible 1. Develop an electronic “continuity of care record” that would serve as an electronic “health passport” 2. Mandatory public benefit eligibility screening and enrollment prior to release 3. Create a county wide resource and referral database 1. Make Substance Abuse treatment a requirement of parole 2. Mandated transfer of communicable disease cases to relevant Public Health department 3. Connect all recently released persons to with Diabetes, hypertension and congestive heart failure to the CMSP-ACE program 4. Pre-release plan should have a clear plan for payment of ongoing treatment including the transference of medical records 1. Identify culturally competent community based health care and treatment providers that serve the formerly incarcerated 2. Develop a set of preferred health care providers that serve the formerly incarcerated 3. Create a multi-service clinic for the formerly incarcerated 4. Make mental health care a requirement of a person’s parole 5. Funding should be allocated to help service providers pay for community health workers 1. Funding should be allocated to help service providers pay for community health workers 2. Provide technical assistance funding to counties to foster collaboration w/ faith & community-based providers 1. Mandatory public benefit eligibility screening and enrollment prior to release 2. Mandatory screening for all communicable disease 3. Establish a robust and competent public health infrastructure within CDCR 4. Ensure that additional allocations are targeted to communities over-represented by recently released inmates 1. Dedicate funding for discharge planning and post-release follow-up 2. Provide prisoners with a copy of their medical records upon release 3. Mandated transfer of communicable disease cases to relevant Public Health department 4. Pre-release plan should have a clear plan for payment of ongoing treatment 1. Eliminate co-payment for health care during incarceration 2. Create a multi-service clinic for the formerly incarcerated 3. Funding should be allocated to help service providers pay for community health workers 4. Provide education and intervention funding for faith & community-based organizations that are collaborative partners 5. Provide technical assistance funding to counties to foster collaboration w/ faith & communitybased providers 1. Structure discharge planning collaborations through formal agreements among agencies and with CBOs, designated agency liaisons, and broad community networks to allow for comprehensive referrals 2. Develop a specialized plan for parolees with mental illnesses 3. Create a multi-service clinic for the formerly incarcerated 1. Develop an electronic “continuity of care record” that would serve as an electronic “health passport” 2. Create a county wide resource and referral database 3. Make Substance Abuse treatment a requirement of parole 4. Establish a system for making supply and demand data accessible so that program, funding and policy decisions can be used more efficiently 1. Mandatory screening for all communicable disease 2. Allow for substance abuse relapse without recidivating 3. Establish a robust and competent public health infrastructure within CDCR 4. Provide prisoners with a copy of their medical records upon release 5. Mandated transfer of communicable disease cases to relevant Public Health department 1. Connect all recently released persons to with Diabetes, hypertension and congestive heart failure to the CMSP-ACE program 2. Pre-release plan should have a clear plan for payment of ongoing treatment including the transference of medical records 3. Develop a set of preferred health care providers that serve the formerly incarcerated 4. Ensure prisoners have direct access to medical staff 5. Make mental health care a requirement of a person’s parole 1. Structure discharge planning collaborations through formal agreements among agencies and with CBOs, designated agency liaisons, and broad community networks 2. Develop an electronic “continuity of care record” that would serve as an electronic “health passport” 3. Mandatory public benefit eligibility screening and enrollment prior to release 4. Make Substance Abuse treatment a requirement of parole 1. Establish a system for making supply and demand data accessible 2. Mandatory screening for all communicable disease 3. Allow for substance abuse relapse without recidivating 4. Establish a robust and competent public health infrastructure within CDCR 5. Dedicate funding for discharge planning and post-release follow-up 6. Mandated transfer of communicable disease cases to relevant Public Health department 1. Connect all recently released persons to with Diabetes, hypertension and congestive heart failure to the CMSP-ACE program 2. Pre-release plan should have a clear plan for payment 3. Annual screening for communicable diseases and mental health problems 4. Eliminate co-payment for health care during incarceration 5. CPOs and/or medical staff need to be trained to identify person’s in need of mental health assessment 1. Ensure prisoners have direct access to medical staff 2. Restructure CPOs and probation officers training/professional development practices so they stay informed of current prisoners current medical needs 3. Provide technical assistance funding to counties to foster collaboration w/ faith & community-based providers 4. Create tools and literature that can be used by case managers and the formerly incarcerated to identify possible sources of health care 1. Pre-release plan should have a clear plan for payment of ongoing treatment including the transference of medical records 2. Community Based Service providers should hire community health workers to conduct outreach 3. Develop a set of preferred health care providers that serve the formerly incarcerated 4. CPOs and/or medical staff need to be trained to identify person’s in need of mental health assessment 1.Create tools and literature that can be used by case managers and the formerly incarcerated to identify possible sources of health care 2. Create a multi-service clinic for the formerly incarcerated 1. Structure discharge planning collaborations through formal agreements among agencies and with CBOs, designated agency liaisons, and broad community networks to allow for comprehensive referrals 2. Create a county wide resource and referral database