Transcript Document
www.zengerfolkman.com Welcome to the Extraordinary Leaders 360 Survey—Self Service Process 2014 Folkman. Zenger Folkman © 2014 © Zenger All rights reserved. CLG.EP50.3.1 www.zengerfolkman.com Webinar II—Processing Your Feedback Joe Folkman 2014 Folkman. Zenger Folkman © 2014 © Zenger All rights reserved. EP50.3.3 Process Check: • At this point of the process, you have taken the Extraordinary Leaders 360—Self Service survey and have requested your feedback report. • The email that you received containing the link to this webinar also contains the link to your survey website where you can go to download your personal feedback report. • We suggest that you download your feedback report after this webinar. © 2014 Zenger Folkman 3 PROFOUND STRENGTHS AND LEADERSHIP DERAILERS Module 3 © 2014 Zenger Folkman What Does Performance Improvement Mean to Most People? Fixing Weaknesses! © 2014 Zenger Folkman Page 3-4 5 Impact of Leadership Effectiveness with No Perceived Strengths 100 90 80 70 Average 60 Percentile 50 Score on 40 360 Results 30 20 10 0 34 0 1 2 3 4 5 Number of Profound Strengths (Competencies at the 90th percentile) © 2014 Zenger Folkman Page 3-5 6 Impact of One Strength on Overall Perception of Leadership Effectiveness 100 90 80 70 Average 60 Percentile 50 Score on 40 360 Results 30 20 10 0 64 34 0 1 2 3 4 5 Number of Profound Strengths (Competencies at the 90th percentile) © 2014 Zenger Folkman Page 3-5 7 Three Strengths Raises Leadership Effectiveness to the 81st Percentile Number of Profound Strengths (Competencies at the 90th percentile) © 2014 Zenger Folkman Page 3-5 Development Insight • You don’t have to be perfect to be extraordinary… • You just need to develop a few extraordinary strengths. © 2014 Zenger Folkman 9 Focusing Development on Weaknesses Works Well When. . . . . . People Have Leadership Derailers A B C D 100 Behaviors F G Strong negative data on an issue can neutralize a person’s effectiveness H I J K L M Overall Effectiveness (Percentile) E 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 18 20 10 0 Fatal Flaws and No Profound Strengths N O P 1 2 © 2014 Zenger Folkman 3 4 5 10 Criteria for Identifying Leadership Derailers • Strong negative feedback results (and/or poor performance review results) • Below average capability in an area that is mission critical to your job © 2014 Zenger Folkman Page 3-6 11 A Few Thoughts about Identifying Leadership Derailers • Determining Leadership Derailers is an art, not a science. • Leadership Derailers affect your overall effectiveness, resulting in potential: – – – – Performance problems Career plateaus Job failure Damaged relationships • Leadership Derailers overshadow other strengths or talents. © 2014 Zenger Folkman Page 3-6 12 Most Common Leadership Derailers in Individual Contributors • Lack of accountability or failure to focus on results • Failure to take initiative • Lack of core interpersonal skills, either in responding to other people or dealing with difficult situations • Questionable integrity and a lack of personal trust • Poor planning and lack of organization • Inability to practice self-development and to learn from mistakes • Lack of core technical expertise and skills © 2014 Zenger Folkman Page 3-6 13 The Leadership Success Behaviors © 2014 Zenger Folkman Page 3-7 14 Leadership Success Supporting Behaviors © 2014 Zenger Folkman Page 3-8 15 Key Points about Feedback • It’s a gift. • Self-perceptions are not as accurate as we might think. © 2014 Zenger Folkman 16 Self-Perceptions Not as Accurate as Others’ Perceptions Accuracy in Predicting Overall Effectiveness (as measured by 360 data) Self-Perceptions of Effectiveness © 2014 Zenger Folkman Others' Perceptions of Effectiveness 17 Key Points about Feedback • It’s a gift. • Self-perceptions are not as accurate as we might think. • Look for your strengths! • Honor the confidentiality. © 2014 Zenger Folkman 18 SARA: Common Reactions to Feedback S Surprise, Shock A Anger, Anxiety R Rejection, Rationalization A Acceptance © 2014 Zenger Folkman 19 More Common Reactions to Feedback • • • • • • • • • • My raters don’t really know me that well. My job makes me act this way; I’m really not like this. Some of my raters have it in for me. My raters don’t understand the situation I’m in. I used to be this way, but I’ve since changed. This must be someone else’s report. My raters didn’t understand the questions. I wasn’t like this in my last job. My raters are just jealous of my success. I purposely picked people who didn’t like me. © 2014 Zenger Folkman 20 The Rating Scale Exceptional performance—performs this behavior much better than most others (Top 10%) 5. Outstanding Strength 4. Strength Above average performance—performs this behavior better than others (Top Quartile) Performs this behavior at an average level or about as well as most others (Good Performance) 3. Competent 2. Needs Some Improvement Performs this behavior below average or sometimes does it poorly (Inconsistent Performance) 1. Needs Significant Improvement Rarely or never performs this behavior well, or rarely or never attempts this behavior (Poor Performance) Don’t Know—Not Applicable Don’t have enough information about or experience with this person to rate performance on this behavior © 2014 Zenger Folkman Page 3-9 21 Hierarchy of Information Leadership Effectiveness Leadership Success Behaviors (5) Supporting Behaviors (15) Survey Items (20) 1 to 2 per behavior © 2014 Zenger Folkman 22 How to Interpret Your Feedback—Section 1 Number Received Number Reported © 2014 Zenger Folkman 23 Your Invited Respondents © 2014 Zenger Folkman 24 Section 2: Overall Leadership Effectiveness © 2014 Zenger Folkman 25 Section 3: Leadership Success Behaviors © 2014 Zenger Folkman 26 Section 4: Supporting Behaviors Summary © 2014 Zenger Folkman 27 Section 5: Supporting Behaviors with Item Details © 2014 Zenger Folkman 28 Section 6: Importance Ratings © 2014 Zenger Folkman 29 Highest and Lowest Scored Items © 2014 Zenger Folkman 30 Written Comments © 2014 Zenger Folkman 31 Next Steps: • Return to the email and follow the link to your survey web page and download your feedback report. • Allow yourself at least one hour of time to devote to analyzing your feedback report. • Use the detailed Step-by-Step Feedback Analysis Exercise in your workbook to guide you through your analysis. • Distill your analysis into your key Strengths and Potential Leadership Derailer(s); record these on your 360 Action Planning Worksheet (Box #3 and Box #4) • Last Step: Return to the email and follow the link to Webinar III where you will: – Receive direction on finishing your 360 Action Planning Worksheet – Receive direction on preparing for your development discussion with your manager. © 2014 Zenger Folkman Pages 3-10 to 3-15; 3-16 32 Sample Development Plan 3. My Strengths • Solves Problems and Analyzes Issues (Personal Capability)— I anticipate problems and identify multiple solutions. • Drives for Results (Focus on Results)—I’m goal oriented and make things happen. • Inspires Others to High Performance (Interpersonal Skills)— I bring a great deal of energy and enthusiasm to the work. • Broad Perspective (Leading Change)—I balance the big picture with short-term results and details. 4. Leadership Derailers • Weakness in Communicates Powerfully and Prolifically (Interpersonal Skills) could prevent me from having greater impact in the organization. © 2014 Zenger Folkman 33 www.zengerfolkman.com Thank you! Zenger Folkman • www.zengerfolkman.com © 2014 Zenger Folkman