International Border Crossing - Electronic Screening System

Download Report

Transcript International Border Crossing - Electronic Screening System

International Border Crossing Program

Electronic Screening

Transportation Border Working Group November 1, 2011

Office of Research and Information Technology

FMCSA Priorities and Goals

 Priorities  Raise the bar   Maintain high safety standards Remove high-risk carriers  Strategic Plan 2006-2011  Advance Electronic Safety and Credential Monitoring to Facilitate International Traffic Flow at our Nation's Borders

Office of Research and Information Technology 1

Safety and Compliance Requirements

 FMCSA  Driver Credentials    Equipment fitness Federal operating authority status Proof of insurance/appropriate coverage  Border State    Vehicle registration status Size and weight limitations Other State-specific requirements

Office of Research and Information Technology 2

Determining Which Vehicles to Inspect

 Current screening is manual  Limits coverage  Time consuming  Based on:     Inspectors’ knowledge of specific carriers Visual check of obvious physical defects Limited conversation with driver Random selection

Office of Research and Information Technology 3

International Border Screening Program

 Phase I – Demonstration of Concept – Completed 2007  Phase II – Analysis of Demonstration – Completed 2009  Phase III – Field Operational Test – Started June 2011   Awarded contract to Battelle Memorial Institute. Team includes: Texas Transportation Institute, Kentucky Transportation Center, University of Washington DOT’s Volpe Center supporting project management and acquisition and installation of required equipment at border sites

Office of Research and Information Technology 4

Enhancing the Screening Process

 International Border Crossing (IBC) e-Screening concept  Use of radio frequency identification device (RFID) transponders to identify drivers and vehicles  RFID technology selected because 90% of trucks entering the U.S. are equipped

Office of Research and Information Technology 5

Phase I – IBC E-Screening Demonstration

 Demonstrated at Santa Teresa, NM port of entry - Low volume (120-140 trips per day) - Staffed 80% of time - Ideal environment for testing and evaluation   14 carriers participated Vehicles screened to validate: - Currency of CVSA decal and truck registration - Federal operating authority status of carrier - Current insurance - Driver tags/commercial drivers license status  Over 5,500 transponder reads in demo

Office of Research and Information Technology 6

Major Findings

 Technology performed reliably (99% accurate)  Reduced processing time for selection for inspection (1 sec vs. 15 min.)  Increased number of vehicles subject to inspection (237/month baseline vs. 965/month during demo)  Focused limited enforcement resources  Reduces processing for compliant vehicles

Office of Research and Information Technology 7

Limitations of Concept

 Currency of CVSA decal  On-site enrollment is time consuming and limiting  No way to identify trailer electronically verify compliance  All drivers did not have ID cards  Screening decision displayed only inside facility

Office of Research and Information Technology 8

Phase II – Analyses of Demonstration

 Utilizing International Trade Data System (ITDS) shared by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) with FMCSA  Identify carrier, truck, trailer, and driver   Eliminate need for on site enrollment Tied to other data sources  Screen on more than 20 factors of interest  Requirements analysis in seven border States  Analysis of 20 ports of entry  Developed system requirements

9 Office of Research and Information Technology

Phase III – Field Operational Test

 Deployment and testing of IBC e-Screening system at 4 border locations  Development of partnerships with States and Customs and Border Protection  Conduct outreach with stakeholders to deploy system nationally  Ensure user needs are met

Office of Research and Information Technology 10

Questions?

Chris Flanigan Office of Analysis, Research, and Technology (202) 385-2384 [email protected]

Office of Research and Information Technology 11