Transcript PBIS Team Planning - Peoria Public Schools / Overview

Upon Arrival…
Download Powerpoint, ARPDPM
template and Focus template
from RtI website to one laptop
Go to District Webiste
Curriculum & Instruction
RtI
Professional Development
Presentations
PBIS Team Planning
Data Analysis & Action Planning
May 1 or 6, 2014
7:30 AM – 10:30 AM or 12:30 PM – 3:30 PM
Facilitated by Kristen McElligatt; RtI Facilitator
Celebrations
Today’s Focus
Comprehensive data analysis
Action Planning for 2014-2015
New PBIS Recognition Process
PBIS Focus Areas 2014-2015
o Type into template
o http://www.psd150.org/Page/14866
o Due electronically by May 27th
o Data Resources
o www.pbisapps.org
o https://fieldtest.pbisassessment.org
o Pinpoint Discipline Analytics Module
o https://psd150.instruction.pinpoint.hmhco.com/secure/
B2BSign-in.aspx
o Other
o Action Plan based upon data analysis
o Patterns/Trends?
o Identify strengths & areas to develop
Average Major Offenses
Per Day Per Month
Goal: per 100 students per
day/per month
Elementary: 2 referrals
M.S./H.S.: 3 referrals
Filter for 2012-2013 school year also.
Option: Record two years of data on paper template.
Record 2013-2014 on Focus Template.
SWPBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
 https://fieldtest.pbisassessment.org/Login
 Coach log in is district email & password is
first name 123
 Go to Reports: Subscale to start
 How to Generate Reports:
 http://www.pbisillinois.org/evaluation/tier-1tools/implementation-inventory
 Focus on Tier 1 & Tier 2
 Goal: 80% at all 3 tiers
Self-Assessment Survey
(SAS)
www.pbisapps.org
Use your school login #
Go to Reports & start with subscale
Total
Items
Determine percentage of staff
completing survey
Benchmarks for Advanced
Tiers (BAT)
www.pbisapps.org
Go to Reports: Start with Total
Score Report
Goal: 70%
Focus analysis on Tiers 1 & 2
School-wide Evaluation Tool
(SET)
 Use report completed by RtI Facilitator
 All but a few schools completed this
year
 Refer to commendations &
recommendations
 Reports can be found on pbisapps.org
Team Implementation
Checklist (TIC)
4 schools completed this year
www.pbisapps.org
Reports: Start with subscale
report
Goal: 80%
Tier 2/3 Tracking Tool
 Maintained by PBIS Tier 2 Coach/Coordinator
 Goal: 70% Group Effectiveness
 Document monthly effectiveness
 Tracking Tool is focus at Tier 2 meetings
 If less than 70% effective in March, April,
May-- develop systems plan (NOT a student
plan)
Discipline Data Analysis
Year-to-Year Comparisons
Patterns
Trends
Average Major Offenses Per Day Per Month
In School Suspensions
 Filter on Pinpoint for Administrative Actions
Out of School Suspensions
 Filter on Pinpoint for Administrative Actions
Other Data
Expulsions
Other
Proportionality of Sub-Groups
 Identify sub-groups
 Gender, IEP/NON-IEP, Ethnicity, ELL, grade level
 Using Enrollment module, determine percent of enrollment
for each sub-group
 Using Pinpoint Discipline module, determine each subgroup’s percent of major offenses
 Compare enrollment & offenses for each sub-group
 Determine proportionality (equivalent, disproportional (too high?
Too low?)
 Dig into data to gain deeper insight and answer questions
 Schedule time to share data with faculty
 Schedule time to problem solve and action plan
Action Planning
Patterns
Trends
Work Smarter, Not Harder
Biggest Bang for the Buck
Staff Buy-In
PBIS Recognition
http://www.pbisillinois.org/schools/school-recognition
Automatic Application
 Bronze: Schools who self-assess and action plan
using the SWPBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
 Silver: Schools that reach 80% fidelity on any tier
of the Tiered Fidelity Inventory
Complete Application for Gold and Platinum only
 Gold: Schools that reach 80% fidelity on 2 or more
tiers of the Tiered Fidelity Inventory (see
supporting documentation; deadline 5/16)
 Platinum: Schools that reach 80% fidelity on all 3
tiers of Tiered Fidelity Inventory
Use the Data!
The data will lead
each team to where
to focus action
planning!
https://psd150.instruction.pinpoint.hmhc
o.com/secure/B2BSign-in.aspx
Far better an approximate
answer to the right question,
which is often vague, than an
exact answer to the wrong
question, which can always
be made precise.
J.Tukey, 1962