Transcript Slide 1
1940s Incident Management 2006 TIME Board of Directors Officers: President Gary Millsaps, GDOT/HERO Vice President Rory Howe, Roswell PD Treasurer Mshadoni Smith, FHWA with Christine Macaulay, PB Farradyne and Dan Branch, Gwinnett PD Secretary Christine Macaulay, PB Farradyne Alternate Member Bob Dallas, Governor’s Office of Highway Safety 2006 TIME Board of Directors Cont. Committees: Operations Larry Seabolt, Remtech Engineers Communications Major Stan Savage, Atlanta Police Dept and Monica Luck, GDOT Program and Institutional Issues Carla Holmes, GDOT Annual Conference Planning Dee Corson, GDOT Terrorism Emergency Response & Preparedness Georgia Office of Homeland Security Georgia Emergency Management Agency Anticipated Directed Programs – 7 Priorities NIMS & NRP Implementation Regional Collaboration Natl. Infrastructure Protection Plan Info Sharing/Collaboration Interoperable Communications CBRNE Detection, Response, Decon Medical Surge & Mass Prophylaxis Target Capabilities List The Target Capabilities List (TCL): Identifies 36 capabilities required to perform the critical tasks described in UTL A capability provides a means to perform one or more critical task(s) under specified conditions and to specific performance standards (continued on following slide) Target Capabilities List A capability may be delivered during an emergency with any combination of elements that achieves the desired outcome, namely properly planned, organized, equipped, trained, and exercised personnel Capability requirements will be tiered based on jurisdiction types Target Capabilities List Common-Target Capabilities Prevent Mission Area-Target Capabilities Protect Mission AreaTarget Capabilities Risk Analysis Planning Interoperable Communications Information Collection and Threat Recognition Intelligence Fusion and Analysis Critical Infrastructure Protection Food and Agriculture Safety and Defense Information Sharing and Collaboration Public Health Epidemiological Investigation and Laboratory Testing Terrorism Investigation and Apprehension Citizen Preparedness and Participation CBRNE Detection Target Capabilities List Respond Mission AreaTarget Capabilities On-Site Incident Management Emergency Operations Center Management Critical Resource Logistics and Distribution Volunteer Management and Donations Worker Health and Safety Public Safety and Security Response Firefighting Operations/Support WMD/Hazardous Incident Response and Decontamination Explosive Device Response Operations Animal Health Emergency Support Environmental Health and Vector Control Citizen Protection: Evacuation and/or In-Place Protection Isolation and Quarantine Search and Rescue Emergency Public Information and Warning Triage and Pre-Hospital Treatment Medical Surge Medical Supplies Management and Distribution Mass Prophylaxis Mass Care (Sheltering, Feeding, and Related Services) Fatality Management Recover Mission Area-Target Capabilities Structural Damage Assessment and Mitigation Restoration of Lifelines Economic and Community Recovery Universal Task List The UTL is a menu of tasks for major events like those illustrated by the National Planning Scenarios Defines what tasks need to be performed to prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from major events Provides the means to ensure that training and exercises address proficiency (continued on following slide) Universal Task List Critical tasks are defined as those prevention, protection, response, and recovery tasks that require coordination among an appropriate combination of Federal, State, local, tribal private sector, and non-governmental entities during a major event in order to minimize the impact on lives, property, and the economy Critical tasks, with associated conditions and performance standards, provide the foundation for developing target levels of capability. Anticipated Directed Programs Continuation: – – – – – – – – Interoperable Communication Planning GSAR EOD HazMat NIMS/ICS Information Sharing & Intel Critical Infrastructure Protection Anticipated Directed Programs New Programs – Counter-Terrorism Task Forces – Law Enforcement HazMat – Tactical & Operational Planning – CI/KR Target Folders & Protective Measures – Training & Exercise State Homeland Security Strategy Update • Each strategy must be revised to include specific homeland security goals and objectives in the four mission areas identified in the National Preparedness Guidance: • Prevention • Protection • Response • Recovery (continued on following slide) State Homeland Security Strategy Update • Goals and objectives must be aligned with the seven National Priorities identified in the National Planning Guidance • Must also address citizen preparedness, volunteer efforts and local government concerns Must be completed by September 30, 2005 • State Homeland Security Strategy Update • A new State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy process aligned with the National Preparedness Guidance should be anticipated during FY 06 to cover FY 07 through 09 What’s Different? Possibly $10M fewer dollars in State grants ($36M to $26M). Possibly $8M more in UASI dollars ($16.6M to $24M). LETPP reduced from separate grant to 25% of state and UASI monies. Questions? Micah Hamrick Assistant Director - Terrorism Division Georgia Office of Homeland Security 404-635-7013 [email protected] Federal Funding 101 TIME Taskforce Incident Management Conference Presented by Mshadoni Smith November 7, 2005 Federal Funding 101 FHWA funded by Gas Tax SAFETEA-LU transportation Bill Annually apportioned by Congress defines amount to Georgia Major Categories of funds (NHS, IM, STP) Oversight & Stewardship Agreements with States Federal Funding 101 Requirements/Process – Planning Process (TIP, STIP, LRP) – NEPA (CE, PCE) – R.O.W. (Uniform Act) – Civil Rights/EOP – ITS Architecture consistent – Contracting/Procurement designations Federal Funding 101 Project Designation Is it Federal Oversight? Yes No Is Constructive Level minimal? (i.e. no trenching) Follow Federal Requirements for Project Administration Yes No What are Equipment and Labor costs? Construction less than 50% more than 50% Are System Integration costs are more than 50%? Construction Yes No Engineering & Design Services Is non-traditional procurement method proposed? Yes SEP 14 No Common Rule "Other" ****** This should be used in addition to discussion with FHWA Division Office personnel. *******This is only a guide and all designations are subject to change Federal Funding 101 ITS funds CMAQ Earmarks Operations & Maintenance Special Deployments Operations Support/Service Plan Federal Funding 101 Other Resources – Peer 2 Peer 1-888-700-PEER [email protected] – NHI Training Courses http://www.nhi.fhwa.dot.gov/ – Technical Assistance