Transcript Banner Ads
Banner Ads Hinder Visual Search and Are Forgotten 1 2 Moira Burke , Nicholas Gorman , 2 1 Erik Nilsen , and Anthony Hornof 1 2 University of Oregon and Lewis & Clark College 1 Banners still popular, getting larger 2 Banners still popular, getting larger 3 Banners still popular, getting larger 4 Banners still popular, getting larger 5 Do banners impact search? • “Banner blindness”: Only 20% of web users noticed any banners (Benway, 1998) • "An animation that appears alongside primary content will disrupt your readers' concentration and keep them from the objective of your site." (Web Style Guide, 1999) • Who is correct? • We investigate visual search speed and participants’ recall of banners 6 Search task Search for linked news headlines. Analogous to: 7 Search task, cont’d Our search area: 8 Search task cont’d • Two kinds searches: literal and semantic precues 9 Search task cont’d • Two kinds searches: literal and semantic precues • Three kinds of banners blank animated static 10 Search task cont’d • Two kinds searches: literal and semantic precues • Three kinds of banners • Two banner placements: – top of search area – covering a random line in search area 11 Search task cont’d • Two kinds searches: literal and semantic precues • Three kinds of banners • Two banner placements: – top of search area – covering a random line in search area • 2 blocks (by precue type) 41 trials per block 12 headline locations x 3 banner types + 5 practice 12 Literal precue 13 Literal search 14 Literal search 15 Literal search 16 Semantic precue 17 Semantic search 18 Semantic search 19 Surprise! A memory test • Did you see this banner? Yes / No • 60 banners 40 appeared, 20 didn’t Half animated, half static • Told some banners were from experiment; others were not 20 Surprise! A memory test 21 Results: Search Time Animated and static were 7% slower than blank (literal condition) Literal precue Banner Type Blank Static Animated Mean Search Time (ms) 2040 2169 Significant difference 2193 p<.005 Semantic precue Banner Type Blank Static Animated Mean Search Time (ms) 6065 6210 Not significant, but similar trend 6110 22 Results: Memory • Overall, memory quite poor (Bayles, CHI 2002) • 20.1% hit rate (100% is perfect) • 20.2% false alarm rate (0% is perfect) • Difficulty of search didn’t affect recall • Top banners remembered significantly better than randomly-placed banners 23 Results: Memory cont’d • Signal Detection Theory to correct for guessing strategies of participants • Transform hit and false alarm rates into single measure of memory strength: d' • d' positive for static banners d' n.s. different than zero for animated • Bottom line: Animated ads harder to recall 24 Summary and future work Who was right? • Banner ads distract • But people don’t remember them • Animation makes recall even worse • Currently analyzing eye-tracking data • So far: People don’t look at banners, except by accident 25