APPROVED CLINICAL INSTRUCTOR WORKSHOP Evaluation

EVALUATION PROCEDURES  Clinical Site  ACI Performance  Student Performance • • Overall student assessment Clinical proficiency skills

ACI PERFORMANCE EVALUATION  Assists in the evaluation of the ATEP    Informs the ACI of performance expectations Determines the ACI’s competency Examines the ACI’s teaching style  Identifies strengths and weaknesses

ACI PERFORMANCE EVALUATION cont.

 Defined rating scale  Opportunity to make general comments  Report major strengths and weaknesses  Appropriate signatures

ACI PERFORMANCE EVALUATION cont.

 Formal Evaluation by the ATS  Formal Evaluation by the CIE

CLINICAL SITE EVALUATION  Provide information regarding the general quality of the clinical site  Included on the ACI Performance Evaluation tools

OVERALL STUDENT ASSESSMENT  Information regarding general performance  Feedback for the student • Expectations  Feedback for the ACI • Discussions  Objective information for grading purposes

OVERALL STUDENT ASSESSMENT cont.

 Goals Sheet  Interaction Forms • Weekly • Physician  Self- Evaluation  Formal Evaluation  Continuous Evaluation

OVERALL STUDENT ASSESSMENT cont.

 Methods of scoring and recording student performance • • Checklists Rating Scales • • Anecdotal Records Mental Records

OVERALL STUDENT ASSESSMENT cont.

 Defined rating scale  Opportunity to make general comments  Report major strengths and weaknesses  Appropriate signatures

OVERALL STUDENT ASSESSMENT cont.

 Technical Standards • • • • Observation Communication Motor Conceptual-Integrative and Quantitative Analysis • Behavioral/Social Attitudes  Documentation achieved through the Formal Evaluation tools

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PROFICIENCY SKILLS  Documentation of skill acquisition  Level of ability  Progression over time  Feedback on instructional techniques and the quality of clinical instruction

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PROFICIENCY SKILLS cont.

 Inform students of the following: • the skills that will be evaluated • • how the skills will be evaluated the grading criteria

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PROFICIENCY SKILLS cont.

 6 Levels • • • • • • Observational Level Level I (Clinical Education I) Level II (Clinical Education II) Level II (Clinical Education III) Level IV (Clinical Education IV) Level V (Clinical Education V)  Academic credit

Fall Semester Spring Semester

Observational ATS •

Management of Medical Emergencies

•

Acute Care and Injury Prevention with Lab

•

Medical Documentation and Pharmacology

Level I ATS •

Orthopedic Assessment I – Lower Extremity with Lab

•

Therapeutic Modalities with Lab

•

Clinical Education I

Level II ATS •

Orthopedic Assessment II – Upper Extremity with Lab

• •

Rehabilitation Techniques in Athletic Training with Lab Clinical Education II

Level IV ATS • •

Administration and Professionalism in Allied Health Clinical Education IV

Level III ATS •

Orthopedic Assessment III – Head, Spine, and Trunk with Lab

•

Intervention and Referral for the Physically Active

•

Diseases and Disabilities in the Physically Active

•

Clinical Education III

Level V ATS •

Clinical Education V

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PROFICIENCY SKILLS cont.

 Skill performance criteria • required elements are described and prioritized • • explanation of each element critique a sample skill performance  Lickert scale • passing score is 3 or greater

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PROFICIENCY SKILLS cont.

 Structured assessment • • controlled environment 1:1  Natural assessment • clinical setting • includes cognitive, psychomotor, and affective skills  Holistic Scoring • • most basic scoring least objective  Analytical Evaluation • based on cognitive, psychomotor, and affective skills

     EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PROFICIENCY SKILLS cont.

5 = SUPERIOR - The ATS performs the skill at a superior level including all of the following: • selects appropriate methods of stabilization • • • applies an effective stabilization device to prevent further injury demonstrates confidence in abilities possesses general knowledge of the skill 4 = GOOD - The ATS performs the skill at a good level by selecting an appropriate and effective method of stabilization and they possess general knowledge of the skill, however; they lack confidence in their abilities.

3 = FAIR - The ATS performs the skill at a fair level by selecting an appropriate and effective method of stabilization but they lack confidence and general knowledge of the skill.

2 = POOR - The ATS performs the skill at a poor level by selecting an inappropriate and ineffective method of stabilization.

1 = The ATS is unable to complete the skill.

QUESTIONS???