Transcript Slide 1
Evaluating the Impact of Nurses’ Rounding on Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Margaret Redmond,BSN, OCN Rene Lavoie, RN-BC Renee DiGiovanni, BSN, RN-BC, CCTN Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans Miro Sarac, PhD, LSUHSC School of Nursing Background – Nursing Rounds Purpose Described as To assess patient needs Task oriented Unstructured without a consistent set of standards – “a peak in the door” Current practice Reactive vs. proactive Literature Review Structured rounding protocol focusing on Pain, Potty, & Positioning supported positive impact on outcomes Reduced call light usage Improved patient satisfaction Decreased in fall rate Mead, C., Bursell, A., & Ketelsen, L. (2006). Effects of nursing rounds on patient call light use, satisfaction, and safety. AJN, 106(9),59-69. Purpose for Study Investigate the impact of a patient rounding protocol on outcomes associated with Pain Potty Positioning Study Methods Research Design Prospective Descriptive Study IRB expedited review with waiver of documentation of informed consent Convenience Sample Patients admitted to five medical surgical units Procedure Rounding protocol over 12 weeks Rounding Protocol Focus on “ 3 P’s” Hourly during the day (6am-10pm) Every 2 hrs at night (10pm-6am “Is there anything else you need?” Data Collection – Pre- & Post-Protocol Call light use Pain Potty Position Pain management satisfaction Press Ganey Patient satisfaction Press Ganey Falls NDNQI Falls 1000/patient days Hospital acquired pressure ulcers NDNQI HAPU/1000 patient days Data Analysis Frequency distribution for each variable Tests for differences between & among groups Chi- square Paired t-test ANOVA All tests 2-tailed, α = 0.05 Distribution of Pre- & Post-Calls total number of postcalls 2500 2000 1500 UNIT 7 UNIT 8 1000 UNIT 11 UNIT 3 500 UNIT 9 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 time (week) precalls postcalls UNIT 9 UNIT 8 UNIT 3 UNIT 11 UNIT 7 percentage of total number of pre/postcalls Distribution of Patient Call Lights Pre- & Post-Protocol 35 30 prepain prepotty prepositioning postpain postpotty postpositioning 25 * 20 15 10 5 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0 UNIT 3 UNIT 11 UNIT 7 UNIT 8 UNIT 9 Significant differences, Anova, *p < .05. ** p < .005, p < .0001 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 mean score mean score Quality Indicators by Unit CICU TSU 9th CICU 11th TSU IMTA PrePain PostSat 9th 11th PostPain 25 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 # per 1000 pt days # per 1000 pt days PreSat IMTA 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 20 15 10 5 0 CICU TSU PrePU IMTA PostPU 9th 11th CICU TSU IMTA PreFalls 9th PostFalls 11th Incidental Finding IV pump alarming Beep Beep Beep Beep Limitations Generalizability of findings Convenience sample at one site Limited to 3-month study period Unable to verify the accuracy of rounding logs Appropriate time? Addressed all 3 variables? Summary Decreased patient call light volume overall Improved outcomes on some units Pain management HAPU and falls Uncertain why some units did not demonstrate improvement Relevance to Nursing Frequent structured rounds should Improve clinical outcomes Reduce nurses’ burden Additional research should address Other foci for rounding should be studied (ie. IV pump) Obstacles to nurses’ rounding References Castledine, G. (2002). Patient comfort rounds: A new initiative in nursing. British Journal of Nursing, 11 (6), 407. Halm, M. et al. (2003). Interdisciplinary rounds: Impact on patients, families and staff. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 17(3), 133-142. Mead, C., Bursell, A., & Ketelsen, L. (2006). Effects of nursing rounds on patient call light use, satisfaction, and safety. AJN, 106(9), 59-69. Van Handel, K. & Krug, B. (1994). Prevalence and nature of call light request on an orthopedic unit. Orthopedic Nursing, 13(1), 13-18.