Transcript Course Summary - Harvard Business School
What Stone did
• • • On April 8th, Stone announced that the equity offering was being canceled Stock price recovered 1 1/2 points (16.7%) on the announcement, but continued to trade in the $8-$9 range for the rest of April. The junk bonds lost about 6% of their value.
Subsequent financial moves: – Renegotiated bank loans – Sold $150 million of 12 5/8% Senior Notes due 1998 – Sold $250 million of 8 7/8% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2000; convertible at $11.55
2.11.09
Stone_Container.ppt
1
• • • • •
More …
Other actions – Sold Mexican subsidiary – Sold minority interests in Canadian and British newsprint subsidiaries – Shut down 220,000 tons of U.S. capacity Linerboard prices began to rise in last half of 1993, eventually rising $180 per ton above 1993 lows by 1995 Stone lost $205 million in 1994, but reports 1995 PAT of $255 million Stone’s stock hit $18 1/2 in 1994 Stone issued 16.5 million new shares at 15 1/4 ($250 million), but leverage was still high at (72%) 2.11.09
Stone_Container.ppt
2
Human and market imperfections
• “I’ve told the junk bond people they won’t be seeing me anymore.” Roger Stone • “Given his past, why should we believe him?” - Sharyl Van Winkle Merrill Lynch analyst 2.11.09
Stone_Container.ppt
3
Two-day wrapup
2.11.09
Stone_Container.ppt
4
Optimal/Target capital structure—Checklist
• • • • • • • • Can company pay interest —coverage ratios?
– – EBIT/Int, EBITDA/Int In good times and bad Industry volatility or cyclicality?
– Operating leverage makes cash flow more volatile/cyclical Industry standards —what are competitors doing?
Is company able to make use of its ITS?
Costs of financial distress?
– What will customers and suppliers do in shadow of bankruptcy?
Agency costs?
– High leverage=>Mgrs take negative NPV projects with high risk – Low leverage=>Mgrs have few incentives to be efficient, may consume excess perks (private jets, plush offices…) Leverage needed to control renk-seeking?
– Unions and/or regulators Does company need strategic flexibility?
– Will covenants interfere with strategy?
2.11.09
Stone_Container.ppt
5
Getting to your optimal capital structure
Stone’s V = D+E = 4323 +1189 = 5512 • • • • • • • • From low leverage, it’s easy: do a leveraged recap From high leverage,
it’s hard
Assume D+E is approx constant (Ignore value of ITS) Each 1% decline in D/V => $55MM in new equity To go from 78% to 50% requires ~ $1.5 Bn in new equity!
At least 100 MM new shares (1.5 B/$15) Dilution = 100/(100+71) = 58% Family share = 42% of what previous holdings 2.11.09
Stone_Container.ppt
6
And that’s before announcement effects!
• • • • • Two explanations for the drop in Pstk on announcement of equity issue Debt overhang – – Transfer of value from new equity to impaired debt Arises under
symmetric
information when
D/V is high
Signaling – Action (debt or equity) communicates true state of company to – market Arises under
asymmetric
information when
D/V is anything
Net result => Companies are reluctant to issue equity – … even when company is over-levered and experiencing costs of – financial distress (out of bankruptcy) … when a company bucks the trend, it is punished Converts can be “backdoor equity” 2.11.09
Stone_Container.ppt
7
Epilogue
• Merged with Jefferson Smurfit Corp. on May 8, 1998 in an exchange of shares implying a value of $20.30 per share ($2.12 billion market cap).
•
Jan. 27, 2009:
Smurfit-Stone Container filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection with debt of $5.6 billion.
Today, they are learning firsthand about the bankruptcy process
2.11.09
Stone_Container.ppt
8
2.11.09
Stone_Container.ppt
9
“Indeed, indeed, repentance oft before I swore – but was I sober when I swore?” -Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam 2.11.09
Stone_Container.ppt
10