Otsikko = Arial 28 p, lihava Toinen rivi

Download Report

Transcript Otsikko = Arial 28 p, lihava Toinen rivi

IV Regional Innovation Forum of Pomerania
Voivodeship
Technology transfer and science & technology parks
Finnish Experience
Dr. Heikki Kotilainen
Deputy Director General
Tekes
Gdansk
10. June, 2005
DEFINITION OF INNOVATION
CUSTOMERS
INNOVATION
BUSINESS
MARKETS
IMITATION
INVENTION
RESEARCH, KNOWLEDGE, IDEA,
TECHNOLOGY
BUSINESS
MODELS
”If innovation is the commercial application of
existing knowledge in a new context,
technologically driven innovation is only one
form of this. Innovation is distinct from
research, which results in new knowledge
and from the entrepreneurial function that
spots market opportunities for products and
services. It is the result of the interaction of
these two functions”
”Innovate for a competitive Europe”,
A new Action Plan for Innovation,
European Commission, 2004
What means tech-transfer?
Direct
University ---- Industry Does it work?
Intermediaries
University --- Science park --- Industry
Linear model of innovation!!
Intermediaries with Business Approach
(New firm creation)
University – incubator/open lab ---science park ---Industry
Utilising the Research Organisation
How technology transfer organisations like to use it
PROJECTS
TRANSFER
BUSINESS OPTIONS
Mis-managing the Research Organisation
How business managers like to use it
PROBLEMS
© Philips
PROJECTS
SOLUTIONS
Not-managing the Research Organisation
How researchers like to be managed
IDEAS
© Philips
PROJECTS
BUSINESS
OPTIONS
Assessment of Project Proposals
Company point of view
Ambition of Proposal
Long range objectives
Time to Deliver
UNCERTAINTY
UNCERTAINTIES IN INNOVATION
IS IT ATTRACTIVE?
DO WE WANT IT?
IDEA
WHAT IS POSSIBLE?
5-10 YEARS
CAN WE DO IT?
3-5 YEARS
HOW WE DO IT?
1-2 YEARS
Source: Research&Technology Management, Sept. Oct. 1997,p.53
MARKET
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
The Interface between Research and Industry
•CURIOSITY
•KNOWLEDGE CREATION
•SCIENTIFIC EXCELLENCE
•PUBLICATIONS
INDUSTRY
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
RESEARCH
•CUSTOMER NEEDS
•MARKET&MARKETABILITY
•STRATEGY
•PRODUCT PORTFOLIO
•R&D PORTFOLIO
•COMPETENCE
•MONEY&FINANCING
•IPR
•REVENUES
PROCESS CHARACTER OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
CURIOSITY
KNOWLEDGE
CREATION
SCIENTIFIC
EXCELLENCE
PUBLICATIONS
(SCIENCE/INDUSTRY
INDUSTRY
PARK)
(INCUBATOR)
ADAPTATION OF
SCIENTIFIC
RESULTS
FOR
TECHNOLOGICAL
USE
”Requirement for
technological success”
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
RESEARCH
ADAPTATION
OF
TECHNOLOGICAL
KNOWLEDGE
FOR
INDUSTRIAL
USE
”Requirement for
market success”
CUSTOMER
NEEDS
MARKET&
MARKETABILITY
STRATEGY
PRODUCT
PORTFOLIO
R&D PORTFOLIO
COMPETENCE
MONEY&
FINANCING
IPR
REVENUES
Tranfer process
INNOVATION PROCESS
Three stages of innovation process
Study, clarify
Ideas &
Wishes from
Market
What
business?
Alternative
concepts
Testing of
concepts
Technological
Ideas and
Opportunities
Concurrent conception
Definition
Functional
and
definition
specification
and design
of
of the product
a product
Concurrent engineering
Product
development
and design
Planning
of
production
and
engineering
Initial
development
INITIAL
CONCEPT
© S&T Balance/IMD
RUN!!!
Select alternatives
DESIGN
Decision for
realisation
REALISATION
Costs start to run!
Innov. vaiheet
Throughput of Innovation
The Creation of Business is Not Necessarily a Local Phenomenon
IDEA
INVENTION
RESEARCH
ENTERPRISE
Finance
-public
Finance
-seed
Finance
-R&D
Finance
-production
.private
-public
-public
-investments
-VC
-semipublic
-factory
-private
Business
model
Income
model
Contacts
-knowledge
-information
Business
plan
Business
start
Partnership
-knowledge
Partnership
-university
-networking
-international
contacts
-partner
company
-international
contacts
Regulations
Market research
Coaching
Pilot
production
Test
marketing
1
Finance
Launch of
production
10
Finance
-investors
(shares)
MARKETING
INNOVATION
100
Marketing
Partnership Partnership
network
-marketing -subcontractors
-international
contacts
Coaching
TECHNOLOGY – INNOVATION - MARKET
TECHNOLOGY
CUSTOMER NEEDS
BUSINESS MODELS
INNOVATION
MARKET
The closeness of technology
and market
determines the success
Concurrent technology
development
and
marketing leads
to success stories and
to real innovations
How to avoid obstacles of the technology
transfer process?
Case Finland
Is technology transfer process like pushing with a rope?
Can we avoid technology transfer?
Tekes instruments for R&D
•National technology programmes
•Universities&companies networking
•Direct company R&D funding
•Grants, loans, capital loans
•University cooperation
•Direct research funding of universities and research institutes
•Company cooperation
•Entrepreneurship funding
•TULI- research to market
•LIKSA- start-up business plan
•Equity fund for start-ups (SBIR)
•Technology transfer
•TUPAS-transfer to SME
RESEARCH PARADIGMS
Old paradigm (Linear model)
BASIC RESEARCH
APPLIED RESEARCH
DEVELOPMENT
SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING
Basic research
DEMAND
Applied research
Development
PROBLEM
SOLVING
BUSINESS
OPTIONS
MARKET
SOCIETAL & BUSINESS
CHALLENGES
New paradigm (Concurrent model)
TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS
© S&T Balance
TTKK TM 15/HK 2.3.1999
PRIORITIES OF THE INNOVATION SYSTEM
SUPPLY
RESEARCH
Case: Finland
FACILITATOR
PUBLIC FINANCE
QUALITY:
APPROPRIATE
STANDARD
NATIONAL
PROGRAMMES
RELEVANCE
VENTURE
CAPITAL
EFFECTIVENESS
IPR PROTECTION
DEMAND
ENTERPRISES
ARTICULATION
OF NEEDS
APPROPRIATE
TECHNOLOGY
ABSORB NEW
TECHNOLOGIES
Pres/ priorit,innovation system
Technology programmes
Steering
• enterprices
Public research projects
Grants
Tekes
Synergy
Networking
• co-ordinating
Concurrent development
• decision
Part financing
• preparing
making
Grants
Loans
Capital loans
Company R&D projects
 23on-going programmes in
2004 with a total extent of
EUR 1.3 billion
 a programme lasts typically
3–5 years
 annually 2000 company
participations
 annually 800 research unit
participations
 Tekes usually finances
- 60–80 % of university projects
- 25–50 % of company projects
Implementation of results of public research is based
on parallel execution and networking with company projects.
#54280
Networking in corporate R&D projects funded by
Tekes
Share of networked projects, %
100
Total corporate
R&D projects
80
Subcontracting
from research
institutes
60
Part of technology
programme
40
International
cooperation
20
Large company
subcontracting
from SMEs
0
1999
2000
2001
2002
DM 58620
08-2003 Copyright © Tekes
Conclusions
•Tech-transfer is TRADE!
Selling IPR (patents, licences)
Business for intermediaries
•Effective tech-transfer
•Joint projects/programmes
•Transfer of people
Thank you for your kind attention!
www.tekes.fi