Command and Control Regulation in Action
Download
Report
Transcript Command and Control Regulation in Action
Command and
Control Regulation
in Action
Regulating Industrial Water
Pollution in the US
Clean Water Act of 1972
Sets national goals as zero-discharge of
pollution by 1985
2 Main Policy Tools
Construction grants program $$
Technology based regulations for
discharge of water pollution from point
sources
National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System
EPA- establishes Federal Effluent Guidelines
States– write,monitoring, and enforce NPEDS
permits
Main Targets
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)
total suspended solids (TSS)
15 pollutants of concerns, (metals i.e. arsenic and
mercury)
POTW publicly owned
treatment works
POTW
POTW
Tech Regulation
Primary treatment (skimming, screening,
settling) 65%
Secondary treatment - 80-90%
Criteria on uses for sludge
ensuring effective operation and
maintenance
Direct Discharges from
Industrial Plants
Direct Discharges from
Industrial Plants
EPA guidelines for 30 designated
industries
best practicable technology by 1977
Best Available Tech by 1983
New Source Performance Standards
Complexity
Dairy Standards
Different standards for subcategories
Acceptable pollutant discharge rates vary
BOD 30 day standard for large facilities Butter
.55kg per 1000 kg of BOD input; Cottage cheese
2.6, Ice bream 1.84, Condensed Milk 1.38, Dry
Milk .65
Separate limits for one day maximum discharge,
30 day average, for small and large facilities.
Indirect discharges from industrial plant
Industrial plants to POTW
Pretreatment guidelines
Rulemaking Process
Information Requirements
Writing of direct discharge standards
How to operationalize best, practicable,
economically achievable
Need information on production techniques,
location, waste products, and waste treatment
tech
heterogeneity --360 industrial subcategories
among first 30 industries requiring effluent
guidelines
separate BPT, BAT, NSPS< and pretreatment
regulations
Rulemaking Process
Role of consulting firms
Proposed standards, industry comment
250 lawsuits
Regulatory Output
BPT - 1 year
BAT standards – 1/3rd done by 1995
Zero Discharge – still waiting
Abatement Costs
Big variation in incremental costs
Estimate of costs > than actual
Compliance
Assumption- 97% reduction in discharge of
priority pollutants
Compliance – mixed
6% of major direct dischargers -significant
noncompliance
% of US served by POTWs increases from 42% to
74%
POTW pretreatment- 54% of significant indutstrial
users were in significant noncompliance (1992)
But is the water cleaner?
Some big successes- Potomac,
Delaware
Lack of data,
Perverse Incentives
Expansion of POTW Construction Grants
Program
shift from direct discharge towards
indirect discharge