Transcript Mid Day Meal Scheme

Mid Day Meal Scheme
MDM-PAB Meeting –HARYANA
On 3.4.12
Part-I
Review of Implementation of
MDMS in HARYANA
(Primary + Upper Primary)
(1.4.2011 to 31.12.2011)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Coverage Institutions : PAB Approval Vs Achievement (PRY)
4600
4579
No. of Institutions
4550
4500
4450
4417
4417
4417
4400
4350
4300
2010-11
PAB Approval
2011-12
Achievement
199 EGS/AIE Centers covered in 2011-12 and 92 NCLP schools were
covered
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Coverage Institutions : PAB Approval Vs Achievement (U.PRY)
12000
11017
11017
11017
11017
No. of Institutions
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
2010-11
PAB Approval
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
2011-12
Achievement
Coverage : Children Approval Vs Achievement (PRY)
15.00
14.86
14.85
14.80
93%
No. of Children
14.60
14.40
97%
98%
14.57
14.39
14.20
14.20
14.00
13.80
13.77
13.86
13.72
13.72
13.60
13.40
13.20
13.00
2009-10
Enrollment
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
2010-11
PAB Approval
2011-12
Achievement
Coverage : Children Approval Vs Achievement (U.PRY)
9.00
8.00
No. of Children
7.00
7.69
81%
6.98
6.25
81%
81%
7.85
6.70
6.34
97
%
97%
7.04
6.33
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
2009-10
Enrollment
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
2010-11
PAB Approval
2011-12
Achievement
6.86
Coverage : Working Days Approval Vs Achievement
(PRY & U. PRY)
No. of Working Days
193
106 %
190 110%
90 %
181
174
2009-10
PAB Approval
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
173
171
2010-11
2011-12
Achievement
Approval Vs Achievement: Number of Meals (P + UP.)
60
No. of Meals( in Crore)
50
40
49.35
71%
34.83
47.50
71%
46.74
83%
38.80
38.24
30
20
10
0
2009-10
2010-11
Approval
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
2011-12
Achievement
FOOD GRAIN : ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION
55927
54334
53807
Quantity in MTs
60%
36%
36%
20230
32248
19125
2011-12
2010-11
2009-10
Allocation
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Utilisation
Food grains Availability – Dist. Wise Haryana Vs Rajasthan
Haryana
>70%
4districts
< 60% 8
district
s
60-70% 9
districts
Rajasthan
Below
60%
Above 70%
32
State Level availability : 61%
82.5 %Children age 6-35 months are anemic
(79.8% U and 83.3% R) as per NFHS – 3
1
District wise Less FG utilization Vs level of
Anemia and underweight
District
%
Utilisation
Severe
Anemia
Children
-3SD
Underweight
Karnal
44%
2.5
14.5
Jhajjar
44%
2.9
11.2
Gurgaon
49%
7.1
19.4
M.garh
50%
4.5
10.3
Payment of cost of Food grains to FCI
Cost of Food Grain (Rs. In Lakhs )
3000
2744.53
2500
100%
2000
1414.06
1500
1414.06
1000
500
0
Allocation
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Bill raised by FCI
Payment to FCI
COOKING COST ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION
18000
14463.42
16000
15694.84
69%
Rs in Lakhs
14000
12000
11042.96
52%
42%
10775.84
10000
8000
6458.06
6055.66
6000
4000
2000
0
2009-10
2010-11
ALLOCATION
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
2011-12
UTILISATION
MME : ALLOCATION vs. UTILISATION
350
317.45
Rs in Lakhs
300
250
250.53
50%
214.34
36%
200
150
0%
90.51
100
50
158.80
0.00
0
2009-10
2010-11
ALLOCATION
NIL EXPENDITURE 2009-10
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
2011-12
UTILISATION
Rs in Lakhs
TA : ALLOCATION vs. UTILISATION
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
419.45
397.33
392.84
69%
277.64
40%
40%
166.03
134.94
2009-10
ALLOCATION
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
2010-11
2011-12
UTILISATION
FG Utilization Vs CC Vs TA Vs Payment to FCI
(1.4.11 to 31.12.11)
100%
100%
75%
50%
60%
69%
Food grains
Cooking Cost
69%
25%
0%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
TA
Payment to FCI
Engagement of Cooks-cum-Helpers
during 1.4.11 to 31.12.11
Primary + Upper Primary
40000
36182
32384
No. of CCH
35000
30000
90%
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
As per PAB-MDM Approval
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Engaged by State
Honorarium to Cooks-cum-Helpers
4000
3618
3500
Rs. In Lakh
3000
2591
2500
2000
1500
72%
1000
500
0
Allocation
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Payment to CCH
Achievement up to 2011-12 (Kitchen cum Stores)
Total Allocation : 11483
Kitchen Cum Stores
55%
60%
Progress (in %)
50%
4076
40%
30%
35%
4701
38%
2706
27%
25%
20%
Physical
Financial
20%
10%
0%
Constructed
In Progress
Yet to be started
19
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Achievement up to 2011-12 (Kitchen Devices)
120%
100%
100%
Progress (in %)
100%
Total Allocation : 11483
units of Kitchen Devices
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
0%
Procured
Physical
inprogress
Financial
20
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Proposal for Cook-cum-helper engaged in MDM Scheme
Approval
2011-12
Engaged by the
State Government
Addition
Requirement
2012-13
36182
32384
5324*
21
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
SCORE CARD- ALL COMPONENTS
10
Institution
7.5
10
10
9 Fund flow
Children
10+
8
10
Toilet Facility
Working Days
6
10
5.9
4
Drinking Water
Foodgrain
2
5.6
10
0
Inspection
Payment to FCI
8.7
School Health
6.9
TA
Kitchen devices
10
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Cooking Cost
MME
Kitchen Shed
6.0
6.9
5.0
ISSUES: MI KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY, First half-Yearly (1-102010 to 31-03-2011)
(Bhiwani , Kaithal, Sonipat, Kurukshetra, Hisar, )
Bhiwani
1. It was found that in six schools MDM was not
cooked during the period.
2. In 34.5% schools, food grains were stored in
classroom, in 10 % schools food grains were
stored in office and in 15% schools in store .
3. In 30% schools, food was cooked in classroom, in
47.5% schools food was cooked in open area and in
12.5% schools food was cooked at other places.
ISSUES: MI
KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY, KURUKSHETRA
Kaithal
1. It was found that in four schools MDM was not
cooked during the period.
2. In the 27.5% schools food grain was not supplied in time.
In 7 schools food grain supply was delayed by one
month.
3. Till 31/05/2011, no state level official of MDM had visited
the schools for inspection.
ISSUES: MI
KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY, KURUKSHETRA
Hisar
1. It was found that in four schools MDM was not
cooked during the period.
2. In 4 schools food grain supply was delayed by one
month.
3. Till 31/05/2011, none of the state level official of MDM
had visited the schools for inspection.
4. In 67.5% schools food was cooked in open area and in
27.5% schools food was cooked at other places.
ISSUES: MI
KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY, KURUKSHETRA
SONEPAT
1. It was found that in four schools MDM was not
cooked during the period.
2. In 4 schools food grain supply was delayed by one
month.
3. In 5 schools the frequency of serving mid-day meal was
irregular due to irregular supply of food grain/ nonavailability of food grain.
4. In two schools it was found that fuel was stored in
classroom posing danger to life of school children.
5. Till 31/05/2011, none of the state level official of MDM
had visited the schools for inspection.
ISSUES

Less Utilization of foodgrains.
Achievement

Ministry of New and Renewable
Energy have issued funds to HAREDA
for installing 4 solar cookers in 4
schools of three Districts for cooking
Mid Day meal on a pilot basis.
Analysis of State’s
Proposal for 2012-13
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2011-12
(Primary)
14.9
13.7
14.9
14.6
14.9
14.3
14.2
14.6
2012-13
(Proposed)
0
2011-12
Enrollment 2011-12
children opted MDM
Proposed for 2012-13 with NCLP
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
PAB approval
QT-III
QT-3
QT-2
10
QT-1
No. of children (in lakhs)
20
Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2011-12
(Upper Primary)
6.9
6.9
6.8
QT-3
6.3
6.8
QT-2
7.0
QT-1
No. of children (in lakhs)
10
6.8
2012-13
(Proposed)
0
2011-12
Enrollment 2011-12
PAB approral
Proposed for 2012-13
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
children Availed MDM
Proposal for Construction of Kitchen-cum-Store
No. of
Sanctioned Constructed
institutions
through
convergenc
e
Gap
Proposal
11483
3822
3822
15305
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Nil
Proposal for Construction of Kitchen - Devices
No. of
Sanctioned
institutions
15596
15305
Procured
through
convergence
Gap
Proposal
0
291
0
Proposals and Recommendations
S.
No
Component
PAB Approval
2011-12
Proposal
2012-13
Recommendation
1378902
633879
6405
1457205
686467
4920
1457205
686467
4920
233
242
7 Cook cum Helper
312
---36182
5324
8 Kitchen Devices
3822
312
3822
Additional
5324
Nil
9 Drought affected
area
Nil
Nil
Nil
1 Children (Pry)
2 Children (U Pry)
3 Children (NCLP)
4 Working Day (Pry
and U Pry)
5. Working days NCLP
6 Kitchen Shed
Nil
The MDM Logo should be widely Publicized
 It may be Painted at prominent Places on the outside wall
of the school.
aa
Thank you