Transcript SPI/DPI

SPI/DPI
CT’S NEW ACCOUNTABILITY METRICS
The NCLB waiver
 Approved May 29, 2012
 Allows more flexible use of Title I funding
 Replaces AYP under NCLB with CT designed
performance targets
 Replaces NCLB sanctions with CT interventions
Sanctions
 Schools will no longer be labeled “in need of
improvement”
 Schools/districts will not be required to offer


School choice
Supplemental education services
CT’s new accountability system
 The School Performance Index (SPI) captures all
subjects (Math, Reading, Writing, Science) by
assigning a point value to the performance level







Goal and advanced=1.0 credit
Proficient=0.67 credit
Basic=0.33 credit
Below Basic=0
MAS goal and Skills Checklist Independent level=1.0
MAS proficient and Checklist proficient=0.50
MAS basic and Checklist basic=0
Example
 Cheryl’s scores:
 Math-goal
 Reading-advanced
 Writing-proficient
 Science-goal

Total credit for performance=3.67
 Sue’s scores:
 Math-proficient
 Reading-proficient
 Writing-basic
 Science-below basic

Total credit for performance=1.67
Calculating the indices
 Individual Performance Index
 Average of M, R, W, S credits based on performance level x 100
 School Performance Index
 Average of all individual scores (total IDI/# students)
 District Performance Index
 Average of all school scores (total SPI/# schools)
 Subgroup Performance Index
 Same, using only students in subgroup of 20+
 Subject Performance Index
 Performance on CMT/MAS/Checklist by subject
Increasing scores
 Individual/school/district can increase by moving
students across performance bands 0-.33-.67-1.0
 Graduation rate will factor in for high schools


4 year cohort: % of incoming 9th graders that graduate in 4
years with a standard diploma
Extended graduation rate: includes students who take more
than 4 years to graduate, but still graduate; counts certificates
of completion; does NOT count those who transfer out and fail
to enroll elsewhere (unknown)
New targets
 NCLB was 100% at proficient by 2014
 CT targets
 Student and subgroup achievement—88
 Achievement gaps--< 10
 Graduation rate—94% for 4 year, 96% for extended
 Make it halfway by 2018
 Make at least 3 points of progress in indices for
schools/districts/subgroups significantly below
School Classifications
 Excelling (Category 1)—meets all state targets
 Progressing (Cat 2)—meeting annual targets
 Transition (Cat 3)—not meeting annual targets
 Review, including Focus schools (Cat 4)
 Turnaround (Cat 5)
 Schools of distinction
 Highest performing
 Highest performing subgroups
 Highest progress
TPS status
 Preliminary SPI/DPI expected before start of school
 Will average performance of students, school, district
based on performance levels in all subjects over the
last 3 years
 Will serve as a baseline for growth as well as a
preliminary category for 2013-14
 Will indentify potential interventions ranging from
self-review to CSDE involved