UW-Stout IRB 2014

Download Report

Transcript UW-Stout IRB 2014

+
UW-Stout IRB
2014
+
News from the IRB

New protocol form

New online training

New certification

New staff
+
The Mission of the IRB

To protect the welfare, safety, and well-being of research
participants

Codified in federal regulations at 45CFR46

Upheld through UW-Stout through the FWA
+
Snapshot: Background of IRBs

Grew out of responses to Tuskegee and Nuremburg Trials which violated:
 Voluntary consent of human subjects
 Capacity to consent
 Freedom from coercion
 Comprehension of risks and benefits
 Minimization of risk/harm
 Favorable risk/benefit ratio
 Qualified investigators
 Appropriate methods
 Freedom to withdraw

Regulations protecting human subjects became effective May 30, 1974

Creation of IRBs

1974 – establishment of National Commission for the protection of Human Subjects of
Biomedical and Behavioral Research

The Belmont Report released 1979; a policy statement – the single most
important document to use as a base for subject research (Available:
http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html)
+
The Belmont Report
 Basic
principles for ethical treatment of human
subjects and research:
Respect for persons – involves a recognition of the
personal dignity and autonomy of individuals, and
special protection of those with diminished autonomy;
must obtain informed consent
 Beneficence – entails an obligation to protect persons
from harm by maximizing anticipated benefits and
minimizing possible risks from research; must engage
in risk benefit analysis and minimize risks
 Justice – requires that risks and benefits are distributed
equally; requires that subjects be fairly selected

+
CFR

In response to the Belmont Report, the DHHS and FDA codified
human subjects protection in Title 45, Part 46 CFR

“all research involving human subjects conducted, supported or
otherwise subject to regulation by any federal department or
agency…”


Stout commitment to ethical research
Provides guidelines—there is subjectivity in the interpretations
of research ethics to some degree: Every IRB is different! UWStout board strives for consistency.
+
The Basics


Get certified!! All UW-Stout researchers need to complete the
new training!

New materials, updated examples, available in qualtrics:

https://uwstout.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9miEKZTmUCMJSPb
Review the RS materials:


http://www.uwstout.edu/rs/humansubjects.cfm
Start with OHRP decision making charts: Is it research? Is it
human subjects research?

http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/checklists/decisioncharts.html
+
The New Protocol and Updated
Training

Walks investigators through a series of steps and facilitates
learning along the way.

Available at http://www.uwstout.edu/rs/humansubjects.cfm

Caution: Do not submit old forms or they will be returned.

Caution: New certificates of completion are required.
+
Reminders

10 working days required; may be longer if protocol requires
full board review.

Advisors must sign advisees protocols.

E-signatures are acceptable.

Proof read.
+
Updated IRB Contacts

Sue Foxwell, Human Subjects Administrator,
[email protected], 232.2477

Mai Vang, IRB Secretary, [email protected], 232.2691

Nels Paulson, Chair, [email protected],

Elizabeth Buchanan, Vice-Chair and IRB Leadership Director,
[email protected], 232.5284

Basic IRB Enquiries: [email protected]
+
Questions/Discussion